Safety reporting of Essure medical device: a qualitative and quantitative assessment on the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience database in 2018.

Background: There have been numerous cases of adverse events since the introduction of Essure medical devices for sterilization in 2002. This study analyzed the safety event reports of the Essure reported in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE). Methods: A retrospective analysis examined the MAUDE reports between Jan-1, 2018, and Oct-31, 2018 and focused on safety reports related to the Essure device. Safety reports were categorized and analyzed by their event type, device problem, patients' symptoms and the level of harm. Of this study cohort, 10% of samples were randomly selected for quantitative analyses. Thematic analysis was conducted for reports included death cases. Results: A total of 4,994 eligible reports were analyzed. There were ten reports associated with individuals' deaths, and the main themes of safety reports from qualitative analysis were pains, bleeding, surgery, migraine, and infection. Quantitative analysis of 500 randomly selected samples showed that 98% of adverse event reports were associated with different injuries such as surgery, pain, bleeding, hysterectomy, and menorrhagia. Additionally, more than 90% of reports were submitted by the manufacturer. Conclusion: These findings indicated several safety issues of Essure. More meaningful pre- and post-marketing surveillance and regulation are warranted in the medical device market to ensure safety and effectiveness, including investigating complaints, promptly sharing relevant information with regulators and users, and implementing corrective actions.

Pharmacists' facilitators and barriers to implementing and billing for patient care services: Interviews from the Ohio Medicaid Project.

BACKGROUND: In the past several decades, a growing body of literature is recognizing the benefits of pharmacist-led health care services in improving clinical and economic outcomes. Despite this evidence, pharmacists are not recognized on a federal level as health care providers in the United States. Ohio Medicaid managed care plans began partnering with local pharmacies in 2020 to launch initial programs for implementing pharmacist-provided clinical services. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing and billing for pharmacist-provided services in Ohio Medicaid managed care plan programs. METHODS: This qualitative study interviewed pharmacists involved in the initial programs using a semistructured interview based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interview transcripts were coded for thematic analysis. Identified themes were mapped to the CFIR domains. RESULTS: Four Medicaid payors partnered with 12 pharmacy organizations, representing 16 unique sites of care. Interviews were conducted with 11 participants. The thematic analysis found data fit within the 5 domains with 32 total themes. Pharmacists described the implementation process of their services. The primary themes for improvement of implementation process were system integration, payor rule clarity, and patient eligibility and access. The 3 themes that emerged as key facilitators were communication between payors and pharmacists, communication between pharmacist and care teams, and the perceived value of the service. CONCLUSIONS: Payors and pharmacists can work collaboratively to improve patient care opportunities by increasing access with sustainable reimbursement, clear guidelines, and open communication. Continued improvement is needed in system integration, payor rule clarity, and patient eligibility and access.

Trends in utilization, reimbursement, and price for DOACs and warfarin in the US Medicaid population from 2000 to 2020.

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is widely increasing in the United States (US). Warfarin has been the conventional anticoagulant used in the past few decades, but it has been gradually replaced by DOACs. The objective of the study was to analyze trends in utilization, reimbursement, and price for those anticoagulants in the US Medicaid population. Retrospective data analysis was conducted using the National Summary Files for the Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data. Study drugs included dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and warfarin. The study assessed secular trends of utilization, reimbursement, and per-prescription price. The data was collected from the first quarter of 2000 through to the second quarter of 2020 restricted for outpatient prescriptions only. During the 21-year study period, a substantial rise in total expenditures on warfarin and DOACs was observed from $144 million in 2000 to $694 million in 2020. Moreover, the utilization of DOACs has increased significantly since the first approval of Xarelto in 2010 from 1079 in 2011 to 1.5 million in 2019. The per-prescription price of DOACs increased from an average of $200 in 2011 to $407 in 2020. Conversely, the total number of prescriptions of Warfarin and branded Coumadin decreased from 2.4 million to 1.4 million and from 3.9 million to less than a million, respectively. The present study demonstrated a change in the trends of US expenditure and utilization for warfarin and DOACs with DOACs representing the majority of market share of both spending per prescription and reimbursement.

