Utility Assessment of Moderate to Severe Thyroid Eye Disease Health States.

Importance: Thyroid eye disease (TED) results in varying degrees of proptosis and diplopia negatively affecting quality of life (QoL), producing possibly substantial visual changes, disfigurement, and disability. Objective: To determine the association of varying TED severities with QoL in a non-TED population by assessing health state utility scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study, conducted from April 20, 2020, to April 29, 2021, assessed health states for active, moderate-severe TED, and values were elicited using time trade-off methods. Six health states of varying severity were determined from 2 placebo-controlled clinical trials (171 patients with TED and clinical activity score ≥4, ±diplopia/proptosis) and refined using interviews with US patients with TED (n = 6). Each health state description was validated by interviews with additional TED patient advocates (n = 3) and physician experts (n = 3). Health state descriptions and a QOL questionnaire were piloted and administered to a general population. Visual analog scales (VASs) were also administered to detect concurrence of the findings. Main Outcomes and Measures: TED health state utility scores and whether they differ from one another were assessed using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum, and paired t tests. Results: A total of 111 participants completed time trade-off interviews. The mean (SD) utility value was 0.44 (0.34). The lowest (worse) mean utility value was observed in the most severe disease state (constant diplopia/large proptosis) with 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36), followed by constant diplopia/small proptosis (0.34; 95% CI, 0.29-0.40), intermittent or inconstant diplopia/large proptosis (0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), no diplopia/large proptosis (0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), and intermittent or inconstant diplopia/small proptosis (0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58). The highest (best) mean value, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54-0.67), was observed for the least severe disease state (no diplopia/small proptosis). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that patients with active, moderate-severe TED may have substantial disutility, with increasing severity of proptosis/diplopia more likely to have detrimental associations with QoL. These health state scores may provide a baseline for determining QoL improvement in these TED health states (utility gains) treated with new therapies.

Budget impact modeling for a single-tablet formulation of ibuprofen and famotidine for prevention of upper gastrointestinal ulcers in patients with osteoarthritis and/or rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the relief of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and to decrease the risk of developing upper gastrointestinal (GI) ulcers in patients taking ibuprofen for those indications. Currently, little is known about the cost impact of gastroprotective therapies, and an estimate of the financial consequences of adopting these therapies will be helpful to decision makers. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to review a model that evaluates the expected financial impact to US health care plans from the introduction of single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine into the chronic NSAID user population. METHODS: A budget impact model, considering a typical health plan of 1 million enrollees, was used to compare patients receiving: (1) single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine; (2) chronic NSAID treatment plus any GI-protective agent; and (3) chronic NSAID treatment without a GI-protective agent. RESULTS: The expected medication cost for single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine was $734,192 ($81,577 in year 1, $244,731 in year 2, and $407,884 in year 3), corresponding to a total per-member per-month cost of $0.020 ($0.007 in year 1, $0.020 in year 2, and $0.034 in year 3). Considering anticipated decreases in the use of other NSAIDs, the use of GI-protective agents, and GI complications, the total expected 3-year drug cost for single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine was offset by 50%, representing an estimated total budget impact of $364,396 or $0.010 per member per month. Sensitivity analyses of cost and market share variables and clinical and drug characteristics identified the most influential variables to be the cost of the drug and persistence to the ibuprofen/famotidine formulation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The expected decrease in treatment costs for less serious GI-related complications illustrates the benefits of single-tablet ibuprofen/famotidine as a gastroprotective therapy in patients receiving chronic NSAID treatment, with a modest financial impact on total health care costs.

Impact of the individualized method of dosing on patients receiving aminoglycosides

Un método computarizado para predicción farmacocinética fue utilizado para comparar dosis iniciales dadas con dosis ideales en veteranos puertorriqueños que recibían tobramicina, gentamicina o amikacina por un período de seis semanas en el Hospital de Veteranos en San Juan, Puerto Rico. El propósito de esta investigación era documentar hábutis de orescruocuíb t deternubar su kis orubcuouis teírucis cubéticos podían ser aplicados clínicamente a priori. Un análisis de costos fue llevado a cabo para determinar si el iniciar un servicio de farmacocinética disminuiría el costo actual de medicamentos así como los costos auxiliares de los mismos. Los resultados indicaron que en términos de predecir niveles de sangre, el programa era clínicamente preciso (r = 0.8, p < 0.01). Nuestros datos inidcan una baja utilización estadísticamente significante (p < .05) de amikacina y sobreutilización de tobramicina y getamicina al ser comparados con dosis ideales. Treinta y siete por ciento de los pacientes tenían regímenes de aminoglycósido que producían niveles de sangre sobre lo recomendado y cincuenta y cinco por ciento de los regímenes de amikacina estaban por debajo de lo óptimo. Los análisis de costos indicaron que si las recomendaciones en cuanto a dosificación era implementadas, se lograrían ahorros cumulativos anuales de aproximadamente $l4,000. Es también probable que el aumento en hospitalizaciones debido a la baja o sobreutilizaciones de aminoglicósidos sería refrenado a través de ...