Non-invasive assessment of muscle compartment elasticity by pressure-related ultrasound in pediatric trauma: a prospective clinical study in 25 cases of forearm shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue swelling after limb fractures in pediatric patients is well known to be a risk factor for developing acute compartment syndrome (ACS). Clinical assessment alone is uncertain in specific cases. Recently, we proposed a non-invasive ultrasound-based method to objectify muscle compartment elasticity for monitoring. We hypothesize a strong correlation between the soft-tissue swelling after stabilization of upper limb fractures and the compartment elasticity objectified with a novel ultrasound-based approach in pediatric trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective clinical study, children suffering forearm fractures but not developing an ACS were included. The muscle compartment elasticity of the m. flexor carpi ulnaris was assessed after surgical intervention by a non-invasive, ultrasound-based method resulting in a relative elasticity (RE in %) in both the control (healthy limb) and study group (fractured limb). Soft-tissue swelling was categorized in four different levels (0-3) and correlated with the resulting RE (%). RESULTS: The RE in the study group (15.67%, SD ± 3.06) showed a significantly decreased level (p < 0.001) compared with the control (22.77%, SD ± 5.4). The categorized grade of soft-tissue swelling resulted in a moderate correlation with the RE (rs = 0.474). CONCLUSIONS: The presented study appears to represent a novel approach to assess the posttraumatic pressure changes in a muscle compartment after fracture stabilization non-invasively. In this first clinical study in pediatric cases, our measurement method represents a low-cost, easy, and secure approach that has the potential to substitute invasive measurement of suspected ACS in muscle compartment conditions. Further investigations in lager cohorts are required to prove its daily clinical practicability and to confirm the expected reliability.

Non-invasive and reliable assessment of compartment elasticity by pressure related ultrasound: An in-vitro study.

PURPOSE: The development of acute compartment syndrome is a serious threat to trauma patients. The clinical assessment alone is not reliable enough to determine the need for fasciotomy in many cases. The Physician´s assessment of the elasticity of the muscle compartment might be particularly important to objectively evaluate the pressure in this enclosed space. The purpose of this study was to determine the observer´s reproducibility, of compartment elasticity measurements by a novel ultrasonic approach. METHODS: Increasing intra-compartmental pressures (ICP) were simulated in a water filled in-vitro model. Pressure related ultrasound was used to determine the relative elasticity (RE) of soft tissue compartments. A pressure transducing probe head was combined with the ultrasonic probe to obtain cross section views of the simulated compartment and to detect the amount of applied pressure by the observer. In this model, the compartment depth without compression (P0) was set to be 100%. Changes of the compartment depth due to a probe pressure of 80 mmHg (P80) were correlated to P0 and an elasticity quotient as a value for RE (%) was calculated. Twelve blinded observers performed measurements for RE determination (%) under three pressure conditions. Reproducibility was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Measurements (n = 432) revealed that the RE (%) in the control group was 17,06% (SD+/-2,13), whereas the RE of the group ICP30 significantly decreased to 12,66% (SD+/- 1,19) (p<0,001). The ICP50 group revealed a further significant decrease to 8,43% (SD+/- 0,67) (p<0,001). Repeated measurement of RE and ICP showed a high level of correlation (spearman correlation coefficient: roh=0,922). A RE <14% resulted in a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 90,3% for diagnosis of an ICP >30 mmHg. ICCinter was 0,986; 95%, CI: 0,977-0,992 (p<0,001). DISCUSSION: The presented ultrasound-based approach reliably assesses the elasticity in a simulated compartment model. In this pioneer study investigating the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility, this method of measurement appears to be of low cost in addition to being an easy and secure approach that may have the potential to substitute invasive measurement. Further investigations are required to improve its feasibility and to confirm the reliability under clinical conditions.

Impact of haemorrhagic shock intensity on the dynamic of alarmins release in porcine poly-trauma animal model.

PURPOSE: Traumatic insults result in an altered inflammatory response, in which alarmins release has a central role. The impact of haemorrhagic shock intensity on the long-term kinetics of alarmins is not yet fully elucidated. We investigated these aspects in a combined trauma (chest, abdominal, and extremities injury) porcine model with different severities and durations of haemorrhagic shock. METHODS: After induction of combined trauma (tibia fracture, lung contusion, and liver laceration), haemorrhagic shock was induced at different intensities: moderate haemorrhage (MH; n = 15): mean arterial pressure (MAP) <30 ± 5 mmHg [maximum loss of total blood volume (TBVmax): 45 %] for 90 min, and severe haemorrhage (SH; n = 10): MAP <25 ± 5 mmHg (TBVmax 50 %) for 120 min. Resuscitation was performed using a standardized crystalloid infusion protocol. Animals were mechanically ventilated and underwent ICU-monitoring for 48 h (MH) and 48.5 h (SH). Blood samples were collected over the clinical time course, and systemic levels of serum alarmins [High-Mobility Group Protein B-1 (HMGB-1) and Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70)] were measured using an ELISA kit. RESULTS: Heart rate, systemic blood pressure, lactate, and base excess were significantly altered as a function of haemorrhagic shock in both trauma groups (MH and SH). Systemic HMGB-1 levels were significantly elevated in both trauma groups when compared to the sham group. Haemorrhagic shock severity and duration were positively correlated with HMGB-1 levels and compared to baseline values, concentrations remained significantly increased in SH when compared to MH. On the other hand, we observed a significant decrease in the systemic HSP70 levels of trauma groups (MH, and SH) when compared to the sham group, which was significantly decreased compared to baseline values in SH over the entire time course. CONCLUSION: Our data show that haemorrhagic shock duration and severity affect the systemic levels of HMGB-1 and HSP70. This early alarmins release after trauma can be used to guide the treatment strategies (e.g. surgical procedures) of polytrauma patients.

Assessment of elevated compartment pressures by pressure-related ultrasound: a cadaveric model.

PURPOSE: There is a risk of misinterpreting the clinical signs of acute compartment syndrome of the lower limb resulting in delayed fasciotomy. Up to date, the diagnosis of compartment syndrome is based on clinical assessment and of invasive needle pressure measurement in uncertain cases. Close monitoring is necessary for early recognition of raising compartment pressures. Clinical assessment of muscle firmness by the physician's palpation alone is unreliable. Thus, a device objectifying this assessment would be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of muscle compartment elasticity measurements by a novel and non-invasive device using pressure-related ultrasound. METHODS: In a cadaveric model, the anterior tibial compartment was prepared to simulate raising intra-compartmental pressures (0-80 mmHg) by saline infusion. Standard invasive pressure monitoring was compared with a novel method to determine tissue elasticity. Changing cross-sectional view in B-mode ultrasound was exerted to measure the compartment depth before and after physician's probe compression of 100 mmHg. Compartment displacement (∆d) was measured and related to the corresponding compartmental pressure (Spearman correlation coefficient). Delta (mm) of the control group at 10 mmHg compartment pressure was compared with measured data at rising compartmental pressures of 30, 50, and 70 mmHg using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The intra-observer reliability (κ) was additionally calculated. RESULTS: Fresh and never frozen lower human limbs (n = 6) were used. The average displacement measured in the anterior tibial compartment was 2.7 mm (0.3-6.7 mm). A concordant consistent correlation between the compartmental displacement and the intra-compartmental pressure occurred. The Spearman coefficient (r s = 0.979) showed a significant correlation between the rising pressure and the decreasing tissue displacement visualized by ultrasound. The intra-observer value kappa showed reliable values (κ 10 = 0.73, κ 30 = 0.80, and κ 70 = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: We introduce a new method of ultrasound imaging enhanced with probe pressure measurement to determine changes of the visco-elastic behavior of isolated muscle compartments. Pressure-related ultrasound could be a reliable tool to determine the correlation between the measured compartmental displacement and the increasing intra-compartmental pressure. Its accuracy revealed promising results. This technique may help the physician to objectify the clinical assessment of compartment elasticity, mainly indicated in cases of unconscious patients and imminent pathology. Further clinical studies and improvements of this technique are required to prove its accuracy and reliability in cases of compartment syndrome.

Transverse + posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum: epidemiology, operative management and long-term results.

UNLABELLED: PURPOUSE OF THE STUDY: Associated transverse and posterior wall fractures account for approximately 20% of all acetabular fractures. To asses the risk of these concommitant bone injuries on early joint failure despite a high rate of postoperative congruency. MATERIAL: The analysis of 104 surgically treated patients with associated transverse and posterior wall fractures showed that more than half of these patients had associated injuries. The mean age was 35 years, and > 75% of these patients were male. A high energy trauma was the trauma mechanism in 94.2%. The mean ISS was 26.3 points. The majority of patients showed a juxta- or transtectal fracture line. The mean articular fracture displacement was 13.5 mm. 87.5% of the patients showed a femoral head dislocation. An acetabular roof comminution was present in 16.3%. 20.2% of patients received a fracture related preoperative nerve injury to the sciatic nerve. METHODS: Osteosynthesis was performed 9.9 days after trauma. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in > 90% for stabilization with a combination of plate and screw fixation in 71.1%. The mean operative time was 190 minutes with a blood loss of 855 ml. Postoperatively the hip joint was congruent in 90.3% with anatomical or near-anatomical joint reconstruction in > 90%. Iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 12 patients (8.9%). RESULTS: 67 patients (67.7%) could be followed after a mean of 42.7 months. The average subjective Visual Analog Scale pain score was 42.7. Mild or no pain was seen in 58.2%. The mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 15.4 with 56.7% of patients having a functionally perfect or good result. 52.2% had no post-traumatic osteoarthritic changes of their hip joint. A joint failure was diagnosed in 32.8% of the patients. Analyzing only patients with anatomically reconstructed hip joints, patients showed comparable results with 61.3% having no or mild pain and 59.2% a good or excellent functional result. Posttraumatic arthrotic changes occur in only 26.5% of these patients. A joint failure was present in 32.7%. In this group, a joint failure was significantly more likely to be present with an additional acetabular comminution zone. CONCLUSION: Associated transverse and posterior wall fractures have a significant risk of early joint failure despite a high rate of postoperative congruency.

Both column fractures of the acetabulum: epidemiology, operative management and long-term-results.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Both column fractures, defined as an acetabular fracture with no articular fragment in connection with the axial skeleton account for approximately 20% of all acetabular fractures. The typical type of a both column acetabular fracture is the C1.2 fracture with a multifragmentary anterior column fracture extending to the iliac crest and a large posterior column fragment in more than half of the patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis of 135 surgically treated patients with both column fractures showed that more than half of these patients had associated injuries. The mean age was 40 years, and two thirds of these patients were male. A high energy trauma was the trauma mechanism in 87.4%. The mean ISS was 14.2 points. The mean articular fracture displacement was 14.8 mm. 65.9% of the patients showed a central femoral head dislocation. An associated posterior wall fracture was present in 34.8% and an acetabular roof comminution in 34.1%. 8.9% of patients had a fracture related nerve damage. RESULTS: Osteosynthesis was performed 9.6 days after trauma. Several approaches were used for stabilization with a combination of plate and screw fixation in 71.9%. The mean operative time was 287 minutes with a blood loss of 1796 ml. Post operatively the hip joint was congruent in 94.7% with anatomical or near-anatomical joint reconstruction in 75.6%. Iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 12 patients (8.9%). 89 patients (66.4%) could be followed after a mean of 54.6 months. The average subjective Visual Analog Scale pain score was 27.6. Mild or no pain was seen in 60.7%. The mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 15 with 60.7% of patients having a functionally perfect or good result. 61.8% had no post-traumatic osteoarthritic changes of their hip joint. A joint failure was diagnosed in 25.8% of the patients. DISCUSSION: Analysing only patients with anatomically reconstructed hip joints patients had better results with 69,8% having no or mild pain and a good or excellent functional result. Post-traumatic arthrotic changes occued in only 17.5% of these patients. A joint failure was present in 25.4%. In this group, a joint failure was significantly more likely to be present with an additional lesion of the femoral head and severe primary articular fracture displacement. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other acetabular fracture types, both column fractures show worser results regarding joint reconstruction, and functional and radiological long-term results. The optimal results can be achieved with anatomic joint reconstruction.