The Utilization, Expenditure, and Price of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in the US Medicaid Programs: Trends Over a 31 Year Period.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are used for several indications including hypertension. Our aim is to evaluate the utilization, expenditure, and drug price of ACEIs and ARBs in the US Medicaid population. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive trend analysis was conducted using Medicaid State Drug Utilization outpatient pharmacy summary files managed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from 1991 to 2021. Study drugs included ACEIs (e.g., captopril) and ARBs (e.g., losartan). Annual reimbursement and utilization were calculated for both classes. The average reimbursement per prescription was calculated as a proxy for drug prices. Market share competition between ACEIs and ARBs was analyzed over time. RESULTS: ACEI and ARB utilization rose by 25% from 1991 to 2021. Brand ACEIs utilization peaked in 2002 with 28 million prescriptions while brand ARBs utilization continued to increase until 2005 with over 23 million prescriptions. However, generic products took the lead and exceeded brand ACEI and ARB utilization in 2006 and 2012 respectively. Medicaid spent over $ 33.7 billion on ACEIs and ARBs over 31-year. Brand ACEIs and ARBs average prices increased sharply to $8,104 and $6,908 respectively in 2021. The total prescription market share for ACEIs was 68% compared to 32% of ARBs over the entire study. CONCLUSION: ACEIs and ARBs utilization increased over the last 31 years. Brand utilization switched over to generic resulting in less reimbursement. The average prices of brand ACEIs and ARBs continue to increase even after generics were introduced to the market.

Assessment of pharmacy technician job satisfaction and duties in ambulatory care pharmacy settings: A mixed-methods analysis.

PURPOSE: Expansion of pharmacy services into ambulatory care has prompted the integration of pharmacy technicians into this setting. Many models exist for technician practice in ambulatory care, and job satisfaction in these settings needs evaluation. This study assessed the job satisfaction of ambulatory care pharmacy technicians, obtained a deeper understanding of their varied roles, and examined commitment to the pharmacy technician career and their employing organization. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design of quantitative followed by qualitative data analysis. The phases included a validated questionnaire on job satisfaction and semistructured interviews using a modified guide and findings from the quantitative data. Descriptive statistics and constant comparative analysis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, and data were integrated in the discussion. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 125 potential participants at 11 organizations in 8 unique states. Seventy-four technicians participated in the quantitative phase. Seventeen of these were interviewed in the qualitative phase. Interviewees represented 7 different institutions in 6 states in the Southeast, Midwest, and Western regions of the US. Both phases indicated that respondents felt a strong commitment to their organization, with 60% of respondents indicating this on the questionnaire. Reasons for this commitment were further elucidated in the qualitative phase, which indicated high satisfaction with technician autonomy, work schedules, and ability to provide important services to patients. It was also found in both phases that technician duties varied greatly among organizations, although most technicians were involved in facilitating medication access. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory care pharmacy technicians are highly satisfied with their positions and careers. Although technician roles vary within ambulatory care settings, the majority involve facilitating medication access in various ways. As these positions become more prevalent in pharmacy practice, it will be important to continue to capitalize on satisfiers and mitigate dissatisfiers to advance the profession and ultimately provide optimal patient care.

Physician-approved protocols increase naloxone dispensing rates.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the implementation of a law that allows pharmacists to provide naloxone under a physician-approved protocol on naloxone dispensing rates in an all-payer population across the United States. METHODS: Prescription claims from a national grocery chain for 31 states and Area Heath Resource File were used for this retrospective study. The study sample included all patients who filled at least one naloxone prescription during the study period from July 16, 2014 to January 16, 2017. A stepwise autoregression was performed for 30 consecutive months to evaluate the change in naloxone prescription dispensing rate. The primary independent variable was "implementation of the physician-approved protocol." The primary outcome measure was the rate of naloxone prescriptions dispensed per month per state. Secondary outcome measures were naloxone dispensing rates by each payer. RESULTS: Number of patients who received naloxone prescriptions in the states with physician-approved protocol was 423% higher compared to states without the protocol. The overall model showed that the naloxone dispensing rate was 6 times higher in the states with a physician-approved protocol. In the payer-based models, comparing states with and without protocol, the dispensing rate was highest for Medicare (9.0 times) followed by Private (4.6 times), Medicaid (3.2 times), and Cash (3.1 times). The number of prescriptions dispensed in the low-employment states with the protocol was 17.59 times higher compared to states without the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of physician-approved protocol was strongly associated with an increase in naloxone dispensing rates, especially in the low-employment states.

Safety and cost-effectiveness of ponatinib versus other tyrosine kinase inhibitors as second-line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ponatinib compared with second-line TKIs in the treatment of adult patients with CML who failed, or were intolerant to, first-line TKIs. A Markov state transition model was conducted. Model transition, adverse-effect probabilities, utility data and medical costs were obtained from clinical trials and literature. Measurements included medications, follow-ups, adverse events, allogeneic stem cell transplantation and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Univariable and Bayesian multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted using Monte Carlo simulations. Dasatinib resulted in an ICER of $79,086/QALY compared to nilotinib. Ponatinib yielded an ICER of $176,278/QALY and $141,563/QALY compared to dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively. Dasatinib was the optimal treatment at a $100,000/QALY threshold. The probability (36%-40%) for ponatinib or dasatinib optimal treatment was associated with thresholds of $160,000-$180,000/QALY. Dasatinib and ponatinib can be considered cost-effective options and provide clinical benefits compared to other second-line TKIs for CML in the US.

Drug Expenditure, Price, and Utilization in the U.S. Medicaid: A Trend Analysis for SSRI and SNRI Antidepressants from 1991 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: SSRIs and SNRIs are antidepressants that have largely substituted old antidepressants like Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) and Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs). They have been widely used since 1987 when the FDA approved the first SSRI Fluoxetine and the first SNRI Venlafaxine in 1993. Since then, several new SSRIs and SNRIs have been approved and entered the market. Utilization, pricing, and spending trends of SSRIs and SNRIs have not been analyzed yet in Medicaid. AIM: To assess the trends of drug expenditure, utilization, and price of SSRI and SNRI antidepressants in the US Medicaid program, and to highlight the market share of SSRIs and SNRIs and the effect of generic drug entry on Medicaid drug expenditure. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive data analysis was conducted for this study. National pharmacy summary data for study brand and generic drugs were retrieved from the Medicaid State Outpatient Drug Utilization Data. These data were collected by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The study period was between 1991 and 2018. Study drugs include 12 different SSRI and SNRI brands and their generics available in the market, such as citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, and levomilnacipran. Data were analyzed annually and categorized by total prescriptions (utilization), total reimbursement (spending), and cost per prescription as the proxy of the price for each drug. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2018, total prescriptions of SSRI and SNRI drugs rose by 3001%. Total Medicaid spending on SSRIs and SNRIs increased from USD 64.5 million to USD 2 billion in 2004, then decreased steadily until it reached USD 755 million in 2018. The SSRIs average utilization market share was 87% compared to 13% of the SNRIs utilization market share. About 72% of total Medicaid spending on the two groups goes to SSRIs, while the remaining 28% goes to SNRIs. Brand SSRIs and SNRIs prices increased over time. On the contrary, generic drugs prices steadily decreased over time. DISCUSSION: An increase in utilization and spending for both SSRI and SNRI drugs was observed. After each generic drug entered the market, utilization shifted from the brand name to the respective generic due to their lower price. These generic substitutions demonstrate a meaningful cost-containment policy for Medicaid programs. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Our findings show the overall view of Medicaid expenditure on one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the US. They also provide an important insight toward the antidepressant market and the importance of monitoring different drugs and their alternatives.

Healthcare services expenditures among prostate cancer patients with and without mood disorders in the United States: A propensity score-matched cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the averages of healthcare services utilization and of expenditures for men with prostate cancer with and without diagnoses of mood disorders applying propensity score matching (PSM), and to identify the potential predictors associated with increased healthcare expenditures. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SAMPLE AND METHODS: A total of 308,602 weighted patients with prostate cancer were identified after applying PSM. The datasets for men with prostate cancer were extracted from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 2010 to 2015. For cohort formation, 1:1 PSM was applied. Healthcare utilization and expenditures analyzed included emergency room visits, length of stay for hospital inpatients, outpatient visits, office-based visits, and prescriptions. Generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link was used to determine which covariates are associated with the increase in healthcare expenditures for each healthcare service. FINDINGS: The mean expenditures for emergency room visits between men with prostate cancer and mood disorders was $3,092.34, and it was $1,330.64 for patients without mood disorders (p = 0.038). The weighted total expenditures for emergency room visits in prostate cancer patients with mood disorders is 57% higher (p = 0.0109). Moreover, the weighted total expenditures for outpatient visits in prostate cancer patients with mood disorders is 93% higher (p = 0.0001). The potential predictor in total healthcare expenditures is perceived health status (fair/poor) (p = 0.0066). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS OR POLICY: Individuals with a diagnosis of mood disorders were found to have higher average healthcare expenditures in emergency room visits than those without mood disorders. Therefore, the implications of this study are to inform the patient care team that the assessment and management of mood disorders is a priority. Moreover, screening of mood- disorder symptoms should occur early to optimize care. Finally, policymakers should provide accessible care to minimize emergency room visits.

Medication safety improvements during care transitions in an Australian intensive care unit following implementation of an electronic medication management system.

BACKGROUND: For patients requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), transfers of care (TOC) during admission to and discharge from the ICU are particularly high-risk periods for medication errors. In the Australian setting, commonly general wards and the ICU do not share an integrated Electronic Medical ecord (EMR) and specifically an Electronic Medication Management System (EMMS) as part of the EMR. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a hospital wide integrated EMMS on medication error rates during ICU admission and at TOC. METHOD: A 6-month historical control study was performed before and after implementation of the EMMS in the ICU of a tertiary hospital. Prescribing errors detected by pharmacists in the study period were divided into phase 1, (pre-EMMS, 6months), phase 2 (3 months post implementation after shakedown stage) and phase 3 (next 3 months of post implementation). They were categorized as prescribing error types under system or clinical intervention. Chi square statistics and interrupted time series analysis were used to determine if there was significant change in the proportion of patients who had an error at TOC during each phase. Logistics regression was used to determine the relationship between the dependent (error type) and the independent variable (study phase) for errors that occurred during TOC. RESULTS: Errors occurred during TOC in 42 %, 64 % and 19 % of patients in phase 1, 2 and 3 respectively. There was a significant decline in the proportion of patients with an error between phase 1 and 3 (p < 0.01). During a patient's ICU admission, at least one medication error occurred in 28.3 %, 62.6 % and 25.1 % in phase 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Besides procedural errors, the likelihood of an error occurring was greatest in phase 1, compared to phase 2 and 3 across system-related error categories. CONCLUSION: Medication errors during TOC reduced following implementation of the integrated ICU EMMS. EMMS safety features facilitated reduced system related prescribing errors as well as the severity of errors made.

Development and validation of coding algorithms to identify patients with incident lung cancer in United States healthcare claims data.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to develop and validate a practical US healthcare claims algorithm for identifying incident lung cancer that improves on positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity observed in past studies. METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (gold standard) were linked with Medicare claims. A 5% Medicare "other cancer" sample and noncancer sample served as controls. A split-sample validation approach was used. Rules-based, regression, and machine learning models for developing algorithms were explored. Algorithms were developed in the model building subset. Rules-based algorithms and those with the highest F scores were evaluated in the validation subset. F scores were compared for 1000 bootstrap samples. Misclassification was evaluated by calculating the odds of selection by the algorithm among true positives and true negatives. RESULTS: A practical single-score algorithm derived from a logistic regression model had sensitivity = 78.22% and PPV = 78.50% (F score: 78.36). The algorithm was most likely to misclassify older patients (ages ≥80 years) or with missing data in the SEER registry, shorter follow-up time in Medicare (<3 months), insurance through Veterans Affairs, >1 cancer in SEER, or certain Charlson comorbidities (dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, liver disease, or myocardial infarction). CONCLUSION: In this dataset, a practical point-based algorithm for identifying incident lung cancer demonstrated significant and substantial improvement (7.9% and 23.9% absolute improvement in sensitivity and PPV, respectively) compared with a current standard.

Expenditure, Utilization, and Cost of Specialty Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis in the US Medicaid Population, 2008-2018.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare, long-standing, and disabling disease that affects the central nervous system and causes several clinical manifestations. As a result, this disease is associated with a high societal economic burden. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the trends in drug expenditure, utilization, and cost of specialty drugs for the treatment of patients with MS in the US Medicaid program. METHODS: In this retrospective drug utilization research analysis, we obtained prescription data and reimbursement of disease-modifying therapies for MS from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data between January 2008 and December 2018. The specialty drugs considered in our analysis included dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, teriflunomide, cladribine, siponimod, alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, daclizumab, glatiramer acetate, peginterferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1a, and interferon beta-1b. The annual trends of the number of prescriptions, reimbursement expenditures, and costs were calculated. The average reimbursement per prescription was calculated as an estimate of the drug cost. RESULTS: The annual MS drug utilization increased from 85,209 prescriptions in 2008 to 223,604 in 2016, and then decreased to 194,877 in 2018. The annual reimbursement surged by 633% in the 10-year study period between 2008 and 2018, from almost $172 million in 2008 to more than $1.4 billion in 2017, and then to approximately $1.26 billion in 2018. The cost per prescription increased over time for most MS brand-name drugs (eg, from $2033 in 2008 to $5114 in 2018 for natalizumab, and from $19,138 in 2016 to $23,588 in 2018 for alemtuzumab). In 2008, self-injectable drugs dominated the market. In recent years, a shift has occurred in the utilization and reimbursement of MS drugs, with oral medications becoming predominant. CONCLUSION: The study findings indicate intermarket and interbrand competition among the MS specialty drugs. The growing utilization and spending trends for specialty MS medications are significant and sizable in the US Medicaid programs. Medicaid cost-containment strategy is warranted to control the economic burden of state budgets across the country.

Economic burden and treatment patterns of gynecologic cancers in the United States: evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2007-2014.

OBJECTIVE: This study estimated nationally representative medical expenditures of gynecologic cancers, described treatment patterns and assessed key risk factors associated with the economic burden in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective repeated measures design was used to estimate the effect of gynecologic cancers on medical expenditures and utilization among women. Data were extracted from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (weighted sample of 609,787 US adults) from 2007 to 2014. Using the behavioral model of health services utilization, characteristics of cancer patients were examined and compared among uterine, cervical, and ovarian cancer patients. Multivariable linear regression models were conducted on medical expenditure with a prior logarithmic transformation. RESULTS: The estimated annual medical expenditure attributed to gynecologic cancers was $3.8 billion, with an average cost of $6,293 per patient. The highest annual cost per person was ovarian cancer ($13,566), followed by uterine cancer ($6,852), and cervical cancer ($2,312). The major components of medical costs were hospital inpatient stays (53%, $2.03 billion), followed by office-based visits (15%, $559 million), and outpatient visits (13%, $487 million). Two key prescription expenditures were antineoplastic hormones (10.3%) and analgesics (9.2%). High expenditures were significantly associated with being a married woman (p<0.001), having private health insurance (p<0.001), being from a low- and middle-income family (p<0.001), or living in the Midwest or the South (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The key risk factors and components were well described for the economic burden of gynecologic cancers. With a growing population of cancer patients, efforts to reduce the burden of gynecologic cancers are warranted.

Association Between a State Law Allowing Pharmacists to Dispense Naloxone Without a Prescription and Naloxone Dispensing Rates.

Importance: Between 2015 and 2017, Ohio had the second highest number of opioid-related deaths. In July 2015, the Ohio General Assembly approved a law allowing pharmacists to dispense naloxone without a prescription in accordance with a physician-approved protocol. This change in the law allowed pharmacists to have more opportunity to participate in the management of patients who were addicted to opioids. Objective: To determine the association between the implementation of an Ohio law allowing pharmacists to dispense naloxone without a prescription in accordance with a physician-approved protocol and naloxone dispensing rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: A segmented regression analysis of an interrupted time series was performed for 30 consecutive months to evaluate the change in the naloxone dispensing rate before and after the implementation of the state law. Ohio Medicaid naloxone claims and Kroger Pharmacy naloxone claims for all 88 counties in Ohio were examined. Any patient 18 years or older with at least 1 naloxone order dispensed through Ohio Medicaid or by a Kroger Pharmacy in Ohio during the study period of July 16, 2014, to January 15, 2017, was included in the study. Data were analyzed from April 23, 2018, to July 7, 2019. Exposures: The primary independent variable was implementation of an Ohio law allowing pharmacists to dispense naloxone without a prescription in accordance with a physician-approved protocol, which took effect in July 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the naloxone dispensing rate per month per county. Results: In the Ohio Medicaid population, the number of naloxone orders dispensed after the policy was implemented increased by 2328%, from 191 in the prepolicy period to 4637 in the postpolicy period. The rate of naloxone orders dispensed per month per county after the policy was implemented increased by 4% in the Ohio Medicaid population and 3% in the Kroger Pharmacy population compared with the prepolicy period. The rate of naloxone orders dispensed after the policy was implemented increased by 18% per month in low-employment counties compared with high-employment counties in the Ohio Medicaid population. Conclusions and Relevance: The implementation of a state law allowing pharmacists to dispense naloxone without a prescription in accordance with a physician-approved protocol was associated with an increase in the number of naloxone orders dispensed in the Ohio Medicaid and Kroger Pharmacy populations. Moreover, a significant increase was observed in the naloxone dispensing rate among the Ohio Medicaid population in counties with low employment and high poverty.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research Knowledge Needs Assessment for Latin America.

BACKGROUND: An increasing awareness of the importance of health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) skills has been reported in Latin America. There is, however, no published study directly assessing perceived knowledge levels and knowledge gaps on specific HEOR topics among professionals and students in the region. OBJECTIVES: To assess perceived HEOR knowledge levels and identify knowledge gaps in Latin America. METHODS: An online needs assessment survey was developed to quantify perceived HEOR knowledge levels and identify knowledge gaps. Members of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in the Latin American region, regional chapters, and student chapter presidents were invited to participate in the survey. The survey, developed using the SurveyMonkey tool, was distributed to participants electronically. Data were extracted from the survey and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics to summarize the survey respondents' demographic information, current and desired knowledge levels, and preferred method/format for delivery of educational training. RESULTS: Survey responses were collected from 106 participants. The largest knowledge gap was calculated for methods for integrating medication adherence and persistence in health economic evaluations (mean = 2.30 ± 1.48). The smallest knowledge gap was calculated for types of healthcare costs (mean = 1.01 ± 1.17). Most respondents (74% [n = 66]) preferred to receive educational materials related to HEOR topics through online learning and continuing education programs. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gap assessment provided current knowledge gap perceptions among members of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research in Latin America. The survey data collected support a need for developing educational programs for topics with the highest perceived knowledge gap.

Factors Associated with Patient Preferences for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential to reduce the rate of acute neurological attacks, severity of relapses, and hospitalizations and to slow its progression. Adherence rates in MS patients have been shown to be affected by multiple factors, including physical or cognitive difficulties, perceived lack of treatment efficacy, treatment-related adverse events, injection anxiety, and frequency of administration. OBJECTIVE: To elicit the preferences of MS patients for noneconomic and economic attributes of current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: We used conjoint analysis to estimate preferences from a convenience sample through a web-based online survey. Patients were invited to participate in the study using web portals and newsletters for MS patients. The conjoint survey included the following 6 attributes: (1) overall efficacy based on autoimmune disease progression stabilization; (2) acute increase in disease activity (flare-up); (3) rate of respiratory tract infections; (4) rate of serious respiratory tract infections (leading to hospitalization); (5) medication use; and (6) patient monthly out-of-pocket medication costs. Using a fractional factorial design, 24 product profiles were created. Each respondent reviewed a random selection of 8 profiles. With each profile, subjects were asked to indicate their likelihood to try the hypothetical products on a scale from 0 to 100. Random effects linear regression was used to elicit preferences. RESULTS: After exclusion of respondents with incomplete information, data from 129 subjects were included in the analysis. The overall relative importance of each attribute for the ranges presented were (1) 38.4% for monthly out-of-pocket cost; (2) 21.5% for route and frequency of administration; (3) 15.9% for risk of hospitalization by infection; (4) 11.9% for risk of respiratory tract infection; (5) 7.4% for risk of flare-ups; and (6) 5.0% for disease progression stabilization. Preference weights indicated that subjects favored subcutaneous (beta coefficient [ß] = -2.26, 95% CI = -4.22 to -0.22) and oral administration (ß = 7.93, 95% CI = 5.95 to 10.2) over intramuscular (ß = -5.67, 95% CI = -8.67 to -3.56), but no significant differences were found between subcutaneous over intramuscular administration. Monthly out-of-pocket cost was the most influential attribute, with an overall relative importance of 38%. The most preferred level was $75 (ß = 12.85, 95% CI = 10.64 to 15.06) followed by $150 (ß = 3.41, 95% CI = 0.98 to 5.84) when compared between $75, $150, $300, and $450 a month. CONCLUSIONS: Conjoint analysis proved to be a convenient tool to quantify respondents' relative preferences for DMT characteristics. Respondents gave higher weight to DMT monthly out-of-pocket costs and mode of administration than to adverse effects or efficacy. These findings may assist in the development of DMT cost-sharing strategies and shared decision making at the point of care. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were contributed by Hincapie and Burns. Data were collected by Hincapie and Burns, and interpreted by all the authors. The manuscript was written by Hincapie, Penm, and Burns and revised by Penm, Hincapie, and Burns. At the time of data collection, Burns was a PhD candidate at The University of Oklahoma, College of Pharmacy.

Patient perceptions of a pharmacy star rating model.

