RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The (ECOG) performance status (PS) is commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients undergoing antitumor therapy. An ECOG PS of 2, indicating patients capable of self-care but restricted strenuous activity, can complicate treatment decisions owing to concerns regarding treatment-related toxicity. We investigated whether frailty assessment could help discriminate treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with an ECOG PS of 2. METHODS: We prospectively included 45 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, with an ECOG PS of 2, and newly diagnosed solid cancer scheduled for chemotherapy. Frailty was assessed using an eight-indicator geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) based on frailty status; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance and toxicity. RESULTS: The median patient age was 73 years (range 65-94), and 71% had stage IV disease. Predominant frailty-related deficits were functional decline (96%), malnutrition (78%), and polypharmacy (51%). The median OS was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-18.4). Patients with 4-6 deficits had significantly lower OS than those with 1-3 deficits (9.9 months vs. 20.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI: 1.16-5.44, P = .020). Frailty significantly correlated with reduced 12-week chemotherapy competence (52% vs. 85%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] .14, 95% CI: .03-.70, P = .016) and enhanced risk of unexpected hospitalization (60% vs. 20%, adjusted OR 6.80, 95% CI: 1.64-28.1, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of patients with an ECOG PS of 2 and emphasize the importance of frailty assessment for treatment outcomes.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Frailty assessment is often overlooked in non-elderly patients with cancer, possibly due to the lack of an effective frailty screening tool. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of two modern frailty screening tools, the Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST) and the modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5), compared to the gold standard comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA) among non-elderly patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: We prospectively included 354 consecutive patients aged < 65 years with newly diagnosed HNC scheduled for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) at three academic hospitals in Taiwan between January 2020 and December 2022. Frailty assessment using the GA, fTRST, and mFI-5 was performed in all patients to evaluate the relationship between frailty and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of frailty was 27.1%, 37.0%, and 42.4% based on GA, mFI-5, and fTRST, respectively. mFI-5 and fTRST demonstrated good predictive value in identifying frail patients compared to the GA. Patients with frailty, as defined by GA, mFI-5, and fTRST, exhibited higher risks of treatment-related complications, incomplete treatment, and poorer baseline quality of life (QoL). However, only GA showed significant prognostic value for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment using fTRST and mFI-5 is valuable for predicting treatment-related adverse events, treatment tolerance, and QoL in non-elderly patients with HNC. Incorporating frailty assessment into the management of non-elderly cancer patients can aid in the identification of high-risk individuals. However, the performance of these tools varies, highlighting the need for further validation and refinement.