Muffins and Meditation: Combatting Burnout in Surgical Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of burnout in our surgical residency program and to assess the impact of a weekly wellness program for surgical residents through validated tools measuring mindfulness, self-compassion, flourishing, and burnout. Our hypothesis was that participants with more frequent attendance would: (1) be more mindful and self-compassionate and (2) experience less burnout and more flourishing. DESIGN: An optional one-hour weekly breakfast conference was facilitated by a senior surgical faculty member with the time protected from all clinical duties. Following a guided meditation, participants were given time for reflection and dialogue about their training experiences or led in a wellness exercise. TRANCE (tolerance, respect, anonymity, nonretaliation, compassion, egalitarianism) principles were utilized to create a safe and open environment. Residents were surveyed at the end of the study period, which was from March 2017 through June 2018. SETTING: The conference and data analysis was conducted at Denver Health Medical Center, affiliated with the University of Colorado School of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: This study analyzed survey responses from 85 surgical residents. RESULTS: Following the wellness program, when answering the 2-question Maslach Burnout Inventory, 35.7% of residents reported feeling burned out by their work once a week or more, and 29.7% reported feeling more callous toward people once a week or more. After multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of increased burnout were "not being married or in a committed relationship," lower positive affect, and higher negative affect. Written feedback was overwhelmingly positive, and residents expressed gratitude for the conference, the opportunity for self-reflection, and open dialogue with attendings and colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of burnout is high among surgical residents. Allowing time to practice a mindfulness meditation while providing space for residents to share their experiences may be protective, and efforts should be made to reduce barriers to participation.

The Waiting Game: How Long Are Breast Cancer Patients Waiting for Definitive Diagnosis?

BACKGROUND: Receiving a new breast cancer (BC) diagnosis can cause significant patient anxiety, which is amplified by delays in diagnosis. There is a lack of defined time periods for delays in the workup of BC. This study aims to evaluate national variations in timing from first abnormal mammogram to first biopsy and to determine independent predictors of delay in diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were derived from SEER-Medicare linked claims database from 2007 to 2013. Time intervals from abnormal mammogram, either screening or diagnostic, to biopsy were assessed. The fourth quartile for timing from first mammogram to first biopsy was utilized to define delay in diagnosis. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association between clinicopathologic variables and delays in diagnosis. RESULTS: We analyzed 53,758 patients with stage 0-II BC who underwent upfront surgery. Significant variations in timing of care were identified, with mean times from mammogram to biopsy, surgeon visit, and breast surgery of 23.3, 31.6, and 52.6 days, respectively. Over the study period, there was a decrease in delays from mammogram to biopsy. Non-White race, Northeast location, and earlier stage disease were found to be independent predictors of delays in the diagnosis of BC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates significant variations in time to diagnostic biopsy. More efficient processes of care to address these delays should be implemented, and further studies are needed to determine whether improved efficiency decreases patient anxiety. The large variations in time to diagnosis speak to the need for consensus guidelines to establish a standard of care.

Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Safety-Net Population Profile.

Background: Timely detection and treatment of breast cancer is important in optimizing survival and minimizing recurrence. Given disparities in breast cancer outcomes based on socioeconomic status, we examined time to diagnosis and treatment in a safety-net hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with breast cancer diagnosed between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2012 (N=120). We limited our analytic sample to patients with nonrecurrent, primary stage 0-III breast cancer (N=105) and determined intervals from presentation to diagnosis, diagnosis to first treatment, last surgery to chemotherapy initiation, and last surgery to start of radiation therapy (RT). Using logistic regression, we calculated unadjusted odds of receiving timely treatment (< median time) versus more delayed treatment (≥ median time) as a function of age, language, ethnicity, insurance, Charlson comorbidity index, disease stage, method of first presentation (screening mammography vs care provider), symptoms at presentation, and type of surgical treatment. Results: Patients aged 55 to 64 years accounted for most of the sample (n=37; 35.2%). Median time from presentation to diagnosis (23 days), time from diagnosis to first treatment, and time from surgery to chemotherapy initiation fell within intervals published in the literature; median time from last surgery to start of RT was greater than recommended intervals. Factors significantly associated with longer intervals than median time included stage, method of presentation, language, surgical treatment, insurance, and ethnicity. Conclusions: Patients in this safety-net setting experienced acceptable diagnosis and treatment intervals, except for time to RT. Focused interventions that help care providers access imaging quickly for their symptomatic patients could improve time to diagnosis. Concentrating additional efforts on non-English-speaking, Hispanic patients and those who need to receive RT could improve time to treatment.