OBJECTIVES: To identify patients' understanding of what constitutes a "quality pharmacy" and to obtain their feedback regarding the development and use of the pharmacy star rating model, a pharmacy-specific aggregate performance score based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Medicare Star Rating. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Focus groups were conducted in Arizona, California, Mississippi, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, and one-on-one interviews were conducted in Indiana. Eligible patients were required to routinely use a community pharmacy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consumer insights on their experiences with their pharmacies and their input on the pharmacy star rating model were attained. Key themes from the focus groups and interviews were obtained through the use of qualitative data analyses. RESULTS: Forty-nine subjects from 5 states and DC participated in 6 focus groups and 4 one-on-one interviews. Eighty-eight percent of participants reported currently taking at least 1 medication, and 87% reported having at least 1 health condition. The 7 themes identified during qualitative analysis included patient care, relational factors for choosing a pharmacy, physical factors for choosing a pharmacy, factors related to use of the pharmacy star rating model, reliability of the pharmacy star rating model, trust in pharmacists, and measures of pharmacy quality. Most participants agreed that the ratings would be useful and could aid in selecting a pharmacy, especially if they were moving to a new place or if they were dissatisfied with their current pharmacy. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy quality measures are new to patients. Therefore, training and education will need to be provided to patients, as pharmacies begin to offer additional clinical services, such as medication therapy management and diabetes education. The use of the pharmacy star rating model was dependent on the participants' situation when choosing a pharmacy.

Relationship Between Patients' Perceptions of Care Quality and Health Care Errors in 11 Countries: A Secondary Data Analysis.

Patients may be the most reliable reporters of some aspects of the health care process; their perspectives should be considered when pursuing changes to improve patient safety. The authors evaluated the association between patients' perceived health care quality and self-reported medical, medication, and laboratory errors in a multinational sample. The analysis was conducted using the 2010 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey, a multinational consumer survey conducted in 11 countries. Quality of care was measured by a multifaceted construct developed using Rasch techniques. After adjusting for potentially important confounding variables, an increase in respondents' perceptions of care coordination decreased the odds of self-reporting medical errors, medication errors, and laboratory errors (P < .001). As health care stakeholders continue to search for initiatives that improve care experiences and outcomes, this study's results emphasize the importance of guaranteeing integrated care.

Impact of a web-based intervention on the awareness of medication adherence.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is a widely recognized problem that leads to adverse outcomes and increased health care costs. Reasons for medication nonadherence are multifactorial, and patient awareness of the salience of medication adherence is critical. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of a pharmacist-led, web-based video presentation in increasing patients' awareness of the importance of medication adherence. METHODS: Patients aged 35 years and above, taking at least 1 chronic prescription medication were included in the study (n = 166). Patients completed a pre-survey, watched a pharmacist-led web-based video presentation educating them on the importance of medication adherence, then completed a 1-month follow-up survey. The primary outcome was measurement of change in patients' awareness of the importance of medication adherence. RESULTS: Results indicated a statistically significant increase in the primary outcome of increasing awareness of the importance of medication adherence. More patients in the follow-up survey indicated that it was important for their health to take their medications around the same time daily (P = 0.002), and more patients identified that their family will be impacted as a result of their medication nonadherence (P = 0.001) as compared to the pre-survey. More patients in the follow-up survey reported that they expected to experience fewer emergency room visits (P = 0.0001) and anticipated that they would get more time to spend with friends and family (P = 0.0039) as benefits of taking medications as prescribed. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led web-based video presentation may be a low-cost intervention to increase patients' awareness of the importance of medication adherence.

Assessment of students' satisfaction with a student-led team-based learning course.

PURPOSE: To date, no studies in the literature have examined student delivery of team-based learning (TBL) modules in the classroom. We aimed to assess student perceptions of a student-led TBL elective. METHODS: Third-year pharmacy students were assigned topics in teams and developed learning objectives, a 15-minute mini-lecture, and a TBL application exercise and presented them to student colleagues. Students completed a survey upon completion of the course and participated in a focus group discussion to share their views on learning. RESULTS: The majority of students (n=23/30) agreed that creating TBL modules enhanced their understanding of concepts, improved their self-directed learning skills (n=26/30), and improved their comprehension of TBL pedagogy (n=27/30). However, 60% disagreed with incorporating student-generated TBL modules into core curricular classes. Focus group data identified student-perceived barriers to success in the elective, in particular the development of TBL application exercises. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that students positively perceived student-led TBL as encouraging proactive learning from peer-to-peer teaching.