Cost-effectiveness comparison between neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

The aim of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) compared to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist and estramustine. We retrospectively analyzed data within Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database containing 2971 PC patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at four institutes between July 1996 and July 2017. We identified 237 and 403 high-risk patients who underwent RP and ePLND (ePLND group), and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by RP and limited PLND (neoadjuvant group), respectively. The oncological outcomes and cost-effectiveness were compared between groups. Medical cost calculation focused on PC-related medication and adjuvant radiotherapy. Biochemical recurrence-free and overall survival rates in the neoadjuvant group were significantly higher than those in the ePLND group. Significantly higher number of patients progressed to castration-resistant PC in the ePLND group than in the neoadjuvant group. Background-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) revealed that neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy independently reduced the risk of biochemical recurrence after RP. The 5-year cost per person was significantly higher in the ePLND group than in the neoadjuvant group. Although the present study was retrospective, neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by RP as a concurrent strategy has potential to improve oncological outcome and cost-effectiveness.

Current status of systemic chemotherapy for octogenarians with advanced urothelial cancer in Japan: a Japanese multi-institutional study (CURE study).

BACKGROUND: The standard regimen of systemic chemotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC) changed from methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in 2008 when the use of gemcitabine for UC began to be reimbursed by public health insurance in Japan. We examined its influence on the chemotherapy trend in elderly patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS: Among 345 patients included in our previous multicenter retrospective cohort study (chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma: renal function and efficacy study; CURE study), the outcome of 30 patients aged ≥80 years was reviewed before and after 2008 and compared with 315 young patients. RESULTS: There were only 7 (4.6 %) elderly individuals among all registered patients before 2008, whereas the number increased to 23 (12 %) after 2008. Before 2008, only one elderly patient received MVAC, while GC (whose rate was similar to the rate in young patients) was administered to 13 patients (56.5 %) after 2008. The chemotherapeutic effect and overall survival (OS) rate was not significantly different between young and elderly patients. In the elderly treated with the GC regimen, the renal impairment rate after the first cycle was significantly higher, and the presence of distant metastases and renal impairment were independent prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Since GC was approved as the standard regimen for first-line chemotherapy in UC, selected elderly patients have been able to safely receive systemic chemotherapy like young patients. The clinical response rate and OS rate were similar to the young, but we need to monitor changes in renal function more closely in the elderly treated with GC.

What is the most preferred wound site for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?: a questionnaire assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Although specimen extraction site selection for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is relatively flexible and is mostly selected by surgeons from the patient's standpoint, the patient's request may differ from the medical worker's recommendation. The cosmetic aspect may also differ with age, gender, and the extent of medical knowledge. We performed an unsigned questionnaire assessment of individual preferences for LDN wound sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2007 and October 2008, we surveyed LDN wound site preferences among 148 physicians, 263 nurses, and 266 outpatients of urology at Akita University Hospital. They were questioned for their age, gender, occupation (medical worker or not), and for the most preferred surgical wound site among the following: A, lower vertical midline: B, upper vertical midline: C, anterior subcostal: D, Pfannenstiel: E, Gibson: and F, subcostal flank. The valid response rate was 93.5% (677/724). RESULTS: Wound sites preferred (ranked in descending order) were F (48.3%), D (25.6%), E (10.5%), A (9.0%), C (5.2%), and B (1.4%). The subcostal flank incision was the most preferred in almost all the categories. Second preferences were Pfannenstiel incisions in women and incisions on the lower abdomen in men. Overall, flank and lower abdominal incisions tended to be preferred, and mid and upper abdominal incisions tended to be avoided. Medical workers selected the subcostal flank and Pfannenstiel incisions more frequently than outpatients. With increasing age, the selection rates of the Gibson and the lower vertical midline incisions increased, whereas the subcostal flank and the Pfannenstiel incisions decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The subcostal flank was the most preferred LDN sites. Age, gender, and the extent of medical knowledge may influence the individual preferences for LDN wound sites.