Reliability of quantitative sensory testing in the assessment of somatosensory function after high-frequency stimulation-induced sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways.

ABSTRACT: The high frequency stimulation (HFS) model can be used alongside quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess the sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways. However, the validity and between-session reliability of using QST z -score profiles to measure changes in mechanical and thermal afferent pathways in the HFS model are poorly understood. In this study, 32 healthy participants underwent QST before and after HFS (5× 100 Hz trains; 10× electrical detection threshold) in the same heterotopic skin area across 2 repeated sessions. The only mechanical QST z -score profiles that demonstrated a consistent gain of function across repeated test sessions were mechanical pain threshold (MPT) and mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS), which were associated with moderate and good reliability, respectively. There was no relationship between HFS intensity and MPT and MPS z -score profiles. There was no change in low intensity, but a consistent facilitation of high-intensity pin prick stimuli in the mechanical stimulus response function across repeated test sessions. There was no change in cold pain threshold (CPT) and heat pain threshold (HPT) z -score profiles across session 1 and 2, which were associated with moderate and good reliability, respectively. There were inconsistent changes in the sensitivity to innocuous thermal QST parameters, with cool detection threshold (CDT), warm detection threshold (WDT), and thermal sensory limen (TSL) all producing poor reliability. These data suggest that HFS-induced changes in MPS z -score profiles is a reliable way to assess experimentally induced central sensitisation and associated secondary mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy participants.

Quantitative Assessment of Ventriculostomy-Related Hemorrhage: A Volume-Based Classification System to Predict New Neurological Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage is one of the most feared complications following ventriculostomy placement. Current studies have assessed factors associated with increased risk of ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage (VRH). However, the clinical significance of VRH has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To correlate quantitative volumetric measurements of VRH with new neurological symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional database of ventriculostomy patients during the last decade was performed. Patients' demographics and procedural details such as indication, number of passes and position of the catheter were recorded. VRH volume was quantified on noncontrast head computed tomography using the Picture Archiving Communication System (Carestream Vue®, Rochester, New York) semi-automated livewire segmentation tool. Patients with new neurological symptoms within 48 h of VRH were considered symptomatic. Several clinical confounders were ruled out. Logistic regression analyses were performed. The best volumetric cut-offs in predicting symptomatic VRH were determined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3090 patients underwent ventriculostomy procedures and 179 (∼6%) developed VRH. A total of 41 (1.06%) patients with VRH developed new neurological symptoms. Only 12 (0.39%) were attributable to a new VRH. Multivariable logistic regression showed that volume of the hemorrhage (OR 1.17, P = .006) is the only significant predictor of symptomatic VRH. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that VRH volume <1.10 cc has 91.7% sensitivity to rule out symptomatic VRH, whereas a volume >7.59 cc has 95.5% specificity to predict symptomatic VRH. CONCLUSION: Approximately 6% of patients developed postprocedural VRH, but only 0.4% were symptomatic. VRH volumes <1 cc are extremely unlikely to become symptomatic, whereas volumes >7.5 cc may predict development of new neurological deficits.

Predictors of Reduced Opioid Use With Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Opioid Use.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has gained traction as an alternative to chronic opioid therapy in light of the opioid crisis. Prior reports vary widely in their estimates of its effect on opioid consumption. We therefore aimed to address the following questions: 1) Does chronic opioid use change after SCS? 2) Which patient characteristics predict reduced opioid consumption after SCS? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Claims from a private health insurance company were used to identify patients with SCS implantation from 2003 to 2014. We required 12 months of continuous data before and after surgery (i.e., a minimum total observation period of two years), and at least two opioid prescription fills in the six months before surgery. Daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) was calculated from prescription medication claims. Diagnosis codes identified common comorbidities. RESULTS: Hundred forty-five patients met inclusion criteria. MED of 65 was the most statistically meaningful preoperative dose threshold. Approximately half of patients decreased opioid use >20% after SCS implantation. Logistic regression analysis revealed age (p = 0.0362), gender (p = 0.0076), and preoperative daily MED < 65 (p = 0.0322) as predictors of meaningful reduction, which was defined as a 20% reduction in MED. CONCLUSIONS: With only half of chronic opioid users demonstrating meaningful opioid reduction after SCS implantation, we demonstrate that current SCS technology does not reliably help a larger number of patients reduce opioid usage. Women, older age, and preoperative MED < 65 are predictive of meaningful opioid reduction but only one of these is modifiable. As not all patients saw benefit from their therapies, there is still much room for improvement in the treatment of refractory chronic pain that is associated with failed back surgery syndrome and chronic regional pain syndrome.

Contemporary Approaches to Preventing and Treating Infections of Novel Intrathecal Neurostimulation Devices.

INTRODUCTION: Contemporary approaches to surgical site infections have evolved significantly over the last several decades in response to the economic pressures of soaring health care costs and increasing patient expectations of safety. Neurosurgeons face multiple unique challenges when striving to avoid as well as manage surgical implant infections. The tissue compartment, organ system, or joint is characterized by biological factors and physical forces that may not be universally relevant. Such implants, once rare, are now routine. Although the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of surgical site infections involving neural implants has advanced, guidelines are ever changing, and the incidence still exceeds acceptable levels. We assess the impact of these factors on a new class of implantable neuromodulation devices. METHODS: The available evidence along with practice patterns were examined and organized to establish relevant groupings for continuing evaluation and to propose justifiable recommendations for the treatment of infections that might arise in the case of intradural spinal cord stimulators. RESULTS: Few studies in the modern era have systematically evaluated preventive behaviors that were applied to intradural neural implants alone. We anticipate that future efforts will focus even more on the investigation of modifiable factors along a continuum from bacterially repellant implants to weight management. Early diagnosis could offer the best hope for device salvage but to date has been largely understudied. CONCLUSIONS: Historically, prevention is the cornerstone to infection mitigation. However, immediate diagnosis and hardware salvage have not received the attention deserved, and that approach may be especially important for intradural devices.

Cost-utility and biological underpinnings of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) versus a psychoeducational programme (FibroQoL) for fibromyalgia: a 12-month randomised controlled trial (EUDAIMON study).

BACKGROUND: The EUDAIMON study focuses on fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), a prevalent chronic condition characterized by pain, fatigue, cognitive problems and distress. According to recent reviews and meta-analyses, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a promising therapeutic approach for patients with FMS. The measurement of biomarkers as part of the analysis of MBSR effects would help to identify the neurobiological underpinnings of MBSR and increase our knowledge of FMS pathophysiology. The main objectives of this 12-month RCT are: firstly, to examine the effectiveness and cost-utility for FMS patients of MBSR as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU + the psychoeducational programme FibroQoL, and versus TAU only; secondly, to examine pre-post differences in brain structure and function, as well as levels of specific inflammatory markers in the three study arms and; thirdly, to analyse the role of some psychological variables as mediators of 12-month clinical outcomes. METHODS: Effectiveness, cost-utility, and neurobiological analyses performed alongside a 12-month RCT. The participants will be 180 adult patients with FMS recruited at the Sant Joan de Déu hospital (St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain), randomly allocated to one of the three study arms: TAU + MBSR vs. TAU + FibroQol vs. TAU. A comprehensive assessment to collect functional, quality of life, distress, costs, and psychological variables will be conducted pre-, post-intervention, and at 12-month post-intervention. Fifty per cent of study participants will be evaluated at pre- and post-treatment using Voxel-Based Morphometry, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, pseudo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling, and resting state fMRI. A cytokine multiplex kit of high-sensitivity will be applied (cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 + high-sensitivity CRP test). DISCUSSION: The findings obtained from this RCT will indicate whether MBSR is potentially cost-effective for FMS and contribute to knowledge of any brain and inflammatory changes associated with MBSR in FMS patients. Specifically, we will determine whether there are morphometric and functional changes associated with participation in MBSR in brain regions related to meta-awareness, body awareness, memory consolidation-reconsolidation, emotion regulation and in networks postulated to underpin the sensory-discriminative, cognitive-evaluative and affective-motivational aspects of the pain experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02561416 . Registered 23 September 2015.