RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We investigate the geographical and racial disparities in accessing CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials for DLBCL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was searched, and 75 trials with at least 1 open site in the US were included. 2020 US Census Bureau data was used to obtain data on race and ethnicity. SPSS version 26 was used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 62 CAR-T and 13 bispecific antibodies trials with 6221 enrolled or expected to enroll patients. Eighty-five percent of the clinical trials were only open in the US, and the majority 64% were pharmaceutical-funded. There were 126 unique study sites distributed over 31 states with 11 (0-51) mean number of trials per state and 4.5 (1-26) and 4.4 (1-24) mean number of CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials per site, respectively. Southern states had the most number of trials 31%, followed by Midwestern 25%, Northeastern 24%, and Western 20%. The highest number of study locations were in California 13, New York 9, and Pennsylvania 9, while the highest number of open studies were in California 51, Texas 32, and New York 23. Twenty states had no open CAR-T or bispecific antibodies trials. Only 33% of African Americans (AA) lived in a county with a trial, and 7 out of 10 states with the highest proportion of AA residents (18.6%-41.4%) have no or less than 4 trial sites. Of the 62 counties analyzed, 92% were White predominant, while only 8% were AA predominant (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies should be framed to address the observed disparities and to improve access.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/imunologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Introduction: In the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, our world has faced multiple challenges. Infection with this virus has commonly been associated with thrombotic events. However, little is known about bleeding risk and anticoagulation therapy. This study aims to determine factors that are associated with increased risk of bleeding in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the records of COVID-19 patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 through May 2020. Using patient charts, investigators manually collected data regarding patient characteristics and bleeding. Patients were included in the analysis if they had a confirmed COVID-19 PCR test, were older than 18 years of age and were admitted to the hospital. Patients who were pregnant or had incomplete charts were excluded from the study. ANOVA and logistic regression were used to determine the statistical significance of the data using SPSS version 27. Results: A total of 651 patients were included in the analysis out of 685 patients located in the database of COVID-19 infected patients during that time frame. The general characteristics of the patients were as follows: 54.2% were males; females 45.8% ages ranged from 28 to 83 years old (median age = 66 years old). There were 31 patients (4.9%) who required more than 1 unit of packed red blood cell (PRBC). A total of 16 (2.85%) patients had a documented gastrointestinal bleed (GIB), of which 8 received a total of 29 units of PRBC transfusions. The HAS-BLED score (without alcohol/drug due to inadequate charting) is calculated for patients who had a documented GI bleed and who received more than one unit of PRBC. It was noted that the higher the HAS-BLED score the greater the likelihood of having a GI bleed (p < 0.001). The HAS-BLED score (not including alcohol/drug) was also predictive for patients who received more than one unit of PRBC during their hospital stay (p < 0.001). Discussion: Using the HAS-BLED score without alcohol/drugs, patients with COVID-19 can be stratified in regard to their risk of GI bleeding and their risk of transfusion while in the hospital. When administering anticoagulation therapy, cautious monitoring should be carried out. Decisions regarding anticoagulant therapy should be based on individual patient characteristics.
RESUMO
Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnosis and management of anemic patients in free clinics around the Tampa Bay area.Methods: In this retrospective study we extracted data including demographics, chronic diseases, and laboratory values from medical charts of uninsured patients seen in 9 free clinics from January 2016 through December 2017 in the Tampa Bay area, FL, USA. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess relationships between socioeconomic variables and a documented history of anemia.Results: From two years of documented data, 6971 patients were included, of which 367 (5%) had a documented diagnosis of anemia. Most were women (315, 86%), and the median age was 41 years (6-91). Among the 367 patients with anemia,191 (52%) patients had an unspecified type of anemia, 144 (39%) were diagnosed with IDA, 16 (4%) with anemia of chronic disease, and the remaining were other uncommon causes. Only 67% (97/144) of IDA patients had documented iron replacement. Colonoscopies were documented in only 32 (9%) of all patients with anemia, and in 23 (16%) IDA patients. Several chronic diseases were statistically associated and comorbid with a diagnosis of anemia.Conclusions: Uninsured patients with IDA are prescribed iron and undergo colonoscopies at sub-optimal rates. Increasing resources, awareness, and education of providers in these settings could lead to improved treatment practices and decrease the risk of morbidity and mortality.