[Environmental Driving Factors and Assessment on the Aquatic Ecosystem of Periphytic Algae of Six Inflow Rivers in Yangtze River Basin].

Phytoplankton is frequently utilized in the assessment of water ecological health, and a great number of related studies have been conducted in China; however, most of them are limited in scope. A phytoplankton survey was carried out at the basin scale in this study. A total of 139 sampling sites were set up in crucial locations of the main stream, from the Yangtze River's source region to the estuary, as well as the eight primary tributaries and the Three Gorges' tributaries. In the Yangtze River Basin, phytoplankton was found in seven phyla and 82 taxa, with Cryptophyta, Cyanophyta, and Bacillariophyta being the dominant species. To begin, the composition of phytoplankton communities in various sections of the Yangtze River Basin was studied, and LEfSe was utilized to identify highly enriched species in different regions. The association between phytoplankton communities and environmental factors in different sections of the Yangtze River Basin was then investigated using CCA. The generalized linear model demonstrated that TN and TP were strongly positively linked with phytoplankton density at the basin scale, whereas TITAN analysis identified the environmental indicator species and their corresponding optimal growth threshold range. Finally, the study assessed each Yangtze River Basin Region in terms of biotic and abiotic factors. Although the results of the two aspects were incongruent, the analysis of all indicators using the random forest method can yield comprehensive and objective ecological evaluation results for each section of the Yangtze River Basin.

[Community Composition and Assessment of the Aquatic Ecosystem of Periphytic Algae in the Yangtze River Basin].

To explore the periphytic algae community structure in the Yangtze River basin, samples were collected from 130 sampling sites, including the source to the estuary along the mainstream of the Yangtze River, eight primary tributaries, and the tributary of the Three Gorges area. The periphytic algae densities of different areas in the mainstream of the Yangtze River ranked from high to low were the upstream area, source area, middle and lower area, and the Jinsha River. The high periphytic algae density in the upstream area was associated with the shift in nutrition level, and the high periphytic algae density in the source area was associated with human activity. The spatial pattern of the periphytic algae community in the whole main stream from west to east presented the alternating dominance of Bacillariophyta and Cyanophyta; the Bacillariophyta (Navicula) had a competitive advantage in the main stream, and the distribution of the periphytic algae community was driven by total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and pH. For the tributary of the Yangtze River, the periphytic algae density in the Three Gorges tributary area was far higher than those in the eight primary tributaries; the periphytic algae community was dominated by Cyanophyta (Lyngbya), which had a competitive advantage in the tributaries of the Yangtze River. The distribution of the periphytic community was driven by dissolved oxygen and pH. According to the diversity analysis and assessment, the periphytic algae community in the source area showed lower species richness and higher evenness, thus leading to a high α-diversity and good assessment result (mesosaprobic zone). The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River also showed the same assessment result, the mesosaprobic zone. However, the community evenness of the middle and lower reaches was significantly lower than that of the source area, thus making the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River have a significantly lower α-diversity than that of the source area. All areas of the Yangtze River showed good water quality assessment; however, different areas had different WQI index numbers, and the assessment results of the WQI index were inconsistent with the results of the aquatic assessment. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of aquatic ecosystem health should use both aquatic assessments and water quality assessments.