Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Digit Health ; 9: 20552076231187249, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37485332

RESUMO

Setting: The internet is an important source of health information but is unregulated. Little research has focused on the assessment of digital information related to nutrition. Aim: To develop and validate a novel online quality assessment tool (OQAT) for quality assessment of online nutrition information. Method: The OQAT was developed and validated in six distinct stages. After reviewing the literature, a framework and criteria were developed and formalised. Next, the quality assessment criteria were piloted on a subset of data and criteria refined. The established criteria were then validated against a previously validated assessment tool, and reliability was tested. Finally, the validated OQAT was used to assess the quality of articles from a 24-h collection period, 19 April 2021. Results: The final OQAT consisted of 10 key questions. Twenty-six news articles were assessed independently by two raters. Comparison of scores found moderate internal consistency (α = 0.382). Cohen's Kappa coefficient demonstrated high interrater agreement (k = 0.653, p < 0.001). The OQAT was tested on 291 relevant Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), which were determined to be either poor 3% (n = 9), satisfactory 49% (n = 144), or high-quality 48% (n = 139) articles. There was a statistically significant difference in OQAT scores between blogs, news articles, and press releases, χ2(2) = 23.22, p < 0.001, with a mean rank OQAT score of 138.2 for blogs, 216.6 for news articles, and 188.7 for press releases. Conclusion: This novel tool provides a reliable and objective method for assessing the quality of nutrition content online. It could potentially be used by researchers to assess the quality of online information in different settings and by organisations to inform readers of the quality of information being accessed.

2.
J Affect Disord ; 227: 834-839, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29689697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the association between antidepressant and prostate cancer by comparing exposures to antidepressants between those with and without prostate cancer. METHODS: A nationwide insurance claims database was used to identify our case subjects. Age- and gender-matched controls were selected at a 1:5 ratio. Conditional logistic regression model was used. RESULTS: 11,515 patients with prostate cancer were identified and matched with 55,373 controls. No increased associations between prostate cancer and most classes of antidepressants were found. However, a positive association with adjusted odds ratios ranged from 1.20 to 1.35 was noted in different doses of imipramine. Nevertheless, this association became statistically insignificant at higher cumulative doses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that there is no association between mechanistically dissimilar antidepressants and increased hazard for prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Correlação de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Imipramina/efeitos adversos , Imipramina/uso terapêutico , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Taiwan
3.
Biotechnol Adv ; 28(1): 160-8, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19913085

RESUMO

Since two decades ago, when the first GM crops were introduced, there have increasingly been hot debates on the applications of gene manipulation. Currently, the development of GM crop varieties has raised a wide range of new legal, ethical and economic questions in agriculture. There is a growing body of literature reflecting the socio-economic and environmental impacts of GM crops which aims to criticize their value for farming systems. While organic crops are promoted as environmentally-friendly products in developed countries, they have provoked great controversy in developing countries facing food security and a low agricultural productivity. Discussion has been especially vigorous when organic farming was introduced as an alternative method. There are in fact, a few tradeoffs in developing countries. On the one hand, farmers are encouraged to accept and implement GM crops because of their higher productivity, while on the other hand, organic farming is encouraged because of socio-economic and environmental considerations. A crucial question facing such countries is therefore, whether GM crops can co-exist with organic farming. This paper aims to review the main considerations and tradeoffs.


Assuntos
Produtos Agrícolas , Países em Desenvolvimento , Abastecimento de Alimentos/economia , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados , Alimentos Orgânicos , Plantas Geneticamente Modificadas , Produtos Agrícolas/economia , Produtos Agrícolas/provisão & distribuição , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/economia , Alimentos Geneticamente Modificados/provisão & distribuição , Alimentos Orgânicos/economia , Alimentos Orgânicos/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA