Prevalence, treatment status, medical costs, quality of life, and productivity loss in Japanese adult patients with anemia: a real-world database study.

AIMS: To investigate the prevalence, treatment status, and effect of anemia on medical costs, quality of life (QOL), and productivity loss in Japan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a database containing claims, health check-ups, and questionnaire data. Adults with hemoglobin data at 2020 check-ups were included. QOL and productivity loss were evaluated using EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire data available for a subset of the population. Nationwide anemia prevalence, including both diagnosed as having anemia and undiagnosed but with low hemoglobin levels, were estimated. Treatment status was described by hemoglobin levels. Differences in medical costs, QOL, and productivity loss were compared between individuals with and without anemia. Subgroup analyses were performed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: The study population included 554,798 individuals. Anemia prevalence was estimated at 15.1% with 55.3% undiagnosed. In patients with anemia, 85.3% were untreated; 79.5% of the treated patients received only oral iron drugs. In patients with anemia, monthly medical costs were ¥17,766 higher, EQ-5D score was 0.0118 lower, and productivity loss was 2.6% higher than in those without anemia. The trends were consistent even in limited patients with CCI = 0. Nationwide annual excess medical costs, deficit QOL, and productivity loss in patients with anemia were estimated at ¥3.32 trillion, 138,000 quality-adjusted life-years, and ¥1.13 trillion, respectively. LIMITATIONS: As the study population only included individuals who underwent health check-ups, they may be healthier than general population. Whether the differences in medical costs, QoL, and productivity loss are caused by anemia or other underlying differences in patient characteristics is unclear, given the likelihood of residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that more than half of patients with anemia were undiagnosed and untreated. Patients with anemia had higher medical costs, lower QOL, and greater productivity loss than those without anemia.

Estimation of Intangible Costs for Factors Associated with Oral Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: A Conjoint Analysis in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: During the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, preferences for factors associated with vaccines have been evaluated. Three oral antiviral drugs have been approved in Japan for patients with mild-to-moderate I COVID-19 symptoms. Although preferences for the drugs may also depend on various factors, these have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: A conjoint analysis was performed based on an online survey in August 2022 to estimate the intangible costs of factors associated with oral antiviral drugs for COVID-19. Respondents were individuals aged 20-69 across Japan. The attributes included the company (Japanese/foreign) that developed the drug, formulation and size of the drug, frequency of administration per day, number of tablets/capsules per dose, number of days until no longer infectious to others, and out-of-pocket expenses. A logistic regression model was applied to estimate the utility of each level for each attribute. The intangible costs were calculated by comparing the utility to the out-of-pocket attribute. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 11,303 participants. The difference between levels was the largest for companies that developed a drug; the intangible costs were JPY 5390 higher for the foreign company than for the Japanese company. The next largest difference was in the number of days until one is no longer infectious. For the same formulation, the intangible cost was lower for small sizes than large sizes. For similar-sized tablets and capsules, the intangible cost was lower for tablets than capsules. These tendencies were similar regardless of COVID-19 infection history and the presence of risk factors for severe COVID-19 in the respondents. CONCLUSION: Intangible costs for factors associated with oral antiviral drugs among the Japanese population were estimated. The results may change as the number of people with a history of COVID-19 infection increases and significant progress is made regarding treatments.

Treatment Status and Healthcare Cost Trends for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Japan: A Claims Database Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The healthcare situation of multiple sclerosis (MS) and its course are not being thoroughly investigated in Japan. We aimed to examine the current healthcare situation, including treatment and healthcare costs, of MS according to duration since its first diagnosis using Japanese real-world data to determine unidentified healthcare issues at each disease stage. METHODS: This retrospective, non-comparative, non-interventional study used a Japanese nationwide claims database (April 2008-August 2018) comprising 20 million patients from 329 acute care hospitals (as of June 2018). Treatment patterns, comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs were analyzed using longitudinal analyses of patients with MS according to duration since the first diagnosis. The time from diagnosis to first treatment was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We identified 7067 patients with MS [mean (standard deviation) age at first diagnosis 45.0 (16.2) years]. About 70% of the patients did not receive disease-modifying therapy (DMT) within the first year of diagnosis. The frequency of DMT use decreased in patients with a longer duration since the first diagnosis. MS treatment costs tended to increase with a longer duration from the first diagnosis until 9 years, followed by a tendency to decrease; contrastingly, other healthcare costs tended to increase with duration after decreasing from the year of the first diagnosis to the next year. The frequencies of hospitalizations and hospital visits, healthcare costs-excluding those for MS treatment and tests-and prevalence of comorbidities tended to be higher in patients with a longer duration since the first diagnosis. CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of patients did not receive DMT, suggesting that patients with early-stage MS may lose the opportunity to improve their prognosis through early intervention with DMT. Among patients with a longer duration since the first diagnosis, fewer treatment choices may be available despite the larger clinical and treatment burden.

Diagnosis and treatment of influenza based on health insurance claims between the 2010-2011 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons in Japan.

Medical practices for influenza virus infection vary among countries. In Japan, treatment with anti-influenza drugs is recommended for patients diagnosed with influenza. This health claims database study provides quantitative information aimed at describing the actual medical practices, including diagnostic testing and medication use, for managing influenza in Japan. Most patients diagnosed with influenza underwent diagnostic tests and were prescribed anti-influenza drugs. Meanwhile, the majority of patients prescribed anti-influenza drugs had undergone diagnostic testing. However, an increase in the percentage of anti-influenza prescriptions without diagnostic testing was observed during the 2019-2020 influenza season, which may be associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Japan based on a claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a cryptogenic chronic interstitial pneumonia with progressive fibrosis and a poor prognosis. A substantial number of epidemiological studies have been conducted in Europe and the United States (US). In contrast, in Japan, only one study reported the prevalence of IPF (10.0 per 100,000 population) using clinical data (2003-2007) from one prefecture; thus, the nationwide prevalence of IPF remains unknown. This study aimed to estimate the nationwide prevalence of IPF in Japan using a nationwide claims database. METHODS: We extracted data from a Japanese claims database provided by Medical Data Vision (MDV database, April 2008-March 2019) containing data from approximately 28 million patients from 385 acute-care hospitals. Patients with IPF (those diagnosed with IPF at least once) from April 2017 to March 2018 were identified in the MDV database. The number of patients in the MDV database was extrapolated nationwide using the fourth NDB Open Data (April 2017-March 2018), and the prevalence was estimated using demographic data as denominators. The prevalence in the US, considering the same definition of IPF, was also calculated and compared with that in Japan. RESULT: The number of patients with IPF in the MDV database was 4278. The estimated nationwide number of patients in Japan was estimated to be 34,040 (mean age: 73 years, percentage of men: 73%), and the prevalence was 27 per 100,000 population. In comparison with that in the US, the prevalence was similar in men and relatively lower in women until the age of 75-79 years, and it was notably lower in both sexes aged ≥ 80 years. CONCLUSIONS: We report the nationwide IPF prevalence in Japan using data from claims databases for the first time. The prevalence estimated in this study was higher than that reported in a previous study. The difference might be due to differences in study settings and definitions of IPF. Further research should be performed to determine the prevalence more accurately and compare it with those in other countries.

Comparison of Inconvenience Costs Between Influenza Antivirals for Japanese Pediatric Patients: A Conjoint Analysis of Parental Responses.

INTRODUCTION: Certain drug characteristics, including dosage and form, are associated with either convenience or inconvenience for the patients taking them, and any inconvenience can be considered as a "cost" in disease treatment. Multiple antivirals are available for influenza in Japan, with various dosages and forms. This study evaluated the inconvenience costs associated with influenza antivirals for pediatric patients by using conjoint analysis on responses from their parents. METHODS: An online survey (May 2021) was conducted for parents whose child took antivirals for influenza at 6-11 years during the 3 years until March 2021. Attributes of the conjoint analysis were administration routes and formulation (tablet, capsule, dry syrup, or inhalant), duration of administration, frequency of administration per day, and out-of-pocket expenses. We assumed the efficacy and safety to be equivalent among the antivirals. A logistic regression model was applied to the analysis. We also asked parents about their recent experiences with antiviral treatment for their child. RESULTS: We collected responses from 3161 eligible individuals. The mean age (standard deviation) of the children when taking the antivirals and percentage of female children were 8.27 (1.63) years old and 53.2%, respectively. The tablet was the most preferred formulation; the inconvenience costs for each administration route and formulation, relative to the tablet as zero, were Japanese yen (JPY) 515 (US dollar 4.61, as of October 2021) for the inhalant, JPY 775 for the capsule, and JPY 804 for the dry syrup. The inconvenience costs for 5 days relative to 1 day and for twice a day relative to once a day were JPY 2150 and JPY 399, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the conjoint analysis, a single-dose tablet antiviral was suggested to have the lowest inconvenience cost for pediatric patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000044243.

Estimation of the cost of influenza antiviral medication guidance or support provided by healthcare professionals: a questionnaire survey in Japan.

AIMS: To estimate the cost of antiviral medication guidance and/or support from the perspective of healthcare professionals by administration route (oral or inhalant). METHODS: An online survey (December 2020) was conducted among physicians, pharmacists, and certified care workers. Those aged 20-64 years working in workplaces with experience of prescribing (physicians) or dispensing (pharmacists) antivirals for influenza, or having care service recipients who took antivirals (certified care workers) since October 2018, were selected through screening questions. The time required for guidance and/or support for drug administration was asked, and its monetary value was calculated by applying the Japanese average wage. Respondents who had a fear of infection while providing guidance and/or support were asked about the monetary value of this fear; the cost of fear was estimated from their responses and the percentage who reported such a fear. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 1,000 physicians, 1,000 pharmacists, and 642 certified care workers. The cost of the time for guidance and/or support in the entire workplace was estimated as JPY 244 (USD 2.14, as of October 2021) for oral antivirals and JPY 289 for inhalants among physicians, JPY 260 and JPY 428 among pharmacists, and JPY 555 and JPY 557 among certified care workers. The cost of fear was estimated to be JPY 965 for oral and JPY 1,361 for inhalants among physicians, JPY 756 and JPY 2,711 among pharmacists, and JPY 2,419 and JPY 2,837 among certified care workers. LIMITATIONS: Respondents might not be representative of Japanese society. The reliability of the results depends on whether the respondents accurately understood the questions and their truthfulness. CONCLUSIONS: Higher costs for guidance and/or support were suggested for inhalant antivirals in physicians and pharmacists compared to oral antivirals. For certified care workers, almost no difference in costs was suggested between administration routes.

Current treatment patterns and medical costs for multiple myeloma in Japan: a cross-sectional analysis of a health insurance claims database.

Aims: Various drugs have recently been launched for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). This increase in the number of treatment options has potentially changed treatment patterns and medical costs for patients with MM. Japanese public health insurance claims were analyzed to examine the change in the treatment patterns of MM drugs and medical costs per patient.Materials and methods: A claims database provided by Medical Data Vision was used, which includes data from ∼20 million patients from >300 acute care hospitals across Japan. The type of MM drugs prescribed and medical costs for patients with MM between April 2008 and December 2016 were examined using monthly cross-sectional analyses. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code of C90.0 were classified as having MM. MM drugs were defined by generic names.Results: In total, 19,137 patients with MM (average age at first diagnosis: 69.6 years; percentage of women: 47.9%) were identified from the database. The percentage of patients prescribed each MM drug changed substantially as novel drugs were launched. Total medical costs increased until 2010, then stabilized. MM drug costs increased from approximately 2010, but costs for other care decreased, particularly for hospitalization (including surgery).Limitations: The database contained data from large, acute care hospitals, which may have caused bias in terms of patients' clinical history and disease severity.Conclusions: Total medical costs for MM have remained stable since 2010. MM drug costs increased, but costs for other care decreased after the launch of lenalidomide in 2010 and other drugs in 2015 and later. More detailed research is required to confirm whether the launch of novel drugs caused the changes in medical costs.

Recent transition of medical cost and relapse rate of multiple sclerosis in Japan based on analysis of a health insurance claims database.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to understand the trends in total and itemized medical expenses, especially of disease-modifying therapy (DMT), for multiple sclerosis (MS) in Japan through an analysis of health insurance claims data. METHODS: We analyzed a database containing health insurance claims data from hospitals that have adopted the Diagnosis Procedure Combination/Per-Diem Payment System in Japan. According to an algorithm based on diagnosis codes, data for all patients diagnosed with MS from April 2008 to July 2016 were extracted. Medical costs, rate of each medical treatment, and rate of relapses were analyzed by calendar-year. Medical costs in the month of relapse were compared with average medical costs per month of all MS patients by a cross-sectional analysis. RESULTS: Four thousand three hundred seventy-four MS patients were identified in the database. Total medical cost per patient per month (PPPM) increased from ¥87,640 (US$787.7 or €723.0 as of May 2017) to ¥102,846 (US$924.4 or €848.4) during the study period. This increment was mainly attributed to the growth in cost of outpatient DMT prescriptions, which increased from ¥23,039 (US$207.1 or €190.1) to ¥51,351 (US$461.5 or €423.6). In contrast, the rate of hospitalizations and relapses PPPM decreased during the study period (from 0.053 to 0.030, and 0.032 to 0.019, respectively). Medical costs in the month of relapse (¥424,661, US$3816.8 or €3503.1) were 3.57 times higher than the average monthly costs for all MS patients (¥119,021, US$1069.8 or €981.8), with the majority comprising hospitalization cost. CONCLUSION: Concomitant with the increased usage of DMT, the total medical cost for treating MS is increasing in Japan. However, rates of relapse and hospitalization have shown a decreasing trend. Although this study does not show the direct causality between DMT and reduction of relapse rates/fewer hospitalizations among MS patients, a reduction in hospital costs has been revealed concomitantly with the increasing prevalence of DMT.

Persistence rates and medical costs of biological therapies for psoriasis treatment in Japan: a real-world data study using a claims database.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapies (BTs) including infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), secukinumab (SCK) and ustekinumab (UST) are approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis. Although the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs treatment have been investigated in multiple foreign studies in recent years, few such studies have been conducted in Japan and the differences between patients who adhered to treatment and those who did not have not been reported. This study is aimed at investigating the persistence rates and medical costs of BTs in the treatment of psoriasis in Japan, using the real-world data from a large-scale claims database. METHODS: Claims data from the JMDC database (August 2009 to December 2016) were used for this analysis. Patient data were extracted using the ICD10 code for psoriasis and claims records of BT injections. Twelve-month and 24-month persistence rates of BTs were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology, and 12-month-medical costs before and after BT initiation were compared between persistent and non-persistent patient groups at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 205 psoriasis patients treated with BTs (BT-naïve patients: 177) were identified. The 12-month/24-month persistence rates for ADL, IFX, SCK, and UST in BT-naïve patients were 46.8% ± 16.6%/46.8 ± 16.6%, 53.0% ± 14.9%/41.0% ± 15.5%, 55.4%/55.4% (95% CI not available) and 79.4% ± 9.9%/71.9% ± 12.2%, respectively. Statistically significant differences in persistence were found among different BT treatments, and UST was found to have the highest persistence rate. The total medical costs during the 12 months after BT initiation in BT-naïve patients were (in 1000 Japanese Yen): 2218 for ADL, 3409 for IFX, 465 for SCK, 2824 for UST (average: 2828). Compared with the 12-month persistent patient group, the total medical costs in the persistent group was higher (Δ:+ 118), but for some medications such as IFX or UST cost increases were lower for persistent patients. CONCLUSIONS: UST was found to have the highest persistence rate among all BTs for psoriasis treatment in Japan. The 12-month medical costs after BT initiation in the persistent patient group may not have increased as much as in the non-persistent patient group for some medications.

The association between smoking cessation outpatient visits and total medical costs: a retrospective, observational analysis of Japanese employee-based public health insurance data.

AIMS: The short-term effects of smoking cessation (SC) on overall healthcare costs are unclear. This study aimed to compare the short-term medical costs between patients with SC outpatient visits (SCOVs) and those without SCOVs, consisting of SCOV itself and overall medical costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective, observational study using a Japanese employee-based health insurance claims database (January 1, 2005-December 31, 2013). It analyzed individuals who were registered as smokers based on their medical checkup details. It compared the per-patient-per-year (PPPY) medical costs for male smokers who made ≥1 claim for SCOVs with those who made no claims. We also assessed whether the number of SCOVs by male and female smokers impacted medical costs. The Index Year was the year after the first SCOV claim and that after the first registration as a smoker (non-SCOV group). Medical costs were calculated using regression analysis and adjusted for baseline costs. RESULTS: In Index Year -1, PPPY medical costs for male smokers were ∼USD 323.01 (JPY 36,500, as of November 2017) higher in the SCOV (n = 5,608) vs the non-SCOV (n = 81,721) group; however, by Year 6 the costs were similar. From Year 4-6, PPPY medical costs for SCOVs were lower than those in the adjusted non-SCOV group. For 2,576 male and female smokers in the SCOV group, the average rates of increasing medical costs before and after the SCOV for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 SCOVs made were 58%, 44%, 50%, 41%, and 34%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The database includes limited data on individuals >65 years. Only SCOVs based on claims data and not on other outcomes were assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Medical costs declined in the short-term following the first SCOV. Attendance at a greater number of SCOVs was associated with a lower increase ratio of medical costs.

Prevalence, treatments and medical cost of multiple sclerosis in Japan based on analysis of a health insurance claims database.

Objective: To understand, through an analysis of health insurance claims data, the current treatment status and medical cost of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Japan. Methods: We analyzed claims data (January 2005-January 2016) from the Japan Medical Data Center Co., Ltd., identifying MS patients, except those with neuromyelitis optica, using an algorithm based on diagnosis codes. Prescription drug usage and medical costs for MS patients were analyzed. Results: A total of 713 MS patients were identified in the database. Between 2011 and 2015, the age-adjusted prevalence of MS in the database increased from 0.015% to 0.019%, and the female-to-male ratio increased from 1.70 to 2.03. The prescription rate for disease-modifying therapy drugs was higher in larger care settings. Prescriptions for fingolimod increased from 2011, with a concomitant decrease in prescriptions for interferon. The per patient per month cost for MS was ¥124 337 (US$1190 or €1084, as of October 2016). This was higher than the costs for Parkinson's disease (¥84 410), myasthenia gravis (¥82 944) and rheumatoid arthritis (¥53 843). However, the total per member per month cost for MS, which represents the population-based economic impact, was ¥25.2, which was lower than the parallel costs for Parkinson's disease (¥123.0) and rheumatoid arthritis (¥311.6) because of the low prevalence of MS in Japan. Conclusions: Using real-world data, we obtained up-to-date prevalence, treatment status and medical cost information for MS in Japan. The present results showed the efficacy of a real-world database to obtain the latest national trends for rare diseases, such as MS; this could have important implications for clinicians and policymakers.

Cost analysis of leuprorelin acetate in Japanese pre-menopausal breast-cancer patients: comparison between 6-month and 3-month depot formulations.

AIMS: The aim in this study is to evaluate economic value for leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot compared with leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot in Japanese pre-menopausal breast cancer patients from a societal perspective. METHODS: The cost analysis was conducted by estimating direct and indirect cost, and intangible costs associated with one 6-month injection compared with two 3-month injections. Claims data were used for the analyses of direct and indirect cost and Medical Fee Schedule Table for direct cost. Discrete choice experiments were conducted by web-based survey to determine the intangible costs. Another web-based survey was also conducted on premenopausal breast cancer patients with injections of leuprorelin acetate, to calibrate the results of discrete choice experiments. RESULTS: The medical costs saved for having one less injection in pre-menopausal breast cancer patients with leuprorelin acetate injection were JPY 6,183. The productivity loss saving was JPY 1,419. An estimation of intangible costs saved for having one less injection of leuprorelin acetate was JPY 58,430, which included the disbenefit due to pain (JPY 8,535), injection site reactions (JPY 44,051), waiting time (JPY 9,595), and subtracting value in medical consultation (JPY 3,751). The total cost saved for having one less injection was JPY 66,032. LIMITATIONS: The respondents from the internet panel provided by a survey company do not necessarily reflect a population of Japanese society. CONCLUSIONS: Leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot demonstrates a higher value than leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot through saving medical costs and loss of productivity, as well as intangible costs saved for having one less injection when treating pre-menopausal breast cancer patients. In the costs for treating with leuprorelin acetate, the percentage of intangible costs might not be negligible. The intangible costs will probably be actively evaluated to proceed to patient-centered healthcare in society.

Cost analysis of leuprorelin acetate in Japanese prostate cancer patients: comparison between 6-month and 3-month depot formulations.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the economic value for leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot compared with leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot from a societal perspective in Japanese prostate cancer patients. METHODS: The cost analysis estimated the reduction in direct and indirect costs as well as intangible costs saved by having one less injection. Claims data were used for the analyses of direct and indirect costs reduction. A discrete choice experiment based on a web-based survey estimated the monetary value of the intangible costs for one injection. Another web-based survey of prostate cancer patients, who had received treatment with leuprorelin acetate injections, was carried out to calibrate the results of the discrete choice experiment. RESULTS: Reductions in medical costs and loss of productivity for having one less injection in prostate cancer patients receiving leuprorelin acetate were JPY 5,670 and JPY 1,723, respectively. Intangible costs saved by using a 6-month depot formulation instead of a 3-month depot formulation for the injection of leuprorelin acetate were estimated to be JPY 19,872, including the values for a reduction in pain (JPY 3,131), injection site reactions (JPY 11,545), waiting time (JPY 9,479), and subtracting the value of medical consultation (JPY 4,283). The total cost reduction for having one less injection was JPY 27,265. LIMITATIONS: The respondents from the internet panel provided by a survey company are not necessarily a representative population of Japanese society. CONCLUSIONS: Leuprorelin acetate 6-month depot has an advantage in monetary value in the reduction in medical costs, loss of productivity, and intangible costs for having one less injection in prostate cancer patients compared with leuprorelin acetate 3-month depot. In the costs for treating with leuprorelin acetate, the percentage of intangible costs might not be negligible. The intangible costs will probably be actively evaluated to proceed to patient-centered healthcare in society.

Current treatment status and medical cost for multiple sclerosis based on analysis of a Japanese claims database.

OBJECTIVE: To assist policymakers as they reflect on treatment protocols and approaches for the efficient delivery of medical care for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed data from a large Japanese health insurance claims database. Using an algorithm based on diagnosis codes, all patients with a diagnosis of MS were identified; patients having a non-MS demyelinating disease were excluded from the population. MS patient data were used for cross-sectional analysis carried out on the data collected at a certain period. We identified a total of 1808 MS patients, and we analyzed data for 1133 patients with an observation period of ≥6 months from October 2013 to September 2014. Newly diagnosed MS patients were identified within the MS patients, and their data were used for longitudinal analysis, tracking each patient over a period of time. RESULTS: The total per patient per month cost for MS was ¥93 542 (US$781, €695 as of October 2015). Disease-modifying therapy drugs costs constituted half of the overall medical costs. For newly diagnosed MS patients, hospitalization costs were the largest component in the initial month, while drug costs were the largest component more than several months after the initial visit. There was a positive correlation between relapse frequency and medical cost. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide up-to-date information on the demographics, medical treatment and cost status of MS in almost real-time by using a claims database. They suggest that claims data analysis can effectively support medical policymaking.

Medical cost, incidence rate, and treatment status of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan: analysis of claims data.

OBJECTIVES: Published reports have shown the prevalence and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Japan. The objective of this study is to examine change in GERD incidence, and to understand current patient demographics, medical costs, treatment status, and the suitability of current treatment based on analysis of an insurance claims database. METHODS: An insurance claims database with data on ∼1.9 million company employees from January 2005 to May 2015 was used. Prevalence, demographics, and medical costs were analyzed by cross-sectional analysis, and incidence and treatment status were analyzed by longitudinal analysis among newly-diagnosed GERD patients. RESULTS: GERD prevalence in 2014 was 3.3% among 20-59 year-olds, accounting for 40,134 people in the database, and GERD incidence increased from 0.63% in 2009 to 0.98% in 2014. In 2014, mean medical cost per patient per month for GERD patients aged 20-59 was JPY 31,900 (USD 266 as of January 2016), which was ∼2.4-times the mean national healthcare cost. The most frequently prescribed drugs for newly-diagnosed GERD patients were proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Although PPIs were prescribed more often in patients with more doctor visit months, over 20% of patients that made frequent doctor visits (19 or more visits during a 24 calendar months period) were prescribed PPIs during only 1 calendar month or not at all. LIMITATIONS: The database included only reimbursable claims data and, therefore, did not cover over-the-counter drugs. The database also consisted of employee-based claims data, so included little data on people aged 60 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: Given the increasing incidence of GERD in Japan there is a need for up-to-date information on GERD incidence. This study suggests that some GERD patients may not be receiving appropriate treatment according to Japanese guidelines, which is needed to improve symptom control.

Resource utilization and cost in a commercially insured population with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a serious public health concern and a leading cause of disability. Previous studies have shown this disease is associated with an economic burden of more than $60 billion annually in direct and indirect costs in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the annual and longitudinal costs associated with the treatment of patients with schizophrenia from a payer perspective. METHODS: Two claim-based analyses were conducted using data from the Truven Health MarketScan database of a commercially insured population: (1) an annual snapshot of patients with newly diagnosed and chronic schizophrenia, and (2) a 24-month longitudinal analysis of patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia. The snapshot analysis included individuals who had ≥2 claims with a diagnosis code for schizophrenia on separate dates during 2011 (with the date of the first claim designated as the index date), and who were enrolled for 12 months before the index date. For the longitudinal analysis, patients were included if they were continuously enrolled for 24 months after the date of schizophrenia diagnosis, which was designated as the index date. The claims were grouped by inpatient, outpatient, professional, and prescription drug categories, and were further segmented by claims for schizophrenia, other psychiatric, and nonschizophrenia/nonpsychiatric conditions. RESULTS: A total of 8985 patients with schizophrenia met the inclusion criteria for the snapshot analysis. The mean cost per patient per month (PPPM) for a patient with schizophrenia was $1806 versus $419 per member per month for the demographically adjusted nonschizophrenic (ie, matched for age and sex) population. The PPPM cost of $1806 for patients with schizophrenia was 42% for inpatient expenditures, 33% for outpatient, and 25% for prescription drug costs. The annual inpatient admission rates were 636 per 1000 patients with schizophrenia and 48 per 1000 persons for the demographically adjusted population without schizophrenia. The annual emergency department visits for patients with schizophrenia were 2270 per 1000 patients and 158 per 1000 persons without schizophrenia for the demographically adjusted population. For the longitudinal analysis, 1902 patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia were identified. The total claim costs for patients increased from $800 monthly in the 12 months before the index date to approximately $2000 in the month before the index date. The highest costs occurred in the month of diagnosis (designated as the index month; mean cost, $6601). The total all-cause claim cost after the index date decreased to $1635 monthly for months 2 to 6, $1456 monthly for months 7 to 12, $1324 monthly for months 13 to 18, and $1218 monthly for months 19 to 24. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of schizophrenia is low in a commercially insured US population, this analysis shows that the average total claim cost per patient with schizophrenia is more than 4 times the average total claim cost for a demographically adjusted population without schizophrenia. Furthermore, for newly diagnosed patients with schizophrenia, the cost, which is largely driven by inpatient charges, is highest in the month of diagnosis.

Medical claim cost impact of improved diabetes control for medicare and commercially insured patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes prevalence is increasing in the United States, yet the control of critical clinical metrics (e.g., hemoglobin A1c [A1c], blood pressure, and lipids) remains suboptimal. Lower A1c levels have been shown to be associated with lower diabetes complication rates, and reduced medical costs have been reported in individuals with diabetes who have improved glycemic control. While many studies have quantified the impact of A1c control on medical claim costs, this article provides new information on the cost and event impact of better control for all 3 metrics for the commercial population and Medicare population separately. OBJECTIVES: To (a) quantify current type 2 diabetes control rates for A1c, blood pressure, and lipids and (b) model the impact of scenarios for better control of these metrics on diabetes complication rates and complication costs in people with diabetes in commercially insured and Medicare populations. METHODS: 858 adults with commercial (n = 392) or Medicare (n = 466) coverage and type 2 diabetes were identified from approximately 10,000 individuals in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; combined series 2005-2006 and 2007-2008). Based on each individual's risk factors, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study modeling tool was used to project rates of 7 diabetes complications under status quo A1c, blood pressure, and lipid levels and complication rates under better management. Three improved management scenarios were created to model the impact of better control in all commercially insured and Medicare individuals with type 2 diabetes who had A1c, blood pressure, or lipids not at goal and in a subset of individuals whose A1c levels were ≥ 7%, with or without blood pressure or lipids not at goal. Thomson Reuters MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (2006-2009) and Medicare 5% sample data (2006-2009), including the eligibility data for each, were used to develop both the average annual costs and per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs, adjusted to 2012 dollars, in commercially insured and Medicare fee-for-service patients with diabetes and the cost of diabetes-related complications to monetize the impact of reducing complications. RESULTS: Analysis of NHANES data showed that type 2 diabetes prevalence is 6.1% in commercially insured individuals aged 20 to 64 years and 19.4% in Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. Of patients with type 2 diabetes, 47% of commercially insured patients and 38% of Medicare patients were found to have A1c ≥ 7%. With improved control of A1c, blood pressure, and lipid levels that were not at goal, as modeled in 3 management scenarios, reductions in the probability of complications across all patients with diabetes ranged from 43% to 67% in the commercial population and 28% to 49% in the Medicare population. The cost savings effect from reduced complications across all patients with diabetes ranged from $67 to $105 PPPM in the commercial population and $99 to $158 in the Medicare population. The high end of this savings range yielded a reduction of about 10% in total costs when compared with an average of $1,090 PPPM in commercially insured patients with diabetes and an average of $1,565 PPPM in Medicare patients with diabetes derived from large claims databases, both in projected 2012 dollars. CONCLUSION: Results of this analysis suggest that better control of A1c, blood pressure, and lipids is associated with savings opportunities in commercially insured and Medicare patients with type 2 diabetes. A focus on only patients with uncontrolled A1c offers a somewhat higher per-patient cost reduction than for all uncontrolled diabetes patients but greatly diminishes the number of targeted patients.

A Medicaid and commercial insured claims-based study to estimate improved antipsychotic medication adherence among patients with schizophrenia.

Compliance with antipsychotic medication is clinically important but challenging for schizophrenia patients. Clinical trials and epidemiological studies strongly suggest that improved compliance results in reduced hospitalizations and other adverse outcomes. Examination of Medicaid and commercial claim data suggests that a significant portion of schizophrenia patients have a regular pattern of visits with one outpatient professional, yet are noncompliant with their medication. For many of these patients, results show that the administration of once-monthly verifiable therapy would improve compliance.

The incidence rate and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia in a working-age population.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is frequently associated with the very young and the elderly but is a largely underrecognized burden among working-age adults. Although the burden of CAP among the elderly has been established, there are limited data on the economic burden of CAP in the employed population. OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic impact of CAP in US working-age adults from an employer perspective by estimating the incidence rate and costs of healthcare, sick time, and short-term disability for this patient population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study is based on data from 2 Truven Health Analytics databases. The study population consisted of commercially insured active employees aged 18 to 64 years, early retirees aged <65 years, and adult dependents of both cohorts. CAP was identified using medical claims with pneumonia diagnosis codes during the 2009 calendar year. Incidence rate, episode level, and annual costs were stratified by age and by risk based on the presence of comorbidities. Descriptive statistics were used to compare healthcare (ie, medical and pharmacy) costs, sick time, and short-term disability costs between the cohorts with and without CAP. Linear regression was used to estimate the average annual incremental healthcare cost in employed patients with inpatient or outpatient CAP versus individuals without CAP. RESULTS: Study eligibility was met by 12,502,017 employed individuals, including 123,920 with CAP and 12,378,097 without CAP; the overall incidence rate of CAP was 10.6 per 1000 person-years. Among individuals with and without CAP, the costs of healthcare, sick time, and short-term disability increased with advancing age and with higher risk status. The mean annual healthcare costs were $20,961 for patients with CAP and $3783 for individuals without CAP. Overall, the mean costs of sick time and short-term disability were $1129 and $1016, respectively, in active employees with CAP, and $853 and $322, respectively, in their counterparts without CAP. Compared with individuals without CAP, the average annual incremental healthcare cost ranged from $39,889 to $113,837 for inpatient management of patients with CAP and from $4170 to $31,524 for outpatient management of patients with CAP, depending on the risk level. CONCLUSIONS: CAP is a common and costly infection among working-age individuals, especially in patients with comorbidities. Prevention strategies, such as influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, that target working-age adults with underlying medical conditions may be the most valuable in reducing the morbidity and costs associated with CAP.