Student Perceptions of Substance Use Disorder Stigma as a Factor for Health Disparities: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of substance use disorders (SUDs) is an alarming problem in the United States; however, only a fraction of patients receive treatment. Stigma from both healthcare professionals and society at large negatively impacts SUD treatment. There are limited data regarding the perceptions of healthcare students on SUD stigma as a health disparity. METHODS: We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study among students enrolled in six health-related colleges at one mid-south health science center in the US over 3 months. Both an electronic survey consisting of 17 close-ended questions and researcher-led focus groups were conducted to understand their perceptions of stigma and SUDs. The research team followed the six steps recommended by Braun and Clarke regarding the data that aimed to capture associations between categories and extract and conceptualize the themes, and thematic analysis was done using Dedoose® (Manhattan Beach, CA, USA) qualitative software, which facilitated all the codes being kept organized and compared the frequency of codes across categories. RESULTS: A total of n = 428 students participated in the survey (response rate = 13%), and n = 31 students took part in five focus groups. Most student respondents, on average, either agreed or strongly agreed that: stigma currently exists in the healthcare field; stigma can lead to patients' not receiving the appropriate care for an SUD; and stigma can lead to lower quality care provided to patients with SUDs. Two themes were identified based on the thematic analysis: (1) additional training is necessary to better equip students for addressing SUDs in practice and (2) suggestions were formed to develop synergy between didactic and clinical rotations to improve SUD training. CONCLUSIONS: It is evident that students perceive the stigma surrounding SUDs as a detriment to patient care. Opportunities may exist in professional training programs to more seamlessly and intentionally weave SUD treatment and management concepts throughout the curriculum, as well as to empower students to operate in the complex regulatory scheme that exists for SUDs in the US.

"Following your dreams, and not killing yourself to do so": Black PharmDstudent perceptions of pharmacy residency.

OBJECTIVE: Residency training is a key element of advancing the roles of pharmacists in patient care. Diversifying the healthcare workforce is also crucial in reducing health disparities and improving health equity.1 The objective of this study was to investigate Black Doctor of Pharmacy students' perceptions of pursuing pharmacy residency training to aid pharmacy educators in creating and improving structures to support the professional advancement of Black student pharmacists. METHODS: A qualitative study employing focus groups was conducted at one of the top 20 colleges of pharmacy. Four focus groups consisting of Black students in years 2 through 4 of the Doctor of Pharmacy program were organized. A constructivist grounded theory approach2 was utilized to collect and analyze the data, which was organized into a conceptual framework. RESULTS: The elements of the framework developed showcase Black students' consistent negotiation between personal well-being and pursuit of professional advancement. This framework also highlights how the experience of navigating personal wellness is unique for Black students, rather than simply a work/life balance concern. CONCLUSION: The concepts in this framework may be valuable for colleges of pharmacy seeking to increase diversity in their residency pipeline. Targeted interventions to ensure adequate mentorship, mental health resources, diversity and inclusion efforts, and financial support will be necessary if the profession truly desires to expand increased diversity in clinical pharmacy.

Impact of a pharmacist-led, primary medication nonadherence intervention program on prescription fills in underserved patient populations.

BACKGROUND: Poor medication adherence is a critical barrier to improving patient health. Patients who are medically underserved are prone to a chronic disease state diagnosis and experience different social determinants of health. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of a primary medication nonadherence (PMN) intervention on prescription fills in underserved patient populations. METHODS: This randomized control trial included 8 pharmacies that were chosen based on current poverty demographic data for each region in a metropolitan area as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. Randomization was completed by a random number generator into (1) an intervention group or (2) a control group: (1) initiation of a PMN intervention and (2) no intervention offered on PMN. The intervention consists of a pharmacist addressing and resolving patient-specific barriers. Patients were enrolled in a PMN intervention at day 7 of a newly prescribed medication or a medication that has not been used in the previous 180 days, not being obtained for therapy. Data were collected to determine the number of eligible medications or therapeutic alternatives that were obtained after a PMN intervention was initiated and if that medication was refilled. RESULTS: The intervention group consisted of 98 patients and the control group had 103. Rate of PMN was higher (P = 0.037) in the control group (71.15%) than the intervention group (47.96%). Cost and forgetfulness encompassed 53% of the barriers experienced by patients in the interventional group. The most commonly prescribed medication classes associated with PMN included statins (32.98%), renin angiotensin system antagonists (26.18%), oral diabetes medications (25.65%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and corticosteroid inhalers (10.47%). CONCLUSION: The rate of PMN had a statistically significant decrease when a pharmacist-led, evidence-based intervention was conducted with the patient. Although this study depicted a statistically significant decrease in PMN rates, larger studies are needed to strengthen the correlation between the decrease in PMN and a pharmacist-led, PMN intervention program.

Pharmacy personnel comfort and confidence in screening for social needs: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Addressing social needs (such as lack of adequate housing, food, and transportation) has been shown to improve medication adherence and overall patient outcomes. However, screening for social needs during routine patient care can be challenging due to lack of knowledge of social resources and adequate training. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to explore the comfort and confidence of community pharmacy personnel in a chain community pharmacy when discussing social determinants of health (SDOH) with patients. A secondary objective of this study was to assess the impact of a targeted continuing pharmacy education program in this area. METHODS: Baseline confidence and comfort were measured through a brief online survey consisting of Likert scale questions regarding various aspects of SDOH (e.g., importance and benefit, knowledge of social resources, relevant training, workflow feasibility). Subgroup analysis of respondent characteristics was conducted to examine differences between respondent demographics. A targeted training was piloted, and an optional posttraining survey was administered. RESULTS: The baseline survey was completed by 157 pharmacists (n = 141, 90%) and pharmacy technicians (n = 16, 10%). Overall, the pharmacy personnel surveyed lacked confidence and comfort when conducting screenings for social needs. There was not a statistically significant difference in comfort or confidence between roles; however, subgroup analysis revealed trends and significant differences between respondent demographics. The largest gaps identified were lack of knowledge of social resources, inadequate training, and workflow concerns. Respondents of the posttraining survey (n = 38, response rate = 51%) reported significantly higher comfort and confidence than the baseline. CONCLUSION: Practicing community pharmacy personnel lack confidence and comfort in screening patients for social needs at baseline. More research is needed to determine if pharmacists or technicians may be better equipped to implement social needs screenings in community pharmacy practice. Common barriers may be alleviated with targeted training programs to address these concerns.

Assessing Student Perceptions of Blended and Online Learning Courses in Pharmacoeconomics, Management, and Leadership.

Objective. Blended learning combines traditional face-to-face education with online instruction. This learner-centered approach has been shown to improve student engagement, critical thinking, and performance outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess and trend student pharmacist perceptions of blended and online learning used to teach pharmacy management, leadership, and economics within a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.Methods. Qualitative methods were employed using in-depth, semistructured interviews. Second- and third-year student pharmacists were recruited by purposeful and snowball sampling and interviewed to a point of saturation. The interview guide was based on social cognitive theory. Themes identified through initial deductive thematic analysis were categorized by the three domains of social cognitive theory: cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors. The coding team additionally analyzed the transcripts using inductive thematic analysis to ensure no themes outside of social cognitive theory were missed.Results. Twenty students were interviewed. Themes reveal perceptions that blended learning facilitated greater understanding of course material, increased motivation among learners, provided more flexibility in workload completion, and was a more enjoyable way to learn compared to traditional didactic instruction. Furthermore, blended learning offered additional distinct advantages over traditional and online-only pedagogies.Conclusion. Student pharmacists perceived blended and online learning positively and acceptable for the delivery of a pharmacy course on management, leadership, and economics over traditional didactic instruction. Blended learning may enhance innovation, leadership, management, and economics content delivery and the student learning experience.

Patient perspectives of discussing social determinants of health with community pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) have a considerable impact on the lives and health outcomes of Black communities. Although the implementation of social needs screening in various clinical settings has been studied, the patient perspective of discussing SDOH with health care providers has not been thoroughly investigated. There is an opportunity for community pharmacists to help identify social risk factors and address social needs, particularly in minoritized communities. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this project were to (1) characterize the perspectives of Black patients regarding social risk discussions with community pharmacists and (2) to develop a framework for community pharmacists to engage in conversations with patients about social risk factors. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using principles of grounded theory. Patient perspectives regarding discussions of 5 key determinants of health (economic stability, education, social and community context, health and health care, and neighborhood and built environment) were elicited through semistructured interviews. Data analysis included interpretation of interview transcripts from 14 Black adults living in medically underserved areas in Memphis, TN. Charmaz's approach to theory development was followed. RESULTS: Three themes emerged to characterize the needs and expectations for patients in discussing social risk factors with community pharmacists. The themes of rationale, relationship, and resources were compiled to construct the newly developed Social Determinants of Health Patient Communication Framework. This framework describes the key factors that affected the patient receptiveness and willingness to discuss their social needs. CONCLUSION: Although patients are open to sharing social issues with community pharmacists, they may be reluctant to discuss social factors if initial understanding, personal connection, or resources are not present. This proposed, novel framework is a step toward improving the assessment of SDOH for underserved Black patients within community pharmacies. This framework can also be used for future education of pharmacists and other health care providers.

