Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The impact of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcomes after noncardiac surgery is not clear. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to study the impact of AF on the risk of adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery in a nationwide cohort. METHODS: We identified Medicare beneficiaries admitted for noncardiac surgery from 2015 to 2019 and divided the study cohort into 2 groups: with and without AF. Noncardiac surgery was classified into vascular, thoracic, general, genitourinary, gynecological, orthopedics and neurosurgery, breast, head and neck, and transplant. We used propensity score matching on exact age, sex, race, urgency and type of surgery, revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) and CHA2DS2-VASc score, and tight caliper on other comorbidities. The study outcomes were 30-day mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. We examined the incremental utility of AF in addition to RCRI to predict adverse events after noncardiac surgery. RESULTS: The study cohort included 8,635,758 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery (16.4% with AF). Patients with AF were older, more likely to be men, and had higher prevalence of comorbidities. After propensity score matching, AF was associated with higher risk of mortality (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.30-1.32), heart failure (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.30-1.33), and stroke (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.37-1.43) and lower risk of myocardial infarction (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.79-0.82). Results were consistent in subgroup analysis by sex, race, type of surgery, and all strata of RCRI and CHA2DS2-VASc score. AF improved the discriminative ability of RCRI (C-statistic 0.73 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: Pre-existing AF is independently associated with postoperative adverse outcomes after NCS.

Super and Nonresponders to Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Quality-of-Life Assessment Using Patient Reported Outcomes.

[Figure: see text].

Predictors of long-term outcomes greater than 10 years after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated in patients with medically refractory heart failure and wide QRS duration. While much is known about predictors of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after CRT implantation and short-term mortality, limited data exist on long-term outcomes after CRT placement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing CRT implantation at our center between 2003 and 2008 and examined mortality using institutional electronic records, social security death index, and online obituary search. We included only patients with preimplant echoes with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% or below. Variable selection was performed using stepwise regression and models were compared using goodness-of-fit criteria. A final model was validated with the bootstrap regression method. RESULTS: Out of the 877 CRT patients undergoing implantation during this time, 287 (32.7%) survived longer than 10 years. Significant (P < .05) predictors of survival in our multivariate model were age, left ventricular diastolic diameter, sex, presence of nonischemic vs ischemic cardiomyopathy, QRS duration, atrial fibrillation, BNP levels, and creatinine levels at the time of CRT implantation. A model using the odds ratios from these variables had a receiver operating curve with an area under the curve score of 0.816 (standard error, 0.019) at predicting survival or freedom from LVAD or heart transplant for longer than 10 years after CRT implantation. The specificity for factors 3 or above and 5 or above was 68% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients are still alive 10 years after CRT implantation. Variables at the time of CRT implant can help provide prognostic information to patients and electrophysiologists to determine the long-term benefit and survival of patients after CRT implantation.

Hibernating substrate of ventricular tachycardia: a three-dimensional metabolic and electro-anatomic assessment.

PURPOSE: Hibernating myocardium (HM) is associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD). Little is known about the electrophysiological properties of HM and the basis of its association with SCD. We aimed to electrophysiologically characterize HM in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS: Endocardial voltage mapping, metabolic 18FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) and perfusion 82Rb, 201Tl, or 99mTc scans were performed in 61 ischemic heart disease patients with VT. Hibernating areas were identified which was followed by three-dimensional PET reconstructions and integration with voltage maps to allow hybrid metabolic-electro-anatomic assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate. RESULTS: Of 61 patients with ischemic heart disease and refractory VT, 7 were found to have hibernating myocardium (13%). A total of 303 voltage points were obtained within hibernating myocardium (8.2 points per 10 cm2) and displayed abnormal voltage in 48.5 and 78.3% of bipolar and unipolar recordings, respectively, with significant heterogeneity of bipolar (p < 0.0001) and unipolar voltage measurements (p = 0.0004). Hibernating areas in 6 of 7 patients contained all three categories of bipolar voltage-defined scar (<0.5 mV), border zone (0.5-1.5 mV), and normal myocardium (>1.5 mV). The characteristics of local electrograms were also assessed and found abnormal in most recordings (76.6, 10.2% fractionated, 5.3% isolated potentials). Exit sites of clinical VTs were determined in 6 patients, of which 3 were located within hibernating myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: Hibernating myocardium displays abnormal and heterogeneous electrical properties and seems to contribute to the substrate of VT. These observations may underlie the vulnerability to reentry and SCD in patients with hypoperfused yet viable myocardium.

Safety of computed tomography in patients with cardiac rhythm management devices: assessment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices, which was subject to an advisory from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008. BACKGROUND: The FDA warned about potential interference of CT imaging with CRM devices and made recommendations for clinical practice despite only limited evidence. METHODS: All 516 CT scans that involved direct radiation exposure of CRM devices (332 defibrillators, 184 pacemakers) at 2 large-volume centers between July 2000 and May 2010 were included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death, bradycardia or tachycardia requiring termination of the scan or an immediate intervention, unplanned hospital admission, reprogramming of the device, inappropriate defibrillator shocks, or device replacement/revision thought to be due to CT imaging. Significant changes in device parameters were sought as a secondary outcome (control group 4:1 ratio). RESULTS: The main finding was that none of the CTs were associated with the primary outcome. With serial device interrogations, there were no differences in changes in battery voltage or lead parameters between devices exposed to radiation and their controls. Potentially significant changes in device parameters were observed in a small group of devices (both the CT group and control group), but no definitive link to CT was confirmed, and there were no associated clinical consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the presence of CRM devices should not delay or result in cancellation of clinically indicated CT imaging procedures, and provide evidence that would be helpful when the FDA advisory is re-evaluated.