Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
OTO Open ; 6(2): 2473974X221092381, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633844

RESUMO

The extent to which medical management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may improve health utility value (HUV) remains unknown. We conducted a prospective pilot study to longitudinally assess HUV via the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in patients with CRS who were receiving medical therapy but did not undergo sinus surgery. The primary study outcome was HUV at 12-month follow-up; secondary end points included HUV at baseline and 3- and 24-month follow-up. Our study enrolled 115 patients who received the following medical treatments: saline irrigations (n = 83, 72.2%), steroid sprays (n = 93, 80.9%), antihistamines (n = 64, 55.7%), steroid irrigations (n = 29, 25.2%), and oral antibiotics (n = 58, 50.4%). There was a statistically significant improvement (mean, +0.073; P = .003) in HUV at 12 months (minimum clinically important difference, 0.055) as compared with baseline. However, there was no statistically significant trend in HUV over time between baseline and 24-month follow-up (P = .3033). These findings can inform cost-effectiveness research as new medical therapies for CRS emerge.

2.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 12(4): 327-680, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373533

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The literature regarding clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential rise in the past year. There is substantial variability in the quality of this literature and a need to consolidate and critically review the evidence. It is with that aim that we have gathered experts from around the world to produce this International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O). METHODS: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to olfaction. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review, or evidence-based review with recommendations format as dictated by available evidence and scope within the ICAR:O document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:O document was integrated and reviewed by all authors for final consensus. RESULTS: The ICAR:O document reviews nearly 100 separate topics within the realm of olfaction, including diagnosis, epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, testing, etiology, treatment, and associated pathologies. CONCLUSION: This critical review of the existing clinical olfaction literature provides much needed insight and clarity into the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with olfactory dysfunction, while also clearly delineating gaps in our knowledge and evidence base that we should investigate further.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade , Olfato , Consenso , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos
4.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 11(7): 1041-1046, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33728824

RESUMO

The frequent association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and olfactory dysfunction is creating an unprecedented demand for a treatment of the olfactory loss. Systemic corticosteroids have been considered as a therapeutic option. However, based on current literature, we call for caution using these treatments in early COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction because: (1) evidence supporting their usefulness is weak; (2) the rate of spontaneous recovery of COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction is high; and (3) corticosteroids have well-known potential adverse effects. We encourage randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of systemic steroids in this indication and strongly emphasize to initially consider smell training, which is supported by a robust evidence base and has no known side effects.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/farmacologia , COVID-19 , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos do Olfato , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global , Humanos , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Avaliação das Necessidades , Transtornos do Olfato/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos do Olfato/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Mucosa Olfatória/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Olfatória/virologia , Remissão Espontânea , Projetos de Pesquisa , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade
5.
Laryngoscope ; 125(5): 1056-61, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25431320

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Health utility value (HUV) is an index used to measure health-related quality of life for the valuation and comparison of treatments. The Euroqol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a widely used method for determining HUV, but it has not been applied for this purpose in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who undergo sinus surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with CRS, who were recruited from 11 different otolaryngologic practices, completed the EQ-5D questionnaire at baseline, as well as 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. HUVs calculated from the results of this questionnaire were compared to those reported in the general U.S. population and to patients suffering from other chronic diseases. RESULTS: Baseline EQ-5D surveys were completed by 242 patients. Mean baseline HUV (standard deviation) was 0.81 (0.13). Female gender, revision surgery, and the use of intraoperative image guidance were associated was significantly lower baseline values. HUV rose at 3 months to 0.89 (0.12) and remained improved at 12 months 0.88 (0.10) and 24 months 0.89 (0.10) (P < 0.001). Baseline HUV in CRS (0.81[0.13]) is lower than the general U.S. population (0.85 [0.18]) and appears appropriately positioned among other common chronic conditions including asthma (0.82-0.92), migraine (0.81-0.91), and seasonal allergies (0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Sinus surgery provides improvement in HUV in patients with CRS. These values may be paired with costs of care to perform cost-utility analysis on this group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.


Assuntos
Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite/psicologia , Sinusite/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas/psicologia , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/cirurgia , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA