Validation of the North Star Assessment for Limb-Girdle Type Muscular Dystrophies.

OBJECTIVE: The North Star Assessment for limb-girdle type muscular dystrophies (NSAD), a clinician-reported outcome measure (ClinRO) of motor performance, was initially developed and validated for use in dysferlinopathy, an autosomal recessive form of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD R2/2B). Recent developments in treatments for limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD) have highlighted the urgent need for disease-specific ClinROs. The purpose of this study was to understand the ability of the NSAD to quantify motor function across the broad spectrum of LGMD phenotypes. METHODS: Assessments of 130 individuals with LGMD evaluated by the physical therapy teams at Nationwide Children's Hospital and the John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre were included in the analysis. NSAD, 100-m timed test (100MTT), and Performance of Upper Limb 2.0 assessment data were collected. Psychometric analysis with Rasch measurement methods was used to examine the NSAD for suitability and robustness by determining the extent to which the observed data "fit" with predictions of those ratings from the Rasch model. The NSAD score was correlated with the 100MTT and Performance of Upper Limb 2.0 assessment scores for external construct validity. RESULTS: The NSAD demonstrated a good spread of items covering a continuum of abilities across both individuals who had LGMD and were ambulatory and individuals who had LGMD and were weaker and nonambulatory. Items fit well with the construct measured, validating a summed total score. The NSAD had excellent interrater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.986, 95% CI = 0.981-0.991] and was highly correlated with the 100MTT walk/run velocity (Spearman rho correlation coefficient of rs(134) = .92). CONCLUSION: Although LGMD subtypes may differ in age of onset, rate of progression, and patterns of muscle weakness, the overall impact of progressive muscle weakness on motor function is similar. The NSAD is a reliable and valid ClinRO of motor performance for individuals with LGMD and is suitable for use in clinical practice and research settings. IMPACT: Recent developments in potential pharmacological treatments for LGMD have highlighted the urgent need for disease-specific outcome measures. Validated and meaningful outcome measures are necessary to capture disease presentation, to inform expected rates of progression, and as endpoints for measuring the response to interventions in clinical trials. The NSAD, a scale of motor performance for both individuals who have LGMD and are ambulatory and those who are nonambulatory, is suitable for use in clinical and research settings.

Consensus Guidelines for Improving Quality of Assessment and Training for Neuromuscular Diseases.

Critical components of successful evaluation of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in multisite clinical trials and clinical practice are standardized training, administration, and documented reliability of scoring. Experiences of evaluators, alongside patient differences from regional standards of care, may contribute to heterogeneity in clinical center's expertise. Achieving low variability and high reliability of COA is fundamental to clinical research and to give confidence in our ability to draw rational, interpretable conclusions from the data collected. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a framework to guide the learning process for COAs for use in clinics and clinical trials to maximize reliability and validity of COAs in neuromuscular disease (NMD). This is a consensus-based guideline with contributions from fourteen leading experts in clinical outcomes and the field of clinical outcome training in NMD. This framework should guide reliable and valid assessments in NMD specialty clinics and clinical trials. This consensus aims to expedite study start up with a progressive training pathway ranging from research naïve to highly experienced clinical evaluators. This document includes recommendations for education guidelines and roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders in COA assessment and implementation to ensure quality and consistency of outcome administration across different settings.

Remote Delivery of Motor Function Assessment and Training for Clinical Trials in Neuromuscular Disease: A Response to the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.

Clinical outcome assessments of function or strength, assessed by physical therapists, are commonly used as primary endpoints in clinical trials, natural history studies and within clinics for individuals with neuromuscular disorders. These evaluations not only inform the efficacy of investigational agents in clinical trials, but also importantly track disease trajectory to prospectively advise need for equipment, home and work modifications, and other assistive devices. The COVID-19 pandemic had a global impact on the safety and feasibility of in-person visits and assessments, necessitating rapid development of mitigation strategies to ensure ongoing collection of key clinical trial endpoints and access to expert clinical care despite travel restrictions. Physical therapists who are expert in neuromuscular disorders working across clinics, countries, and clinical trials developed initial guidelines and methods for the suitability and feasibility of performing remote evaluations. A number of Sponsors introduced amendments to their study protocols to enable remote evaluations, supported by live video streaming of the assessment to their local clinical evaluators. Similarly, application of these techniques to clinical telemedicine enabled objective evaluations for use in payer discussions, equipment procurement, and general access to expert physical therapy services. Here we report on our methodology for adapting current practices to remote testing and considerations for remote evaluations.

Assessment of disease progression in dysferlinopathy: A 1-year cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of functional measures to detect disease progression in dysferlinopathy over 6 months and 1 year. METHODS: One hundred ninety-three patients with dysferlinopathy were recruited to the Jain Foundation's International Clinical Outcome Study for Dysferlinopathy. Baseline, 6-month, and 1-year assessments included adapted North Star Ambulatory Assessment (a-NSAA), Motor Function Measure (MFM-20), timed function tests, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Brooke scale, Jebsen test, manual muscle testing, and hand-held dynamometry. Patients also completed the ACTIVLIM questionnaire. Change in each measure over 6 months and 1 year was calculated and compared between disease severity (ambulant [mild, moderate, or severe based on a-NSAA score] or nonambulant [unable to complete a 10-meter walk]) and clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: The functional a-NSAA test was the most sensitive to deterioration for ambulant patients overall. The a-NSAA score was the most sensitive test in the mild and moderate groups, while the 6MWT was most sensitive in the severe group. The 10-meter walk test was the only test showing significant change across all ambulant severity groups. In nonambulant patients, the MFM domain 3, wrist flexion strength, and pinch grip were most sensitive. Progression rates did not differ by clinical diagnosis. Power calculations determined that 46 moderately affected patients are required to determine clinical effectiveness for a hypothetical 1-year clinical trial based on the a-NSAA as a clinical endpoint. CONCLUSION: Certain functional outcome measures can detect changes over 6 months and 1 year in dysferlinopathy and potentially be useful in monitoring progression in clinical trials. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01676077.