For making a declaration of countermeasures against the falling birth rate from the Japanese Society for Hygiene: summary of discussion in the working group on academic research strategy against an aging society with low birth rate.

In 1952, the Japanese Society for Hygiene had once passed a resolution at its 22nd symposium on population control, recommending the suppression of population growth based on the idea of cultivating a healthier population in the area of eugenics. Over half a century has now passed since this recommendation; Japan is witnessing an aging of the population (it is estimated that over 65-year-olds made up 27.7% of the population in 2017) and a decline in the birth rate (total fertility rate 1.43 births per woman in 2017) at a rate that is unparalleled in the world; Japan is faced with a "super-aging" society with low birth rate. In 2017, the Society passed a resolution to encourage all scientists to engage in academic researches to address the issue of the declining birth rate that Japan is currently facing. In this commentary, the Society hereby declares that the entire text of the 1952 proposal is revoked and the ideas relating to eugenics is rejected. Since the Society has set up a working group on the issue in 2016, there have been three symposiums, and working group committee members began publishing a series of articles in the Society's Japanese language journal. This commentary primarily provides an overview of the findings from the published articles, which will form the scientific basis for the Society's declaration. The areas we covered here included the following: (1) improving the social and work environment to balance between the personal and professional life; (2) proactive education on reproductive health; (3) children's health begins with nutritional management in women of reproductive age; (4) workplace environment and occupational health; (5) workplace measures to counter the declining birth rate; (6) research into the effect of environmental chemicals on sexual maturity, reproductive function, and the children of next generation; and (7) comprehensive research into the relationship among contemporary society, parental stress, and healthy child-rearing. Based on the seven topics, we will set out a declaration to address Japan's aging society with low birth rate.

[Socioeconomic Factors and Policies Regarding Declining Birth Rates in Japan].

The factors contributing to the declining birthrate in Japan include the declining marriage rate, an increase in the average age of those getting married, economic burden, childcare burden, later child-bearing, and infertility. There is a gender difference in role division, with 70% of unmarried people live with their parents and continue to work while leaving the household chores to their mothers. The loss of these housekeeping services and the increase in the number of irregular workers are factors contributing to the declining marriage rate and the increase in the average age of those getting married. The expansion of the family support policy in Japan from the male breadwinner model to the earner-career model may have been delayed, but it is expected to provide economic benefits as well as actual childcare service benefits in order to reduce the economic and physical burden of childcare for married couples. It is also necessary to provide education in reproductive health to both men and women in schools and workplaces regarding late child-bearing and infertility. Furthermore, it is necessary to evaluate the cost-effectiveness analysis of improvements in fertility and disclose the relevant information in addition to sharing information on medical technology related to pregnancy/childbirth and treatment of diseases. It is urgent to prepare society for natural and healthy pregnancies/childbirths during optimal child-bearing years.

Cost-benefit analysis of comprehensive mental health prevention programs in Japanese workplaces: a pilot study.

We examined the implementation of mental health prevention programs in Japanese workplaces and the costs and benefits. A cross-sectional survey targeting mental health program staff at 11 major companies was conducted. Questionnaires explored program implementation based on the guidelines of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Labor, materials, outsourcing costs, overheads, employee mental discomfort, and absentee numbers, and work attendance were examined. Cost-benefit analyses were conducted from company perspectives assessing net benefits per employee and returns on investment. The surveyed companies employ an average of 1,169 workers. The implementation rate of the mental health prevention programs was 66% for primary, 51% for secondary, and 60% for tertiary programs. The program's average cost was 12,608 yen per employee and the total benefit was 19,530 yen per employee. The net benefit per employee was 6,921 yen and the return on investment was in the range of 0.27-16.85. Seven of the 11 companies gained a net benefit from the mental health programs.

[Resource utilization of gastric cancer patients aggregated item-by-item and comparison of the medical costs with the reimbursement level and length of hospital stay].

OBJECTIVE: Using the new hospital cost accounting method per case based on cost per service, we compared the medical costs with the reimbursement level and length of hospital stay for gastric cancer patients. METHOD: The subjects were 158 gastric cancer patients who were admitted for surgery in a public hospital in Tokyo between 1995 and 1997. The new cost accounting method that we developed according to the activity-based costing method was applied in the following four levels; major items of expenditure for the hospital; costs incurred in each department; costs per medical service units; and costs of all the services per case. RESULTS: 1) 158 patients were studied. All the cost figures are adjusted to those in the 1998 fiscal year. The mean length of stay (LOS) of the 158 cases were 52 +/- 16 days. The average charge was 1,835,000 yen, and the average costs was 2,034,000 yen. 2) The per capita ratio of charge to cost (RCC) was 0.90. RCC for medications, procedure treatments, laboratory tests, and medical management/accommodation were 1.04, 1.44, 1.35, and 0.31, respectively. 3) The peason's correlation coefficient between the total costs and LOS was 0.80 (P < 0.001). A high correlation was noted for costs for medical management/accommodation and nursing with LOS (r = 0.98, P < 0.001; r = 0.97, P < 0.001; respectively), while that for cost for operations was low (r = 0.03, P > 0.05). The partial correlation coefficient between the total costs and the total charges with the LOS adjustment was 0.58 (P < 0.001). The coefficient for costs and charges for medications and procedure were high (r = 0.99, P < 0.001; r = 1.00, P < 0.001), while that for medical management/accommodation was low (r = 0.16, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LOS reflected the cost for room and nursing, but not the resource consumption for medical treatment per case. While the present fee schedules overestimate the costs of medication and laboratory tests, they underestimate those for medical management/accommodation. LOS and charges did not correctly reflect the medical costs per case.