The minimal important difference for the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients in the subacute stage.

BACKGROUND: The minimal important difference (MID) of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) remains unknown, limiting the interpretation of change scores. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the MID of the PASS in patients with subacute stroke. METHODS: Data at admission and discharge for 240 participants were retrieved from a longitudinal study. The "mobility" item of the Barthel Index was used as the anchor for indicating the improvement of posture control. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was used to estimate the anchor-based MID of the PASS. RESULTS: The ROC method identified a MID of 3.0 points, with a sensitivity of 81.0 % and a specificity of 75.6 %. CONCLUSION: The MID of the PASS was 3.0 points, indicating that if a patient achieves an improvement of 3.0 or more points on the PASS, they have a clinically important improvement in posture control. Our results can help in interpreting change scores and aid in understanding the clinical values of treatment outcomes.

Correlations between subjective rating and objective assessment of balance function in individuals with stroke.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationships among therapist-reported, patient-reported, and objective assessment scores of balance function. METHODS: Inpatients with stroke and occupational therapists were recruited. The objective balance scores were measured using the Balance Computerized Adaptive Testing (Balance CAT) system. The therapist and patient-reported scores were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and Likert-type scale. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients and 16 therapists participated. The correlations (r= 0.64 and 0.65; R-squared about 0.42 at baseline and follow-up assessments, respectively) between the therapist-reported VAS scores and the Balance CAT system were larger than those (r = 0.31 and 0.21) between the patient-reported VAS scores and the Balance CAT system. Low correlations (r = 0.27 and 0.26 for VAS and Likert-type scores, respectively) were found between the therapist-reported and patient-reported change scores. Low correlations (r = 0.12-0.17) were found between the change scores of therapist- and patient-reported ratings and those of the Balance CAT system. CONCLUSIONS: The therapists' judgments explained <50% of variance of the Balance CAT system scores. Neither therapist-reported nor patient-reported change scores reflected the changes demonstrated by the objective assessments. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.Implications for RehabilitationNeither therapist- nor patient-reported balance function and change could effectively reflect the scores resulting from objective assessments.The routine use of objective balance assessments should not be replaced by therapists' subjective judgments.Communications regarding the balance function measured by objective assessments between therapists and patients can help patients to better understand their balance function and progress.

A Comparison of the Responsiveness of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke and the Berg Balance Scale in Patients With Severe Balance Deficits After Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous evidence that the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) have similar responsiveness is doubtful. Compared with the BBS, the PASS has more items assessing basic balance abilities (such as postural transition during lying and sitting), so it should be more likely to detect changes in patients with severe balance deficits. We aimed to compare the responsiveness of the PASS and the BBS in patients with stroke who have severe balance deficits. METHODS: The PASS and BBS scores of 49 patients with severe balance deficits at 14 and 30 days after stroke were retrieved. The group-level responsiveness was examined with the standardized response mean (SRM). The individual-level responsiveness was examined by the proportion of patients who achieved clinically significant improvements (ie, their pre-post change scores in the PASS/BBS exceeded the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence of each measure). The responsiveness of the 2 measures was compared using the bootstrap approach. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The comparisons of responsiveness showed significant differences between the PASS and the BBS at both the group and individual levels. At the group level, the PASS indicated moderate changes in balance function (SRM = 0.79), but the BBS indicated only small changes (SRM = 0.39). At the individual level, the PASS showed that 42.9% of patients had clinically significant improvements, while the BBS showed that only 6.1% of patients had clinically significant improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the BBS, the PASS was better able to detect balance improvements in patients having severe balance deficits. The PASS is recommended as an outcome measure to detect change in balance in patients with stroke who have severe balance deficits.

