Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0233367, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32480400

RESUMO

Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009-2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools among historically top-funded schools, private and public schools, and by region of the country. Changes in both unadjusted and real funding dollars over time revealed a significant difference. Region was the only significant factor for mean percent change in funding from 2009-2018, with the Western region showing a 33.79% increase in purchasing power. The Northeastern region showed a -6.64% decrease in purchasing power while the Central and Southern regions reported changes of 2.46% and -6.08%, respectively. The mean percent increases were more proportional and nonsignificant in the public vs. private institutions comparison, at -3.41% and 4.75%, respectively. Likewise, the top-funded institutions vs. other institutions comparisons demonstrated modest, nonsignificant differences. However, although the relative changes might be proportional, the absolute increases evidence a pattern of growing cumulative advantage that favor the highest-funded institutions and private institutions. The potential consequences of this disproportionate increase include health science education, biomedical research, and patient access disparities in large parts of the country. The NIH and the scientific community should explore potential solutions in its funding models.


Assuntos
Financiamento Governamental/tendências , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/tendências , Faculdades de Medicina/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Financiamento Governamental/história , Organização do Financiamento/tendências , História do Século XXI , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economia , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/história , Estados Unidos
2.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0134578, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26226183

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laboratory tests are routinely defined in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, and ease of use. But the actual clinical impact of a diagnostic test also depends on its availability and price. This is especially true in resource-limited settings such as sub-Saharan Africa. We present a first-of-its-kind report of diagnostic test types, availability, and prices in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: Test types (identity) and availability were based on menus and volumes obtained from clinical laboratories in late 2011 in Kampala using a standard questionnaire. As a measure of test availability, we used the Availability Index (AI). AI is the combined daily testing volumes of laboratories offering a given test, divided by the combined daily testing volumes of all laboratories in Kampala. Test prices were based on a sampling of prices collected in person and via telephone surveys in 2015. FINDINGS: Test volumes and menus were obtained for 95% (907/954) of laboratories in Kampala city. These 907 laboratories offered 100 different test types. The ten most commonly offered tests in decreasing order were Malaria, HCG, HIV serology, Syphilis, Typhoid, Urinalysis, Brucellosis, Stool Analysis, Glucose, and ABO/Rh. In terms of AI, the 100 tests clustered into three groups: high (12 tests), moderate (33 tests), and minimal (55 tests) availability. 50% and 36% of overall availability was provided through private and public laboratories, respectively. Point-of-care laboratories contributed 35% to the AI of high availability tests, but only 6% to the AI of the other tests. The mean price of the most commonly offered test types was $2.62 (range $1.83-$3.46). INTERPRETATION: One hundred different laboratory test types were in use in Kampala in late 2011. Both public and private laboratories were critical to test availability. The tests offered in point-of-care laboratories tended to be the most available tests. Prices of the most common tests ranged from $1.83-$3.46.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/economia , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/estatística & dados numéricos , Uganda
4.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 38(8): 555-63, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19937939

RESUMO

Screening for HPV-driven cervical dysplasia and neoplasia is a significant public health concern in the developing world. The purpose of this study was to use a manual, low-cost liquid-based Pap preparation to determine HPV prevalence in HIV-positive and HIV-negative young women in Kampala, Uganda and to correlate cervical cytopathology with HPV-DNA genotype. About 196 post-partum women aged 18-30 years underwent rapid HIV testing and pelvic examination. Liquid-based cervical cytology samples were processed using a low-cost manual technique. A DNA collection device was used to collect specimens for HPV genotyping. HIV and HPV prevalence was 18 and 64%, respectively. Overall, 49% of women were infected with a high-risk HPV genotype. The most common high-risk HPV genotypes were 16 (8.2%), 33 (7.7%), 35 (6.6%), 45 (5.1%), and 58 (5.1%). The prevalence of HPV 18 was 3.6%. HIV-positive women had an HPV prevalence of 86% compared to 59% in HIV-negative women (P = 0.003). The prevalence of HPV 16/18 did not differ by HIV status. HIV-positive women were infected with a significantly greater number of HPV genotypes compared to HIV-negative women. By multivariate analysis, the main risk factor for HPV infection was coinfection with HIV. HIV-positive women were four times more likely to have abnormal cytology than HIV-negative women (43% vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001). These data highlight that HIV infection is a strong risk factor for HPV infection and resultant abnormal cervical cytology. Notably, the manual low-cost liquid-based Pap preparation is practical in this setting and offers an alternate method for local studies of HPV vaccine efficacy.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/economia , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus/genética , Colo do Útero/patologia , Colo do Útero/virologia , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Uganda , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 46(4): 426-32, 2007 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17786129

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine costs for adverse event (AE) procedures for a large HIV perinatal trial by analyzing actual resource consumption using activity-based costing (ABC) in an international research setting. METHODS: The AE system for an ongoing clinical trial in Uganda was evaluated using ABC techniques to determine costs from the perspective of the study. Resources were organized into cost categories (eg, personnel, patient care expenses, laboratory testing, equipment). Cost drivers were quantified, and unit cost per AE was calculated. A subset of time and motion studies was performed prospectively to observe clinic personnel time required for AE identification. RESULTS: In 18 months, there were 9028 AEs, with 970 (11%) reported as serious adverse events. Unit cost per AE was $101.97. Overall, AE-related costs represented 32% ($920,581 of $2,834,692) of all study expenses. Personnel ($79.30) and patient care ($11.96) contributed the greatest proportion of component costs. Reported AEs were predominantly nonserious (mild or moderate severity) and unrelated to study drug(s) delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive identification and management of AEs to conduct clinical trials ethically and protect human subjects require expenditure of substantial human and financial resources. Better understanding of these resource requirements should improve planning and funding of international HIV-related clinical trials.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/economia , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Criança , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/economia , Masculino , Gravidez , Uganda
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA