Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success.

Skeletal remains recovered from missing persons' cases are often exposed to harsh environmental conditions resulting in the DNA being damaged, degraded, and/or the samples containing PCR inhibitors. In this study, the efficacy of common extraction methods was evaluated to remove high levels of PCR inhibitors commonly encountered with human remains, and their downstream compatibility with the two leading sequencing chemistries and platforms for human identification purposes. Blood, hair, and bone samples were spiked with high levels of inhibitors commonly identified in each particular substrate in order to test the efficiency of various DNA extraction methods prior to sequencing. Samples were extracted using three commercial extraction kits (DNA IQ™, DNA Investigator, and PrepFiler® BTA), organic (blood and hair only), and two total demineralization protocols (bone only)). Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed using two different systems: Precision ID chemistry and a custom AmpliSeq™ STR and iiSNP panel on the Ion S5™ System and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx™. The overall results showed that all DNA extraction methods were efficient and are fully compatible with both MPS systems. Key performance indicators such as STR and SNP reportable alleles, read depth, and heterozygote balance were comparable for each extraction method. In samples where CE-based STRs yielded partial profiles (bone), MPS-based STRs generated more complete or full profiles. Moreover, MPS panels contain more STR loci than current CE-based STR kits and also include SNPs, which can further increase the power of discrimination obtained from these samples, making MPS a desirable choice for the forensic analysis of such challenging samples.

Assessment of DNA degradation and the genotyping success of highly degraded samples.

DNA becomes progressively more fragmented as biological tissue degrades resulting in decreasing ability to gain a complete DNA profile. Successful identification of samples exhibiting very high levels of DNA degradation may be complicated by presenting in minute quantities. The industry standard method for human DNA identification utilising short tandem repeats (STR) may produce partial or no DNA profile with such samples. We report a comparative study of genotyping using STRs, mini-STRs and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with template at different levels of degradation in varying amounts. Two methods of assessing quantity and quality of a DNA sample prior to genotyping were investigated. The QIAxcel capillary gel electrophoresis system provided a rapid, cost effective screening method for assessing sample quality. A real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was able to simultaneously quantify total human DNA, male DNA, DNA degradation and PCR inhibition. The extent of DNA degradation could be assessed with reasonable accuracy to 62.5 pg and genomic targets could be quantified to a lower limit of 15.6 pg. The qPCR assay was able to detect male DNA to a lower limit of 20 pg in a 1:1,000 background of female DNA. By considering the amount of DNA and the degradation ratio of a sample, a general prediction of genotyping success using AmpFlSTR® Profiler Plus®, MiniFiler™ kits and SNP analysis can be made. The results indicate mini-STRs and SNP markers are usually more successful in typing degraded samples and in cases of extreme DNA degradation (≤200 bp) and template amounts below 250 pg, mini-STR and SNP analysis yielded significantly more complete profiles and lower match probabilities than corresponding STR profiles.