Intraoperative echocardiographic assessment of mitral valve translocation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present a rigorous method to analyse the intraoperative echocardiographic images from the novel mitral translocation procedure, which assesses the changes in mitral structure and function and compares this data to a control group of patients who have no mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Transoesophageal echocardiography was post-processed using dedicated 3D software. Ten patients with normal mitral valves (MV) undergoing non-mitral cardiac surgery served as controls. Mitral coaptation area, mid-leaflet coaptation length and mitral annular circumference were measured in 3D. RESULTS: Twenty-three consecutive patients with severe secondary MR underwent MV translocation. All patients had none/trace MR post-translocation. The mean coaptation surface area increased from 63 to 427 mm2 (P < 0.001) and coaptation length increased from 1.0 to 10.5 mm (P < 0.001). The control group coaptation surface area (136 mm2) and length (2.5 mm) were greater than pre-translocation (P = 0.019; P < 0.001) and less than post-translocation (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). 3D mitral annular circumference in the translocation group decreased 15% (130-110 mm) (P < 0.001). Post-translocation, the mean gradient was 2(2-3) mmHg with the diastolic mitral orifice area of 3.4 ± 0.3 cm2 by planimetry and 3.5 ± 0.3 cm2 by pressure half-time. The coaptation to septum distance remained unchanged (P = 0.305) without systolic anterior leaflet motion. CONCLUSIONS: This echocardiographic analysis method demonstrates that MV translocation abolishes secondary MR, increases coaptation area and length and produces acceptable diastolic function. This method of analysis should allow precise structural and quantitative assessment of the durability of the repair in future long-term follow-up.

Influence of socioeconomic status on objective sleep measurement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of actigraphy studies.

Social inequities have many health effects; one of these is a potential relationship to sleep disturbances. Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important factor that contributes to social inequities. SES is a marker of living conditions and habits that influence health by way of different processes, including stress-related mechanisms. However, a systematic review of the relationship between SES and objectively measured sleep parameters has not been conducted. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to examine the relationship between SES and sleep parameters measured with actigraphy in the general population. Nineteen articles were identified and included from a keyword search in Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS, following PRISMA guidelines. For an article to be included, it had to have a measure of SES and also, an actigraphy-based measure of sleep. For, included studies, qualitative and quantitative data were extracted, and study quality was assessed with The National Institute of Health's Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Bivariate correlations were extracted and entered into a meta-analysis, along with a qualitative review of articles. These analyses revealed that SES was associated with sleep parameters in the predicted direction, with lower SES associated with worse sleep parameters. Specifically, lower SES was associated with lower total sleep time, longer sleep latency, greater sleep fragmentation, and higher variability in sleep onset and sleep latency. Higher education, higher perceived economic well-being, and higher income were significantly associated with improved sleep efficiency and longer sleep duration. For the 19 articles included, 10 were rated as fair or poor in study quality. Thus, higher quality studies in this area are needed. This meta-analysis and systematic review demonstrated that social inequities of sleep can be measured objectively, opening the path to the development and integration of methodologies combining actigraphy with current subjective measures for utilization in clinical practice.

Maryland's Global Budget Revenue Program and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In 2014 Maryland began a global budget revenue (GBR) program where hospitals were assigned a global budget for each year. We hypothesized that this program would be associated with changes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patient risk profile, reductions in potentially preventable complications (PPCs) and 30-day hospital readmissions, and low annual per patient charge growth. METHODS: Patients having isolated CABG surgery in Maryland between fiscal years 2013 and 2017 were included. Patient characteristics, admission all-payer refined severity of illness, PPCs, 30-day hospital readmissions, and per patient hospital charges were compared between years. The impact of Maryland's GBR program on PPCs and 30-day hospital readmissions was evaluated using interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS: During the study period 11,070 patients had CABG surgery. The percentage of patients with major or extreme severity of illness at admission differed significantly between years (34.6% in 2013 vs 46.1% in 2017, P < .001). There was a significant reduction in mean PPC incidence of -22.8% (95% confidence interval, -29.8% to -15.8%) after GBR implementation but no significant reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions (-2.7%; 95% confidence interval, -6.0% to 0.6%). Without adjusting for inflation the annual per patient charge growth remained between -1.4% and 2.6% from 2013 to 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Maryland's GBR program was associated with significant PPC reductions, minimal charge growth, and no significant change in 30-day hospital readmissions during its first 14 fiscal quarters. These findings suggest that Maryland's GBR program achieved some but not all of its predefined goals in CABG patients.

Lung transplantation and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion in the era of lung allocation score - a retrospective study.

This study evaluated the impact of Medicaid eligibility expansion (ME) on lung transplant (LT) listings and Medicaid coverage. Data on LT candidates aged 18-64 were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (N = 9153). The impact of ME was evaluated by comparing LT listings in 2011-2013 with listings in 2014-2016, as well as comparing states that had and had not adopted ME in 2014. LT listings increased by 7.7% nationally post-ME. In ME states, LT listings increased by 15.2%, whereas nonexpansion states decreased by 1.5%. LT candidates with Medicaid increased after ME nationally (8.3% vs. 9.9%, P = 0.006) and in ME states (9.7% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.036), but not in nonexpansion states (6.6% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.170). Following multivariable adjustment, LT listings in ME states had 58% greater odds for Medicaid compared to nonexpansion states (P < 0.001). Expansion of Medicaid provided greater healthcare access and increased LT listings, but only within states that adopted eligibility expansion.

Robotic Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Pulmonary Segmentectomy: A Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary segmentectomy using robotic assistance is often perceived as being more expensive than segmentectomy using video-assisted thoracic surgery. The robotic technique allows for meticulous dissection during segmentectomy, potentially leading to fewer parenchymal injuries, fewer air leaks, and shorter length of stay. This study compared pulmonary segmentectomy costs using video-assisted thoracic surgery versus robotic with manual staplers versus robotic with robotic staplers. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed evaluating our early experience with robotic pulmonary segmentectomy for 30 months compared with the video-assisted thoracic surgery approach. All 50 anatomical segmentectomies performed since introduction of robotic technique in the practice were included. Twenty-eight procedures were robotic-assisted and 22 were video-assisted thoracic surgery. Procedure-specific evaluation of direct costs was performed, including cost of robotic instruments, staplers, and average length of stay in the hospital. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age was 70 ± 10 years (range = 43-91 years). There were 12 males in the robotic group and eight in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group (P = 0.642). The mean age was 69 years in the robotic group and 71 years in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group (P = 0.367). The median length of stay was 2 (2-4) days in the robotic group (range = 1-9) and 4 (2-5) days in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group (range = 1-20, P = 0.089). The cost of robotic segmentectomy with manual staplers was less than that with robotic staplers. Both robotic techniques cost less than video-assisted thoracic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, cost and outcomes in our early experience with robotic-assisted segmentectomy were comparable with our video-assisted thoracic surgery approach with trends toward shorter length of stay and fewer complications. Larger series are needed to validate these results.

The impact of a multidisciplinary blood conservation protocol on patient outcomes and cost after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Although associations between transfusion and inferior outcomes have been documented, there is a lack of blood transfusion standardization in cardiac surgery. At the Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, a multidisciplinary, criterion-driven algorithm for transfusion management was implemented. We examined the effect of our blood conservation protocol on transfusion rates and outcomes after cardiac surgery and on stability of transfusion over time. METHODS: Patients undergoing first-time cardiac surgery from 2006 (full year before protocol) were compared with those in 2009 (after protocol) and propensity score matched to improve balance. Data were prospectively collected. Stability of transfusion incidence also was compared (2005-2006 vs 2008-2014). RESULTS: After matching, 890 patients from each year were included. Use of blood products decreased from 54% in 2006 to 25% in 2009 (P < .001). Patients in 2009 had a lower incidence of postoperative renal failure (2.6% vs 4%, P = .04), reoperations for bleeding (2% vs 4%, P = .004), and readmissions at less than 30 days (6% vs 12%, P < .001). No differences were found for operative mortality, deep sternal wound infection, or permanent strokes. Patients in 2009 had greater improvement in physical (P = .001) and mental (P = .02) quality of life than patients in 2006. Reduction of blood products led to significant cost savings for packed erythrocytes (P < .001) and platelets (P < .001). After protocol implementation, transfusion incidence remained 30% or less, with less than 28% in most years. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary blood conservation program can significantly control blood transfusion rates, improve outcomes, and be sustained over time. Efforts are needed to implement evidence-based protocols to standardize and decrease blood use in cardiac surgery to improve outcomes and reduce cost.

The state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral valve disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation has been shown to be associated with less favorable short and long-term outcomes in patients having mitral valve surgery. Despite the growing evidence related to the potential benefits of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation at the time of the mitral valve operation, there is a significant variability among surgeons in their approaches to atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current state of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation as reported in the literature, as well as to discuss the significance of atrial fibrillation and the different surgical approaches to treat patients with mitral valve disease who may also concurrently suffer from tricuspid valve disease and atrial fibrillation. RECENT FINDINGS: Increased mortality and morbidity are expected when atrial fibrillation is left untreated in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Modern surgical ablations resulted in a shift from the cut and sew maze procedure to the vast majority of cases being performed using different ablation technologies. The use of ablation technology simplifies the procedure. The expectation is that the vast majority of patients with atrial fibrillation will be ablated at the time of their mitral valve surgery. SUMMARY: Patients who have mitral valve with or without tricuspid valve disease with a significant history of atrial fibrillation may benefit from surgical ablation to eliminate atrial fibrillation. No increased perioperative morbidity or mortality has been documented with an improved long-term survival and very low incidence of thromboembolic events.

Patient disposition and long-term outcomes after valve surgery in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Valve surgery is performed routinely in octogenarians. This study explored variables affecting patient discharge disposition (home versus other facility) and whether patient disposition was related to long-term survival. METHODS: Patients 80 years or older who presented for aortic valve or mitral valve surgery from 2002 to 2010 were included. Baseline demographic, perioperative, and long-term outcomes were captured. Disposition was categorized into 2 groups; home (n=184) or other facility (n=123). The National Death Index and Social Security Death Index verified deaths. RESULTS: Mean age was 82.9±2.5; 46% (140 of 307) were female. Discharge location logistic regression, adjusted for gender (odds ratio [OR]=1.45, p=0.17) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (OR=1.09, p=0.10), predicted that older (OR=1.18, p<0.001), unmarried (OR=2.07, p=0.006) patients with at least 1 major complication (OR=3.86, p<0.001) were more likely to be not discharged home. Kaplan-Meier analysis found significantly lower 1- and 2-year (85.8% vs 94.6%, p=0.009; 80.1% vs 90.3%, respectively, p=0.01) cumulative survival in patients not discharged home. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated poorer 1- and 2-year survival (hazard ratio [HR]=2.56, p=0.04; HR=2.06, p=0.05, respectively). Predictors of follow-up mortality for patients not discharged home were length of stay (OR=1.06, p=0.03) and any major complication (OR=6.90, p=0.002); lower body mass index was marginally significant (OR=1.12, p=0.06). The significant predictor for patients discharged home was length of stay (OR=1.17, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians can expect excellent survival after valve surgery. Those not discharged home had poorer long-term survival. Therefore, adequate resources should be secured so sicker patients receive the appropriate level of care.

Performance of four risk algorithms in predicting intermediate survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: : Several risk models exist to predict operative outcomes after cardiac surgery and are used in selecting patients for alternative procedures such as transcatheter valve implantation. We sought to evaluate the performance of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) model in accurately identifying patients at high risk for aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: : Three hundred and ninety four consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR from January 1, 2001, to July 1, 2007, at a tertiary care center were analyzed using the STS database. Patients were stratified into tertiles according to operative surgical risk calculated by the four models [STS-PROM, European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE), Ambler, and Providence]. Vital status at 1 year was determined using the National Death Index and Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: : There were 310 low-risk patients, 56 intermediate-risk patients, and 28 high-risk patients with respect to the STS-PROM. The predicted risk of death for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 2.4% ± 1.1%, 6.9% ± 1.4%, 15.8% ± 7.6% (P < 0.001) with respect to the STS-PROM model. Actual operative mortality for each respective group was 1.94%, 5.36%, 14.29% (P < 0.001) and 1-year mortality was 3.23%, 12.50%, 21.43% (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : High-risk patients have significantly high mortality after AVR. The STS-PROM accurately predicts operative mortality and can be used to predict 1-year survival as well. This risk model may be preferentially used instead of the EuroSCORE.