RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of racial disparities and Socioeconomic Status (SES) on pelvic floor disorder (PFD) care. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Racial disparities in colorectal PFD remain uninvestigated, despite prior research in urogynecology. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital of London in 2023. Patients with colorectal PFD from 2013 to 2018 were evaluated. Patients were classified according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores and divided into quintiles. The lowest quintile represents the most deprived, whereas the higher quintile represents the least deprived. Assessed variables: patient complaint, symptoms, consultant and biofeedback referrals, investigations, multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) discussions, treatment, and follow-up appointments. RESULTS: 2001 patients were considered. A total of 1126 patients were initially analyzed, and 875 patients were excluded owing to incomplete data. Eight ethnic groups were identified in this study. Constipation was the most common compliant across ethnic groups (P=0,03). Diagnostics, MDM discussions, and conservative treatment did not vary between ethnicities. White British and Asian patients were significantly more likely to be seen by a consultant (P=0.001) and undergo surgery (P=0.002). In the second part of the study, the IMD was calculated for 1992 patients who were categorized into quintiles. Diagnostic tests, discussion in MDM, Consultant review, and surgical treatments were significantly lower in the two lowest quintiles (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.02, and P=0.02, respectively). Conservative treatment did not vary between the IMD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal PFD exist among ethnic minorities and patients of low SES. This study allows for the replication of service provision frameworks in other affected areas to minimize inequalities.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To meet the increasing demands for colorectal pelvic floor services, a dedicated telephone triage assessment clinic (TTAC) was set up to establish a more efficient pathway, and reduce waiting times and patient's visits to the hospital. The primary aim of this study was to review TTAC in patients suffering from pelvic floor dysfunction and assess its feasibility. Secondary aims include measurement of waiting times for TTAC, main presenting complaints, and main treatment outcomes, including the need for review by a consultant surgeon. METHODS: Review of data collected retrospectively in a single tertiary referral center collected from an institutional database. KEY RESULTS: Between January 2016 and October 2017, 1192 patients referred to our pelvic floor unit were suitable for TTAC. Of these, 694 patients had complete records. There were 66 without follow-up after the initial TTAC, leaving 628 patients for analysis. In all, 86% were females and 14% were males, with a mean age of 52 years (range: 18-89). The median waiting time for TTAC was 31 days (range: 0-184). The main presenting complaint during the TTAC was obstructive defecation in 69.4%, fecal incontinence in 28.5%, and rectal prolapse in 2.1%. In our study, 611 patients had conservative management (97.3%), with a median of three sessions per patient (range: 1-16), while 82 patients (13.1%) needed a surgical intervention. Only 223 patients (35.5%) were reviewed by a consultant at some stage during the study period. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: To optimize resources, an adequate triage system allowed us to streamline the pathway for each individual patient with pelvic floor dysfunction according to their symptoms and/or test results with the aim of reducing waiting times and expediting treatment.