Exploring medicines information needs of mental health service users at a New Zealand hospital.

Providing effective medicines information to individuals can improve outcomes, yet little is known about what information mental health service users need and want about their medicines, and how best to deliver this. The aim of this study was to explore the medicines information needs of mental health service users. Adults (n=30) under the care of acute mental health services in a New Zealand hospital were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews or a focus group to explore preferences for medicines information. Interview data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Six key themes were identified: 1) personalisation of information, 2) adverse and beneficial effects, 3) relationships and trust, 4) informed choice, 5) use of reliable internet resources and 6) involvement of family and support people. Preferences on content, timing, provider and format of information delivery were highly individualised indicating the need for information to be personalised to the needs of the service user. A trusted relationship with their healthcare provider was essential . Making informed decisions reduced confusion or fear about medicines. Understanding medicines information needs of patients can help improve the education health professionals provide on medicines, thus potentially improving patient engagement and outcomes.

Feasibility of describing community strengths relative to Omaha system concepts.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to determine the feasibility of using a standardized language, the Omaha System, to describe community-level strengths. The objectives were: (a) to evaluate the feasibility of using the Omaha System at the community level to reflect community strengths and (b) to describe preliminary results of community strengths observations across international settings. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: A descriptive qualitative design was used. The sample was a data set of 284 windshield surveys by nursing students in 5 countries: Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Turkey, and the United States. MEASURES: An online survey included a checklist and open-ended questions on community strengths for 11 concepts of the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme: Income, Sanitation, Residence, Neighborhood/workplace safety, Communication with community resources, Social contact, Interpersonal relationship, Spirituality, Nutrition, Substance use, and Health care supervision. Themes were derived through content analysis of responses to the open-ended questions. RESULTS: Feasibility was demonstrated: Students were able to use the Omaha System terms and collect data on strengths. Common themes were described among the five countries. CONCLUSIONS: The Omaha System appears to be useful in documenting community-level strengths. Themes and exemplar quotes provide a first step in developing operational definitions of strengths at a more granular level.