Digital tools for the assessment of pharmacological treatment for depressive disorder: State of the art.

Depression is an invalidating disorder, marked by phenotypic heterogeneity. Clinical assessments for treatment adjustments and data-collection for pharmacological research often rely on subjective representations of functioning. Better phenotyping through digital applications may add unseen information and facilitate disentangling the clinical characteristics and impact of depression and its pharmacological treatment in everyday life. Researchers, physicians, and patients benefit from well-understood digital phenotyping approaches to assess the treatment efficacy and side-effects. This review discusses the current possibilities and pitfalls of wearables and technology for the assessment of the pharmacological treatment of depression. Their applications in the whole spectrum of treatment for depression, including diagnosis, treatment of an episode, and monitoring of relapse risk and prevention are discussed. Multiple aspects are to be considered, including concerns that come with collecting sensitive data and health recordings. Also, privacy and trust are addressed. Available applications range from questionnaire-like apps to objective assessment of behavioural patterns and promises in handling suicidality. Nonetheless, interpretation and integration of this high-resolution information with other phenotyping levels, remains challenging. This review provides a state-of-the-art description of wearables and technology in digital phenotyping for monitoring pharmacological treatment in depression, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of its application in clinical trials and research.

Withdrawal from mental and psychosocial care during pregnancy.

Psychopathology, psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) commonly occur in pregnant women, and can have a negative impact on the course of pregnancy and the healthy development of the child. As PPS often remains undetected and untreated during pregnancy, we developed and implemented a four-step screen-and-treat protocol in routine obstetric care, with: (i) screening including triage and subsequent confirmation, (ii) indication assessment, (iii) transfer towards care and (iv) utilization of care. Adherence to the protocol and risk factors associated with dropout were examined for 236 Dutch pregnant women in a deprived urban area. Seventy-nine percent of women accepted the screening, 21% dropped out during triage, 15% during confirmation, 3% during transfer and 8% thereafter. Provided reasons for dropout were lack of time and lack of perceived benefit. In particular, smokers, multiparous women, and women of non-Western ethnicity dropout on the way towards mental and psychosocial care. For a successful implementation of the protocol in the future, with improved adherence of pregnant women to the protocol, education of women on PPS risks, motivational skills and compulsory treatment are worth investigation.

Associations between sociodemographic, sampling and health factors and various salivary cortisol indicators in a large sample without psychopathology.

BACKGROUND: Cortisol levels are increasingly often assessed in large-scale psychosomatic research. Although determinants of different salivary cortisol indicators have been described, they have not yet been systematically studied within the same study with a large sample size. Sociodemographic, health and sampling-related determinants of salivary cortisol levels were examined in a sample without potential disturbances because of psychopathology. METHODS: Using 491 respondents (mean age=43.0 years, 59.5% female) without lifetime psychiatric disorders from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), sociodemographic, sampling and health determinants of salivary cortisol levels were examined. Respondents collected seven salivary cortisol samples providing information about 1-h awakening cortisol, diurnal slope, evening cortisol and a dexamethasone (0.5mg) suppression test (DST). RESULTS: Higher overall morning cortisol values were found for smokers, physically active persons, persons without cardiovascular disease, sampling on a working day or in a month with less daylight. In addition, the cortisol awakening response was significantly flattened for males, persons with cardiovascular disease, those with late awakening times and those with longer sleep duration. Diurnal slope was steeper in men, physically active persons, late awakeners, working persons, and season with less daylight. A higher evening cortisol level was associated with older age, smoking and season with more daylight. Cortisol suppression after dexamethasone ingestion was found to be less pronounced in smokers, less active persons and sampling on a weekday. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic variables (sex, age), sampling factors (awakening time, working day, sampling month, sleep duration) and health indicators (smoking, physical activity, cardiovascular disease) were shown to influence different features of salivary cortisol levels. Smoking had the most consistent effect on all cortisol variables. These factors should be considered in psychoneuroendocrinology research.

Intrapair differences in hippocampal volume in monozygotic twins discordant for the risk for anxiety and depression.

BACKGROUND: Current biological psychiatric models assume that genetic and environmental risk factors for anxiety and depression act on the same brain structures. METHODS: To test this assumption, we assessed brain anatomy by using optimized voxel-based morphometry on magnetic resonance images obtained in monozygotic twin pairs who were discordant for the risk of anxiety and depression (n = 10 pairs) and in monozygotic twin pairs who were concordant for high (n = 7 pairs) or low (n = 15 pairs) risk for anxiety and depression. RESULTS: We observed volume reductions in the temporal lobe, most notably in the left posterior hippocampal region in subjects at high risk for anxiety and depression, but exclusively in the intrapair comparison of discordant monozygotic twins. Because monozygotic twins are genetically identical, any discordance in their risk for anxiety and depression and hippocampal volume must arise from differential exposure to environmental influences. A group comparison between pairs concordant for low or high risk, which is more likely to reflect differences in genetic vulnerability, did not show reduced temporal-lobe and posterior hippocampal volumes in the pairs at high risk for anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: This pattern of results suggests that damage to temporal-lobe structures may be specific to an environmentally driven etiology of anxiety and depression.