Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Lipidol ; 4(3): 165-72, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20563294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study (SANDS) reported cardiovascular benefit of aggressive versus standard treatment targets for both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) in diabetic individuals. OBJECTIVE: In this analysis, we examined within trial cost-effectiveness of aggressive targets of LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL and systolic BP ≤115 mmHg versus standard targets of LDL-C ≤100 mg/dL and systolic BP ≤130 mmHg. DESIGN: Randomized, open label blinded-to-endpoint 3-year trial. DATA SOURCES: SANDS clinical trial database, Quality of Wellbeing survey, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Wholesale Drug Prices. TARGET POPULATION: American Indians ≥ age 40 years with type 2 diabetes and no previous cardiovascular events. TIME HORIZON: April 2003 to July 2007. PERSPECTIVE: Health payer. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to aggressive versus standard groups with treatment algorithms defined for both. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with the standard group, the aggressive group had slightly lower costs of medical services (-$116) but a 54% greater cost for BP medication ($1,242) and a 116% greater cost for lipid-lowering medication ($2,863), resulting in an increased cost of $3,988 over 3 years. Those in the aggressively treated group gained 0.0480 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) over the standard group. When a 3% discount rate for costs and outcomes was used, the resulting cost per QALY was $82,589. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The use of a 25%, 50%, and 75% reduction in drug costs resulted in a cost per QALY of $61,329, $40,070, and $18,810, respectively. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by use of a single ethnic group and by its 3-year duration. CONCLUSIONS: Within this 3-year study, treatment to lower BP and LDL-C below standard targets was not cost-effective because of the cost of the additional medications required to meet the lower targets. With the anticipated availability of generic versions of the BP and lipid-lowering drugs used in SANDS, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention should improve. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the National Lipid Association.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/economia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Hipolipemiantes/economia , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Análise Custo-Benefício , Complicações do Diabetes/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA