Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(34): e4126, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27559940

RESUMO

Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is essential for eradicating tuberculosis (TB). Moreover, the patient adherence is crucial in determining the effectiveness of TB control. Isoniazid given by DOTS daily for 9 months (9H) is the standard treatment for LTBI in Taiwan. However, the completion rate is low due to the long treatment period and its side effects. The combined regimen using a high dose of rifapentine/isoniazid once weekly for 12 weeks (3HP) has been used as an alternative treatment option for LTBI in the United States. This may result in a higher completion rate. In this pilot study, patient adherence and cost of these 2 treatment regimens were investigated. Thus, we aimed to assess the treatment completion rate and costs of 3HP and compare to those with 9H.Data from 691 cases of LTBI treatments including 590 cases using the conventional regimen and 101 cases with rifapentine/Isoniazid were collected. The cost was the sum of the cost of treatment with Isoniazid for 9 months or with rifapentin/Isoniazid for 3 months of all contacts. The effectiveness was the cost of cases of tuberculosis avoided.In this study, the treatment completion rate for patients prescribed with the 3 months rifapentine/isoniazid regimen (97.03%) was higher than those given the conventional 9-month isoniazid regimen (87.29%) (P <0.001). The cost of 3HP and 9H was US$261.24 and US$717.3, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratio with isoniazid for 9 months was US$ 15392/avoided 1 case of tuberculosis and US$ 5225/avoided 1 case of tuberculosis with 3HP. In addition, when compared with the conventional regimen, there were fewer patients discontinued with rifapentine/isoniazid regimen due to undesirable side effects.This was the first study to compare the 2 treatment regimens in Taiwan, and it showed that a short-term high-dosage rifapentine/isoniazid treatment regimen reduced costs and resulted in higher treatment completion than the standard LTBI isoniazid treatment.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Isoniazida/administração & dosagem , Tuberculose Latente/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Rifampina/análogos & derivados , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Antituberculosos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Terapia Diretamente Observada , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Isoniazida/efeitos adversos , Isoniazida/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Rifampina/efeitos adversos , Rifampina/economia , Taiwan , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 111(7): 976-85, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27166128

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The protective effect of statins in cirrhosis and its decompensation in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database from 1997 to 2009. A total of 298,761 CHB patients were identified. CHB patients using statins (n=6,543; defined as ≥28 cumulative defined daily doses (cDDD)) and a 1:1 ratio propensity score and inception point (the date of first use of statins)-matched non-statins (<28 cDDD) were followed up from the inception point until the development of cirrhosis or its decompensation or until withdrawal from insurance or December 2009. RESULTS: After adjustment for competing mortality, CHB patients using statins had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of cirrhosis (relative risk)=0.433; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.344-0.515; modified log-rank test, P<0.001) and decompensated cirrhosis (relative risk=0.468; 95% CI=0.344-0.637; P<0.001) compared with patients not using statins. After adjustment for age, gender, comorbidity index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, aspirin use, diabetes medication, CHB treatment, non-statin lipid-lowering drugs, and triglyceride lipid-lowering drugs using the Cox proportional hazard model, statins were still an independent protector against cirrhosis (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR)=0.512; 95% CI=0.413-0.634; P<0.001) and its decompensation (AHR=0.534; 95% CI=0.433-0.659; P<0.001). The AHRs for cirrhosis were 0.467 and 0.200, and the AHRs for decompensated cirrhosis were 0.611 and 0.231 with 91-365 and >365 cDDD of statins, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CHB patients who receive statin therapy have a dose-dependent reduction in the risk of cirrhosis and its decompensation.


Assuntos
Hepatite B Crônica , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Cirrose Hepática , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite B Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite B Crônica/patologia , Humanos , Incidência , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Cirrose Hepática/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Proteção , Fatores de Risco , Taiwan/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA