RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the peripartum period is considered to be a higher risk of critical obstetric bleeding compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). However, the evidence for the safety of using LMWH during the peripartum period is currently lacking. METHODS: This study retrospectively investigated a nationwide medical database to clarify the safety of using LMWH during childbirth. The Japanese Nationwide Diagnosis Procedure Combination database was retrospectively reviewed, and data from women with childbirth between 2018 and 2022 were collected. RESULTS: Among the overall 354,299 women with childbirth, 3,099 were with obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 484 were with critical obstetric bleeding requiring massive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion ≥4,000 cc, and 38 were with maternal death. Among the overall women, each of the anticoagulants other than LMWH was associated with critical obstetrical bleeding with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) greater than 1.0, while LMWH was not associated with critical obstetrical bleeding (aOR, 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.11-2.71)). This finding did not change in subgroup analyses among those with Cesarean section. Furthermore, UFH was associated with critical bleeding among the 3,099 women with obstetrical DIC (aOR, 3.91 (2.83-5.46)), while LMWH was not (aOR, 0.26 (0.03-1.37)). CONCLUSION: The use of UFH was significantly associated with an increased critical obstetric hemorrhage requiring massive RBC transfusion or total hysterectomy. Meanwhile, the use of LMWH was not associated with increased critical obstetric bleeding. LMWH would be safer than UFH to be used for women during childbirth.
RESUMO
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of nerve preservation confirmed by intraoperative electrical stimulation (IES) on subjective symptoms of urinary and sexual function in uterine cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomies. This study included 85 patients who underwent type C radical hysterectomy with IES. Pelvic splanchnic nerve preservation with IES after hysterectomy (nerve-stimulation positive group) was confirmed in 61 women and 24 women did not have nerve preservation (negative group). Urinary function was assessed with the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) questionnaires. Sexual function was surveyed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Longitudinal changes in those scores according to response to nerve-stimulation were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation. IPSS quality of life (QOL) scores were significantly better in the nerve-stimulation positive group compared with the scores in the negative group until 12 months after surgery, whereas OABSS, IPSS total, IPSS voiding, and ICIQ-SF scores evaluating urinary symptoms were not significantly different between the two groups. FSFI scores were better in the nerve-stimulation positive group 36 months after surgery compared with the scores in the negative group. In this study, we assessed self-reported urinary and sexual symptoms after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) with IES in the long term. We demonstrated that nerve-sparing significantly reduced distress associated with QOL until 1 year, improved urinary storage symptoms at 2 years, and sexual symptoms 3 years after surgery.