Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0266573, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363733

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The HPTN071 (PopART) for Youth (P-ART-Y) study evaluated the acceptability and uptake of a community-level combination HIV prevention package including universal testing and treatment (UTT) among young people in Zambia and South Africa. We determined whether a four-question primary care level screening tool, validated for use in clinical settings, could enhance community (door-to-door) identification of undiagnosed HIV-positive younger adolescents (aged 10-14) who are frequently left out of HIV interventions. METHOD: Community HIV-care Providers (CHiPs) contacted and consented adolescents in their homes and offered them participation in the PopART intervention. CHiPs used a four question-screening tool, which included: history of hospital admission; recurring skin problems; poor health in last 3 months; and death of at least one parent. A "yes" response to one or more questions was classified as being "at risk" of being HIV-positive. Rapid HIV tests were offered to all children. Data were captured through an electronic data capture device from August 2016 to December 2017. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were estimated for the screening tool, using the rapid HIV test result as the gold standard. RESULTS: In our 14 study sites, 33,710 adolescents aged 10-14 in Zambia and 8,610 in South Africa participated in the study. About 1.3% (427/33,710) and 1.2% (106/8,610) self-reported to be HIV positive. Excluding the self-reported HIV-positive, we classified 11.3% (3,746/33,283) of adolescents in Zambia and 17.5% (1,491/8,504) in South Africa as "at risk". In Zambia the estimated sensitivity was 35.3% (95% CI 27.3%-44.2%) and estimated specificity was 88.9% (88.5%-89.2%). In South Africa the sensitivity was 72.3% (26.8%-94.9%) and specificity was 82.5% (81.6-83.4%). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the screening tool in a community setting in Zambia was low, so this tool should not be considered a substitute for universal testing where that is possible. In South Africa the sensitivity was higher, but with a wide confidence interval. Where universal testing is not possible the tool may help direct resources to adolescents more likely to be living with undiagnosed HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Number: NCT01900977.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Zâmbia/epidemiologia , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Programas de Rastreamento , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
2.
Qual Health Res ; 29(5): 700-718, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30556470

RESUMO

We describe and reflect on a rapid qualitative survey approach called "Broad Brush Survey" (BBS) used in six community-randomized trials (CRTs)/studies in Zambia and South Africa (2004-2018) to document, compare, classify, and communicate community features systematically for public health and multidisciplinary research ends. BBS is based on a set sequence of participatory qualitative methods and fieldwork carried out prior to a CRT intervention and/or research by social scientists to generate rapid community profiles using four key indicators: physical features, social organization, networks, and community narratives. Profiling makes apparent similarities and differences, enabling comparison across communities and can be facilitated by an ideal model of open-closed systems. Findings have provided practical outputs (e.g., community profiles) and academic opportunities (e.g., community typologies). The BBS approach enables complex social landscapes to be incorporated in CRTs. This method has proven to be useful, adaptable and to have multidisciplinary appeal.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , África Austral , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ciências Sociais/métodos , África do Sul , Zâmbia
3.
Trials ; 19(1): 693, 2018 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30572905

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) presents a challenge for global TB control. Treating individuals with MDR-TB infection to prevent progression to disease could be an effective public health strategy. Young children are at high risk of developing TB disease following infection and are commonly infected by an adult in their household. Identifying young children with household exposure to MDR-TB and providing them with MDR-TB preventive therapy could reduce the risk of disease progression. To date, no trials of MDR-TB preventive therapy have been completed and World Health Organization guidelines suggest close observation with no active treatment. METHODS: The tuberculosis child multidrug-resistant preventive therapy (TB-CHAMP) trial is a phase III cluster randomised placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of levofloxacin in young child contacts of MDR-TB cases. The trial is taking place at three sites in South Africa where adults with MDR-TB are identified. If a child aged < 5 years lives in their household, we assess the adult index case, screen all household members for TB disease and evaluate any child aged < 5 years for trial eligibility. Eligible children are randomised by household to receive daily levofloxacin (15-20 mg/kg) or matching placebo for six months. Children are closely monitored for disease development, drug tolerability and adverse events. The primary endpoint is incident TB disease or TB death by one year after recruitment. We will enrol 1556 children from approximately 778 households with an average of two eligible children per household. Recruitment will run for 18-24 months with all children followed for 18 months after treatment. Qualitative and health economic evaluations are embedded in the trial. DISCUSSION: If the TB-CHAMP trial demonstrates that levofloxacin is effective in preventing TB disease in young children who have been exposed to MDR-TB and that it is safe, well tolerated, acceptable and cost-effective, we would expect that that this intervention would rapidly transfer into policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN92634082 . Registered on 31 March 2016.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Busca de Comunicante , Levofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Fatores Etários , Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Antituberculosos/economia , Pré-Escolar , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Esquema de Medicação , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Habitação , Humanos , Lactente , Levofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Levofloxacino/economia , Masculino , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , África do Sul , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/economia , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/microbiologia , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/transmissão
4.
Trials ; 19(1): 237, 2018 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29673395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in children is frequently paucibacillary and non-severe forms of pulmonary TB are common. Evidence for tuberculosis treatment in children is largely extrapolated from adult studies. Trials in adults with smear-negative tuberculosis suggest that treatment can be effectively shortened from 6 to 4 months. New paediatric, fixed-dose combination anti-tuberculosis treatments have recently been introduced in many countries, making the implementation of World Health Organisation (WHO)-revised dosing recommendations feasible. The safety and efficacy of these higher drug doses has not been systematically assessed in large studies in children, and the pharmacokinetics across children representing the range of weights and ages should be confirmed. METHODS/DESIGN: SHINE is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled, two-arm trial comparing a 4-month vs the standard 6-month regimen using revised WHO paediatric anti-tuberculosis drug doses. We aim to recruit 1200 African and Indian children aged below 16 years with non-severe TB, with or without HIV infection. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints are TB disease-free survival 72 weeks post randomisation and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Nested pharmacokinetic studies will evaluate anti-tuberculosis drug concentrations, providing model-based predictions for optimal dosing, and measure antiretroviral exposures in order to describe the drug-drug interactions in a subset of HIV-infected children. Socioeconomic analyses will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention and social science studies will further explore the acceptability and palatability of these new paediatric drug formulations. DISCUSSION: Although recent trials of TB treatment-shortening in adults with sputum-positivity have not been successful, the question has never been addressed in children, who have mainly paucibacillary, non-severe smear-negative disease. SHINE should inform whether treatment-shortening of drug-susceptible TB in children, regardless of HIV status, is efficacious and safe. The trial will also fill existing gaps in knowledge on dosing and acceptability of new anti-tuberculosis formulations and commonly used HIV drugs in settings with a high burden of TB. A positive result from this trial could simplify and shorten treatment, improve adherence and be cost-saving for many children with TB. Recruitment to the SHINE trial begun in July 2016; results are expected in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number: ISRCTN63579542 , 14 October 2014. Pan African Clinical Trials Registry Number: PACTR201505001141379 , 14 May 2015. Clinical Trial Registry-India, registration number: CTRI/2017/07/009119, 27 July 2017.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , África , Fatores Etários , Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Antituberculosos/economia , Antituberculosos/farmacocinética , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Esquema de Medicação , Custos de Medicamentos , Interações Medicamentosas , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/economia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/microbiologia
5.
AIDS ; 31 Suppl 3: S221-S232, 2017 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28665880

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the uptake of home-based HIV counselling and testing (HCT) in four communities of the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial in Zambia among adolescents aged 15-19 years and explore factors associated with HCT uptake. DESIGN: The PopART for youth study is a three-arm community-randomized trial in 12 communities in Zambia and nine communities in South Africa which aims to evaluate the acceptability and uptake of a HIV prevention package, including universal HIV testing and treatment, among young people. The study is nested within the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial. METHODS: Using a door-to-door approach that includes systematically revisiting households, all adolescents enumerated were offered participation in the intervention and verbal consent was obtained. Data were analysed from October 2015 to September 2016. RESULTS: Among 15 456 enumerated adolescents, 11 175 (72.3%) accepted the intervention. HCT uptake was 80.6% (8707/10 809) and was similar by sex. Adolescents that knew their HIV-positive status increased almost three-fold, from 75 to 210. Following visits from community HIV care providers, knowledge of HIV status increased from 27.6% (3007/10 884) to 88.5% (9636/10 884). HCT uptake was associated with community, age, duration since previous HIV test; other household members accepting HCT, having an HIV-positive household member, circumcision, and being symptomatic for STIs. CONCLUSION: Through a home-based approach of offering a combination HIV prevention package, the proportion of adolescents who knew their HIV status increased from ∼28 to 89% among those that accepted the intervention. Delivering a community-level door-to-door combination, HIV prevention package is acceptable to many adolescents and can be effective if done in combination with targeted testing.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Administração de Serviços de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , África do Sul , Adulto Jovem , Zâmbia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA