Observational, nonintervention, multicenter study for validation of the Bowel Function Index for constipation in European countries.

OBJECTIVE: Constipation is a common adverse event of treatment with opioids for chronic non-malignant pain and may result in a considerable reduction in health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Bowel Function Index (BFI) in european patients suffering from constipation secondary to opioid analgesic treatment for chronic, non-malignant pain. METHODS: This was a multinational study conducted at 15 clinical sites in the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Patients suffering from constipation secondary to opioid analgesic treatment for chronic, non-malignant pain were recruited to complete a series of questionnaires including a socio-demographic form, the BFI, the Patient Assessment of Constipation - Symptoms (PAC-SYM), a global frequency item, and a clinical form. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included in this study. Inter-item correlations of the BFI were statistically significant in the moderate to large range and the analysis indicated a strong degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). All correlations between the BFI and the global item were statistically significant in the moderate to high range (r = 0.59 to 0.69; p < 0.0001). Correlations between the BFI and the PAC-SYM were moderate and statistically significant (p < 0.01 to 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was limited by the relatively small sample size, it is a part of an extensive validation program. This study suggests that the BFI is a reliable and valid measure of constipation-related symptomatology in chronic pain patients. This measure may be a valuable indicator of patients' experience of symptoms of opioid treatment of chronic pain in future trials.

Patient assessment of a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of severe, chronic pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Opioid-induced constipation can have a major negative impact on patients' quality of life. This randomised clinical trial evaluated patient assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of oral prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone when co-administered with oral naloxone PR. METHODS: Two hundred and two patients with chronic cancer- or non-cancer-related pain undergoing stable oxycodone PR therapy (40, 60 or 80 mg/day) were randomised to one of four intervention groups: 10, 20 or 40 mg/day naloxone PR or placebo. Following a 4-week maintenance phase, patients were followed-up for 2 weeks in which time they received oxycodone PR only. At the end of the maintenance phase, patients and investigators were asked to assess treatment efficacy and tolerability, as well as preference for the titration or maintenance phase. RESULTS: Patient and investigator global assessment of efficacy and tolerability improved with increasing naloxone dose. Efficacy was ranked as 'good' or 'very good' by 50.0%, 67.4% and 72.5% of patients in the 10, 20 and 40 mg naloxone PR dose groups, respectively, compared with 43.5% of patients in the placebo group. Patient assessment of tolerability was similar between treatment groups and placebo, being ranked as 'good' or 'very good' by 83.3%, 79.1% and 82.5% of patients in the 10, 20 and 40 mg/day naloxone PR dose groups, respectively, compared with 71.7% of patients in the placebo group. The maintenance treatment phase was preferred by patients in the naloxone groups. A 2 : 1 dose ratio of oxycodone to naloxone was also assessed. Efficacy was ranked as 'good' or 'very good' by 70.4% of patients treated with the 2 : 1 dose ratio compared with 43.5% of patients receiving placebo. Tolerability of the 2 : 1 dose ratio was ranked as being 'good' or 'very good' by 81.5% of patients compared with 71.1% for the placebo group and patients preferred the maintenance phase. CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of oral naloxone PR with oxycodone PR improves patient assessment of analgesic opioid therapy for severe chronic pain, in terms of both efficacy and tolerability.

Assessment of laryngeal function by digital subtraction laryngography.

The evaluation of vocal cord function can be problematic in the presence of oropharyngeal tumors, hypopharyngeal tumors, and supraglottic lesions and in noncompliant adult and pediatric patients. The use of computer image subtraction techniques coupled with digital fluoroscopy has inherent high-quality resolution that can provide an excellent image of vocal cord symmetry and movement. The use of air as the contrast medium provides the ability to measure the extent of vocal cord excursion as well as the extent of piriform sinus lesions. In addition, it is a noninvasive procedure that requires a minimal imaging exposure time, with the result that the patient undergoes minimal radiation exposure.

A demonstration of the cost benefits of case management services for discharged mental patients.

The authors report on a demonstration of the cost benefits of case management for hospitalized mental patients discharged from a New York State Community Mental Health Center to community living in a rural catchment area. Case managers promoted social rehabilitation and maximized time spent in the community. Comparison of the treatment group with matched controls on frequency and duration of rehospitalization during the 15 month intervention period shows a benefit conservatively estimated as 2.03 to 2.72, depending on size of case load.