Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(3): 1726-1738, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35079880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography has been introduced for lymphatic mapping in gastric cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ICGFL in lymph node dissection during minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure was performed from the inception to January 2021 for all studies comparing ICGFL with non-ICGFL in GC patients undergoing minimal access gastrectomy. The primary outcome was the total number of harvested lymph nodes. The secondary endpoints were the number of metastatic LNs, operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications. The registration number of this protocol is PROSPERO CRD42020203443. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies including 1882 participants were included. In this meta-analysis, the use of ICGFL was associated with a higher number of harvested LNs (40.33 vs. 33.40; MD = 6.93; 95%CI: 4.28 to 9.58; P < 0.0001; I2 = 86%). No significant difference was found between the ICGFL and control groups in terms of metastatic LNs (2.63 vs. 2.42; MD = 0.21; 95%CI: -0.46 to 0.87; P = 0.54; I2 = 0%). In addition, the use of ICGFL could be safely performed without increasing the operative time (P = 0.49), estimated blood loss (P = 0.26) and postoperative complications (P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: The use of ICGFL may be a useful tool facilitating complete lymph node dissection during minimally invasive GC resection. However, more high-quality RCTs with large sample size are needed to validate this issue.


Assuntos
Verde de Indocianina , Neoplasias Gástricas , Fluorescência , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfografia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia
2.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 61(131): 683-8, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26176057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate a proper preoperative assessment and management of preoperative cardiac, pulmonary and digestive comorbidities in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODOLOGY: A general description of comorbidities in bariatric patients was reviewed and a clinical practice path in assessment and management of comorbidities was summarized. RESULTS: Morbidly obese patients frequently carried serious comorbidities in cardiovascular, pulmonary and digestive systems. The most common abnormalities included hypertension, left ventricular wall hypertrophy, ST and T wave abnormalities, obstructive sleep apnea, ventilatory dysfunction, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. A routine specialized preoperative evaluation could find the potential abnormality and screen the appropriate patients. Prophylactic treatments obviously reduced the morbidity of peri-operative complications CONCLUSION: Comprehensive preoperative evaluation and proper management is essential to appropriately select and prepare bariatric patients, and minimize surgical risk.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/terapia , Pneumopatias/terapia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Clínicos , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/epidemiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/diagnóstico , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 59(118): 1784-8, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22282038

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate short-term versus long-term single prophylactic antibiotic for elective gastric tumor surgery. METHODOLOGY: Patients in a single surgical team undergoing elective gastric tumor surgery were enrolled from November 2009 to December 2010. The included patients were aged from 18 to 70 years without conditions as severe comorbidity, preoperative infectious diseases, antibiotic administration 48 h before surgery, exploratory laparotomy only or combined colorectal resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or steroid administration before surgery. The overall and infection-related postoperative complications and also economic outcomes were analyzed. The software SPSS 17.0 and TreeAge Pro 2007 were used for statistics. RESULTS: Patients (n=158 (45 vs. 113)) were enrolled in short-term and long-term groups. No death cases occurred. Overall postoperative complication rates were 8.9% and 8.0%, respectively (p=1.000). The rates of infection related complications were 8.9% and 4.4%, respectively (p=0.231). No surgical site infection (SSI) occurred in the short-term group, whereas SSI was 1.8% in the long-term group. Total hospitalization cost (THC) of short-term branch was 36,557RMB per patients and preferable against 39,523RMB of long-term branch. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed there was a 10 times interval between the extra healthcare expenditure of benefit and harm. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term administration did not increase the risk of postoperative complications and was more cost-effective.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Gastrectomia , Derivação Gástrica , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , China , Análise Custo-Benefício , Esquema de Medicação , Custos de Medicamentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/economia , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
World J Gastroenterol ; 14(17): 2715-22, 2008 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18461656

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the economics of various chemotherapeutic regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and to select the best cost-effective regimen for the common Chinese patients. METHODS: Data source used in this study was the Chinese Biomedical Disk Database. Patients were diagnosed as AGC and any regimen was eligible. Outcome measures included median survival time (MST) and percentage of complete and partial response (CR+PR). Economic statistics was per capita direct medical cost (DMC) of a single cycle. TreeAge Pro Healthcare 2007 software was used to carry out cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. Sensitivity analyses were applied by altering willingness-to-pay and annual discount rate, and also re-analyzed by excluding the studies with apparent heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven retrospective economics studies on 760 patients were included. 5-fluorouracil-based regimens were universal, and also some new agents were involved, such as docetaxel, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin. By processing analysis, we could recommend etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) regimen as preference, with a DMC/MST ratio of 2543 RBM/11.7 mo and a DMC/CR+PR ratio of 2543 RMB/53.3%. Uracil-tegafur, etoposide and cisplatin (FEP) or 5-fluorouracil, adrimycin/epirubin and mitomycin (FAM) regimens could be regarded as optional first-line chemotherapy for AGC in common Chinese patients. With no regard for willingness-to-pay, the docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen could be chosen as either a first- or a second-line chemotherapy, with a DMC/CR+PR ratio of 9979 RMB/56.3%. CONCLUSION: 5-fluorouracial regimens are still considered the mainstream for AGC, while new agents such as taxanes are optional. More randomized clinical trials are required before any mandatory recommendation of certain regimens for patients with AGC in China is made.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/economia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , China , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/economia , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA