Toward an optimal cadaveric brain model for neurosurgical education: assessment of preservation, parenchyma, vascular injection, and imaging.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed types of cadaveric head and brain tissue specimen preparations that are used in a high throughput neurosurgical research laboratory to determine optimal preparation methods for neurosurgical anatomical research, education, and training. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens (N = 112) prepared using different preservation and vascular injection methods were imaged, dissected, and graded by 11 neurosurgeons using a 21-point scale. We assessed the quality of tissue and preservation in both the anterior and posterior circulations. Tissue quality was evaluated using a 9-point magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scale. RESULTS: Formalin-fixed specimens yielded the highest scores for assessment (mean ± SD [17.0 ± 2.8]) vs. formalin-flushed (17.0 ± 3.6) and MRI (6.9 ± 2.0). Cadaver assessment and MRI scores were positively correlated (P < 0.001, R2 0.60). Analysis showed significant associations between cadaver assessment scores and specific variables: nonformalin fixation (ß = -3.3), preservation within ≤72 h of death (ß = 1.8), and MRI quality score (ß = 0.7). Formalin-fixed specimens exhibited greater hardness than formalin-flushed and nonformalin-fixed specimens (P ≤ 0.006). Neurosurgeons preferred formalin-flushed specimens injected with colored latex. CONCLUSION: For better-quality specimens for neurosurgical education and training, formalin preservation within ≤72 h of death was preferable, as was injection with colored latex. Formalin-flushed specimens more closely resembled live brain parenchyma. Assessment scores were lower for preparation techniques performed > 72 h postmortem and for nonformalin preservation solutions. The positive correlation between cadaver assessment scores and our novel MRI score indicates that donation organizations and institutional buyers should incorporate MRI as a screening tool for the selection of high-quality specimens.

Volumetric 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Supraorbital vs Pterional Approach to Paramedian Vascular Structures: Comprehensive Assessment of Surgical Maneuverability.

BACKGROUND: Both the pterional and supraorbital approaches have been proposed as optimal access corridors to deep and paramedian anatomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess key intracranial structures accessed through the surgical approaches using the angle of attack (AOA) and the volume of surgical freedom (VSF) methodologies. METHODS: Ten pterional and 10 supraorbital craniotomies were completed. Data points were measured using a neuronavigation system. A comparative analysis of the craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF of the ipsilateral paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), terminal ICA, and anterior communicating artery (ACoA) complex was completed. RESULTS: For the paraclinoid ICA, the pterional approach produced larger craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF than the supraorbital approach (28.06° vs 10.52°, 33.76° vs 23.95°, and 68.73 vs 22.59 mm3 normalized unit [NU], respectively; P < .001). The terminal ICA showed similar superiority of the pterional approach in all quantitative parameters (27.43° vs 11.65°, 30.62° vs 25.31°, and 57.41 vs 17.36 mm3 NU; P < .05). For the ACoA, there were statistically significant differences between the results obtained using the pterional and supraorbital approaches (18.45° vs 10.11°, 29.68° vs 21.01°, and 26.81 vs 16.53 mm3 NU; P < .005). CONCLUSION: The pterional craniotomy was significantly superior in all instrument maneuverability parameters for approaching the ipsilateral paraclinoid ICA, terminal ICA, and ACoA. This global evaluation of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional surgical freedom and instrument maneuverability by amalgamating the craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF produces a comprehensive assessment while generating spatially and anatomically accurate corridor models that provide improved visual depiction for preoperative planning and surgical decision-making.

Comparative Anatomical Assessment of Full vs Limited Transcavernous Exposure of the Carotid-Oculomotor Window.

BACKGROUND: Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS: Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION: In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered.

Volume of Surgical Freedom: The Most Applicable Anatomical Measurement for Surgical Assessment and 3-Dimensional Modeling.

Surgical freedom is the most important metric at the disposal of the surgeon. The volume of surgical freedom (VSF) is a new methodology that produces an optimal qualitative and quantitative representation of an access corridor and provides the surgeon with an anatomical, spatially accurate, and clinically applicable metric. In this study, illustrative dissection examples were completed using two of the most common surgical approaches, the pterional craniotomy and the supraorbital craniotomy. The VSF methodology models the surgical corridor as a cone with an irregular base. The measurement data are fitted to the cone model, and from these fitted data, the volume of the cone is calculated as a volumetric measurement of the surgical corridor. A normalized VSF compensates for inaccurate measurements that may occur as a result of dependence on probe length during data acquisition and provides a fixed reference metric that is applicable across studies. The VSF compensates for multiple inaccuracies in the practical and mathematical methods currently used for quantitative assessment, thereby enabling the production of 3-dimensional models of the surgical corridor. The VSF is therefore an improved standard for assessment of surgical freedom.