Healthcare costs and productivity costs of hand and wrist injuries by external cause: A population-based study in working-age adults in the period 2008-2012.

BACKGROUND: Hand and wrist injuries are very common at the Emergency Departments (ED), and among the most costly injury types in the working population. The purpose of this study was to explore the causes of non-trivial hand and wrist injuries (i.e., hand fractures, wrist fractures and complex soft-tissue injuries) in working-age adults in order to identify target areas for prevention. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Dutch Injury Surveillance System, from the National Hospital Discharge Registry and from a patient follow-up survey in working-age adults (aged 20-64 years) in the period 2008-2012. An incidence-based cost model was used to estimate healthcare costs, and an absenteeism model for estimating the productivity costs. Total costs were calculated by external cause, subdivided in their main categories (home, sports, work, traffic and violence) and their most important subclasses. RESULTS: Total costs of these injuries in The Netherlands were US $410 million per year, of which 75% (US $307 million) productivity costs. Males represented 66% (US $271 million) of the total costs. Within the male group, the group 35-49 years had the highest contribution to total costs (US $112 million), as well as the highest costs per case (US $10,675). Work-related injuries showed the highest costs per case (US $11,797), however, only 25% of the total costs were work-related. The top five causes in terms of total costs were: accidents at home (falls 23%, contact with an object 17%), traffic (cycling 9%) and work (industrial work 4%, and construction work 4%). CONCLUSION: Hand and wrist injuries are a major cause of healthcare and productivity costs in working-age adults. To reduce the costs to society, prevention initiatives should be targeted at major contributing causes, that are mainly related to activities at home (falls, contact with an object) and accidents at the road (cycling).

A clinically weighted approach to outcome assessment in radial polydactyly.

UNLABELLED: Currently available outcome assessment systems for radial polydactyly are mainly based on expert opinion. The aim of this study was to develop an outcome assessment system based on clinical data. We performed linear regression analysis on data from a multicentre study of 121 patients with radial polydactyly types II, IV and VII to develop a clinically weighted outcome assessment system. Items were weighted according to their influence on overall functional and aesthetic outcome in the regression analysis. Active flexion, scar appearance and prominence at amputation site were the main items influencing overall functional and aesthetic outcome (ß = 0.393, ß = 0.326 and ß = 0.288, respectively). Palmar abduction, metacarpophalangeal joint deviation and nail appearance influenced overall functional and aesthetic outcome the least (ß = -0.002, ß = -0.104 and ß = 0.070, respectively). Our proposed assessment system for radial polydactyly reflects the way clinicians value individual aspects of outcome as determinants of overall outcome and helps guide future treatment and evaluation of outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Cost analysis of surgically treated pressure sores stage III and IV.

Health-care costs associated with pressure sores are significant and their financial burden is likely to increase even further. The aim of this study was to analyse the direct medical costs of hospital care for surgical treatment of pressure sores stage III and IV. We performed a retrospective chart study of patients who were surgically treated for stage III and IV pressure sores between 2007 and 2010. Volumes of health-care use were obtained for all patients and direct medical costs were subsequently calculated. In addition, we evaluated the effect of location and number of pressure sores on total costs. A total of 52 cases were identified. Average direct medical costs in hospital were €20,957 for the surgical treatment of pressure sores stage III or IV; average direct medical costs for patients with one pressure sore on an extremity (group 1, n = 5) were €30,286, €10,113 for patients with one pressure sore on the trunk (group 2, n = 32) and €40,882 for patients with multiple pressure sores (group 3, n = 15). The additional costs for patients in group 1 and group 3 compared to group 2 were primarily due to longer hospitalisation. The average direct medical costs for surgical treatment of pressure sores stage III and IV were high. Large differences in costs were related to the location and number of pressure sores. Insight into the distribution of these costs allows identification of high-risk patients and enables the development of specific cost-reducing measures.

Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the hand and wrist account for approximately 20% of patient visits to emergency departments and may impose a large economic burden. The purpose of this study was to estimate the total health-care costs and productivity costs of injuries to the hand and wrist and to compare them with other important injury groups in a nationwide study. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Dutch Injury Surveillance System, from the National Hospital Discharge Registry, and from a patient follow-up survey conducted between 2007 and 2008. Injury incidence, health-care costs, and productivity costs (due to absenteeism) were calculated by age group, sex, and different subgroups of injuries. An incidence-based cost model was used to estimate the health-care costs of injuries. Follow-up data on return to work rates were incorporated into the absenteeism model for estimating the productivity costs. RESULTS: Hand and wrist injuries annually account for $740 million (in U.S. dollars) and rank first in the order of most expensive injury types, before knee and lower limb fractures ($562 million), hip fractures ($532 million), and skull-brain injury ($355 million). Productivity costs contributed more to the total costs of hand and wrist injuries (56%) than did direct health-care costs. Within the overall group of hand and wrist injuries, hand and finger fractures are the most expensive group ($278 million), largely due to high productivity costs in the age group of twenty to sixty-four years ($192 million). CONCLUSIONS: Hand and wrist injuries not only constitute a substantial part of all treated injuries but also represent a considerable economic burden, with both high health-care and productivity costs. Hand and wrist injuries should be a priority area for research in trauma care, and further research could help to reduce the cost of these injuries, both to the health-care system and to society.

Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps.

BACKGROUND: Free flap breast reconstruction (BR) is generally believed to be more expensive than implant BR, but costs were previously shown to level out over time due to complications and re-operations. The aim of this study was to assess the economic implications of four BR techniques: silicone prosthesis (SP), implant preceded by tissue expansion (TE/SP), latissimus dorsi transposition with or without implant (LD ± SP) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. METHODS: A prospective historic cohort study was performed to evaluate intramural medical costs in 427 patients, who had undergone BR between 2002 and 2009. Short- and medium-term complications were incorporated. In addition, 58 patients, who had recently undergone BR, participated in a questionnaire study to prospectively evaluate extramural medical and non-medical costs. Estimates of mean short- and medium-term costs are presented per patient. RESULTS: Intramural medical costs for BR and short-term complications for unilateral DIEP flaps (€ 12,848) and TE/SP reconstructions (€ 12,400) were significantly higher than those for LD ± SP reconstructions (€ 5804), which, in turn, were more expensive than SP reconstructions (€ 4731). In bilateral cases, costs of TE/SP (€ 12,723) and LD ± SP (€ 10,760) reconstructions were comparable, while DIEP flaps (€ 15,747) were significantly more expensive and SP reconstructions were significantly cheaper (€ 6784). Overall, the medium-term costs for complications and additional operations were not significantly different (€ 3017-€ 4503). Extramural medical costs and non-medical costs were approximately € 9300 per stage, regardless of technique. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in short-term costs between techniques did not level out during follow-up and SP reconstructions remained least expensive. Single-stage SP reconstructions, however, are not suitable for all patients due to high complication rates. Definite implant placement is therefore increasingly preceded by tissue expansion at more comparable costs to autologous BR. Incorporation of non-medical costs into the cost analysis would render two-stage procedures more costly than autologous BR. To achieve the optimal result, careful patient selection is critical. Only in select cases where two options are equally applicable, cost comparison becomes a valid argument for treatment selection.

An economic evaluation of the use of TNP on full-thickness wounds.

OBJECTIVE: Topical negative pressure (TNP) (vacuum therapy) is frequently used in the management of acute, traumatic, infected and chronic full-thickness wounds. This prospective clinical randomised trial compared the costs of TNP with conventional therapy (moist gauze) in the management of full-thickness wounds that required surgical closure. METHOD: The direct medical costs of the total number of resources needed to achieve a healthy, granulating wound bed that was 'ready for surgical therapy' were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients admitted to a department of plastic and reconstructive surgery were recruited into the trial. Cost analysis showed significantly higher mean material expenses for wounds treated with TNP (414euros+/-229euros [SD]) compared with conventional therapy (15euros+/-11euros; p<0.0001 ), but significantly lower mean nursing expenses (33euros+/-31 euros and 83euros+/-58euros forTNP and conventional therapy respectively; p<0.0001). Hospitalisation costs were lower in theTNP group (1788euros+/-1060euros) than in the conventional treatment group (2467euros+/-1336euros; p<0.043) due to an on average shorter duration until they were'ready for surgical therapy'. There was no significant difference in total costs per patient between the two therapies (2235euros+/-1301euros for TNP versus 2565euros+/-1384euros for conventional therapy). CONCLUSION: TNP had higher material costs. However, these were compensated by the lower number of time-consuming dressing changes and the shorter duration until they were 'ready for surgical therapy', resulting in the therapy being equally as expensive as conventional moist gauze. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: This work was partly supported by the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Esser Foundation, and KCI Medical, Houten,The Netherlands. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Assessing adolescents and young girls for plastic surgical intervention: pre-surgical appearance ratings and appearance-related burdens as reported by adolescents and young adults, parents and surgeons.

Currently available research on psychological aspects of plastic surgery offers little basis for clinical decision making in the plastic surgeon's assessment of adolescents and young adults applying for surgery. Therefore, the research aims were to study: first, how these adolescents and young adults estimate their appearance as compared to their parents and plastic surgeons to determine the reality of their own appearance perception; second, what appearance-related burdens they experience to determine the urgency of their request for surgery; and third, the surgeons' considerations for the operation. Data were obtained from 184 plastic surgical patients aged 12-22 years (71.2% girls), 172 of their parents and 37 surgeons from 16 hospitals in The Netherlands, using appearance rating scales and to surgeons and parents, and reported substantial appearance-related suffering. There was a moderate to large overlap between the adolescent- and parent-reported burdens. In their assessment, surgeons took psychological and social impediments into consideration. In conclusion, plastic surgeons may rightfully assume that adolescents and young adults have a realistic view of their appearance and that they suffer from significant appearance-related burdens. Parents prove to be an important additional source of information.