Disparity in the use of adjuvant radioactive iodine ablation among high-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify treatment disparities existing prior to publication of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines in order to identify patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) at risk for receiving inadequate treatment. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PTC from 2011 to 2013 were identified using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. High-risk disease was defined as T4, N1, or M1. Chi-square tests compared characteristics of patients with and without high-risk disease and characteristics of high-risk patients who did and did not receive radioactive iodine ablation (RAI). Likelihoods of having high-risk disease, of receiving RAI, and of cause-specific death were calculated using regression analyses. RESULTS: Sample included 32,229 individuals; 7894 (24.5%) had high-risk disease. Mean age was 50.0 years, 24,815 (77.0%) were female, and 21,318 (66.2%) were white. Odds of high-risk disease were greater among males (OR:2.04; 95% CI:1.92-2.16), Hispanics (OR:1.67; 95% CI:1.56-1.79) and Asians (OR:1.49; 95% CI:1.37-1.62), and uninsured (OR:1.24; 95% CI:1.07-1.43), and lower among patients ages 45-64 (OR:0.57; 95% CI:0.53-0.60), and ≥65 years (OR:0.54; 95% CI:0.50-0.59), and Blacks (OR:0.46; 95% CI:0.40-0.53). Most (69.3%) high-risk patients received RAI. Odds of receiving RAI were lower among patients age ≥65 years (OR:0.67; 95% CI:0.58-0.77), uninsured (OR:0.52; 95% CI:0.41-0.67), or with Medicaid (OR:0.58; 95% CI:0.50-0.69). RAI use reduced the risk of cause-specific mortality (HR:0.29; 95% CI:0.18-0.47). CONCLUSION: Knowledge of these treatment disparities will allow recognition of groups at risk for high-risk disease and receiving inadequate treatment.

Recent Trends Suggest Possible Inappropriate Utilization of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the utilization of elective stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the Medicare population. METHODS: Nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service databases for 2004 to 2016 were reviewed. Current Procedural Terminology codes for stress MPI were selected: standard planar and single-photon emission computed tomography (STD) and PET. Utilization rates per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated. Elective examinations were identified using place-of-service codes for private offices and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs). Medicare physician specialty codes identified the performing physician. Because Medicare Part B databases are complete population counts, sample statistics were not required. RESULTS: Elective STD MPI utilization peaked in 2006 at 74 studies/1,000 and had declined by 36% by 2016. Cardiologists' share of STD MPI grew from 79% to 87% between 2004 and 2016. Cardiologists perform STD MPI primarily in private offices, where utilization peaked in 2008 and then demonstrated an absolute decline of 28 studies/1,000 by 2016. During this same time period, cardiologists' use of STD MPI in HOPDs demonstrated an absolute increase of 8.1 studies/1,000. From 2004 to 2016, STD MPI use by radiologists declined by 58%. Elective PET MPI maintained an upward trend, reflecting increasing use by cardiologists in private offices. CONCLUSIONS: Elective STD MPI use is declining, but cardiologists are performing an increasing share in outpatient settings. The drop in private office STD MPI among cardiologists was far greater than the corresponding increase in its use in HOPDs, suggesting that many studies previously performed in private offices were unindicated. Self-referred PET MPI utilization has rapidly grown in cardiology private offices.

Provider Distribution Changes in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in the Medicare Population Over the Past Decade.

Both radiologists as well as nonimaging physicians perform dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging in the United States. This study aims to compare provider distribution between these physician groups on the Medicare population, which is the predominant age group of patients evaluated by this imaging procedure. Using the 2 relevant Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition codes for DXA scans, source data were obtained from the CMS Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 2003 through 2013. DXA scan procedure volumes for radiologists and nonradiologists on Medicare patients were tabulated. Utilization rates were calculated. From 2003 to 2013, the total number of DXA scans performed on Medicare patients decreased by 2%. However, over the same period, the number of scans performed by radiologists had increased by 25% over nonimaging specialists, whose utilization had declined by approximately the same amount. From 2003 to 2013, the rate of utilization of DXA scans in the Medicare fee-for-service population declined somewhat. However, radiologists continue to gain market share from other specialists and now predominate in this type of imaging by a substantial margin.

Recent reimbursement changes and their effect on hospital and private office use of myocardial perfusion imaging.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to examine recent trends in the utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and to reflect on their causes and their implications for radiologists. METHODS: Nationwide Medicare Part B databases for 2000 through 2010 were used. Codes for primary MPI studies (including PET) were selected. Medicare specialty codes were used to identify MPI examinations done by radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians. Place-of-service codes were used to identify examinations performed in offices versus hospital settings. Utilization rates per 1,000 fee-for-service beneficiaries were calculated. Trends were assessed by place of service and specialty. RESULTS: The overall MPI utilization rate rose from 2000 through 2004, followed by a period of stabilization from 2005 to 2008. A peak of 88.0 per 1,000 was reached in 2006. In 2009 and 2010, a decline occurred, with the rate dropping by 13% to 76.9. In private offices, cardiologists' utilization grew rapidly from 2000 through 2006, but growth stopped thereafter. Their rate peaked in 2008 at 50.6 but dropped to 44.4 by 2010 (-12%). Radiologists' role in office MPI was minimal. In hospital settings, radiologists predominated in 2000. Their rate remained stable through 2004 but thereafter began to decline steadily, dropping by 35% by 2010. Cardiologists' hospital-based utilization rate rose gradually, then flattened, but began to rise in 2009 and 2010. By 2010, cardiologists performed more hospital MPI examinations than radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists' initially predominant role in hospital-based MPI has eroded recently, while that of cardiologists has strengthened. This seems related to a shift among cardiologists away from office practice and into hospital affiliations.

Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of self-referral by comparing recent trends in payments and utilization rates for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) among radiologists and cardiologists between 1998 and 2006. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nationwide Medicare Part B claims databases for 1998 through 2006 were used. The 4 primary MPI codes were selected. Using Medicare's physician specialty codes, physician providers were identified as radiologists, cardiologists, or other physicians. Payments for MPI to the 3 groups were tracked over the study period. Trends in utilization rates in both hospital and private office settings were also compared among the 3 groups. In addition, utilization trends were studied for related procedures, such as stress echocardiography (SE) and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography (CA). RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2006, Medicare Part B payments to radiologists for MPI increased from $72.6 million to $84.0 million (+16%), while among cardiologists, payments increased from $242.6 million to $972.0 million (+301%). Private office utilization rates per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased by 215% among cardiologists, compared with 32% among radiologists. In hospital settings, the rate changes were much more modest. Hospital utilization rates were consistently higher among radiologists than cardiologists; in hospital settings in 2006, the rate was 15.3 per 1,000 among radiologists, compared with 11.8 per 1,000 among cardiologists. Between 1998 and 2006, the utilization rate for SE among cardiologists increased by 20%, and the rate for diagnostic CA among cardiologists also increased by 20%. CONCLUSION: In recent years, there have been very sharp increases in the costs and utilization of MPI among cardiologists compared with radiologists. Most of the growth occurred in cardiologists' private offices. In hospital settings, radiologists still do more MPI examinations than cardiologists. Because MPI is a highly reimbursed procedure and there is no evidence that coronary disease is increasing in frequency in the Medicare population, this trend raises a concern about inappropriate self-referral. This is particularly true in view of the facts that the utilization of a competing procedure such as SE also continues to increase among cardiologists and that MPI is not substituting for an invasive procedure such as diagnostic CA.

Comparison of recent utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging among radiologists and cardiologists.

PURPOSE: To study recent practice patterns in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and related procedures among radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The nationwide Medicare administrative Part B claims summary databases from 1998 and 2002 were used to assess utilization rate changes in the 4 primary procedure codes for MPI, the seven codes for diagnostic cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography, and the single code for stress echocardiography. Rate changes among radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians were determined for the total Medicare population, as well as for the 3 primary places of service at which imaging is formed: hospital inpatient facilities, hospital outpatient facilities, and private offices. Ratios of the use of the 2 supplementary codes for left ventricular (LV) wall motion and ejection fraction to that of the primary MPI codes were calculated for 2002. RESULTS: The utilization rate per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries of MPI rose among radiologists from 19.8 in 1998 to 20.1 in 2002, a 2% increase. The rate among cardiologists rose from 22.9 in 1998 to 40.7 in 2002, a 78% increase. Most of this growth occurred in cardiologists' offices, where the utilization rate increased 101% over the 4 years. In 2002, the ratios of the use of the supplementary LV wall motion and ejection fraction codes to that of the primary MPI codes were 1.73 for cardiologists and 1.46 among radiologists. Between 1998 and 2002, the utilization of diagnostic cardiac catheterization among cardiologists increased by 19%, and their utilization of stress echocardiography increased by 21%. CONCLUSION: In recent years within the Medicare population, the rate of utilization of MPI among radiologists has remained relatively stable, whereas it has risen sharply among cardiologists. The greatest growth was seen in cardiologists' private offices. This raises concerns about possible inappropriate utilization of MPI and also about the potential effect self-referral has on this utilization trend. The increased use of MPI by cardiologists did not result in reduction in their use of either cardiac catheterization with coronary angiography or stress echocardiography.

Recent rapid increase in utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and related procedures: 1996-1998 practice patterns.

PURPOSE: To evaluate cardiac nuclear medicine practice patterns in different physician specialty groups to better understand a recent rapid increase in utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and certain supplementary examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: National Medicare Part B databases from 1996 and 1998 were used to evaluate utilization of four primary procedure codes for radionuclide MPI and two supplementary codes (add-on left ventricular wall motion or left ventricular ejection fraction). Utilization rates were calculated for cardiologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Other cardiac imaging for which radionuclide imaging might be substituted was similarly studied. RESULTS: Overall utilization rate of radionuclide MPI per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased 19.1%, from 4,046 in 1996 to 4,820 in 1998 (P <.001). However, for cardiologists the rate increased from 1,771 to 2,413 (36.3%), whereas for radiologists it increased from 1,958 to 2,031 (3.7%) (P <.001 for both changes). Overall utilization rate of add-on codes increased 264% from 1,006 to 3,657 (P <.001). By 1998, the ratio of these add-on examinations to primary MPI was 0.94 among cardiologists compared with 0.53 among radiologists (relative risk, 1.77; 95% CI: 1.76, 1.78). Cardiologist-performed stress echocardiography and cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography increased by 24.2% and 8.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Growth in utilization of radionuclide MPI between 1996 and 1998 was almost 10 times higher among cardiologists than radiologists. Utilization of the two add-on codes increased even more dramatically. The greater use of MPI is not a substitute for other cardiac imaging.