Social determinants of health and adult influenza vaccination: a nationwide claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: The health and economic benefits of the annual influenza vaccine are well documented, yet vaccination rates in the United States missed the Healthy People 2020 goal and remain a focus of Healthy People 2030 efforts. By identifying underlying reasons for low annual influenza vaccination, social elements that need targeting may be identified and could guide future interventions or policy development to achieve vaccination goals and improve overall public health. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of certain social determinants of health on adherence to annual influenza vaccination in American adults. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis using data from IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and national Medicare 5% sample data from 2013 to 2016. Study eligibility criteria included adults (aged 18 years and older) who were continuously enrolled for 3 influenza seasons between 2013 and 2016. Receipt of the influenza vaccine was counted over 3 consecutive influenza seasons, and select social determinants were extracted from publicly available sources. Patient characteristics, health resource utilization, and selected social determinants of health were included in bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine their association with annual influenza vaccination. RESULTS: 6,694,571 adults across employer-sponsored and Medicare coverage groups were analyzed, of which 14.7% of Medicare-enrolled adults and 9.2% of commercially enrolled adults were vaccinated in all 3 seasons. Higher proportions of vaccine adherence (ie, all 3 seasons) were observed among females (9.6% vs 8.7% [commercial], 15.0% vs 14.4% [Medicare]), the immunocompromised (11.8% vs 8.3% [commercial], 15.9% vs 13.6% [Medicare]), rural residents (10.5% vs 9.0% [commercial], 15.4% vs 14.6% [Medicare]; all P < 0.0001), and those enrolled in a high-deductible health plan (10.3%). Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that the odds of vaccine adherence tended to be higher in areas of higher poverty (OR=1.012; 95% CI = 1.01-1.02 [commercial], OR=1.01; 95% CI = 1.01-1.01 [Medicare]) yet lower in areas with higher proportions of Democratic voters (OR=0.998; 95% CI = 0.998-0.998 [commercial], OR = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.996-0.997 [Medicare]). Among commercially insured adults, the odds of vaccine adherence were higher in areas of higher health literacy (OR=1.036; 95% CI = 1.036-1.037), but this effect was not observed among Medicare members. Conversely, the odds of vaccine adherence increased as the proportion of those residing in areas of limited Internet access increased (OR=1.007; 95% CI = 1.004-1.010) among Medicare members only. CONCLUSIONS: Key social determinants of health are important factors of vaccine adherence and can guide policy and intervention efforts toward addressing potential hesitancy. A deeper assessment of other contributing social factors is needed in seasonal influenza and other vaccines to better interpret the vaccine-seeking behaviors of adults. DISCLOSURES: This study received no outside funding. Gatwood, Hagemann, Hohmeier, and Chiu declare vaccine-related grant funding from Merck & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline for vaccine research unrelated to the current study. Ramachandran declares vaccine-related grant funding from Glaxo-SmithKline for research unrelated to the current study. Shuvo and Behal have nothing to disclose. Findings described in this study were presented as a poster and podium at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2020 Virtual meeting, October 19-23, 2020.

Use of Rapid Assessment Procedures when analyzing qualitative data in pharmacy research.

Qualitative research analytics and methodology are a useful part of many research projects. However, qualitative data analysis may be time intensive causing delays in results. This is especially problematic in time-sensitive projects where there an urgent need for results and a rapidly evolving situation being studied, such as during health crisis or early stages of project implementation. An emerging body of literature around the use of Rapid Assessment Procedures (RAP) suggests that this method of qualitative assessment provides more efficient coding and categorizing of data without comprising rigor. The objectives of this manuscript are to: 1) describe how RAP can be used in pragmatic healthcare research studies and 2) provide an example of when RAP was applied to a qualitative research study in the healthcare setting. RAP includes 5 core features: 1) use in combination with quantitative outcomes or process data (mixed methods approach), 2) quick timeline from start to finish (weeks to months), 3) population of interest participation in planning and implementing the research, 4) team approach to research process, and 5) iterative cycle of data collection and analysis. Use of RAP provides key stakeholders and decision makers the ability to generate solutions to problems faster than ever before without compromising rigor, a method needed now more than ever. The progression of healthcare and clinical management is moving at an unprecedented rate, and RAP allows researchers to stay ahead by providing quicker results for better outcomes.

The Tennessee Medicaid medication therapy management program: early stage contextual factors and implementation outcomes.

BACKGROUND: First investigated in the 1990s, medication therapy management (MTM) is an evidence-based practice offered by pharmacists to ensure a patient's medication regimen is individualized to include the safest and most effective medications. MTM has been shown to a) improve quality of patient care, b) reduces health care costs, and c) lead to fewer medication-related adverse effects. However, there has been limited testing of evidence-based, a-priori implementation strategies that support MTM implementation on a large scale. METHODS: The study has two objectives assessed at the organizational and individual level: 1) to determine the adoption, feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to support the MTM pilot program in Tennessee; and 2) to report on the contextual factors associated with program implementation based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The overall design of the study was a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study reporting outcomes of Tennessee state Medicaid's (TennCare) MTM Pilot program. This paper presents early stage implementation outcomes (e.g., adoption, feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness) and explores implementation barriers and facilitators using the CFIR. The study was assessed at the (a) organizational and (b) individual level. A mixed-methods approach was used including surveys, claims data, and semi-structured interviews. Interview data underwent initial, rapid qualitative analysis to provide real time feedback to TennCare leadership on project barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The total reach of the program from July 2018 through June 2020 was 2033 MTM sessions provided by 17 Medicaid credentialed pharmacists. Preliminary findings suggest participants agreed that MTM was acceptable (µ = 16.22, SD = 0.28), appropriate (µ = 15.33, SD = 0.03), and feasible (µ = 14.72, SD = 0.46). Each of the scales had an excellent level of internal (> 0.70) consistency (feasibility, α = 0.91; acceptability, α = 0.96; appropriateness, α = 0.98;). Eight program participants were interviewed and were mapped to the following CFIR constructs: Process, Characteristics of Individuals, Intervention Characteristics, and Inner Setting. Rapid data analysis of the contextual inquiry allowed TennCare to alter initial implementation strategies during project rollout. CONCLUSION: The early stage implementation of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to support delivery of Tennessee Medicaid's MTM program was found to be well accepted and appropriate across multiple stakeholders including providers, administrators, and pharmacists. However, as the early stage of implementation progressed, barriers related to relative priority, characteristics of the intervention (e.g., complexity), and workflow impeded adoption. Programmatic changes to the MTM Pilot based on early stage contextual analysis and implementation outcomes had a positive impact on adoption.

Amazon Pharmacy: distraction or disruption?

After years of anticipation about Amazon's rumored entry into pharmacy, Amazon Pharmacy launched in November 2020. What is yet to be understood is whether this new Amazon offering is a true market disruption capable of upending the pharmacy industry. This commentary describes the epic rise of Amazon from bookseller to retail giant, leading to its entry into the retail pharmacy space. Amazon Pharmacy's business model is described and its potential for industry disruption discussed.

Factors associated with medication nonadherence among Medicare low-income subsidy beneficiaries with diabetes, hypertension, and/or heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented factors influencing medication nonadherence among the Medicare population, but few studies have examined medication nonadherence among the Medicare low-income subsidy (LIS) population. Furthermore, little is known about the factors associated with nonadherence among this population, especially those with prevalent chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or heart failure. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with the likelihood of medication nonadherence among Medicare LIS recipients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or heart failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 2012-2013 Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims (most recent available for this research) linked to the Area Health Resources Files. Beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with continuous Medicare coverage and receiving any LIS were included. Individuals were categorized into full LIS or partial LIS groups. Nonadherence was determined by the proportion of days covered less than 80% for specified oral type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure medications, as defined by the Pharmacy Quality Alliance. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine and compare individual-level and community-level characteristics associated with nonadherence among the entire study sample, the full LIS group, and the partial LIS group. RESULTS: The study sample included 505,771 Medicare beneficiaries, with 448,509 (88.7%) receiving full LIS and 57,262 (11.3%) receiving partial LIS. The proportion of individuals nonadherent was higher among the full LIS population (33.2%) than that of the partial LIS population (30.8%). Among the entire population, younger age was associated with nonadherence (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.98-0.99). Men were more likely to be nonadherent than women (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.11-1.14). Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, racial/ethnic minorities had higher nonadherence. Compared with beneficiaries who were non-Hispanic White, the ORs for those who were Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other were 1.41 (95% CI = 1.38-1.43), 1.58 (95% CI = 1.55-1.61), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.05-1.11), and 1.63 (95% CI = 1.56-1.70), respectively. There were higher nonadherence rates among patients living in communities with lower socioeconomic characteristics, such as a metropolitan statistical area (MSA vs non-MSA; OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07). A higher risk adjustment summary score, indicating worse health status, was associated with an increased likelihood of medication nonadherence (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.20-1.22). These patterns were similar among the full and partial LIS groups. CONCLUSIONS: Individual- and community-level characteristics were associated with the likelihood of medication nonadherence among Medicare LIS recipients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or heart failure. These characteristics included younger age, male sex, racial/ethnic minorities, living in lower socioeconomic communities, and a higher risk adjustment summary score. This study provided insight into medication nonadherence within the Medicare LIS population and identified the need to consider these factors when developing future policies to improve medication adherence. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which was involved in the preparation and revision of the manuscript. Dougherty is employed by PhRMA. Todor was a PQA-CVS Health Foundation Scholar who was funded to work on this study. Hines is employed by Pharmacy Quality Alliance. Wang reports grants from AbbVie, Curo, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer, during the time of this study, and fees from the PhRMA Foundation for work on its Heath Outcomes Research Advisor Committee. The other authors have nothing to disclose. This study was presented as a poster at the online 2020 PQA Annual Meeting, May 7, 2020.

Alignment of diagnosis and pharmacy claims data coding of medication adherence among patients with diabetes or hypertension.

BACKGROUND: ICD-10-CM codes exist that facilitate provider designation of patients as "nonadherent to therapy"; however, it is unclear whether this label accurately reflects patient behavior according to widely accepted medication adherence metrics using pharmacy claims data. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which patients are accurately coded for and have calculated rates of nonadherence using ICD-10-CM codes and claims, respectively. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage claims data from 2015 to 2016. The analysis focused on adults aged 18 years and older who had been diagnosed with and were being treated for hypertension and/or diabetes and had been coded as nonadherent by a provider during an outpatient encounter. Adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) to oral antihypertensive and/or antidiabetic therapy was calculated 6 months before and after the first nonadherence diagnosis identified in outpatient encounters, using 2 distinct calculation methods. Inferential statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine predictors of coding agreement and changes in adherence after the nonadherence diagnosis controlling for available patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1,142 patients who had been coded as nonadherent were identified, of which between 5.3% and 22.0% (depending on metric and condition) had PDCs before the nonadherence code deeming them adherent according to claims, conflicting with nonadherence diagnosis codes documented by their providers. Mean PDCs increased significantly (20.5%-24.3%, all P < 0.001) among both conditions following the nonadherent code, as did the proportion adherent (PDC > 80%), irrespective of disease (all P < 0.01). The odds of being correctly labeled nonadherent according to claims decreased with age (diabetes odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, 95% CI = 0.694-0.976; hypertension OR: 0.86, 95% CI = 0.773-0.944) but were higher among those taking more medications (diabetes OR: 2.97, 95% CI = 1.658-5.326; hypertension OR: 3.0, 95% CI = 2.095-4.305). Following the nonadherence coding, the odds of being adherent increased with age in both models (diabetes OR: 1.17, 95% CI = 1.012-1.363; hypertension OR: 1.13, 95% CI = 1.048-1.223) yet decreased with increasing medications (diabetes OR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.138-0.468; hypertension OR: 0.47, 95% CI = 0.368-0.592) and were lower if the patient was observed to be nonadherent before the index encounter (diabetes OR: 0.33, 95% CI = 0.146-0.760; hypertension OR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.152-0.423). CONCLUSIONS: In general, providers are properly classifying patients as nonadherent using ICD-10-CM codes, but additional assessment is needed to determine the reasons for the remaining mismatch between claims- and diagnosis-based nonadherence. In addition, the correct claims-based metric needs to be established to improve alignment with provider interpretation of patient medication use. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. Gatwood reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Kovesdy reports consulting fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Fresenius Medical Care, Keryx, Bayer, Abbott, Abbvie, Dr. Schar, Astra-Zeneca, Takeda, Tricida, and Reata and grants from Shire, outside the submitted work. The other authors have nothing to disclose. Findings described in this article were presented as a poster at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting in New York City, October 2019.

The role of social determinants in timely herpes zoster vaccination among older American adults.

CDC recommends that U.S. adults ≥50 years receive the herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine; but few are vaccinated at the recommended age. Little is known about how social determinants of health (SDH) influence timely vaccination. This retrospective observational study included U.S. adults aged ≥50 years who were vaccinated against HZ between 2014 and 2016 from IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare supplemental databases. The cohort was classified into three groups based on age of vaccination: earlier (50-59 years), timely (60-64 years), and later (65+ years). Select SDH data from publicly-available sources were linked and included in multinomial logistic regression assessing the impact of SDH on timely vaccination. The final cohort comprised 549,544 individuals, 49.5% of whom were vaccinated at the age of 60-64. Odds of later HZ vaccination increased with higher poverty (OR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.031-1.038), more democratic voters (OR: 1.011, 95% CI: 1.010-1.012), and lack of Internet access (OR: 1.028, 95% CI: 1.024-1.032), but decreased with higher health literacy (OR: 0.971, 95% CI: 0.970-0.973). Conversely, higher health literacy and lower poverty were associated with higher odds of earlier vaccination. Being male, not receiving a seasonal influenza vaccine, and higher healthcare utilization were associated with later vaccination. Individuals on an EPO/PPO vs. HMO plan, or who resided in regions other than the Northeast were more likely to receive the vaccine earlier. This study demonstrates the influence of SDH on time of HZ vaccination, but further research is needed to fully understand the impact of SDH on vaccination.

Association Between Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients Receiving the Low-Income Subsidy.

OBJECTIVES: Significant literature exists on the effects of medication adherence on reducing healthcare costs, but less is known about the effect of medication adherence among Medicare low-income subsidy (LIS) recipients. This study examined the effects of medication adherence on healthcare costs among LIS recipients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or heart failure. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed Medicare claims data (2012-2013) linked to the Area Health Resources Files. Using measures developed by the Pharmacy Quality Alliance, adherence to 11 medication classes was studied among patients with 7 possible combinations of the diseases mentioned. Adherence was measured in 8 categories of proportion of days covered (PDC): ≥95%, 90% to <95%, 85% to <90%, 80% to <85%, 75% to <80%, 50% to <75%, 25% to <50%, and <25%. Annual Medicare costs were compared across adherence categories. A generalized linear model was used to control for patient/community characteristics. RESULTS: Among patients with only one disease, such as diabetes, patients with the lowest adherence (PDC < 25%) had $3152/year higher Medicare costs than patients with the highest adherence (PDC ≥ 95%; $11 101 vs $7949; P < .05). The adjusted costs among patients with PDC < 25% was $1893 higher than patients with PDC ≥ 95% ($9919 vs $8026; P < .05). Among patients with multiple chronic conditions, patients' adherence to medications for fewer diseases had higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: Greater medication adherence is associated with lower Medicare costs in the Medicare LIS population. Future policy affecting the LIS program should encourage better medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases.

Community pharmacist workflow and medication therapy management delegation: An assessment of preferences and barriers.

OBJECTIVES: The role of community pharmacists continues to evolve to meet the changing medication-related needs of patients in the United States, requiring a fundamental shift in the pharmacist's workflow and tasks including medication dispensing and medication therapy management (MTM). To compare community pharmacists' current and idealized time allocation. Barriers to, and potential facilitators of, typical and specific pharmacist functions are also reported, with an emphasis on MTM practices. A secondary objective included interpreting how pharmacists perceived the value of social determinants of health to the MTM process. METHODS: Community pharmacists practicing in Tennessee were surveyed online with 3 distinct foci: time allocation and delegation, MTM barriers, and the perceived value of health-related and social data to the MTM process. For the first 2 sections, the respondents provided responses in 2 different scenarios: (1) current workflow and (2) an idealized workflow. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank and chi-square tests compared the responses to workday items, and Spearman correlations assessed the relationships between preferences and perceived barriers. RESULTS: The pharmacists reported spending the largest share of time verifying product (32.8% [SD 19.28]), and most indicated that they spent no time in either point-of-care testing (POCT) or physical patient assessment. In an ideal work environment, more patient-focused roles would be preferred (e.g., health screening, POCT, MTM, and vaccinations), with more than 80% indicating that they would delegate register activities, data entry, and product verification to technicians. In performing MTM, the pharmacists indicated that they would prefer delegating more data collection and patient management activities to technicians to reserve time for patient assessment and care plan creation. Key barriers to MTM included a lack of time, staff support, and patients' willingness to participate. CONCLUSION: Ideally, pharmacists would prefer to do no prescription filling or selling or register activities. Facilitating community pharmacy practice evolution will require focusing on building teams around support personnel.

