Physiological responses, trunk posture, and work pace in commercial building cleaning in Washington State: An observational field study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate whether work pace is a critical indicator for predicting a janitor's risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). METHOD: Field measurements were obtained from commercial building janitors as well as the determination of work pace. Physiological responses collected were heart rate, energy expenditure (calories), activity level (METs), steps, trunk posture. Data were obtained using direct measurements, along with a time study, which was performed by shadowing 13 janitors in Washington State. The measured values were summarized descriptively, and five of the most common janitorial tasks were compared. The relationships between work pace and the physiological response variables were determined by calculating the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The highest average percent heart rate reserve (47.4%) was reported during restroom cleaning, while the highest activity and energy expenditure levels (3.6 METs and 217.1 calories/h) were reported for mopping. The top 90% of trunk flexion angles and the highest percentage of time in trunk flexion from 20° to 60° were recorded during restroom cleaning. Restroom cleaning showed the highest correlation between all the physiological response variables and work pace. In most of the tasks, a high work pace may have increased the degree and duration of severe trunk flexion. CONCLUSION: Overall, when several tasks were considered, the extent of physiological responses, trunk joint angles, and exposure time to awkward postures tended to increase with an increase in work pace. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This study showed the feasibility of using the work pace measured from time studies as a predictive indicator of WMSDs risks. Using this information, managers may compose a schedule that can minimize WMSDs risks while considering actual work pace deviations that may impact a janitor's ability to complete assigned tasks properly within a shift.

Bringing a structural perspective to work: Framing occupational safety and health disparities for nursing assistants with work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

BACKGROUND: Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) experience a high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and are further made vulnerable by their situation in low levels of workplace and societal hierarchies of power and privilege. OBJECTIVE: This study applies structural vulnerability theory to CNA WMSD experiences in order to identify structural factors that may influence such injuries. METHODS: A sample of CNAs (n = 26) working in Nursing and Residential Care Facilities (NRCFs) was selected from workers who filed a claim during 2011-2014 for a WMSD of the back, shoulder, knee, or hand/wrist in the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries workers' compensation system. Interviews included questions about workers' injury experiences and work contexts. Qualitative data was analyzed for themes related to structural vulnerability theory and occupational safety and health (OSH) models. RESULTS: Themes illustrate a work environment in NRCFs with major organizational deficiencies for CNA safety and a broader structural environment that appears to mediate them. CNAs described policies and practices that result from management priorities being diverted away from worker safety. These difficulties are compounded by several aspects of CNAs' socio-economic vulnerability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of a structural perspective for OSH disparities research and points to the need for occupational health intervention on a structural level.

An analysis of injuries among home health care workers using the Washington state workers' compensation claims database.

An examination of the Washington State workers' compensation claims for home health care workers was conducted. Some comparisons were made with nursing homes, acute care hospitals, and all other industries in the state. Between 1998 and 2007, the average claims rate for home health care workers was 1,375 claims/10,000 full-time equivalents (FTEs) compared to 862 claims/10,000 FTEs for all other industries. The proportion of home health care workers' injuries resulting from interactions with another person (89.6%) was comparable to those for nursing homes and hospitals. Although this industry has important economic and social value, risks are poorly characterized. Continued research is necessary.

Assessment of perceived injury risks and priorities among truck drivers and trucking companies in Washington State.

PROBLEM: The trucking industry experiences one of the highest work-related injury rates. Little work has been conducted previously in the United States to assess the hazards, needs, and injury prevention priorities in trucking. METHOD: Two separate industry-wide surveys of 359 trucking companies and 397 commercial truck drivers were conducted in Washington State. RESULTS: Trucking companies and drivers both ranked musculoskeletal and slip, trip, fall injuries as the top two priorities. Controlling heavy lifting, using appropriate equipment, and addressing slippery surfaces were frequently listed as solutions. There appears to be a gap in safety climate perception between workers and employers. However, driver and company priorities agreed with industry workers' compensation claims. There is room for safety program management improvement in the industry. The study findings detail opportunities for prioritizing and reducing injuries. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: This information can be used to focus and design interventions for the prevention of work-related injuries while improving industry competitiveness.

Reliability and validity assessment of the hand activity level threshold limit value and strain index using expert ratings of mono-task jobs.

This study evaluated two subjective assessment methods for physical work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) risk factors. A total of 567 participants from 12 companies in the manufacturing and health care industries were evaluated using the hand activity level (HAL) threshold limit value (TLV) and the Strain Index. Inter-rater reliability comparisons were performed on 125 selected cyclic tasks, with one novice and three experienced raters. Predictive validity was assessed by evaluation of relationships between measured exposure parameters and diagnosed WMSDs of the hand/wrist and elbow. HAL hand repetition ratings had a Spearman r value of 0.65 and a kappa value of 0.44 between raters. Subjective force (0-10 scale) estimates had a Spearman r = 0.28 and were not significantly different between raters (p > .05). The rating comparison for the four subjective components of the Strain Index had Spearman r correlations of 0.37-0.62 and kappa values of 0.25-0.44. The Strain Index and HAL TLV agreed on exposure categorization 56% of the time. Logistic regression showed, after adjustment for age, gender, and body mass index, that higher peak hand force estimates (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.27), most common force estimates (OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.28), hand/wrist posture rating (OR 1.71, CI 1.15-2.56), and Strain Index scores >/= 7 (OR 1.82, CI 1.04-3.18) were associated with distal upper extremity disorders in the dominant hand. HAL repetition ratings >/= 4 (OR 2.81, CI 1.40-5.62) and hand/wrist posture ratings (OR 1.59, CI 1.01-2.49) were associated with disorders in the nondominant hand. These findings show moderate to good inter-rater agreement and significant relationships to health outcomes for the identified measures.