Is the rating result reliable? A new approach to respond to a medical trainee's concerns about the reliability of Mini-CEX assessment.

PURPOSE: Whether the rating result of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) for rating clinical skills is reliable is of a medical trainee's great concerns. The objectives of this study were to analyze the test-retest reliability, interrater reliability and internal consistency reliability of Mini-CEX. METHODS: Three clinical scenarios, each played by a standardized patient and resident, were developed and videotaped. A group of assessors were recruited to rate the resident's clinical skills using Mini-CEX with a nine-point grading scale in each videotaped clinical scenario. Each assessor was required: (1) to watch the videotaped clinical scenarios a sequential order; (2) to rate each medical trainee's clinical skills in each clinical scenario for two rating sessions, and there must be a minimum three-week interval between the first and the second Mini-CEX rating session. RESULTS: A total of 38 assessors participated in this study. This study showed that: (1) an assessor carried out similar rating reuslts under the same clinical performance based on an acceptable test-retest reliability (Pearson's correlation coefficients = 0.24-0.76, P value=<0.01-0.14); (2) assessors gave similar rating results to a medical trainee's clinical performance based on a good interrater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.57-0.83, P value=<0.01-0.03); and (3) the items reflected unidimensionally a construct-a medical trainee's clinical skills based on an excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92-0.97). CONCLUSION: This study convincingly showed that Mini-CEX is a reliable assessment tool for rating clinical skills, and can be widely used to assess medical trainees' clinical skills.

Decreasing rate of biliary atresia in Taiwan: a survey, 2004-2009.

OBJECTIVES: The pathogenesis of biliary atresia (BA) is unclear, but epidemiological studies may help to elucidate possible causes. The goals of this study were to identify BA incidence changes in Taiwan in 2004-2009 and to survey the factors that might influence incidence changes to elucidate the possible causes of BA. METHODS: A Taiwan national registry system for BA has been established since 2004. By using data from the national registry system for BA, we identified BA incidence changes in 2004-2009. We also evaluated the correlations between BA incidences and estimated rotavirus vaccine coverage rates and between BA incidences and the gross domestic product. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients with BA were identified in 2004-2009 in Taiwan, whereas the number of live births was 1 221 189. Compared with the incidence of BA in 2004-2006 (1.79 cases per 10,000 live births), the incidence of BA in 2007-2009 (1.23 cases per 10,000 live births) was decreased significantly (P = .01). BA incidences were negatively correlated with the gross domestic product (P = .02) and marginally negatively correlated with rotavirus vaccine coverage rates (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in BA incidence in Taiwan since 2007 has been noted and may be related to improvements in the general socioeconomic status and the popularity of rotavirus vaccination. Although more evidence is needed to establish a direct correlation, this phenomenon may shed light on possible causes of and preventive interventions for BA.