Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 308, 2024 Mar 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504289

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health professionals are increasingly called upon and willing to engage in planetary health care and management. However, so far, this topic is rarely covered in medical curricula. As the need for professional communication is particularly high in this subject area, this study aimed to evaluate whether the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) could be used as an accompanying teaching tool. METHODS: During the winter semester 2022/2023, 20 third- and fifth-year medical students voluntarily participated in a self-directed online course, three workshops, and a formal eight-station OSCE on planetary health care and management. Each examinee was also charged alternatingly as a shadower with the role of providing feedback. Experienced examiners rated students' performance using a scoring system supported by tablet computers. Examiners and shadowers provided timely feedback on candidates` performance in the OSCE. Immediately after the OSCE, students were asked about their experience using a nine-point Likert-scale survey and a videotaped group interview. Quantitative analysis included the presentation of the proportional distribution of student responses to the survey and of box plots showing percentages of maximum scores for the OSCE performance. The student group interview was analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Depending on the sub-theme, 60% -100% of students rated the subject of planetary health as likely to be useful in their professional lives. Similar proportions (57%-100%) were in favour of integrating planetary health into required courses. Students perceived learning success from OSCE experience and feedback as higher compared to that from online courses and workshops. Even shadowers learned from observation and feedback discussions. Examiners assessed students' OSCE performance at a median of 80% (interquartile range: 83%-77%) of the maximum score. CONCLUSIONS: OSCE can be used as an accompanying teaching tool for advanced students on the topic of planetary health care and management. It supports learning outcomes, particularly in terms of communication skills to sensitise and empower dialogue partners, and to initiate adaptation steps at the level of individual patients and local communities.


Assuntos
Exame Físico , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Atenção à Saúde , Competência Clínica
2.
GMS J Med Educ ; 38(3): Doc71, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33824907

RESUMO

Background: As doctors often fail to explain diagnoses and therapies to patients in an understandable and appropriate way, the improvement of doctor-patient communication is essential. The current medical training and examinations are focused on verbal rather than on written communication. Following the premise of "assessment drives learning", the final medical licensing examination in Germany has been further developed by the German National Institute for state examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy (IMPP). As part of the discharge management the candidates have to prepare a report for the patient that is understandable and provides them with all important information about their stay in hospital. Aim: A standardized evaluation form for formative and summative feedback has been developed and tested with regard to applicability and the assurance of test quality criteria, especially the reliability to assess the written communication skills of the students. Methodology: In an expert consensus procedure, a draft for a standardized evaluation form was developed. This form was revised after an initial trial run on patient-directed reports written by students in their last year of medical studies. Afterwards twenty-one patient-directed reports were evaluated by fourteen different examiners. The reliability was tested by calculating the generalizability-coefficient and by analysing the inter-rater reliability. Results: The first test on the evaluation of the patient-directed reports indicated the practicability of the application and the usefulness of the evaluation form as an instrument for assessing the written communication skills of students. The analyses of the inter-rater reliability showed that the degree of agreement in the evaluations was partly different between two groups of examiners. The calculated G-coefficient indicates a high reliability. The content validity of the evaluation form was given through the comprehensive medical expertise in the development process. Conclusion: Assessing written patient-directed communication is a benefit of the newly developed last part of the medical licensing examination in Germany. Continuous formative assessment and feedback based on the evaluation form is intended to improve the written communication skills of future doctors. Furthermore, a better understanding of their diagnosis and treatment as well as a trusting relationship with their doctor may empower patients in the medical decision process and lead to fewer dismissal errors in the future. For consistent use of the evaluation form a standardized training of examiners should be implemented.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional , Licenciamento , Estudantes de Medicina , Comunicação , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Alemanha , Humanos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
GMS J Med Educ ; 37(7): Doc88, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33364367

RESUMO

Background: Due to the corona pandemic, we conducted the Heidelberg module of the Master of Medical Education (MME) study program, which focuses on teaching and assessment of communicative and interpofessional skills, digitally for the first time. Method: We outsourced the teaching to a pre-module phase in the weeks upfront. During the module week, the lecturers picked up again and deepened the topics and the participants created, revised and simulated a virtual OSCE course. Results/Conclusion: Evaluation and reflection of the module showed that the digital implementation including an OSCE examination can be an appropriate alternative to a classroom-based training. However, important elements of the MME program that provide networking possibilities and personal exchange can only be replicated in the digital environment to a limited extent. In the future, sensibly applied digital components can be used to enrich the study program.


Assuntos
Currículo , Tecnologia Digital , Educação Médica , Relações Interprofissionais , Comunicação por Videoconferência , Competência Clínica , Comunicação , Currículo/normas , Educação Médica/métodos , Humanos
4.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29230515

RESUMO

In Germany, future physicians have to pass a national licensing examination at the end of their medical studies. Passing this examination is the requirement for the license to practice medicine. The Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020 with its 41 measures aims to shift the paradigm in medical education and medical licensing examinations.The main goals of the Masterplan include the development towards competency-based and practical medical education and examination as well as the strengthening of general medicine. The healthcare policy takes into account social developments, which are very important for the medical education and licensing examination.Seven measures of the Masterplan relate to the realignment of the licensing examinations. Their function to drive learning should better support students in achieving the study goal defined in the German Medical Licensure Act: to educate a medical doctor scientifically and practically who is qualified for autonomous and independent professional practice, postgraduate education and continuous training.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação Baseada em Competências/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Licenciamento em Medicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Baseada em Competências/normas , Educação Baseada em Competências/tendências , Currículo/normas , Currículo/tendências , Educação Médica/normas , Educação Médica/tendências , Educação Médica Continuada/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação Médica Continuada/normas , Educação Médica Continuada/tendências , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Previsões , Alemanha , Objetivos , Humanos , Licenciamento em Medicina/tendências
7.
Ger Med Sci ; 12: Doc09, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24808816

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rapid progress of psychosomatic research in cardiology and also the increasing impact of psychosocial issues in the clinical daily routine have prompted the Clinical Commission of the German Heart Society (DGK) to agree to an update of the first state of the art paper on this issue which was originally released in 2008. METHODS: The circle of experts was increased, general aspects were implemented and the state of the art was updated. Particular emphasis was dedicated to coronary heart diseases (CHD), heart rhythm diseases and heart failure because to date the evidence-based clinical knowledge is most advanced in these particular areas. Differences between men and women and over the life span were considered in the recommendations as were influences of cognitive capability and the interactive and synergistic impact of classical somatic risk factors on the affective comorbidity in heart disease patients. RESULTS: A IA recommendation (recommendation grade I and evidence grade A) was given for the need to consider psychosocial risk factors in the estimation of coronary risks as etiological and prognostic risk factors. Furthermore, for the recommendation to routinely integrate psychosocial patient management into the care of heart surgery patients because in these patients, comorbid affective disorders (e.g. depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder) are highly prevalent and often have a malignant prognosis. A IB recommendation was given for the treatment of psychosocial risk factors aiming to prevent the onset of CHD, particularly if the psychosocial risk factor is harmful in itself (e.g. depression) or constrains the treatment of the somatic risk factors. Patients with acute and chronic CHD should be offered anti-depressive medication if these patients suffer from medium to severe states of depression and in this case medication with selective reuptake inhibitors should be given. In the long-term course of treatment with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) a subjective health technology assessment is warranted. In particular, the likelihood of affective comorbidities and the onset of psychological crises should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS: The present state of the art paper presents an update of current empirical evidence in psychocardiology. The paper provides evidence-based recommendations for the integration of psychosocial factors into cardiological practice and highlights areas of high priority. The evidence for estimating the efficiency for psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions has increased substantially since the first release of the policy document but is, however, still weak. There remains an urgent need to establish curricula for physician competence in psychodiagnosis, communication and referral to ensure that current psychocardiac knowledge is translated into the daily routine.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Psicologia/normas , Psicoterapia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Alemanha , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
8.
GMS Z Med Ausbild ; 29(5): Doc70, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23255965

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The acquisition of clinical-technical skills is of particular importance for the doctors of tomorrow. Procedural skills are often trained for the first time in skills laboratories, which provide a sheltered learning environment. However, costs to implement and maintain skills laboratories are considerably high. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate students' patterns of attendance of voluntary skills-lab training sessions and thereby answer the following question: Is it possible to measure an effect of the theoretical construct related to motivational psychology described in the literature--'Assessment drives learning'--reflected in patterns of attendance at voluntary skills-lab training sessions? By answering this question, design recommendations for curriculum planning and resource management should be derived. METHOD: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of student skills-lab attendance related to voluntary basic and voluntary advanced skills-lab sessions was conducted. The attendance patterns of a total of 340 third-year medical students in different successive year groups from the Medical Faculty at the University of Heidelberg were assessed. RESULTS: Students showed a preference for voluntary basic skills-lab training sessions, which were relevant to clinical skills assessment, especially at the beginning and at the end of the term. Voluntary advanced skills-lab training sessions without reference to clinical skills assessment were used especially at the beginning of the term, but declined towards the end of term. CONCLUSION: The results show a clear influence of assessments on students' attendance at skills-lab training sessions. First recommendations for curriculum design and resource management will be described. Nevertheless, further prospective research studies will be necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the motivational factors impacting students' utilisation of voluntary skills-lab training in order to reach a sufficient concordance between students' requirements and faculty offers, as well as resource management.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Currículo/normas , Avaliação Educacional , Docentes de Medicina , Motivação , Alocação de Recursos , Alemanha , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volição
9.
J Psychosom Res ; 70(2): 135-9, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21262415

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although psychiatric comorbidity often goes undetected and untreated in cardiovascular patients, it is not clear whether the costs for a special treatment of psychiatric comorbidity are appropriately reflected in the reimbursement system. To investigate the economic impact of psychiatric comorbidity, we compared costs, returns, net gain, and duration of hospitalization in cardiovascular inpatients with and without psychiatric comorbidity. METHODS: For a period of 2 years, we analyzed costs, net gain, and other outcome variables according to the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system for cardiovascular inpatients of a German university department (n = 940). Psychiatric disorders were diagnosed by the treating physicians based on clinical criteria and results from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). With respect to the outcome variables, we compared patients with and without a psychiatric disorder, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The average total costs of hospitalization (mean ± S.E.) for cardiovascular patients without psychiatric comorbidity and for patients with psychiatric comorbidity differed significantly (€5142 ± 210 vs. €7663 ± 571; d = 0.39). The increased costs for patients with psychiatric comorbidity were related to elevated returns, but the net gain for patients without psychiatric comorbidity was €277 ± 119. In contrast, the treatment of internal medicine patients with psychiatric disorders resulted in a net loss of -€624 ± 324 (overall group difference, d = -0.25). CONCLUSION: Psychiatric comorbidity in cardiovascular inpatients leads to higher costs that are not reflected in the current reimbursement system in Germany. The inappropriate reimbursement of psychiatric comorbidity in cardiovascular inpatients may result in a serious undertreatment of these patients.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Comorbidade , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Fatores Socioeconômicos
10.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 15(1): 81-95, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19609700

RESUMO

In case of an emergency, a fast and structured patient management is crucial for patient's outcome. The competencies needed should be acquired and assessed during medical education. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a valid and reliable assessment format to evaluate practical skills. However, traditional OSCE stations examine isolated skills or components of a clinical algorithm and thereby lack a valid representation of clinical reality. We developed emergency case OSCE stations (ECOS), where students have to manage complete emergency situations from initial assessment to medical treatment and consideration of further procedures. Our aim was to increase the authenticity and validity in the assessment of students' capability to cope with emergency patients. 45 students participated in a 10-station OSCE with 6 ECOS and 4 traditional OSCE stations. They were assessed using a case-specific checklist. An inter-station and post-OSCE-questionnaire was completed by each student to evaluate both ECOS and traditional OSCE. In this study, we were able to demonstrate that ECOS are feasible as time-limited OSCE stations. There was a high acceptance on both students and examiners side. They rated ECOS to be more realistic in comparison to the traditional OSCE scenarios. The reliability estimated via Crohnbach's alpha for the 6 ECOS is high (0.793). ECOS offer a feasible alternative to the traditional OSCE stations with adequate reliability to assess students' capabilities to cope with an acute emergency in a realistic encounter.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manequins , Simulação de Paciente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA