Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel as a second-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China and the United States.

Background: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is the first Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Immunotherapy (CAR-T) product approved in China for treating adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after receiving second-line or above systemic therapy. However, it cannot be widely used in clinical practice due to its high price. Objectives: To evaluate the economic value of Axi-cel fully in countries at different stages of economic development, this article, from the perspective of the medical and health system in China and the United States, evaluated the cost-effectiveness of Axi-cel in the second-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Design: Cost effectiveness analysis of Axi-cel in the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Methods: Based on the clinical trial data of ZUMA-7, a short-term decision tree and a long-term semi-Markov partitioned survival model were constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the two strategies. This model was cycled for 40 years in 1-month cycles. In this article, only direct medical costs were considered. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the base-case results. Results: In the baseline cost-effectiveness analysis, Axi-cel was associated with more quality-adjusted life year (QALY; 2.72 versus 1.46) and greater costs overall ($180,501.55 versus $123,221.34) than standard second-line chemotherapy in China. Moreover, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the Axi-cel group was $45,726.66/QALY, which was greater than the threshold of $37,654.5. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the price of Axi-cel must be reduced appropriately. In the United States, Axi-cel was associated with more QALYs (2.63 versus 1.74) and greater costs overall ($415,915.16 versus $289,564.34). The ICER for the Axi-cel was $142,326.94/QALY, below the set threshold of $150,000. Conclusion: Axi-cel is not a cost-effective option as second-line therapy for treating DLBCL in China. However, In the United States, Axi-cel has shown a cost-effectiveness advantage as a second-line treatment for DLBCL.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs. salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China.

PURPOSE: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-Cel, 2 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg, single intravenous injection) is a chimeric antigen receptor cell immunotherapy that exhibits favorable clinical efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, this treatment is expensive in China. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Axi-Cel versus salvage chemotherapy for the treatment of R/R DLBCL from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. METHODS: A decision analysis model containing a short-term decision tree and long-term semi-Markov partitioned survival model was developed. The time horizon was 40 years and the period from 10 to 40 years was included in sensitivity analysis. The model was developed based on data from the ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 trials. Life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), overall costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of US $31,320 per QALY, which is three times the gross domestic product per capita. RESULTS: The base case analysis revealed that treatment with Axi-Cel is associated with an increased overall cost of US $175,380 and improved effectiveness of 3.43 LYs and 2.61 QALYs compared to salvage chemotherapy, leading to an ICER of US $51,190 per LY and US $67,250 per QALY. The developed model is sensitive to the discount rate, utility of progression-free survival (PFS), and cost of Axi-Cel. The ICER of Axi-Cel was greater than the WTP threshold in the sensitivity and scenario analyses. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the price of Axi-Cel must be reduced by 59.19% to US $71,000. CONCLUSION: At its current price, Axi-Cel is not likely to be a cost-effective option compared to salvage chemotherapy for adult patients with R/R DLBCL.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in newly diagnosed older myeloma patients: a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a disease of the older people, whose prognoses are highly heterogeneous. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) proposed a geriatric assessment (GA) based on age, functional status and comorbidities to discriminate between fit and frail patients. Given the multidimensional nature of frailty and the relatively recent exploration of frailty in the field of MM, reaching a consensus on the measurement of frailty in MM patients remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the feasibility of performing a comprehensive GA (CGA) in older MM patients in a real-world and multicentre setting and to evaluate their baseline CGA profiles. RESULTS: We studied 349 older patients with newly diagnosed MM (age range, 65-86 years). Our results showed that a CGA is feasible for older MM patients. Using the IMWG-GA criteria, we identified significantly more frail patients in our cohort comparing to in the IMWG cohort (43% vs 30%, P = 0.002). In the IMWG-GA 'fit' group, risk of malnutrition, depression and cognitive impairment remains. The median follow-up time was 26 months (range 1-38). The median overall survival (OS) was 34.7 months, and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 50%. A high MNA-SF score (MNA-SF ≥ 12), low GDS score (GDS ≤ 5) and high CCI score (CCI ≥ 2) can be used to predict the OS of older patients with newly diagnosed MM. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03122327). CONCLUSIONS: Our study justifies the need for a CGA in older patients with newly diagnosed MM.

Real-world assessment of the effectiveness of posaconazole for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in hematological patients: A retrospective observational study.

ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to analyze the efficacy of posaconazole for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with hematological malignancies.In this retrospective observational multi-center study, 762 patients from 25 Chinese hematological centers were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were patients with hematological malignancy or they had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and received at least 1 dose of posaconazole. The primary endpoints were the observation of breakthrough rates and the clinical efficacy of posaconazole prophylaxis. The secondary endpoint was the efficacy of posaconazole for the treatment of IFDs.Of the 762 enrolled patients, 456 (59.8%) were prescribed posaconazole prophylactically while 243 (31.9%) received posaconazole as an IFD treatment (12 proven, 61 probable, 109 possible, and 61 unclassified IFD cases) for ≥7 days. The overall IFD breakthrough rate (probable cases) for the ≥4 days prophylactic treatment (n = 445) group was 1.6% (95% Cl: 0.6%-3.2%), with breakthrough rates of 2.6% for acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients undergoing chemotherapy and 2.2% for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. For primary antifungal prophylaxis, the breakthrough rate was 1.9% and for secondary antifungal prophylaxis 0%. The overall effective IFD remission rate of patients treated for ≥7 days with posaconazole was 56.0% and the effective remission rate of proven/probable/possible IFD cases was 59.3%. The effective remission rate of posaconazole as salvage therapy was 50% (95% CI: 32.4%-67.6%) including 75% (CI: 19.4%-99.4%) for Aspergillus infections.The present retrospective study confirmed posaconazole as IFD prophylaxis and medication for hematological malignancy patients undergoing various treatments in China.

Clinical risk score for predicting invasive fungal disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Analysis of the China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Hematological Diseases (CAESAR) study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is associated with a high mortality for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study aimed not only to develop a proven/probable IFD risk-scoring model but to identify high-risk populations that would benefit from anti-fungal prophylaxis. METHODS: Data from the China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Hematological Diseases (CAESAR) study were retrieved, and all patients (n = 1053) undergoing allo-HSCT were randomly divided into the training set (n = 685) for model development and the validation set (n = 368) for model verification. A weighted risk score for proven or probable IFD was established through multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 28.95 years and the majority underwent myeloablative transplantation in complete remission 1 (53.4%). Five risk factors of IFD were identified, namely neutropenia lasting longer than 14 days, corticosteroid use, diabetes, haploidentical donor, and unrelated donor. Based on the risk score for IFD, the patients were categorized into three groups: low risk (score 0-4, 1.5%-4.0%), intermediate risk (score 5-8, 9.8%), and high risk (score>8, 24.7%-14.0%). Anti-fungal prophylaxis may provide benefits for patients with intermediate (8.5% vs. 18.5%, P = .0085) or high risk (19.4% vs. 30.8%, P = .4651) but not low risk (2.1% vs. 3.8%, P = .6136) of IFD. CONCLUSION: A practical weighted risk score for IFD in patients receiving allo-HSCT was established, which can aid decision-making regarding the administration of anti-fungal prophylaxis.

Fluconazole is as effective as other anti-mold agents in preventing early invasive fungal disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: assessment of antifungal therapy in haematological disease in China.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of mold-active antifungal drugs has led clinicians to reconsider the use of fluconazole for preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this study of recipients of allo-HSCT, we evaluated the effects of different antifungal prophylaxes on the incidence of IFD at different times after transplantation. METHODS: Among the 1,401 patients registered in the prospective China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Haematological Disease (CAESAR) study database, there were 661 eligible patients who received primary antifungal prophylaxis. The incidence of IFD at different times after transplantation (early, late, and very late) and overall survival were compared for patients who received different drugs. RESULTS: The overall incidence of probable IFD was 7.0% in the fluconazole group, 12.6% in the itraconazole group, 1.4% in the voriconazole group, and 5.2% in the micafungin group (P=0.0379). However, the four groups had no significant differences in early, late, or very late IFD. The risk factors associated with IFD were neutropenia for more than 14 days, age greater than 18 years, and receipt of transplantation from an alternative (unrelated and haploidentical) donor (P<0.05). Sub-group analysis of alternative donors indicated that the efficacy of fluconazole was similar to the other three drugs in preventing early IFD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the efficacy of fluconazole is similar to that of mold-active drugs in preventing early IFD in HSCT patients, even in high-risk patients receiving transplantation from alternative donors. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Clinical risk score for invasive fungal diseases in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy: China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Hematological Diseases (CAESAR) study.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a major infectious complication in patients with hematological malignancies. In this study, we examined 4889 courses of chemotherapy in patients with hematological diseases to establish a training dataset (n = 3500) by simple random sampling to develop a weighted risk score for proven or probable IFD through multivariate regression, which included the following variables: male patients, induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed or relapsed disease, neutropenia, neutropenia longer than 10 days, hypoalbuminemia, central-venous catheter, and history of IFD. The patients were classified into three groups, which had low (0-10, ~1.2%), intermediate (11-15, 6.4%), and high risk ( > 15, 17.5%) of IFD. In the validation set (n = 1389), the IFD incidences of the groups were ~1.4%, 5.0%, and 21.4%. In addition, we demonstrated that antifungal prophylaxis offered no benefits in low-risk patients, whereas benefits were documented in intermediate (2.1% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.007) and high-risk patients (8.4% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.007). To make the risk score applicable for clinical settings, a pre-chemo risk score that deleted all unpredictable factors before chemotherapy was established, and it confirmed that anti-fungal prophylaxis was beneficial in patients with intermediate and high risk of IFD. In conclusion, an objective, weighted risk score for IFD was developed, and it may be useful in guiding antifungal prophylaxis.