Pneumococcal vaccination in older adults: An initial analysis of social determinants of health and vaccine uptake.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the potential influence of social determinants of health on pneumococcal vaccination in older American adults. METHODS: This study used nationwide, US Medicare claims data from 2013 to 2016 to assess uptake of pneumococcal vaccination among adults in the first year after turning age 65. Patients were followed from the point of being 65 years of age and initially enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan through the subsequent year and observed for pneumococcal vaccination in outpatient clinics and pharmacies. Publicly-available data on select social determinants of health were incorporated and guided by the World Health Organization vaccine hesitancy matrix. Logistic regression determined predictors of vaccination while controlling clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 307,488 and 74,995 adults aged 65 years were identified from Medicare Advantage and Medicare fee-for-service claims, respectively, and 21.1% of Medicare Advantage and 38.2% of Medicare fee-for-service patients received a pneumococcal vaccine in the first year after turning 65. Those residing in urban areas had a higher likelihood of pneumococcal vaccination in both the Medicare Advantage (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.267-1.344) and Medicare fee-for-service (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.450-1.615) cohorts. Additionally, residing in areas of higher health literacy or communities with more democratic voters were consistently associated with a higher odds of pneumococcal vaccination regardless of Medicare type. Results also pointed to a synergistic relationship between receiving the influenza vaccine and also being vaccinated against pneumococcal disease. CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health, including local health literacy, poverty, residing in more liberal areas, and access to information, may be influencing the pneumococcal vaccine-related decisions of older adults. However, additional factors associated with the vaccine hesitancy matrix and more granular data (e.g., zip code-level) are needed to fully determine the impact in this and other vaccines recommended in older adults.

The Tennessee medication therapy management program: A hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) programs are considered evidence-based and have clearly defined core components. Despite this, MTM programs are often implemented without fidelity due to notable implementation barriers, such as physician-pharmacist relationships and pharmacist access to patient medical records. To improve MTM implementation, the Tennessee Medicaid program developed a MTM intervention that incorporates implementation strategies to address some of the known barriers to implementation (e.g., formalizing pharmacist-physician relationships through collaborative practice agreements, ensuring pharmacists' access to medical records). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study is to (1) assess the effectiveness of the MTM pilot program in Tennessee (e.g., medication adherence, healthcare utilization, quality and cost of care) and (2) assess the implementation of the MTM pilot program (e.g., feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, penetration). METHODS: The Tennessee MTM pilot program is being assessed as a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study with a quasi-experimental design. A mixed methods approach (QUAN + QUAL) for the purpose of complementarity (e.g., answering related research questions). Data will include surveys, interviews, MTM platform encounter information, and medical and pharmacy claims. Initial analyses will include data between January 2018 and December 2019. CONCLUSION: The study will further add to the evidence base of MTM interventions by testing an intervention that addresses known barriers to implementation and simultaneously collecting data on effectiveness and implementation to speed up MTM translation. The Tennessee MTM program is expected to serve as a guide to other states seeking to expand pharmacist-delivered clinical services to their Medicaid members, particularly those intending to incorporate MTM into programs seeking to improve primary care delivery. Further, by improving the implementation of MTM, the pilot program is expected to improve the reliability of MTM program benefits including healthcare quality and cost and patient outcomes.

Targeting adaptability to improve Medication Therapy Management (MTM) implementation in community pharmacy.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To develop an adaptation framework for MTM delivery for pharmacists (the MTM Adaptability Framework), (2) to examine the impact of an educational intervention informed by the MTM Adaptability Framework on MTM completion rates over a 2-year period, and (3) to explore pharmacists' perceptions regarding knowledge and beliefs about MTM and MTM implementation self-efficacy pre- and post-intervention. METHODS: This study is a prospective, mixed-methods research study including a quasi-experimental, one-group pretest-posttest quantitative study with a sequential explanatory qualitative study arm featuring semi-structured key informant interviews. US supermarket pharmacy chain setting included 93 community pharmacy sites located in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Alabama. MTM completion rates are reported as percentage of completed comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) and targeted medication reviews (TMRs) and pharmacist perceptions. RESULTS: An 11.4% absolute increase in MTM completion rates was seen after the educational intervention targeting adaptation of MTM in the community pharmacy setting. This was found to be significant (46.92% vs. 58.3%; p < 0.001). Responses to the semi-structured interviews were mapped against CFIR and included themes: "knowledge and beliefs about MTM (pre-intervention)," "self-efficacy for MTM implementation (pre-intervention)," "knowledge and beliefs about MTM (post-intervention)," and "self-efficacy for MTM implementation (post-intervention)." Data convergence was found across these methodologies and suggested that targeting adaptability of MTM delivery increases MTM completion rates (quantitative data) and positively changes perceptions of MTM feasibility and self-efficacy (interviews). CONCLUSION: The use of an educational intervention about adaptation of MTM to influence adaptation of MTM to a chain community pharmacy setting part of an implementation strategy improved MTM completion rates significantly. Future research should investigate combined implementation strategies and their impact on MTM implementation success.

The opioid crisis: Origins, trends, policies, and the roles of pharmacists.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to (1) provide information concerning the opioid crisis including origins, trends, and some important related laws/policies; and (2) summarize the current involvement and impact of pharmacists in helping to address the crisis, as well as examine practices in other healthcare disciplines from which pharmacists might derive guidance and strategies. SUMMARY: Contributors to the opioid crisis included campaigns to treat pain as a fifth vital sign and to use opioids in treatment of non-cancer-related pain, as well as aggressive marketing of opioid analgesics by pharmaceutical companies. To address the crisis, numerous strategies have been implemented at the policy/legislative, health-system, and patient levels, such as prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), increased regulation of pain clinics, and expanded use of naloxone. Pharmacists have a critical role to play in interventions to address opioid misuse and reduce harm resulting from misuse. Such interventions include patient screening and risk stratification, patient and community education and outreach concerning appropriate pain management, medication reviews/medication therapy management, education on safe storage and disposal, distribution of naloxone/opioid rescue kits and training on their proper use, and referral of patients to addiction treatment, among other strategies. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists have multiple, complex roles in addressing the opioid crisis. Outcomes of several studies provide substantial evidence that pharmacists can make an impact through appropriate pain management, use of PDMPs, opioid overdose prevention training, and medication reviews and counseling, among other interventions.

Economic viability of tech-check-tech in an independent community pharmacy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the economic feasibility of implementing community pharmacy-based tech-check-tech compared with other common community pharmacy practice models. METHODS: A decision tree analysis compared 4 community pharmacy practice models: (1) historical (pharmacist or technician fills prescriptions and pharmacist gives immunizations); (2) historical with tech-check-tech (technician or certified technician fills prescriptions and pharmacist gives vaccinations); (3) modern (historical model plus medication therapy management [MTM] services); and (4) modern with tech-check-tech (modern model but a technician or certified technician handles all fills). A series of summed Markov models with a 1-year time horizon compared strategies on gross profit with the use of cycles of 1 hour of work attributed to either filling prescriptions, giving vaccinations, or conducting MTM. RESULTS: Based on current MTM volume, the splitting of pharmacist time across all services (modern model) was the most profitable strategy, resulting in approximately $1700 more than the next most profitable approach (historical model). Models incorporating tech-check-tech need significant time to be filled by MTM services, vaccinations, or other billable services to make up for the investment made into pharmacists' time. For these models, the likelihood of conducting a comprehensive medication review (CMR) in a given hour needs to exceed 47% for allocating all pharmacist time to nonfilling functions to be more profitable. Performing targeted medication reviews alone (without the chance of a CMR) was not sufficient to make tech-check-tech a profitable strategy. At the current inputs, billable services of exceeding approximately $18 and $20 per hour are needed for tech-check-tech to be the most profitable model with and without MTM services, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tech-check-tech implementation in the community setting has the potential to be profitable if pharmacist time is adequately scheduled with other billable services. Future research in this area should increase the number of pharmacies included and expand analyses to encompass chain-based community pharmacies.