Gender Equality in Plastic Surgery Training: A Canadian Nationwide Cross-sectional Analysis.

Introduction: One of the important factors in achieving gender equity is ensuring equitable surgical training for all. Previous studies have shown that females get significantly lower surgical exposure than males in certain surgical specialties. Gender gap in surgical exposure has never been assessed in plastic surgery. To that end, the goal of this study was to assess if there are any differences in plastic surgery training between male and female residents. Methods: A survey was sent to all plastic surgery residency programs in Canada to assess the No. of surgeries residents operated on as a co-surgeon or primary assistant during their training. The survey also assessed career goals, level of interest in the specialty, and subjective perception of gender bias. Results: A total of 89 plastic surgery residents (59.3% participation rate) completed the survey and were included in the study. The average No. of reconstructive cases residents operated on as a co-surgeon or primary assistant was 245 ± 312 cases. There was no difference in either reconstructive or aesthetic surgery case logs between male and female residents (p > .05). However, a significantly larger proportion of females (39%) compared to males (4%) felt that their gender limited their exposure to surgical cases and led to a worsening of their overall surgical training (p < .001). Finally, a larger proportion of male residents were interested in academic careers while a larger proportion of female residents were interested in a community practice (p = .024). Conclusion: While there is no evidence of differences in the volume of logged cases between genders, female surgical residents still feel that their respective gender limits their overall surgical training. Gender inequalities in training should be addressed by residency programs.

Introduction: L'un des facteurs importants pour atteindre l'égalité des genres est d'assurer une formation chirurgicale équitable pour tous. Des études antérieures ont montré que les femmes ont une exposition significativement moindre à la chirurgie que les hommes dans certaines spécialités chirurgicales. L'écart entre genres pour l'exposition à la chirurgie n'a jamais été évalué en chirurgie plastique. À cette fin, la présente étude a eu pour objectif d'évaluer s'il y avait des différences dans la formation à la chirurgie plastique entre les résidents masculins et féminins. Méthodes: Une enquête a été envoyée à tous les programmes canadiens de résidence en chirurgie plastique pour évaluer le nombre d'interventions auxquelles les résidents ont participé en tant que co-chirurgien ou assistant principal au cours de leur formation. L'enquête a également évalué les objectifs de carrière, le niveau d'intérêt dans la spécialité et la perception subjective d'un biais lié au genre. Résultats: En tout, 89 résidents en chirurgie plastique (taux de participation de 59,3 %) ont répondu à l'enquête et ont été inclus dans l'étude. Le nombre moyen de cas de chirurgie reconstructrice au cours desquelles les résidents sont intervenus en tant que co-chirurgien ou principal assistant était de 245 ± 312 cas. Il n'y a pas eu de différence entre les journaux de cas, qu'il s'agisse de chirurgie reconstructrice ou de chirurgie esthétique entre résidents masculins et féminins (P > 0,05). Cependant, un nettement plus grand pourcentage de femmes (39 %) que d'hommes (4 %) estimait que leur genre limitait leur exposition à des cas chirurgicaux et résultait dans une aggravation de leur formation globale à la chirurgie (P < 0,001). Enfin, un plus grand pourcentage de résidents masculins était intéressé par une carrière universitaire alors qu'un plus grand pourcentage de résidentes était intéressé par une pratique dans la communauté (P = 0,024). Conclusion: Bien qu'il n'y ait pas de données probantes étayant des différences de volume des cas consignés entre les genres, les résidentes féminines en chirurgie pensent encore que leur genre limite leur formation chirurgicale. Les inégalités entre genres devraient être abordées par les programmes de résidence.

Upper Extremity Infection Related to Intravenous Drug Use: Considering the True Cost of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant morbidity and mortality in people who inject drugs (PWID). Upper extremity soft tissue infections are frequently associated with intravenous drug use (IVDU) due to poor compliance with aseptic technique. In Canada, multiple safe injection sites providing clean injection supplies closed, leaving many PWID with no alternatives to inject safely. It was hypothesized that these closures will correspond with increased morbidity and mortality among PWID. The main objective of this study was to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of upper extremity infections in PWID. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study. The primary outcome of interest was the frequency of upper extremity infections in PWID. Data were filtered to include only those patients presenting to the emergency department between March to June of 2019 and 2020. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare the number of IVDU patients among patients with upper extremity skin infections between these time periods. RESULTS: The number of IVDU patients treated for upper extremity infections in Hamilton significantly increased during the pandemic, relative risk = 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.9, P = .0012,) while total upper extremity infections numbers have decreased overall. During the pandemic, PWID made up a larger proportion of upper extremity infections (χ2 = 10.444, P = .00123). Demographic data such as age and sex of IVDU patients presenting with upper extremity infection was not significantly affected by the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the pandemic on accessing harm reduction services has led to evident increases in morbidity as described by this study. Further research on the impact of closures in PWID is needed to quantify these harms and work toward mitigation strategies.

Assessment of the Readability, Adequacy, and Suitability of Online Patient Education Resources for Benign Vascular Tumours Using the DISCERN Instrument.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the quality and readability of Internet-based patient resources for vascular tumours in order to understand which areas require improvement. METHODS: A World Wide Web search was performed, in addition to a literature review using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Any material that contained information on vascular tumours pertaining to patient education was included. We evaluated resources with DISCERN and Flesch Reading Ease scores when applicable. The language of publication was restricted to English and French. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087885). RESULTS: A total of 117 online resources were screened, with 73 resources included in the final analysis. The overall DISCERN rating for the patient resources was 1.8 (0.8). The majority of online resources failed to depict the entire spectrum of benign vascular tumours. The mean Flesch score was 36 (19), which translates to a college-level readability. CONCLUSION: The majority of resources were not adequate or comprehensive and were written at a much higher level than the average reader would be expected to comprehend.

OBJECTIF: La présente étude vise à évaluer la qualité et la lisibilité de ressources en ligne sur les tumeurs vasculaires pour les patients afin de déterminer les améliorations à apporter. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont effectué une recherche dans Internet et procédé à une analyse bibliographique dans PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE et EMBASE. Tous les documents qui contenaient de l'information sur les tumeurs vasculaires à l'intention des patients étaient inclus. Les chercheurs ont évalué les ressources à l'aide des scores de DISCERN et de Flesch Reading Ease, si la situation le justifiait. La langue des publications était restreinte à l'anglais et au français. La présente analyse a été enregistrée dans PROSPERO (CRD42018087885). RÉSULTATS: Au total, les chercheurs ont examiné 117 ressources en ligne, dont 73 ont fait partie de l'analyse définitive. La classification DISCERN globale des ressources pour les patients était de 1,8 (0,8). La majorité des ressources en ligne ne décrivaient pas tout le spectre des tumeurs vasculaires bénignes. Le score de Flesch moyen s'élevait à 36 (19), soit une lisibilité de niveau collégial. CONCLUSION: La majorité des ressources étaient inadéquates ou incomplètes et étaient rédigées à un niveau de lecture beaucoup plus élevé que ce à quoi on pourrait s'attendre chez un lecteur moyen.

Asymptotic convergence in distribution of the area bounded by prevalence-weighted Kaplan-Meier curves using empirical process modelling.

The Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator is a simple and powerful tool in time to event analysis. An extension exists for populations stratified into cohorts where a population survival curve is generated by weighted averaging of cohort-level survival curves. For making population-level comparisons using this statistic, we analyse the statistics of the area between two such weighted survival curves. We derive the large sample behaviour of this statistic based on an empirical process of product-limit estimators. This estimator was used by an interdisciplinary National Institutes of Health-Social Security Administration team in the identification of medical conditions to prioritize for adjudication in disability benefits processing.

Quantitation of Cancer Treatment Response by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Multicenter Assessment of Measurement Variability.

The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability of quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters used in assessments of treatment response across multiple sites and readers. Methods: Paired pre- and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT images of 30 oncologic patients were distributed to 22 readers across 15 U.S. and international sites. One reader was aware of the full medical history (readreference) of the patients, whereas the 21 other readers were unaware. The readers selected the single hottest tumor from each study, and made SUV measurements from this target lesion and the liver. Descriptive statistics, percentage changes in the measurements, and their agreements were obtained. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the percentage change in SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax) of the hottest tumor was 0.894 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.813-0.941), and the individual equivalence coefficient was 1.931 (95% CI, 0.568-6.449) when all reads were included (n = 638). When only the measurements that selected the same target tumor as the readreference (n = 486) were included, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the %ΔSUVmax was 0.944 (95% CI, 0.841-0.989), and the individual equivalence coefficient was -0.688 (95% CI, -1.810 to -0.092). The absolute change in SUVmean of liver corrected for lean body mass showed upper and lower limits of agreement (average bias ± 2 SDs) of 0.13 and -0.13 g/mL. Conclusion: The quantitative tumor SUV changes measured across multiple sites and readers show a high correlation. Selection of the same tumor target among readers further increased the degree of correlation.

Batch Model for Batched Timestamps Data Analysis with Application to the SSA Disability Program.

The Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) is responsible for holding hearings, issuing decisions, and reviewing appeals as part of the Social Security Administration's disability determining process. In order to control and process cases, the ODAR has established a Case Processing and Management System (CPMS) to record management information since December 2003. The CPMS provides a detailed case status history for each case. Due to the large number of appeal requests and limited resources, the number of pending claims at ODAR was over one million cases by March 31, 2015. Our National Institutes of Health (NIH) team collaborated with SSA and developed a Case Status Change Model (CSCM) project to meet the ODAR's urgent need of reducing backlogs and improve hearings and appeals process. One of the key issues in our CSCM project is to estimate the expected service time and its variation for each case status code. The challenge is that the systems recorded job departure times may not be the true job finished times. As the CPMS timestamps data of case status codes showed apparent batch patterns, we proposed a batch model and applied the constrained least squares method to estimate the mean service times and the variances. We also proposed a batch search algorithm to determine the optimal batch partition, as no batch partition was given in the real data. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods. Finally, we applied the method to analyze a real CPMS data from ODAR/SSA.

Assessment and Care of the Critically Ill Rabbit.

Rabbits have the ability to hide their signs and often present in a state of decompensatory shock. Handling can increase susceptibility to stress-induced cardiomyopathy and specific hemodynamic changes. Careful monitoring with a specific reference range is important to detect early decompensation, change the therapeutic plan in a timely manner, and assess prognostic indicators. Fluid requirements are higher in rabbits than in other small domestic mammals and can be corrected both enterally and parenterally. Critical care in rabbits can be extrapolated to many hindgut fermenters, but a specific reference range and dosage regimen need to be determined.

Disability Among Veterans: Analysis of the National Survey of Veterans (1997-2001).

This manuscript assesses whether the Veterans Administration Rating System (VADR) correlates with self-reported activities of daily living (ADL) used in the National Survey of Veterans and likelihood of employment. Veterans' disability benefits are determined based on a single-index standardized rating scheme, measured at time of discharge. The primary aim of this study was to assess how this single-index rating of disability for veterans compares to multidimensional measures of disability (ADL and instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]). The relationship between disability ratings and labor market outcomes such as job search behavior and the likelihood of being employed was assessed. Successful labor market reintegration requires both physical/mental well-being, we examined the extent that VADR can capture the relationship between job market behavior and measures of mental/physical health. Kernel regression estimates were obtained of the likelihood of working/looking for work. Mean numbers of IADL and ADL difficulties and medical conditions were positively associated with VADR (p-trend < 0.001). An inverse relationship was observed with VADR and predicted probability of working (p-trend < 0.001). The combination of >4 ADL/IADL deficits and mental health diagnosis increased the likelihood of not working. The probability of not working correlated with VADR when VADR was greater than 40%.

First in line: prioritizing receipt of Social Security disability benefits based on likelihood of death during adjudication.

BACKGROUND: Given the complexity of the adjudication process and volume of applications to Social Security Administration's (SSA) disability programs, many individuals with serious medical conditions die while awaiting an application decision. Limitations of traditional survival methods called for a new empirical approach to identify conditions resulting in rapid mortality. OBJECTIVE: To identify health conditions associated with significantly higher mortality than a key reference group among applicants for SSA disability programs. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified mortality patterns and generated a survival surface for a reference group using conditions already designated for expedited processing. We identified conditions associated with significantly higher mortality than the reference group and prioritized them by the expected likelihood of death during the adjudication process. SUBJECTS: Administrative records of 29 million Social Security disability applicants, who applied for benefits from 1996 to 2007, were analyzed. MEASURES: We computed survival spells from time of onset of disability to death, and from date of application to death. Survival data were organized by entry cohort. RESULTS: In our sample, we observed that approximately 42,000 applicants died before a decision was made on their disability claims. We identified 24 conditions with survival profiles comparable with the reference group. Applicants with these conditions were not likely to survive adjudication. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach facilitates ongoing revision of the conditions SSA designates for expedited awards and has applicability to other programs where survival profiles are a consideration.

Transitions in mobility, ADLs, and IADLs among working-age Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Disability is a dynamic process where functional status may change over time. Examination of the Medicare population suggests that, for those over age 65, disability status will fluctuate in 30% of beneficiaries each year. Less is known about those under age 65. The dynamic nature of disability is of relevance since it has important implications for social policies related to disability. OBJECTIVES: To: (1) describe the characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries eligible due to disability; and (2) estimate the proportion of individuals with transitions in functional status over a one-year period stratified by baseline characteristics and diagnostic subgroups. METHODS: We used the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 1995 to 2005 to examine transitions in mobility and daily activities among individuals who were eligible for Medicare coverage due to disability. RESULTS: From the standpoint of function in mobility and daily activities, the working-age Medicare population with disability is fairly stable. While 75%-90% of our sample reported no disability or stable disability from one year to the next, depending on the condition and disability metric, as many as 13-14% of individuals showed improvement or decline in their functional status. CONCLUSIONS: In the working-age population with disability, a small percentage of individuals will improve or worsen from one year to the next. Since these transitions are associated with a variety of individual characteristics including health conditions, further research applied to larger samples is required to refine policy relevant models that might inform decisions related to ongoing eligibility for disability programs.

Estimating transition probabilities in mobility and total costs for medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To examine how persons move back and forth along levels of mobility disability. DESIGN: Self-reported mobility limitations were used to create categories of annual transition states. The total cost to Medicare associated with each year was calculated for each participant. In addition, we examined cost relative to transition state, adjusting for demographic and other health status variables. SETTING: National survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the longitudinal Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 1992 to 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual self-reported mobility limitations and total Medi costs. RESULTS: Most participants remained without mobility limitations or improved over time. Reported average costs were 10 times higher for those who transitioned to severe limitations, unable to walk, or death compared with persons who reported no mobility limitation. Estimated costs were highest for those transitioning to increased states of disability and to death. CONCLUSIONS: Mobility limitations in older adults are dynamic, and improvement (as measured by annual transitions) occurred for a large number of Medicare beneficiaries. High total annual costs were observed in groups that transitioned to worsening mobility states, suggesting a link between mobility limitation transitions and cost. Prevention and treatment of mobility limitation may be an important factor to consider in health care reform.

Concordance between prescriber- and patient-reported previous medical history and NSAID indication in the CADEUS cohort.

PURPOSE: Various data sources may be used in pharmacoepidemiological studies. When they cannot be obtained from valid databases, medical data must be obtained from physicians or patients. In the CADEUS study, both patients and their prescribers reported medical data allowing investigation of the concordance between these sources. METHODS: CADEUS is a French national cohort study of traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and coxib users conducted between September 2003 and August 2004 in France that employed self-administered questionnaires to obtain medical data from patients and their prescribers. The Kappa statistic (kappa) was used to measure concordance between patients and prescribers in 18 530 pairs with regard to previous medical history and index NSAID indication. RESULTS: For previous medical history, the proportion of agreement ranged from 70.7 to 99.2% and concordance was: substantial (kappa = 0.61-0.80) for hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke and diabetes; moderate (kappa = 0.41-0.60) for angina pectoris, peripheral arterial disease and hypercholesterolaemia; fair (kappa = 0.21-0.40) for unstable angina, cardiac insufficiency, dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux and gastric ulcer; slight (kappa < 0.21) for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. For index NSAID indication, the proportion of agreement ranged from 84.3 to 99.4% and concordance was almost perfect (kappa = 0.81-1.00) for inflammatory rheumatism, flu-like symptoms, dysmenorrhoea and dental pain; substantial for arthritis, back pain and headache; moderate for osteoarticular pain. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance was better for specific or serious conditions both regarding previous medical history and indication. Prescriber or patient perception and understanding may reduce concordance for certain items.