Prognostic Value of CSF IL-10 at Early Assessment of Induction Chemotherapy in Primary CNS Lymphomas: A LOC Network Study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite a high response rate at the first evaluation during induction chemotherapy, the risk of early relapse remains high and unpredictable in primary CNS lymphomas (PCSNLs). We aimed to assess the prognostic value of early IL-10 levels in CSF (e-IL-10) after 2 months of induction chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively selected from the LOC (Lymphomes Oculo-Cérébraux) network database patients with PCSNLs who had complete or partial response at the 2-month evaluation of a high-dose methotrexate-based first-line chemotherapy for whom e-IL-10 was available. RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age: 62 years, brain involvement in 30/30, CSF involvement in 10/30, median baseline CSF IL-10: 27.5 pg/mL) met the selection criteria. e-IL-10 was undetectable in 22 patients and detectable in 8 patients. At the end of induction treatment, 7 of 8 and 4 of 22 of the patients with detectable and undetectable e-IL-10 had experienced progressive disease, respectively (p = 0.001, OR: 26.8, 95% CI 2-1,478). The median progression-free survival times were 5.8 months (95% CI 2.8-8.8) and 28.7 months (95% CI 13.4-43.9) in the groups with detectable and undetectable e-IL-10, respectively (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that despite an objective response, the persistence of detectable e-IL-10 is associated with a high risk of early relapse in PCNSL. A closer follow-up of such patients is warranted.

Use of FDG-PET/CT for systemic assessment of suspected primary central nervous system lymphoma: a LOC study.

INTRODUCTION: Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare disease with different therapeutic implications than systemic lymphoma. In this study, we evaluated whole-body 18FDG-PET/CT for pre-chemotherapy imaging of suspected PCNSL. METHODS: One hundred and thirty consecutive immunocompetent patients were retrospectively included. The results of initial 18FDG-PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT (CeCT) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) when available were compared to a gold standard based on pathological diagnosis or follow-up. RESULTS: CNS lesion pathology showed large B-cell lymphoma in 95% of patients, including 11 patients with primary vitro-retinal lymphoma. Ten patients (8%) where ultimately diagnosed with systemic lymphoma involvement, including five pathologically confirmed cases, all of which were detected by 18FDG-PET/CT. 18FDG-PET/CT showed incidental systemic findings unrelated to lymphoma in 14% of patients. An SUVmax threshold of nine enabled good discrimination between systemic lymphoma and other lesions (sensitivity 92% and specificity 89%). CeCT and BMB performed in 108 and 77 patients respectively revealed systemic lesions in only three patients. CONCLUSION: 18FDG-PET/CT detected concomitant occult systemic involvement in a non-negligible proportion of suspected PCNSL cases (8%). In this setting its sensitivity is higher than that of CeCT. All of our patients ultimately diagnosed with concomitant systemic involvement had positive 18FDG-PET/CT. We believe it constitutes a safe one-stop shop evaluation for the systemic pre-treatment imaging of suspected PCNSL.

Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria.

Traditionally, the most widely used criteria for response assessment in glioblastoma have been Macdonald and the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Recently, new criteria addressing contrast enhancement and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)/T2 hyperintensity have been defined (the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria) to better evaluate the effect of antiangiogenic therapy. Whether FLAIR/T2 imaging could also be helpful to refine RECIST criteria remains unresolved. This study proposed the RECIST + F criteria and compared the 4 methods (Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F) to determine their agreement in identifying response and progression of recurrent glioblastomas to irinotecan-bevacizumab. Patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with second-line irinotecan-bevacizumab were eligible. Clinical status, corticosteroid dose, and 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional measurements of tumor contrast enhancement and FLAIR hyperintensity were retrospectively assessed. Response and progression were determined according to each set of criteria. Seventy-eight patients were included. Response rates ranged from 34.2% with RECIST + F to 44.7% with Macdonald criteria. Agreement among the 4 methods in determining response and type of progression was high (kappa statistic > 0.75). One-third of patients exhibited nonenhancing progression with stable or improved contrast enhancement. Median progression-free survival was predicted by RECIST, at 13.6 weeks; RECIST + F, 12.3; Macdonald, 12.7; and RANO, 11.7 (P = .840). Intra- and interobserver correlations were high for both contrast enhancement and FLAIR hyperintensity measurements. There was a strong concordance among the different methods in determining response and progression to irinotecan-bevacizumab. Criteria integrating FLAIR hyperintensity tended, however, to reduce response rates and progression-free survival compared with criteria considering only contrast enhancement. The 1-dimensional approach appeared to be as valid as the 2-dimensional approach.