Comparison between COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores for evaluation of clinical symptoms, comorbidities and medical resources utilization in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: The 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) proposed a new severity assessment system for emphasizing clinical symptom evaluation by COPD Assessment Test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two scoring systems in evaluating COPD patients. METHODS: A population based cross-sectional study employing computer-assisted telephone interviewing system (CATI) for surveying the epidemiology of COPD in Taiwan. Among 6600 subjects recruited (age > 40), 404 subjects (6.1%) were diagnosed as COPD. The comorbidities, COPD-related symptoms, health care resources utilization were compared between CAT and mMRC. RESULTS: There were significant differences in all co-morbidities, symptom severity in favor of CAT as compared to mMRC. When comparing health care resources utilization, CAT and mMRC have equal effectiveness in evaluating patients with regular medical treatment. There were significant differences in emergency room visit and hospitalization in favor of mMRC. However, CAT was more effective in evaluating patients with ICU admission (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Compared with CAT and mMRC, there are individual benefits in the evaluation of clinical symptoms, co-morbidities and medical resources utilization for ER, hospitalization and ICU admission in COPD patients.

COPD in Taiwan: a National Epidemiology Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of COPD in Taiwan and to document the disease characteristics and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a random cross-sectional national survey of adults older than 40 years in Taiwan. Respiratory health screening questions identified subjects with diagnosed COPD or whose reported symptoms also fulfilled an epidemiological case definition; these were eligible to complete the survey, which also included indices of symptom severity and disability and questions on comorbidities, medical treatments, smoking habits, and occupations potentially harmful to respiratory health. Subjects with diagnosed COPD were subdivided by smoking status. Subjects who fulfilled the case definition of COPD and smoked were designated as "possible COPD". Participants who did not fit the case definition of COPD were asked only about their personal circumstances and smoking habits. Data from these groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Of the 6,600 participants who completed the survey, 404 (6.1%) fulfilled the epidemiological case definition of COPD: 137 with diagnosed COPD and 267 possible COPD. The most common comorbidities of COPD were hypertension or cardiovascular diseases (36.1%). Subjects with definite COPD had significantly higher COPD Assessment Test scores than the possible COPD group (14.6±8.32 vs 12.6±6.49, P=0.01) and significantly more comorbid illnesses (P=0.01). The main risk factors contributing to health care utilization in each COPD cohort were higher COPD Assessment Test scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.26), higher modified Medical Research Council Breathlessness Scale scores (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.11-3.51), and having more than one comorbidity (OR 5.19, 95% CI 1.05-25.61). CONCLUSION: With estimated prevalence of 6.1% in the general population, COPD in Taiwan has been underdiagnosed. Symptoms and comorbidities were independent risk factors for health care utilization in subjects with definite or possible COPD. There is an urgent need to raise awareness of the importance of early evaluation and prompt treatment for subjects with chronic airway symptoms.