[Comparison of early total care (ETC) and damage control orthopedics (DCO) in the treatment of multiple trauma with femoral shaft fractures: benefit and costs]. / Early Total Care (ETC) im Vergleich zu Damage Control Orthopedics (DCO) bei der Behandlung polytraumatisierter Patienten mit Femurschaftfrakturen: Nutzen und Kosten.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral fractures are common injuries in multiple trauma patients. The treatment concept of damage control orthopedics (DCO) is in competition with the concept of early total care (ETC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study (2003-2007) 73 multiple trauma patients with femoral shaft fractures were included. The cohort was subdivided according to the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (16-24, 25-39 and more than 40) and treatment strategy (ETC versus DCO). Patients were analyzed for outcome and cost aspects. RESULTS: In the patient group with an ISS 16-24 ventilation time and intensive care treatment were longer after DCO treatment, overall costs and deficient cost cover were higher in the DCO group. In the patient group with an ISS 25-39 cost aspects showed a higher cover deficient in the DCO group. CONCLUSION: From an economic point of view the cost deficits for the ETC group were lower than in the DCO group. The treatment strategy should be selected by the pattern of injuries. The costs should be addressed by the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (INEK).

[The economic challenges of polytrauma care]. / Wirtschaftliche Herausforderungen der Polytraumaversorgung.

Following the introduction of DRGs ("diagnosis-related groups") in Germany, reimbursements changed from a per diem rate to a flat charge per patient. DRGs are defined by the German Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK, Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus) along with the respective reimbursement. The revenues are set according to the diagnoses and procedures. In complex cases like serious injury this applies for the average diagnoses and procedures. As a result, several groups reported costs of polytrauma care as high as 70,000 euro with losses as high as 20,000 euro. In the USA, a similar constellation has lead to the closure of trauma centers. The main reasons for the financial deficit are heterogeneity of polytrauma patients and contingency costs. Both are difficult to transfer to a case-based compensation system. Since the German DRG system was designed to learn during introduction, there were adjustments to reimbursements for polytrauma care in the initial phase. However, in recent years, no further improvements in the care of severely injured patients have been seen. The deficit per seriously injured patient currently runs at approx. 5000 euro. A renewed joint effort is required in order to avoid an economy-related reduction in quality of care.

Trauma care in Germany.

Trauma Care in Germany fulfils all requirements to deal with injured young and mobile individuals as well as with an increasing number of injured elderly patient. Furthermore, it is prepared to cope with mass casualties of injured. As a public task the Trauma System in Germany is well organized and follows clear cut demands. To perform technical and medical therapy at highest available level as soon as possible, a ground system of physician staffed ambulances is supported by a network of physician-staffed HEMS all over Germany. Therefore, enormous efforts in financing, basic research and quality management have been undertaken during recent years to create such a sophisticated rescue system.

[Screening for rehabilitation needs of patients in care of family practitioners]. / Screening des Rehastatus hausärztlicher Patienten.

Family doctors play an important role in promoting the access of patients to rehabilitation. On the one hand they are very often the first professionals to be contacted if patients want to take part in rehabilitation procedures whereas on the other hand there are also many patients whose need for rehabilitation remains undisclosed. No detailed estimates are available on how many of such patients exist in German GP-practices although it should be an important task of family doctors to discuss the pros and cons of rehabilitation particularly with their patients who are in need of it. We performed a non-representative pilot study in three GP offices during ten working days. patients older than 29 years were screened for their "rehabilitation status" with an instrument frequently used in German rehabilitation clinics. The patients were also asked whether or not they would like to participate in a rehabilitation procedure and what was the reason for their decision. Not knowing the patients' answers their doctors rated whether or not it would be appropriate for their patients to take part in rehabilitation. Additionally the doctors stated what kind of rehabilitation should be performed and what could be ist aims. In a sample of 181 patients about one-third was found to be in a severe "rehabilitation status", about one third in a state with higher than normal values--although not severe--and also approx. another third had a normal status. Family doctors stated that for one-third of their patients rehabilitation would be undoubtedly suitable at the time of the screening. In about two thirds of the cases the results of the questionnaire and the doctors' ratings corresponded. Some patients felt completely healthy although the results of the questionnaire and the doctors' statements rated them as being in need of rehabilitation. Other patients in need of rehabilitation rejected it for other than health-related reasons. The results of our study give evidence to the family doctors' key role for patients' access to rehabilitation. A representative study with a larger sample should be performed in the future because it could yield more detailed figures on the rehabilitation needs of family doctors' patients. Possibilities of standardised screening for rehabilitation needs in primary medical are should also be studied. The results of our pilot study also indicate the need for studies concerning non-medical causes of underutilised rehabilitation facilities. Family doctors should discuss these problems with their patients.