Risk-standardized sepsis mortality map of the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the United States (US). Quality improvement initiatives for improving sepsis care depend on accurate estimates of sepsis mortality. While hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates have been published for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia, risk-standardized mortality rates for sepsis have not been well characterized. We aimed to construct a sepsis risk-standardized mortality rate map for the United States, to illustrate disparities in sepsis care across the country. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adults from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample who were hospitalized with sepsis between 1 January 2010 and 30 December 2011. Hospital-level risk-standardized mortality rates were calculated using hierarchical logistic modelling, and were risk-adjusted with predicted mortality derived from (1) the Sepsis Risk Prediction Score, a logistic regression model, and (2) gradient-boosted decision trees, a supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm. RESULTS: Among 1,739,033 adults hospitalized with sepsis, 50% were female, and the median age was 71 years (interquartile range: 58-81). The national median risk-standardized mortality rate for sepsis was 18.4% (interquartile range: 17.0, 21.0) by the boosted tree model, which had better discrimination than the Sepsis Risk Prediction Score model (C-statistic 0.87 and 0.78, respectively). The highest risk-standardized mortality rates were found in Wyoming, North Dakota, and Mississippi, while the lowest were found in Arizona, Colorado, and Michigan. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation exists in sepsis risk-standardized mortality rates across states, representing opportunities for improvement in sepsis care. This represents the first map of state-level variation of risk-standardized mortality rates in sepsis.

Dietary Sodium Intake and Sodium Density in the United States: Estimates From NHANES 2005-2006 and 2015-2016.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, current guidelines recommend a total sodium intake <2,300 mg/day, a guideline which does not consider kilocalorie intake. However, kilocalorie intake varies substantially by age and sex. We hypothesized that compared with sodium density, total sodium intake overestimates adherence to sodium recommendations, especially in adults consuming fewer kilocalories. METHODS: In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we estimated the prevalence of adherence to sodium intake recommendations (<2,300 mg/day) and corresponding sodium density intake (<1.1 mg/kcal = 2,300 mg at 2,100 kcal) by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and kilocalorie level. Adherence estimates were compared between the 2005-2006 (n = 5,060) and 2015-2016 (n = 5,266) survey periods. RESULTS: In 2005-2006, 23.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.5, 24.9) of the US population consumed <2,300 mg of sodium/day, but only 8.5% (CI: 7.6, 9.4) consumed <1.1 mg/kcal in sodium density. In 2015-2016, these figures were 20.9% (CI: 18.8, 23.2) and 5.1% (CI: 4.4, 6.0), respectively. In 2015-2016, compared with 2005-2006, adherence by sodium density decreased more substantially (odds ratio = 0.59; CI: 0.48, 0.72; P < 0.001) than adherence by total sodium consumption (odds ratio = 0.85; CI: 0.73, 0.98; P = 0.03). The difference in adherence between total sodium and sodium density goals was greater among those with lower kilocalorie intake, namely, older adults, women, and Hispanic adults. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence estimated by sodium density is substantially less than adherence estimated by total sodium intake, especially among persons with lower kilocalorie intake. Further efforts to achieve population-wide reduction in sodium density intake are urgently needed.