Distribution of Edentulism by the Macro Determinants of Health in 204 Countries and Territories: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a comprehensive description of edentulism estimates by the macro determinants of health in 2000, 2010 and 2019 worldwide. METHODS: This ecological study analyzed data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to describe the incidence rate, prevalence rate and years lived with disability (YLDs) rate due to edentulism by macro determinants of health (governance, macroeconomic policy, social policy, public policies, societal values), for 204 countries and territories. The estimates were reported as rates (cases/100,000 people), for people of both sexes aged 55 years or older. RESULTS: Countries belonging to the least privileged categories of the macro determinants showed the lowest prevalence rate, incidence rate, and YLD rate due to edentulism for all exposures. Countries with low government expenditure on health showed the lowest prevalence rate of edentulism in 2000 (18,972.1; 95 %CI 15,960.0 - 21,984.3) and 2010 (16,646.8; 95 %CI: 14,218.3-19,075.4) than those with high government expenditure on health in 2000 (25,196.6; 95 %CI: 23,226.9 - 27,166.2) and 2010 (21,014.7; 95 %CI: 19,317.9 - 22,711.5). Countries with low SDI showed the lowest YLDs in 2000 (321.0, 95 %CI: 260.1- 381.9), 2010 (332.0; 95 %CI: 267.7-396.3), and 2019 (331.6; 95 %CI: 266.6-396.5). CONCLUSION: The findings point to persistent inequalities in the distribution of edentulism between countries worldwide. The most privileged countries, with higher economic development, better governance, and better social and public policies, have shown higher rates of edentulism. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This model must be reconsidered by advancing toward upstream and midstream strategies, beyond its conventional downstream clinical interventions.

Preventive dental service use and oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian older adults.

BACKGROUND: Information on the use of preventive dental services and associated variables is needed to guide policy for the old adult population and consequently promote better oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between preventive dental service use and OHRQoL by older Brazilians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out using the baseline data of participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Stud of Aging (ELSEI-Brazil) who were aged 60 years or more. Associations with the use of preventive dental services were carried out using Poisson regression models with robust variance, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 5432 older adults. Almost all (90.7%) participants reported not having sought preventive dental services in the last year. Individuals who used dental services for prevention had fewer impacts on their OHRQoL (RR: 0.74; [95% CI: 0.57-0.97]). CONCLUSION: Preventive dental service use is associated with a better OHRQoL in older Brazilians. Policies to improve access to preventive dental services may result in improved OHRQoL in this age group.

O uso dos serviços odontológicos no último ano na população brasileira: revisão sistemática com metanálise / The use of dental services in the past year in the brazilian population: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Resumo O objetivo foi analisar os fatores associados ao uso dos serviços odontológicos no Brasil. A estratégia de revisão incluiu as bases PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, Scopus, WOS e Google Scholar, além de repositórios e bancos de dissertações e teses. Os estudos foram selecionados ​​usando a estratégia PEO (população/exposição/desfechos). O desfecho deste estudo foi o uso dos serviços odontológicos no último ano pela população brasileira, tratado como variáveis dicotômicas para as análises: ≤ 1 ano e > 1 ano. Foi realizada uma metanálise de efeito randômico de Mantel-Haenszel, estimando-se razões de prevalência (RP) e intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%). Foram selecionados 94 estudos. A maioria (98%) tinha delineamento transversal, sendo 63% oriundos de dados primários. Para a metanálise, 25 estudos foram incluídos. O uso dos serviços odontológicos no último ano esteve associado com maior escolaridade (≥ 8 anos de estudo) (RP = 0,49, (IC95%: 0,39-0,60)); maior renda familiar (≥ 2 salários-mínimos) (RP = 0,79, (IC95%: 0,74-0,84)); e residir na zona urbana (RP = 0,79, (IC95%: 0,64-0,97)). A oferta de serviços odontológicos no Sistema Único de Saúde precisa ser ampliada entre pessoas com menor renda, menor escolaridade e moradores da zona rural.

Abstract The scope of this study was to analyze the factors associated with the use of dental services in Brazil. The review strategy included PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, BBO, EMBASE, Scopus, WOS and Google Scholar databases, in addition to repositories and databases of dissertations and theses. Studies were selected using the PEO (Population/Exposure/Outcomes) strategy. The outcome of this study was the use of dental services in the last year by the Brazilian population, treated as dichotomous variables for the following analyses: ≤ 1 year and > 1 year. Mantel-Haenszel random effect meta-analysis was performed, estimating Prevalence Ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). A total of 94 studies were selected. The majority (98%) had a cross-sectional design, with 63% derived from primary data. For the meta-analysis, 25 studies were included. The use of oral health services in the last year was associated with higher education (≥ 8 years of schooling) (PR = 0.49, (95%CI: 0.39-0.60)); higher family income (≥ 2 minimum wages) (RP = 0.79, (95%CI: 0.74-0.84)); and living in urban areas (RP = 0.79, (95%CI: 0.64-0.97)). The availability of dental services in the Unified Health System needs to be made readily accessible to people with lower income, less education and those living in rural areas.

Dental visits and depression mediating the association of socioeconomic status with oral health behaviors.

Determinants of oral diseases include behaviors, which in turn are influenced by a series of social determinants such as psychosocial aspects and dental care services. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether depressive symptoms and use of dental care services mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and oral health behaviors. This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed data from participants in the 2019 National Health Survey (PNS) (n = 88,531). The eligibility criteria were individuals who were 18 years and older and exclusion criterion was living in households located in special or sparsely populated census tracts. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test direct and indirect pathways from a latent variable for SES to oral health through depressive symptoms (assessed through the "Patient Health Questionnaire-9") and use of dental care services. The maximum likelihood estimator for complex samples with the robust standard error was used. The final model presented an adequate fit: RMESA of 0.008, CFI of 0.998, and SMRM of 0.005. The results showed that higher SES was directly associated with better oral health-related behaviors [standardized coefficient (SC): 0.428; p < 0.01] and indirectly through depressive symptoms [(SC): 0.002; p < 0.01] and dental care services [(SC): 0.089; p < 0.01]. The total effect of SES on oral health-related behaviors was equal to [(SC: 0.519 (p < 0.01)]. In conclusion, the findings suggest that high socioeconomic status, mediated by depressive symptoms and dental care services, has a positive effect on oral health.

Hospitalizations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil by the SUS: impacts of the covid-19 pandemic / Hospitalizações por câncer bucal e orofaríngeo no Brasil pelo SUS: impactos da pandemia de covid-19

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of the different phases of the covid-19 pandemic on hospitalizations for oral (CaB) and oropharyngeal (CaOR) cancer in Brazil, carried out within the scope of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS We obtained data regarding hospital admissions due to CaB and CaOR between January 2018 and August 2021 from the SUS Hospital Information System, analyzing hospital admissions as rates per 100,000 inhabitants. We divided the pandemic (January 2020 to August 2021) and pre-pandemic (January 2018 to December 2019) periods into four-month periods, comparing the pandemic period rates with analogous rates for the pre-pandemic period - for Brazil, by macro-region and by a group of procedures performed during hospitalization. We also analyzed the impact of the pandemic on the average cost of hospitalizations, expressing the results in percentage change. RESULTS Rates of hospitalization in the SUS due to CaB and CaOR decreased during the pandemic in Brazil. The most significant reduction occurred in the second four-month period of 2020 (18.42%), followed by decreases in the third four-month period of 2020 (17.76%) and the first and second four-month periods of 2021 (respectively, 14.64% and 17.07%), compared with 2019. The South and Southeast showed the most expressive and constant reductions between the different phases of the pandemic. Hospitalizations for clinical procedures suffered a more significant decrease than for surgical procedures. In Brazil, the average expenditure per hospitalization in the four-month pandemic periods was higher than in the reference periods. CONCLUSION After more than a year of the pandemic's beginning in Brazil, the SUS hospital care network for CaB and CaOR had yet to be re-established. The repressed demand for hospitalizations for these diseases, which have fast evolution, will possibly result in delays in treatment, negatively impacting the survival of these patients. Future studies are needed to monitor this situation.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar o impacto das diferentes fases da pandemia de covid-19 sobre as hospitalizações por câncer bucal (CaB) e de orofaringe (CaOR) no Brasil, realizadas no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). MÉTODOS Os dados quanto às internações hospitalares por CaB e CaOR, entre janeiro de 2018 e agosto de 2021, foram obtidos no Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do SUS. As internações foram analisadas sob a forma de taxas por 100 mil habitantes. Os períodos de pandemia (janeiro de 2020 a agosto de 2021) e pré-pandemia (janeiro de 2018 a dezembro de 2019) foram divididos em quadrimestres; as taxas quadrimestrais do período pandêmico foram comparadas às taxas análogas do período pré-pandemia - para o Brasil, por macrorregião e por grupo de procedimentos realizados na internação. O impacto da pandemia sobre o valor médio das internações também foi analisado. Os resultados foram expressos em variação percentual. RESULTADOS As taxas de internação hospitalar no SUS por CaB e CaOR reduziram durante a pandemia no Brasil. Em comparação com os quadrimestres de 2019, a maior redução foi identificada no segundo quadrimestre de 2020 (18,42%), seguida das reduções do terceiro quadrimestre de 2020 (17,76%) e do primeiro e segundo quadrimestres de 2021 (respectivamente, 14,64% e 17,07%). Sul e Sudeste apresentaram as reduções mais expressivas e constantes entre as diferentes fases da pandemia. As internações para procedimentos clínicos sofreram maior redução do que para procedimentos cirúrgicos. No Brasil, o gasto médio por internação nos quadrimestres da pandemia foi maior do que nos quadrimestres de referência. CONCLUSÃO Após mais de um ano do início da pandemia no Brasil, a rede hospitalar de cuidado ao CaB e CaOR do SUS ainda não tinha se restabelecido. A demanda reprimida de hospitalizações por essas doenças, que são de rápida evolução, possivelmente resultará em atrasos para tratamento, com impacto negativo para a sobrevida desses pacientes; futuros estudos são necessários para monitorar essa situação.

Pathways of socioeconomic inequalities in self-perceived oral health.

Although there is a large body of evidence of the influence of social determinants on oral health, information on the mechanisms by which these determinants operate is poorly documented. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the pathways through which socioeconomic inequalities may influence self-perceived oral health (SPOH) in Brazilian adults. This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health Survey (NHS) of 2019, with a representative sample of adults aged 18 to 59 years (n = 65,803). The outcome was SPOH, assessed by a global self-item. Structural equation modeling was used to test direct and indirect pathways connecting a latent variable for socioeconomic position (SEP) to SPOH via psychosocial, behavioral, and biological factors. Higher SEP was directly associated with better SPOH [standardized coefficient (SC) = 0.069; p < 0.01)] fewer depressive symptoms (SC = -0.059; p < 0.01), fewer missing teeth (SC = 0.131; p < 0.01), and more healthy behaviors (SC = 0.643; p < 0.01). Fewer depressive symptoms (SC = -0.141; p < 0.01), more healthy behaviors (SC = 0.242; p < 0.01), and fewer missing teeth (SC = 0.058; p < 0.01) were directly associated with good SPOH. Among specific indirect effects of SEP on SPOH, the behavioral pathway was the one that best explained this association (SC = 0.155). Socioeconomic inequities in SPOH are mediate by psychosocial, behavioral, and biological factors. This has implications for positioning health strategies in the social context in which people live, to facilitate healthy choices and promote good oral health.

Spending on emergency care due to nontraumatic dental conditions in the United States, 1996 through 2016.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) use for oral health care is a growing problem in the United States. The objective of the study was to describe spending on ED visits due to nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) in the United States and to quantify changes in spending and its drivers. METHODS: Spending estimates for ED visits due to NTDCs according to type of payer were analyzed for the period from 1996 through 2016 and estimates about the drivers of change were analyzed for the period from 1996 through 2013. NTDCs included caries, periodontitis, edentulism, and other oral disorders. Estimates were calculated according to age, sex, and type of payer (that is, public, private, and out of pocket), adjusted for inflation, and expressed in 2016 US dollars. The estimate of expenses was decomposed into 5 drivers for the period from 1996 through 2013 (that is, population, aging, prevalence of oral disorders, service use, and service price and intensity). RESULTS: The total change in spending from 1996 through 2016 amounted to $540 million, an increase of 216%. The drivers of changes in spending from 1996 through 2013 were price and intensity ($360 million), service use ($220 million), and population size ($68 million). CONCLUSIONS: Spending on ED visits due to NTDCs more than tripled during the study period, with price and intensity representing the main drivers. This increase was primarily in adults and paid via the public sector. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Possible solutions include strengthening the oral health care safety net, especially for the most vulnerable populations.

Measuring health inequalities: implications of choosing different socioeconomic indicators.

We aimed to verify the association between different socioeconomic indicators and self-rated health in a nationally representative sample of older adults. This cross-sectional study analyzed the baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), a population-based cohort study of persons aged 50 years or older. Data was collected using a household and an individual questionnaire at participants' households. Self-rated health was assessed by a global self-rating item. Three socioeconomic indicators were assessed: individual income, per capita household income, and wealth index. Poisson regression models were performed to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of self-rated health and each socioeconomic indicator, adjusting for covariates. In total, 9,390 older adults answered the outcome question. Whilst for the individual income indicator only the richest quintile showed a statistically significant association with the outcome (PR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.87; 0.93), for the per capita household income, the fourth (PR: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.91; 0.98) and the fifth quintiles (PR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.86; 0.94) remained associated with the outcome. Regarding the wealth index, only the second quintile was not associated with the outcome, with lower prevalence of poor self-rated health as richer was the quintile, showing a social gradient. The wealth index seems to be a more adequate indicator, as it reflects resources accumulated over the life course.

Prevalence, incidence, and years-lived with disability due to oral disorders in Brazil: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological surveys revealed that Brazil has a high burden of oral diseases. However, no prior study has reported estimates of untreated dental caries, periodontitis, and edentulism over a three-decade period. The objective of this study is to report the trends of prevalence, incidence, and years-lived with disability (YLDs) due to untreated dental caries in primary and permanent teeth, periodontitis, and edentulism in Brazil between 1990 and 2019. METHODS: Estimates of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs due to dental caries in primary and permanent teeth, periodontitis, and edentulism were produced for Brazil, by sex and age, between 1990 and 2019, using Dismod-MR 2.1, as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019). Trends of oral disorders were analyzed using generalized linear regression models applying the Prais-Winsten method. RESULTS: Almost 100 million Brazilians presented at least one oral disorder in 2019, which was equivalent to a prevalence of 45.3%. All oral diseases combined ranked eighth among all causes of disability, causing more than 970,000 YLDs. Untreated dental caries in primary teeth were estimated to affect 13.5 million children, and untreated dental caries in permanent teeth affected more than 52 million people. Periodontitis affected 29.5 million people, and edentulism affected almost 22 million. The generalized linear regression models revealed a trend of stability of oral disorders between 1990 and 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of oral diseases in Brazil is extremely high. Oral disorders, edentulism in particular, caused disability at levels that are comparable to other important chronic diseases.

Incidence and mortality rates of lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancers in Brazil: time-trend and age-period-cohort analysis from the last 30 years, Global Burden of Disease Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cancers are the second main cause of morbidity worldwide, but robust information on lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancers in Brazil is lacking. This study aimed to analyze the trends of incidence and mortality caused by lip, oral cavity, and pharynx cancers and age-period-cohort effects in the Brazilian population of 30 years of age and over, in the period of 1990 to 2019. METHODS: A time series study of the incidence and mortality rates for oral cavity and pharynx cancer ("Lip and oral cavity cancer", "Nasopharynx cancer", and "Other pharynx cancer") was conducted, with corrected data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019. Age-standardized rates per 100,000 inhabitants, for the global population, were gathered according to the individuals' sex. The annual average percentage change (AAPC) was estimated, as was the age-period-cohort effects. RESULTS: The incidence and mortality rates were higher for men in the studied anatomical regions. The cancers tended to decrease for men, except for nasopharynx cancer, which increased in individuals of both sexes. Mortality tended to present a decline in most of the groups studied. For men and women, the age-period-cohort model presented a better adjustment for both incidence and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and mortality caused by the main head and neck cancers showed a tendency to decline over the past 30 years in Brazil, except for nasopharynx cancer, which showed an increase in incidence and mortality in some segments of the population. Higher rates were found for lip and oral cavity cancers in men.

[Influence of self-assessment for improving access and quality in the outpatient procedures in the Dental Specialties Centers]. / Influência da autoavaliação para melhoria do acesso e da qualidade no quantitativo de procedimentos dos Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas.

We studied the influence of Self-Assessment for Improving Access and Quality (AMAQ) in the production of specialized procedures in the of Dental Specialties Centers (DSC). Data were obtained from the 900 DSC submitted to the external evaluation of the Program for Improving Access and Quality (PMAQ-CEO) and the Outpatient Information System (SIA-SUS). The dependent variable was the monthly average of dental procedures (proc/mon) in the DSC performed in three periods: 1) October 2012 to September 2013; 2) October 2013 to September 2014; and 3) October 2014 to September 2015. The main independent variable was the use of AMAQ/CEO, which occurred during the second period. Type of DSC, average number of dentists with a 20-hour workload, strategies to reduce missing appointments, referral support, clinical protocols and coverage of PHC registered users were used as covariates. Multiple linear regression models were run to estimate adjusted differences. Teams that used AMAQ-CEO had a mean of 515.0 proc/mon, 575.5 proc/mon, and 519.9 proc/mon in the first, second and third periods, respectively. The DSC that used AMAQ-CEO had a higher mean than those that did not, with an adjusted difference of 32.7 proc/mon, 64.7 proc/mon and 27.7 proc/mon for the first, second and third periods, respectively.

Estudou-se a influência da Autoavaliação para Melhoria do Acesso e Qualidade (AMAQ) na produção de procedimentos especializados nos Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO). Utilizou-se dados da avaliação externa de 900 CEO do primeiro ciclo do Programa para Melhoria do Acesso e Qualidade (PMAQ/CEO) e Sistema de Informação Ambulatorial (SIA/SUS). A variável dependente foi a média mensal de procedimentos (proc/mês) dos CEO entre os três períodos: 1) outubro de 2012 a setembro de 2013; 2) outubro de 2013 a setembro de 2014; e 3) outubro de 2014 a setembro 2015. A principal variável independente foi o uso da AMAQ/CEO no segundo período. Tipo de CEO, média de cirurgiões-dentistas com carga-horária de 20h, estratégias contra absenteísmo, apoio matricial, protocolos clínicos e cobertura de cadastrados na Estratégia de Saúde Bucal das Família foram covariáveis. Utilizou-se modelos de regressão linear múltipla para análises ajustadas. Equipes que utilizaram a AMAQ-CEO apresentaram média de 515,0 proc/mês, 575,5 proc/mês, e 519,9 proc/mês no primeiro, segundo e terceiro períodos, respectivamente. As equipes que utilizaram AMAQ-CEO tiveram uma maior média de produção do que aquelas que não utilizaram, com diferença ajustada de 32,7 proc/mês, 64,7 proc/mês e 27,7 proc/mês no primeiro, segundo e terceiro períodos, respectivamente.

Influência da autoavaliação para melhoria do acesso e da qualidade no quantitativo de procedimentos dos Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas / Influence of self-assessment for improving access and quality in the outpatient procedures in the Dental Specialties Centers

Resumo Estudou-se a influência da Autoavaliação para Melhoria do Acesso e Qualidade (AMAQ) na produção de procedimentos especializados nos Centros de Especialidades Odontológicas (CEO). Utilizou-se dados da avaliação externa de 900 CEO do primeiro ciclo do Programa para Melhoria do Acesso e Qualidade (PMAQ/CEO) e Sistema de Informação Ambulatorial (SIA/SUS). A variável dependente foi a média mensal de procedimentos (proc/mês) dos CEO entre os três períodos: 1) outubro de 2012 a setembro de 2013; 2) outubro de 2013 a setembro de 2014; e 3) outubro de 2014 a setembro 2015. A principal variável independente foi o uso da AMAQ/CEO no segundo período. Tipo de CEO, média de cirurgiões-dentistas com carga-horária de 20h, estratégias contra absenteísmo, apoio matricial, protocolos clínicos e cobertura de cadastrados na Estratégia de Saúde Bucal das Família foram covariáveis. Utilizou-se modelos de regressão linear múltipla para análises ajustadas. Equipes que utilizaram a AMAQ-CEO apresentaram média de 515,0 proc/mês, 575,5 proc/mês, e 519,9 proc/mês no primeiro, segundo e terceiro períodos, respectivamente. As equipes que utilizaram AMAQ-CEO tiveram uma maior média de produção do que aquelas que não utilizaram, com diferença ajustada de 32,7 proc/mês, 64,7 proc/mês e 27,7 proc/mês no primeiro, segundo e terceiro períodos, respectivamente.

Abstract We studied the influence of Self-Assessment for Improving Access and Quality (AMAQ) in the production of specialized procedures in the of Dental Specialties Centers (DSC). Data were obtained from the 900 DSC submitted to the external evaluation of the Program for Improving Access and Quality (PMAQ-CEO) and the Outpatient Information System (SIA-SUS). The dependent variable was the monthly average of dental procedures (proc/mon) in the DSC performed in three periods: 1) October 2012 to September 2013; 2) October 2013 to September 2014; and 3) October 2014 to September 2015. The main independent variable was the use of AMAQ/CEO, which occurred during the second period. Type of DSC, average number of dentists with a 20-hour workload, strategies to reduce missing appointments, referral support, clinical protocols and coverage of PHC registered users were used as covariates. Multiple linear regression models were run to estimate adjusted differences. Teams that used AMAQ-CEO had a mean of 515.0 proc/mon, 575.5 proc/mon, and 519.9 proc/mon in the first, second and third periods, respectively. The DSC that used AMAQ-CEO had a higher mean than those that did not, with an adjusted difference of 32.7 proc/mon, 64.7 proc/mon and 27.7 proc/mon for the first, second and third periods, respectively.

Pay-for-performance and dental procedures: A longitudinal analysis of the Brazilian Program for the Improvement of Access and Quality of Dental Specialities Centres.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of a pay-for-performance program on changes in the number of dental procedures performed by public secondary dental care services in Brazil. METHODS: A longitudinal study was carried out with 932 public Dental Specialities Centres (Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas - CEO) that participated in the pay-for-performance Program for the Improvement of Access and Quality of Dental Specialities Centres Services (PMAQ/CEO) and 379 non-CEO centres with secondary dental production. The non-CEO and a group of CEOs did not receive financial incentives from the PMAQ-CEO and served as control groups. Three CEOs groups received additional financial incentives of 20%, 60% or 100% over maintenance values, based on their performance scores. The outcome was the increase (yes/no) in the number of dental procedures between 2011/2013 and 2015/2017. Analyses were carried out using logistic regressions. RESULTS: The number of specialized procedures increased in 48.4% of the services, 44.6% among non-CEO, 52.3% among CEO with no financial incentive and 59.1% among CEO with 100% incentive. The fully adjusted model showed that CEOs receiving 100% of the financial incentive had greater odds of increasing the production of dental procedures (OR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.09-2.51). Services that increased the number of specialist dentists had (OR = 2.35, 95%CI 1.88-2.94). Municipalities that increased in coverage of private dental insurance had OR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.94-1.02), and those with higher coverage of primary dental care had OR = 1.02 (95%CI: 0.99-1.05). CONCLUSION: Pay-for-performance may increase the production of dental procedures by CEOs, and mechanisms explaining it must be further investigated.

Dental visits and depression mediating the association of socioeconomic status with oral health behaviors

Abstract Determinants of oral diseases include behaviors, which in turn are influenced by a series of social determinants such as psychosocial aspects and dental care services. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether depressive symptoms and use of dental care services mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and oral health behaviors. This was a cross-sectional study that analyzed data from participants in the 2019 National Health Survey (PNS) (n = 88,531). The eligibility criteria were individuals who were 18 years and older and exclusion criterion was living in households located in special or sparsely populated census tracts. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test direct and indirect pathways from a latent variable for SES to oral health through depressive symptoms (assessed through the "Patient Health Questionnaire-9") and use of dental care services. The maximum likelihood estimator for complex samples with the robust standard error was used. The final model presented an adequate fit: RMESA of 0.008, CFI of 0.998, and SMRM of 0.005. The results showed that higher SES was directly associated with better oral health-related behaviors [standardized coefficient (SC): 0.428; p < 0.01] and indirectly through depressive symptoms [(SC): 0.002; p < 0.01] and dental care services [(SC): 0.089; p < 0.01]. The total effect of SES on oral health-related behaviors was equal to [(SC: 0.519 (p < 0.01)]. In conclusion, the findings suggest that high socioeconomic status, mediated by depressive symptoms and dental care services, has a positive effect on oral health.

Pathways of socioeconomic inequalities in self-perceived oral health

Abstract Although there is a large body of evidence of the influence of social determinants on oral health, information on the mechanisms by which these determinants operate is poorly documented. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the pathways through which socioeconomic inequalities may influence self-perceived oral health (SPOH) in Brazilian adults. This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health Survey (NHS) of 2019, with a representative sample of adults aged 18 to 59 years (n = 65,803). The outcome was SPOH, assessed by a global self-item. Structural equation modeling was used to test direct and indirect pathways connecting a latent variable for socioeconomic position (SEP) to SPOH via psychosocial, behavioral, and biological factors. Higher SEP was directly associated with better SPOH [standardized coefficient (SC) = 0.069; p < 0.01)] fewer depressive symptoms (SC = -0.059; p < 0.01), fewer missing teeth (SC = 0.131; p < 0.01), and more healthy behaviors (SC = 0.643; p < 0.01). Fewer depressive symptoms (SC = -0.141; p < 0.01), more healthy behaviors (SC = 0.242; p < 0.01), and fewer missing teeth (SC = 0.058; p < 0.01) were directly associated with good SPOH. Among specific indirect effects of SEP on SPOH, the behavioral pathway was the one that best explained this association (SC = 0.155). Socioeconomic inequities in SPOH are mediate by psychosocial, behavioral, and biological factors. This has implications for positioning health strategies in the social context in which people live, to facilitate healthy choices and promote good oral health.

Toothache and tooth extraction as reasons for dental visits: an analysis of the 2019 National Health Survey

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of dental visits due to toothache and tooth extraction in Brazil and its association with individual and contextual variables. This two-step cross-sectional study included persons aged 18 years and older in the 2019 National Health Survey who had visited a dentist in the 12 months prior to the interview (n = 40,369). The individual-level outcome was having a dental visit due to toothache or tooth extraction. The ecological-level outcome was the proportion of dental visits for these reasons relative to all dental visits by Brazilian state. Associations with individual - sociodemographic characteristics, number of teeth, and type of health service used - and ecological variables - HDI and dental service coverage - were assessed using Poisson regressions. The prevalence of dental visits due to toothache or extraction was higher among individuals with no formal education, household income < 25% of the minimum wage, of black and brown skin color, living in rural areas, who consulted in the public health system, with 10-19 and 1-9 teeth, and men. The proportion of dental visits due to toothache/extraction in Brazilian states was negatively associated with the HDI and the rate of dental emergency team/100,000 inhabitants and positively associated with primary dental care coverage. The prevalence of dental visits due to toothache/extraction was associated with individual and ecological characteristics, indicating inequities in reasons for dental visits in Brazil. The potential of a well-structured oral health care network to overcome these inequities is suggested and needs to be better explored.

Measuring health inequalities: implications of choosing different socioeconomic indicators / Aferição das desigualdades em saúde: as implicações da escolha entre diferentes indicadores socioeconômicos / Midiendo inequidades de salud: implicaciones de elegir diferentes indicadores socioeconómicos

Abstract: We aimed to verify the association between different socioeconomic indicators and self-rated health in a nationally representative sample of older adults. This cross-sectional study analyzed the baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), a population-based cohort study of persons aged 50 years or older. Data was collected using a household and an individual questionnaire at participants' households. Self-rated health was assessed by a global self-rating item. Three socioeconomic indicators were assessed: individual income, per capita household income, and wealth index. Poisson regression models were performed to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of self-rated health and each socioeconomic indicator, adjusting for covariates. In total, 9,390 older adults answered the outcome question. Whilst for the individual income indicator only the richest quintile showed a statistically significant association with the outcome (PR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.87; 0.93), for the per capita household income, the fourth (PR: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.91; 0.98) and the fifth quintiles (PR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.86; 0.94) remained associated with the outcome. Regarding the wealth index, only the second quintile was not associated with the outcome, with lower prevalence of poor self-rated health as richer was the quintile, showing a social gradient. The wealth index seems to be a more adequate indicator, as it reflects resources accumulated over the life course.

Resumo: O estudo buscou verificar a associação entre diferentes indicadores socioeconômicos e autoavaliação da saúde em uma amostra nacionalmente representativa de adultos mais velhos. Este estudo transversal analisou os dados da linha de base do Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde dos Idosos Brasileiros (ELSI-Brasil), um estudo de coorte de base populacional em indivíduos com 50 anos ou mais. Os dados foram coletados através de um questionário domiciliar e individual no domicílio dos participantes. A autoavaliação da saúde foi avaliada com um item de autoavaliação global. Três indicadores socioeconômicos foram avaliados: renda individual, renda domiciliar per capita e índice de riqueza. Foram construídos modelos de regressão Poisson para estimar a razão de prevalência (RP) e os intervalos de 95% de confiança (IC95%) para autoavaliação da saúde e cada indicador socioeconômico, ajustando para variáveis de confusão. No total, 9.390 idosos responderam à pergunta referente a autoavaliação de saúde geral. Para o indicador de renda individual, apenas o quintil mais rico mostrou uma associação significativa com o desfecho (RP: 0,90; IC95%: 0,87; 0,93); enquanto isso, para a renda domiciliar per capita, o quarto (RP: 0,95; IC95%: 0,91; 0,98) e quinto quintis (RP: 0,90; IC95%: 0,86; 0,94) permaneceram associados com o desfecho. Com relação ao índice de riqueza, apenas o segundo quintil não esteve associado com o desfecho. As menores prevalências de autoavaliação ruim da saúde foram associadas aos quintis mais altos de riqueza, revelando um gradiente social. O índice de riqueza parece ser um indicador mais adequado para uso, na medida em que reflete os recursos acumulados ao longo da vida.

Resumen: Nuestro objetivo fue verificar la asociación entre diferentes indicadores socioeconómicos y de salud autoevaluada en una muestra representativa nacional de adultos mayores. Este estudio transversal analizó los datos de referencia del Estudio Longitudinal de Salud de los Ancianos (ELSI-Brasil), un estudio de cohorte basado en población con individuos de 50 años o más. Los datos fueron recogidos usando un cuestionario por domicilio e individual entre los hogares participantes. La salud autoevaluada se evaluó mediante un ítem de autoevaluación global. Se evaluaron tres indicadores socioeconómicos: ingresos individuales, ingresos per cápita por hogar e índice de riqueza. Se realizaron modelos de regresión de Poisson para estimar la ratio de prevalencia (RP) y los intervalos de 95% de confianza (IC95%) de salud autoevaluada y cada indicador socioeconómico, ajustándolos mediante variables de confusión. En total, 9.390 personas mayores respondieron la pregunta sobre la autoevaluación de la salud general. Mientras que para el indicador de ingresos individuales solamente el quintil más rico mostró una asociación estadísticamente significativa con el resultado (RP: 0.90; IC95%: 0.87; 0.93), en los ingresos per cápita por hogar, los quintiles cuarto (RP: 0.95; IC95%: 0.91; 0.98) y quinto (RP: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.86; 0.94) continuaron asociados con el resultado. Respecto al índice de riqueza, solo el segundo quintil no estuvo asociado con el resultado, con prevalencia más baja de salud autoevaluada peor percibida cuanto más rico era el quintil, mostrando un gradiente social. El índice de riqueza parece ser un indicador más adecuado respecto a su uso, puesto que refleja fuentes acumuladas a lo largo del curso de la vida.

Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental services in Brazil: an analysis of the 2019 National Health Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of use of dental services in Brazil according to states and the Federal District and its relationship with socioeconomic variables and types of services, based on the 2019 National Health Survey. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional population-based study using data from the 2019 National Health Survey, which included 88,531 participants aged 18 or older. We assessed variables related to the use of dental health services according to sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics through multivariate analysis, using a Poisson regression model with robust variance. RESULTS: The use of dental services in the year prior to the interview was higher among adults (53.2%, confidence interval - 95%CI 52.5-53.9) than older adults (34.3%, 95%CI 33.2-34.4). The multivariate analysis revealed that the use of dental services was greater in people with better schooling (prevalence ratio - PR=2.02, 95%CI 1.87-2.18) and higher income (PR=1.54, 95%CI 1.45-1.64). States from the Southeast, Midwest, and South regions presented the highest percentages of individuals who visited a dentist in the previous year - between 49.0 and 57.6% of the population. CONCLUSION: Inequalities were found in the use of dental health services among the adult and older adult population, with regional differences; the use was higher among women, younger individuals, those with better schooling, higher income, healthier behaviors, better self-perceived oral health status, and who paid for their last dental treatment.

Brazilian Oral Health Policy: metasynthesis of studies on the Oral Health Network.

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the performance of the oriented oral health care network from its implementation, in 2004 to 2020, according to publications on the subject. METHODS: This is a research with a methodological description of metasynthesis. RESULTS: The searches resulted in 600 complete publications (586 in the first search and another 14 in the second search), according to the established criteria. 539 articles were excluded: 151 after duplication analysis, 236 after reading the title, 45 by type of publication and 107 after reading the abstract, as they did not fit the research theme. Thus, 61 original publications and another 29 publications in snowball sampling were selected and analyzed, totaling 90 publications. From this selection, we chose to use the model proposed by the Projeto de Avaliações de Desempenho de Sistemas de Saúde (PROADESS - Health Systems Performance Assessment Project). The study will use its guiding principles on the dimension "Health Services Performance". CONCLUSION: The analyzed set allowed us to identify that the way the Brazilian State organizes and finances oral health care made it possible to expand access and the number of procedures performed, but not the creation of an effective comprehensive care network, after more than a decade of implementation of Brasil Sorridente (Smiling Brazil).

[Contextual and individual factors associated with dissatisfaction with dental care in Brazil]. / Fatores contextuais e individuais associados à insatisfação com a assistência odontológica no Brasil.

The scope of this study was to evaluate the influence of contextual and individual factors associated with dissatisfaction of users of the Unified Health System (SUS) with the care provided by dentists in Primary Health Care. It is a cross-sectional and multilevel study, based on secondary data derived from a national basic research project to assess user satisfaction with the SUS. Data were collected by the Ombudsman's Department of the SUS by telephone contact with a sample of 35,393 individuals from around the country. Contextual and individual variables were associated with dissatisfaction with the dental service provided by the SUS. For the analysis, Stata version 11.0 software was used together with multilevel random effects logistic regression. A total of 2,331 individuals from 61 municipalities were included in the final sample of satisfaction with the dental service. Only 43% of the participants reported that their claims had been resolved, and a seven times greater chance of dissatisfaction was perceived for those individuals who had unresolved demand in relation to those who resolved it. This research provides input that can subsidize the government in actions aimed at improving access and quality of care provided in dental care.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de fatores contextuais e individuais associados à insatisfação dos usuários do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) com o atendimento prestado pelo cirurgião-dentista na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Estudo transversal multinível, fundamentado em dados advindos de uma pesquisa de base nacional para avaliação da satisfação dos usuários com o SUS. Os dados foram coletados pelo Departamento de Ouvidoria Geral do SUS por meio de contato telefônico de uma amostra de 35.393 indivíduos de todo o país. Variáveis contextuais e individuais foram associadas à insatisfação com o serviço odontológico prestado pelo SUS. Para as análises, foi utilizado o software Stata versão 11.0 e realizada uma regressão logística multinível de efeitos aleatórios. Um total de 2.331 indivíduos de 61 municípios foram incluídos na amostra final de satisfação com o serviço odontológico. Apenas 43% dos participantes relataram haver resolução de seus pedidos e percebeu-se uma chance sete vezes maior de insatisfação para aqueles indivíduos que tiveram demanda não resolvida em relação aos que a resolveram. A presente pesquisa traz elementos que podem subsidiar o governo em ações voltadas para a melhoria do acesso e qualidade do atendimento prestado na atenção odontológica.