Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Environ Manage ; 326(Pt A): 116679, 2023 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36403320

RESUMO

Despite significant drop in pollinator abundance, no studies exist on the benefits and costs of pollinator conservation in the public domain. An in-person survey was conducted at three large, public US universities to estimate benefits to become Bee Campus USA certified. We test whether different types of reminders on existing student sustainability fees affect Willingness to Pay. Costs of achieving this certification per university were obtained. Net Present Value demonstrates that the net benefits to each school are largely positive, except under the most restrictive assumption. Information reminders of existing fees lead to little change in support of pollinator conservation.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos , Certificação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Animais , Abelhas , Certificação/economia , Setor Público , Universidades/economia , Criação de Animais Domésticos/economia , Criação de Animais Domésticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Polinização
2.
J Rural Health ; 31(1): 7-18, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25040781

RESUMO

CONTEXT: As today's rural hospitals have struggled with financial sustainability for the past 2 decades, it is critical to understand their value relative to alternatives, such as rural health clinics and private practices. PURPOSE: To estimate the willingness-to-pay for specific attributes of rural health care facilities in rural Kentucky to determine which services and operational characteristics are most valued by rural residents. METHODOLOGY: We fitted choice experiment data from 769 respondents in 10 rural Kentucky counties to a conditional logit model and used the results to estimate willingness-to-pay for attributes in several categories, including hours open, types of insurance accepted, and availability of health care professionals and specialized care. FINDINGS: Acceptance of Medicaid/Medicare with use of a sliding fee scale versus acceptance of only private insurance was the most valued attribute. Presence of full diagnostic services, an emergency room, and 24-hour/7-day-per-week access were also highly valued. Conversely, the presence of specialized care, such as physical therapy, cancer care, or dialysis, was not valued. In total, respondents were willing to pay $225 more annually to support a hospital relative to a rural health clinic. CONCLUSION: Rural Kentuckians value the services, convenience, and security that rural hospitals offer, though they are not willing to pay more for specialized care that may be available in larger medical treatment centers. The results also inform which attributes might be added to existing rural health facilities to make them more valuable to local residents.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Financiamento Pessoal/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Serviços de Saúde Rural/economia , População Rural , Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Humanos , Kentucky , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA