Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Surg ; 176(3): 239-43, 1998 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9776150

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We determined whether preoperative antibiotics decreased incidence or treatment cost of infectious complications following ALND. METHODS: Two hundred patients entered this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients received either placebo or cefonicid preoperatively. Loco-regional signs of infection were monitored for 4 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: There was a trend toward fewer infections in the prophylactic group (placebo 13% versus cefonicid 6%; P = 0.080). Cefonicid significantly decreased severe infections requiring hospitalization (placebo 8% versus cefonicid 1%; P = 0.033). Cefonicid also decreased the treatment cost of infection per patient ($49.80 versus $364.87). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a trend toward fewer overall infections and significantly fewer severe infections in patients given prophylactic antibiotics, which translated into a decrease in the cost of treatment for infectious complications. These findings support antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing ALND.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Cefonicida/administração & dosagem , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Axila , Cefonicida/economia , Cefalosporinas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Excisão de Linfonodo/economia , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
2.
Am J Surg ; 152(1): 100-4, 1986 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3728801

RESUMO

Palliative terminal care of patients with malignant bowel obstruction is a major clinical and ethical challenge. These patients are often mentally alert and ambulatory, but are kept in the hospital for hydration, nasogastric suction, and pain control. Parenteral nutrition requires frequent metabolic monitoring, is expensive, and is ethically questionable. We have used an alternative method of home management for 27 patients who met the following criteria: inoperable bowel obstruction due to untreatable cancer, an estimated life expectancy of between 2 weeks and 3 months, and understanding of the goals and limits of therapy. Hydration was provided by 10 percent dextrose and electrolyte solutions administered as overnight infusions through long-term central venous catheters. Thirteen patients with complete bowel obstruction required a venting gastrostomy which, when connected to passive drainage, relieved nausea and vomiting. The mean duration of survival was 64 days (range 9 to 223 days). Acceptance by patients and families was excellent, although most acknowledged increased costs due to limited insurance coverage for outpatient care. Seven patients returned to the hospital for terminal care (average stay 3.2 days), and 20 chose to die at home. The mean daily expense for fluids and supplies was +73.50, with an overall cost decrease of $900,000 compared with inpatient care. Home support with fluids and gastric venting is a humane, cost-effective alternative to in-hospital care for selected patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Abdominais/complicações , Hidratação , Gastrostomia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Obstrução Intestinal/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA