The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The application of telehealth for surgical follow-up has gained recent exposure in orthopedic care. Although the results following joint arthroplasty are encouraging, the role of telemedicine for postoperative care following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair still needs to be defined. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and socioeconomic benefits of telehealth as a platform for postoperative follow-up. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 66 patients who underwent follow-up in the office vs. via telemedicine for postoperative visits at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery. Post-visit surveys were administered to patients and physicians via e-mail, and the Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare responses. RESULTS: In total, 58 patients (88%) completed the study (28 telehealth vs. 30 control). Patients in each group demonstrated similar pain scores at each follow-up visit (P = .638, P = .124, and P = .951) and similar overall satisfaction scores (P = .304). Patients in the telehealth group expressed a stronger preference for telehealth than their control counterparts (P < .001). Telehealth visits were less time-consuming from both a patient (P < .001) and physician (P = .002) perspective. Telehealth visits also required less time off work for both patients (P = .001) and caregivers (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery were able to receive safe and effective early postoperative follow-up care using telemedicine. The preference for telehealth increased for both surgeons and patients following first-hand experience. The use of a telehealth platform is a reasonable follow-up model to consider for patients seeking convenient and efficient care following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Ethnic and gender differences in the functional disparities after primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of TKA have been well documented. Whether these benefits apply equally across gender and ethnic groups is unclear. Given the underuse of TKA among certain demographic groups, it is important to understand whether gender or ethnicity influence pain and function after TKA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) the influence of race, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on primary TKA functional scores and ROM before gender-specific implants; and (2) whether comorbidities influenced ROM and functional scores. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all 202 patients who underwent primary TKAs in 2004. We contacted 185 of the 202 patients, including 90 African-Americans, 87 Caucasians, four Asians, and four Hispanics (55 men, 130 women). Their average age was 66 years, and average BMI was 34.4 (range, 20-55). Knee Society scores (KSS) and ROM, patient demographics, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were recorded. Minimum followup was 24 months (average, 29.1 months; range, 24-60.3 months). RESULTS: African-Americans had longer delays to presentation, higher BMI, and worse 2-year KSS. Women (all races) had higher BMI and worse preoperative flexion/arc ROM. African-American women had worse final ROM and had similar final gains in ROM (postoperative minus preoperative ROM) after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Gender and race affected functional KSS and ROM variables. The worse results experienced by African-American women may be attributable to a longer delay to presentation. However, the scores and motion were high for all subgroups, and underuse of TKA in women and African-Americans cannot be justified based on a perception of lesser functional gains.