Centers of Excellence: If We Build It, Will They Come?

Pediatric surgeons have been pursuing high quality, affordable care or value-based care for over 50 years. One approach to streamlining the clinical care for a complex problem was the development of a center of excellence (COE). The concept of COE focuses on a shared vision of providing high quality care through a multidisciplinary approach. The goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy as well as therapeutic outcomes using focused expertise within a group. COEs are often resource intensive before becoming fiscally viable and therefore require initial support from hospital leadership. This review discusses the key steps to consider before building a COE, strategies to help build one, and how to keep one successful as defined by quality, accessibility, equity, training, and maintaining teams within the group.

Interprofessional/interdisciplinary teamwork during the early COVID-19 pandemic: experience from a children's hospital within an academic health center.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created multiple, complex and intense demands on hospitals, including the need for surge planning in the many locations outside epicenters such as northern Italy or New York City. We here describe such surge planning in an Academic Health Center that encompasses a children's hospital. Interprofessional teams from every aspect of inpatient care and hospital operations worked to prepare for a COVID-19 surge. In so doing, they successfully innovated ways to integrate pediatric and adult care and maximize bed capacity. The success of this intense collaborative effort offers an opportunity for ongoing teamwork to enhance efficient, effective, and high-quality patient care.

Epidemiology of gastroschisis: A population-based study in California from 1995 to 2012.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of gastroschisis is increasing, risk factors are not clearly identified. METHODS: Using the Linked Birth Database from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development from 1995 to 2012, patients with gastroschisis were identified by ICD-9 diagnosis/procedure code or birth certificate designation. Logistic regressions examined demographics, birth factors, and maternal exposures on risk of gastroschisis. RESULTS: The prevalence of gastroschisis was 2.7 cases per 10,000 live births. Patients with gastroschisis had no difference in fetal exposure to alcohol (p = 0.609), narcotics (p = 0.072), hallucinogenics (p = 0.239), or cocaine (p = 0.777), but had higher exposure to unspecified/other noxious substances (OR 3.27, p = 0.040; OR 2.02, p = 0.002). Gastroschisis was associated with low/very low birthweight (OR 5.08-16.21, p < 0.001) and preterm birth (OR 3.26-10.0, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed lower risk in black (OR 0.44, p < 0.001), Asian/Pacific Islander (OR 0.76, p = 0.003), and Hispanic patients (OR 0.72, p < 0.001) compared to white patients. Risk was higher in rural areas (OR 1.24-1.76, p = 0.001). Compared to women age < 20, risk decreased with advancing maternal age (OR 0.49-OR 0.03, p < 0.001). Patients with gastroschisis had increased total charges ($336,270 vs. $9012, p < 0.001) and length of stay (38.1 vs. 2.9 days, p < 0.001). Mortality was 4.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest population-based study summarizing current epidemiology of gastroschisis in California. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.