Health literacy and cancer care coordination in Chinese migrant patients and their carers: A cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the levels of health literacy and experience of care coordination among Chinese migrant patients with cancer and their carers in Australia, and to examine factors associated with these. METHODS: Patients' self-reported data were collected using the Health Literacy and Cancer Care Coordination questionnaires. We conducted multivariate linear regression analyses to investigate predictors of patients' health literacy and their care experience. Canonical correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between patients' health literacy and their care experience. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients and eight carers participated in the survey. Patients and carers reported similar levels of health literacy, with the lowest scores being in the "Having sufficient information to manage health" and "Navigating the health system" subscales. Gender (P = 0.026, partial η2  = 0.281) and educational attainment (P = 0.015, partial η2  = 0.250) had significant and large effects on patients' health literacy, after controlling for each other. Educational attainment showed a significant and medium association with patients' experience of cancer care coordination (P = 0.041, partial η2  = 0.101). A large and positive correlation was found between patients' health literacy and experience of cancer care coordination (canonical correlation = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal the health literacy and care coordination needs of Chinese migrant patients with cancer in Australia, especially those with lower educational attainment. Future efforts are necessary to enhance Chinese migrants' health literacy and establish an accessible and easy-to-navigate care environment.

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke.

The computerized adaptive testing system of the functional assessment of stroke (CAT-FAS) can simultaneously assess four functions (motor functions of the upper and lower extremities, postural control, and basic activities of daily living) with sufficient reliability and administrative efficiency. CAT, a modern measurement method, aims to provide a reliable estimate of the examinee's level of function rapidly. CAT administers only a few items whose item difficulties match an examinee's level of function and, thus, the administered items of CAT can provide sufficient information to reliably estimate the examinee's level of function in a short time. The CAT-FAS was developed through four steps: (1) determining the item bank, (2) determining the stopping rules, (3) validating the CAT-FAS, and (4) establishing a platform of online administration. The results of this study indicate that the CAT-FAS has sufficient administrative efficiency (average number of items = 8.5) and reliability (group-level Rasch reliability: 0.88 - 0.93; individual-level Rasch reliability: ≥70% of patients had Rasch reliability score ≥0.90) to simultaneously assess four functions in patients with stroke. In addition, because the CAT-FAS is a computer-based test, the CAT-FAS has three additional advantages: the automatic calculation of scores, the immediate storage of data, and the easy exporting of data. These advantages of the CAT-FAS will be beneficial to data management for clinicians and researchers.

Validation of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in Women With Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Health literacy enables effective communication, participation, and cooperation with clinicians of patients with breast cancer in healthcare processes. The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) comprehensively assesses multiple conceptual domains of health literacy in a diverse range of health contexts. However, the HLS-EU-Q has not been validated in women with breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: We examined the psychometric properties, particularly the factorial validity, of the HLS-EU-Q in women with breast cancer. METHODS: We performed a first-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify the 12-subdomain model of the 47-item HLS-EU-Q. A second-order CFA was conducted to investigate whether the 12 subdomains reflected the 3 domains of healthcare, disease prevention, and health promotion correspondingly. RESULTS: A total of 475 women with breast cancer participated in this study. The first-order CFA fitted with the HLS-EU-Q containing 47 items. However, item 29, with a low factor loading (-0.05), was deleted. The modified first-order CFA adequately fitted the data of the HLS-EU-Q with 46 items. The second-order CFA model acceptably fitted with the data, but the 3 domains with high correlations (0.92-1.00) were merged into a single domain, health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results supported the factorial validity of the 12-subdomain HLS-EU-Q with 46 items in women with breast cancer. It is recommended that the 12 subdomain scores be summed up to represent overall health literacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The HLS-EU-Q with 46 items is recommended for use in capturing the diverse health literacy competencies of women with breast cancer in different health contexts.

A Reliable and Valid Assessment of Sustained Attention for Patients With Schizophrenia: The Computerized Digit Vigilance Test.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to examine the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and ecological validity of the Computerized Digit Vigilance Test (C-DVT) in patients with schizophrenia. METHOD: Each participant was assessed four times, with 1-week intervals. In each assessment, the participants completed both the C-DVT and the original DVT. The participants were also assessed using the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (LIADL) and the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). RESULTS: Forty-nine participants were recruited in this study. The results showed that the test-retest agreement of the C-DVT was good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71-0.89). The random measurement errors of the C-DVT were acceptable (percentages of minimal detectable change = 12.9%-24.1%). The practice effect of the C-DVT reached a plateau after three assessments (effect size <0.20). The concurrent validity of the C-DVT was good (r = .75-.79 with DVT) when we controlled for the randomized administration order of the two tests. The ecological validity of the C-DVT was good (r = -.44 with the LIADL; r = -.45 with the PSP). CONCLUSIONS: The C-DVT had acceptable test-retest reliability, sound concurrent validity, and sound ecological validity in patients with schizophrenia. These findings indicate that the C-DVT has the potential to be a reliable and valid test of sustained attention in patients with schizophrenia.

Development of a Social Functioning Assessment Using Computerized Adaptive Testing for Patients With Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized adaptive test of social functioning (Social-CAT) for patients with stroke. DESIGN: This study contained 2 phases. First, a unidimensional item bank was formed using social-related items with sufficient item fit (ie, infit and outfit mean square [MNSQ]). The social-related items were selected from 3 commonly used patient-reported quality-of-life measures. Items with differential item functioning (DIF) of sex were deleted. Second, we performed simulations to determine the best set of stopping rules with both high reliability and efficiency. The participants' responses to the items were extracted from a previous study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards and departments of rehabilitation/neurology of 5 general hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=263) with stroke (47.1% were inpatients). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Social-CAT. RESULTS: The unidimensionality of the 24 selected items was supported (infit and outfit MNSQs =0.8-1.2). One item had DIF of sex and was deleted. The item bank was composed of the remaining 23 items. With the best set of stopping rules (person reliability ≥.90 or limited reliability increased ≤.001), the Social-CAT used on average 10 items to achieve sufficient reliability (average person reliability =.88; 81.0% of the patients with reliability ≥.90). CONCLUSIONS: The Social-CAT appears to be a unidimensional measure with acceptable reliability and efficiency, and it could be useful for both clinicians and patients in time-pressed clinical settings.

Group- and Individual-Level Responsiveness of the 3-Point Berg Balance Scale and 3-Point Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine both group- and individual-level responsiveness of the 3-point Berg Balance Scale (BBS-3P) and 3-point Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS-3P) in patients with stroke, and to compare the responsiveness of both 3-point measures versus their original measures (Berg Balance Scale [BBS] and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients [PASS]) and their short forms (short-form Berg Balance Scale [SFBBS] and short-form Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients [SFPASS]) and between the BBS-3P and PASS-3P. DESIGN: Data were retrieved from a previous study wherein 212 patients were assessed at 14 and 30 days after stroke with the BBS and PASS. SETTING: Medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=212) with first onset of stroke within 14 days before hospitalization. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group-level responsiveness was examined by the standardized response mean (SRM), and individual-level responsiveness was examined by the proportion of patients whose change scores exceeded the minimal detectable change of each measure. The responsiveness was compared using the bootstrap approach. RESULTS: The BBS-3P and PASS-3P had good group-level (SRM, .60 and SRM, .56, respectively) and individual-level (48.1% and 44.8% of the patients with significant improvement, respectively) responsiveness. Bootstrap analyses showed that the BBS-3P generally had superior responsiveness to the BBS and SFBBS, and the PASS-3P had similar responsiveness to the PASS and SFPASS. The BBS-3P and PASS-3P were equally responsive to both group and individual change. CONCLUSIONS: The responsiveness of the BBS-3P and PASS-3P was comparable or superior to those of the original and short-form measures. We recommend the BBS-3P and PASS-3P as responsive outcome measures of balance for individuals with stroke.

Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized adaptive testing system of the Functional Assessment of Stroke (CAT-FAS) to assess upper- and lower-extremity (UE/LE) motor function, postural control, and basic activities of daily living with optimal efficiency and without sacrificing psychometric properties in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Simulation study. SETTING: One rehabilitation unit in a medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with subacute stroke (N=301; mean age, 67.3±10.9; intracranial infarction, 74.5%). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The UE and LE subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, and Barthel Index. RESULTS: The CAT-FAS adopting the optimal stopping rule (limited reliability increase of <.010) had good Rasch reliability across the 4 domains (.88-.93) and needed few items for the whole administration (8.5 items on average). The concurrent validity (CAT-FAS vs original tests, Pearson r=.91-.95) and responsiveness (standardized response mean, .65-.76) of the CAT-FAS were good in patients with stroke. CONCLUSIONS: We developed the CAT-FAS, and our results support that the CAT-FAS has sufficient efficiency, reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness in patients with stroke. The CAT-FAS can be used to simultaneously assess patients' functions of UE, LE, postural control, and basic activities of daily living using, on average, no more than 10 items; this efficiency is useful in reducing the assessment burdens for both clinicians and patients.

Refining 3 Measures to Construct an Efficient Functional Assessment of Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients, and Barthel Index are widely used to assess patients' upper extremity and lower extremity motor function, balance, and basic activities of daily living after stroke, respectively. However, these 3 measures (72 items) require a great amount of time for assessment. Therefore, we aimed to develop an efficient test, the Functional Assessment of Stroke (FAS). METHODS: The FAS was constructed from 4 short-form tests of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity, Fugl-Meyer Assessment-lower extremity, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients, and Barthel Index based on the results of Rasch analyses and the items' content. We examined the psychometric properties of the FAS, including Rasch reliability, concurrent validity, convergent validity, known-group validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: The FAS contained 29 items (10, 6, 8, and 5 items for the 4 short-form tests, respectively). The FAS demonstrated high Rasch reliability (0.92-0.94), concurrent validity (r=0.90-0.97 with the original tests), convergent validity (r=0.62-0.94 with the 5-scale Fugl-Meyer Assessment), and known-group validity (significant difference in the FAS scores among 3 groups of disability levels; P<0.001). In addition, the responsiveness of the FAS (standardized response mean=0.55-1.93) was similar or significantly superior to those of the original tests (standardized response mean=0.46-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: The FAS contains 29 items and has sufficient Rasch reliability, validities, and responsiveness. These findings support that the FAS is efficient for reliably and validly assessing upper extremity/lower extremity motor function, balance, and basic activities of daily living and for sensitively detecting change in those functions in patients with stroke.

Comparison of the Responsiveness of the Long-Form and Simplified Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement: Group- and Individual-Level Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The group-level responsiveness of the original, 30-item Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement measure (STREAM-30) is similar to that of the simplified STREAM (STREAM-15), even though the STREAM-30 has twice as many items as those of the STREAM-15. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the responsiveness of the STREAM-30 and STREAM-15 at both group and individual levels in patients with stroke. For the latter level, the Rasch-calibrated 27-item STREAM (STREAM-27) was used because the individual-level indexes of the STREAM-30 could not be estimated. DESIGN: A repeated-measurements design was used. In total, 195 patients were assessed with the STREAM-30 at both admission and discharge. METHODS: The Rasch scores of the STREAM-27 and STREAM-15 were estimated from the participants' responses on the STREAM-30. We calculated the paired t-test value, effect size, and standardized response mean as the indexes of group-level responsiveness. The significance of change for each participant was estimated as the individual-level responsiveness index, and the paired t test and test of marginal homogeneity were used for individual-level comparisons between the STREAM-27 and STREAM-15. RESULTS: At the group level, the STREAM-30, STREAM-27, and STREAM-15 showed sufficient and comparable responsiveness. At the individual level, the STREAM-27 detected significantly more participants with significant improvement and fewer participants with no change or deterioration compared with the STREAM-15. LIMITATIONS: Few patients with subacute stroke showed deterioration at discharge, so the abilities of the 2 measures to detect deterioration remain inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: The STREAM-27 detected more participants with significant recovery compared with the STREAM-15, although the group-level responsiveness of the 2 measures was the same. The STREAM-27 is recommended as an outcome measure to demonstrate the treatment effects of movement and mobility for patients with stroke.