Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(1): 101225, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37972925

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although severe maternal morbidity is associated with adverse health outcomes in the year after delivery, patterns of healthcare use beyond the 6-week postpartum period have not been well documented. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate healthcare utilization and expenditures for deliveries with and without severe maternal morbidity in the 12 months following delivery among commercially insured patients. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2016 to 2018 IBM Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Research Databases, we identified deliveries to individuals 15 to 49 years of age who were continuously enrolled in noncapitated health plans for 12 months after delivery discharge. We used multivariable generalized linear models to estimate adjusted mean 12-month medical expenditures and 95% confidence intervals for deliveries with and without severe maternal morbidity, accounting for region, health plan type, delivery method, and obstetrical comorbidities. We estimated expenditures associated with inpatient admissions, nonemergency outpatient visits, outpatient emergency department visits, and outpatient pharmaceutical claims. RESULTS: We identified 366,282 deliveries without severe maternal morbidity and 3976 deliveries (10.7 per 1000) with severe maternal morbidity. Adjusted mean total medical expenditures for deliveries with severe maternal morbidity were 43% higher in the 12 months after discharge than deliveries without severe maternal morbidity ($5320 vs $3041; difference $2278; 95% confidence interval, $1591-$2965). Adjusted mean expenditures for readmissions and nonemergency outpatient visits during the 12-month postpartum period were 61% and 39% higher, respectively, for deliveries with severe maternal morbidity compared with deliveries without severe maternal morbidity. Among deliveries with severe maternal morbidity, adjusted mean total costs were highest for patients living in the western region ($7831; 95% confidence interval, $5518-$10,144) and those having a primary cesarean ($7647; 95% confidence interval, $6323-$8970). CONCLUSION: Severe maternal morbidity at delivery is associated with increased healthcare use and expenditures in the year after delivery. These estimates can inform planning of severe maternal morbidity prevention efforts.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde , Obstetrícia , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Período Pós-Parto , Atenção à Saúde , Hospitalização
2.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 34(2): 685-702, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464526

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To understand perinatal risks associated with social needs in pregnancy Methods. Multivariable log-binomial regression analyses adjusting for age, parity, and insurance were used to evaluate the relationship between any social need (e.g., housing, transportation, food, and intimate partner violence) and adverse perinatal outcomes (stillbirth, prematurity, maternal morbidity) in a cohort of English and Spanish-speaking patients who obtained prenatal care and birthed at our institution during a one-year period. RESULTS: Of 2,435 patients, 1,608 (66%) completed social needs screening at least once during prenatal care. The cohort was predominantly non-Hispanic Black (1,294, 80%) and publicly insured (1,395, 87%). Having one or more social need was associated with three-fold increased risk of stillbirth (aRR 3.35, 95%CI 1.31,8.6) and 14% reduction in postpartum care attendance (aRR 0.86, 95%CI 0.78-0.95) and was highest in individuals reporting transportation needs. CONCLUSIONS: Social needs during pregnancy were associated with increased risk of stillbirth.


Assuntos
Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Natimorto , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Parto
3.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 115(4): 405-420, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37330393

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, policymakers and professional organizations support screening for social assets and risks during clinical care. Scant evidence exists on how screening impacts patients, providers, or health systems. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published literature for evidence of the clinical utility of screening for social determinants of health in clinical obstetric and gynecologic (OBGYN) care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We systematically searched Pubmed (March 2022, 5,302 identified) and identified additional articles using hand sorting (searching articles citing key articles (273 identified) and through bibliography review (20 identified)). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all articles that measured a quantitative outcome of systematic social determinants of health (SDOH) screening in an OBGYN clinical setting. Each identified citation was reviewed by two independent reviewers at both the title/abstract and full text stages. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified 19 articles for inclusion and present the results using narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS: The majority of articles reported on SDOH screening during prenatal care (16/19) and the most common SDOH was intimate partner violence (13/19 studies). Overall, patients had favorable attitudes towards SDOH screening (in 8/9 articles measuring attitudes), and referrals were common following positive screening (range 5.3%-63.6%). Only two articles presented data on the effects of SDOH screening on clinicians and none on health systems. Three articles present data on resolution of social needs, with inconsistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence exists on the benefits of SDOH screening in OBGYN clinical settings. Innovative studies leveraging existing data collection are needed to expand and improve SDOH screening.


Assuntos
Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Medicina , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde
4.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 19: E68, 2022 10 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36302381

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite the strong link between cardiometabolic pregnancy complications and future heart disease, there are documented gaps in engaging those who experience such conditions in recommended postpartum follow-up and preventive care. The goal of our study was to understand how people in a Medicaid-insured population perceive and manage risks during and after pregnancy related to an ongoing cardiometabolic disorder. METHODS: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with postpartum participants who had a cardiometabolic conditions during pregnancy (chronic or gestational diabetes, chronic or gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia). We recruited postpartum participants from a single safety-net hospital system in Atlanta, Georgia, and conducted virtual interviews during January through May 2021. We conducted a content analysis guided by the Health Belief Model and present themes related to risk management. RESULTS: From the 28 interviews we conducted, we found that during pregnancy, advice and intervention by the clinical care team facilitated management behaviors for high-risk conditions. However, participants described limited understanding of how pregnancy complications might affect future outcomes, and few described engaging in postpartum management behaviors. CONCLUSION: Improving continuity and content of care during postpartum may improve uptake of preventive behaviors among postpartum patients at risk of heart disease.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Georgia/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Parto , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Gestão de Riscos
5.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 10110-10115, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36038962

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite growing acceptance of the role of context in shaping perinatal risk, data on how neighborhood factors may identify high-risk obstetric patients is limited. In this study, we evaluated the effect of neighborhood deprivation and neighborhood racial composition on severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among persons delivered in a large public health system in Atlanta, Georgia. METHODS: We conducted a population cohort study using electronic medical record data on all deliveries at Grady Memorial Hospital during 2011-2020. Using residential zip codes, we calculated neighborhood deprivation index based on data from the US Census. We used log-binomial regression with generalized estimating equations to estimate crude and adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between tertile of neighborhood deprivation and SMM, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and neighborhood-level (racial composition, food desert, and transit access) covariates. RESULTS: Among 25,257 deliveries, 6.2% (1566) experienced SMM. Approximately 24.0%, 32.0%, and 44.0% of women lived in the lowest, middle, and highest tertile of neighborhood deprivation, respectively and 64.9% lived in a neighborhood with majority non-Hispanic Black residents. After adjustment, there was no association between neighborhood deprivation and SMM (aRR: 1.0 (0.8, 1.1)) or residence in a majority Black neighborhood and SMM (aRR:1.0 (0.9, 1.2)). CONCLUSION: In this safety-net hospital, residence in a high deprivation or majority Black neighborhood did not predict SMM at or following delivery. Individual-level social determinants may better explain variation in risk, particularly in high-burden populations.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Características de Residência , Gravidez , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , População Negra , Morbidade
8.
Matern Child Health J ; 25(7): 1147-1155, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909207

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Underserved subgroups are less likely to have optimal health prior to pregnancy. We describe preconception health indicators (behavior, pregnancy intention, and obesity) among pregnant Latina women with and without chronic stress in metro Atlanta. DESIGN: We surveyed 110 pregnant Latina women enrolled in prenatal care at three clinics in Atlanta. The survey assessed chronic stress, pregnancy intention, preconception behavior changes (taking folic acid or prenatal vitamins, seeking healthcare advice, any reduction in smoking or drinking), and previous trauma. RESULTS: Specific behaviors to improve health prior to pregnancy were uncommon (e.g., taking vitamins (25.5%) or improving nutrition (20.9%)). Just under half of women were experiencing a chronic stressor at the time of conception (49.5%). Chronically stressed women were more likely to be obese (aOR: 3.0 (1.2, 7.4)), less likely to intend their pregnancy (aOR: 0.3 (0.1, 0.7)), and possibly less likely to report any PHB (45.5% vs. 57.4%; aOR: 0.5 (0.2-1.1)). CONCLUSIONS: Chronically stress women were less likely to enter prenatal care with optimal health. However, preconception behaviors were uncommon overall.


Assuntos
Cuidado Pré-Concepcional , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gestantes , Proibitinas , Fumar
9.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 121(9): 1704-1720, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Factors that influence breastfeeding initiation and duration have been well established; however, there is limited understanding of in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), which is critical for establishing breastfeeding. Grady Memorial Hospital, which serves a high proportion of participants receiving Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and racial/ethnic minorities, had an in-hospital EBF rate in 2018 by the Joint Commission's definition of 29% and sought contextualized evidence on how to best support breastfeeding mothers. OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to (1) identify facilitators and barriers to in-hospital EBF and (2) explore breastfeeding support available from key stakeholders across the social-ecological model. DESIGN: In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included a total of 38 purposively sampled participants from Grady Memorial Hospital (10 EBF mothers, 10 non-EBF, and 18 key stakeholders such as clinicians, community organizations' staff, and administrators). RESULTS: Key themes included that maternal perception of inadequate milk supply was a barrier to in-hospital EBF at the intrapersonal level. At the interpersonal level, a personable and individualized approach to breastfeeding counseling may be most effective in supporting EBF. At the institutional level, key determinants of EBF were gaps in prenatal breastfeeding education, limited time to provide comprehensive prenatal education to high-risk patients, and practical help with latching and positioning. Community-level WIC services were perceived as a facilitator due to the additional benefits provided for EBF mothers; however, the distribution of WIC vouchers for formula to mothers while they are in the hospital undermines the promotion of EBF. Cultural norms and a diverse patient population were reported as barriers to providing support at the macrosystem level. CONCLUSION: Multipronged approaches that span the social-ecological model may be required to support early EBF in hospital settings.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Mães/psicologia , Cuidado Pós-Natal/psicologia , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Assistência Alimentar , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Alta do Paciente , Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Apoio Social , Estados Unidos , População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(11): 2787-2789, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33050982

RESUMO

We conducted a cohort study to determine sociodemographic risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among obstetric patients in 2 urban hospitals in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Prevalence of infection was highest among women who were Hispanic, were uninsured, or lived in high-density neighborhoods.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2 , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Contraception ; 101(6): 405-411, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32194040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this analysis were to 1) estimate prevalence of contraceptive use among women at risk for unintended pregnancy and 2) identify correlates of contraceptive use among women with ongoing or potential need for contraceptive services in Puerto Rico during the 2016 Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cell-phone survey July-November, 2016. Women aged 18-49 years living in Puerto Rico were eligible. We completed 3059 interviews; the overall response rate was 69.2%. After weighting, the data provide population-based estimates. For this analysis, we included women at risk for unintended pregnancy, and assessed ongoing or potential need for contraceptive services in this group, excluding women using permanent contraceptive methods. RESULTS: Most women reported using contraception (82.8%), and use increased with age. Female sterilization and male condoms were most frequently reported (40.8% and 17.1%, respectively). Among women with ongoing or potential need for contraceptive services, 24.7% talked to a healthcare provider about ZIKV, and 31.2% reported a change in childbearing intentions due to ZIKV. Most women were at least a little worried about getting infected with ZIKV (74.3%) or having a baby with a birth defect (80.9%). Being very worried about getting infected with ZIKV and already having Zika were significantly associated with use of any contraception (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38 and 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.72, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need for regular contraceptive prevalence studies to inform programs about contraceptive needs, especially during public health emergencies. IMPLICATIONS: When the 2016 Zika virus outbreak began in Puerto Rico there were no recent population-based data available on contraceptive prevalence. To fill this information gap, we conducted a population-based survey. Our findings provided baseline contraceptive prevalence estimates to support response planning and allocation of health resources.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Congênitas/epidemiologia , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Surtos de Doenças , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoncepção/métodos , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(5): 623-632, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30600516

RESUMO

Objectives We aimed to examine the extent to which health plan expenditures for infertility services differed by whether women resided in states with mandates requiring coverage of such services and by whether coverage was provided through a self-insured plan subject to state mandates versus fully-insured health plans subject only to federal regulation. Methods This retrospective cohort study used individual-level, de-identified health insurance claims data. We included women 19-45 years of age who were continuously enrolled during 2011 and classified them into three mutually exclusive groups based on highest treatment intensity: in vitro fertilization (IVF), intrauterine insemination (IUI), or ovulation-inducing (OI) medications. Using generalized linear models, we estimated adjusted annual mean, aggregate, and per member per month (PMPM) expenditures among women in states with an infertility insurance mandate and those in states without a mandate, stratified by enrollment in a fully-insured or self-insured health plan. Results Of the 6,006,017 women continuously enrolled during 2011, 9199 (0.15%) had claims for IVF, 10,112 (0.17%) had claims for IUI, and 23,739 (0.40%) had claims for OI medications. Among women enrolled in fully insured plans, PMPM expenditures for infertility treatment were 3.1 times higher for those living in states with a mandate compared with states without a mandate. Among women enrolled in self-insured plans, PMPM infertility treatment expenditures were 1.2 times higher for mandate versus non-mandate states. Conclusions for Practice Recorded infertility treatment expenditures were higher in states with insurance reimbursement mandates versus those without mandates, with most of the difference in expenditures incurred by fully-insured plans.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade/economia , Programas Governamentais/economia , Adulto , Feminino , Programas Governamentais/métodos , Programas Governamentais/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/economia , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Infertilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
13.
Transl Androl Urol ; 7(Suppl 3): S264-S270, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30159231

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess postpartum use of secondary contraception with vasectomy within Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). METHODS: Secondary contraception and type of method used were assessed among married women reporting partner vasectomy 4 months after a recent live birth in female residents of 15 US states and New York City who participated in the 2007-2011 PRAMS. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2011, 1,004 married women who had a recent live birth participating in PRAMS reported they and their partners relied on vasectomy for postpartum contraception. Among these couples, 57.8% reported not using additional forms of contraception postpartum. Of those reporting additional contraception, condoms were most commonly used (50.0%), followed by oral contraceptive pills (26.5%), and withdrawal (9.5%). Multivariable modeling showed that use of secondary contraception was twice as high among women reporting a second birth versus women reporting a fourth or higher birth [adjusted prevalence odds ratio (POR) =2.0 (1.1-3.2)]. No other sociodemographic characteristics (maternal age, maternal race, parental education, household income) were significantly associated with use of secondary contraception with vasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Most couples within PRAMS reporting partner vasectomy as postpartum contraception did not use secondary contraception in the months immediately after vasectomy, and, of those who did, most relied on less effective methods. Clinicians need to better understand reasons for limited use of secondary contraception with vasectomy to improve counseling strategies for reducing unintended pregnancy.

14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 131(6): 1145-1152, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29742653

RESUMO

Although there is much discussion about population health in academic medical centers, managed care organizations, and a variety of disciplines, it is not always clear what this term means. Population health describes the health outcomes of a group of individuals including health disparities, social determinants of health, and policies and interventions that link health outcomes with and patterns of health determinants. We describe some of the successes and challenges to addressing reproductive health issues in Georgia from a population health perspective, focusing on efforts to reduce teenage pregnancy and improve maternal health.


Assuntos
Ginecologia/tendências , Obstetrícia/tendências , Saúde da População , Adolescente , Feminino , Georgia , Política de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez na Adolescência , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde
15.
Lancet Public Health ; 3(2): e91-e99, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29371100

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prevention of unintended pregnancy is a primary strategy to reduce adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes related to Zika virus infection. The Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) aimed to build a network of health-care providers offering client-centred contraceptive counselling and the full range of reversible contraception at no cost to women in Puerto Rico who chose to prevent pregnancy during the 2016-17 Zika virus outbreak. Here, we describe the Z-CAN programme design, implementation activities, and baseline characteristics of the first 21 124 participants. METHODS: Z-CAN was developed by establishing partnerships between federal agencies, territorial health agencies, private corporations, and domestic philanthropic and non-profit organisations in the continental USA and Puerto Rico. Private donations to the National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCF) secured a supply of reversible contraceptive methods (including long-acting reversible contraception), made available to non-sterilised women of reproductive age at no cost through provider reimbursements and infrastructure supported by the CDCF. To build capacity in contraception service provision, doctors and clinic staff from all public health regions and nearly all municipalities in Puerto Rico were recruited into the programme. All providers completed 1 day of comprehensive training in contraception knowledge, counselling, and initiation and management, including the insertion and removal of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). Z-CAN was announced through health-care providers, word of mouth, and a health education campaign. Descriptive characteristics of programme providers and participants were recorded, and we estimated the factors associated with choosing and receiving a LARC method. As part of a Z-CAN programme monitoring plan, participants were invited to complete a patient satisfaction survey about whether they had obtained free, same-day access to their chosen contraceptive method after receiving comprehensive counselling, their perception of the quality of care they had received, and their satisfaction with their chosen method and services. FINDINGS: Between May 4, 2016, and Aug 15, 2017, 153 providers in the Z-CAN programme provided services to 21 124 women. 20 110 (95%) women received same-day provision of a reversible contraceptive method. Whereas only 767 (4%) women had used a LARC method before Z-CAN, 14 259 (68%) chose and received a LARC method at their initial visit. Of the women who received a LARC method, 10 808 (76%) women had used no method or a least effective method of contraception (ie, condoms or withdrawal) before their Z-CAN visit. Of the 3489 women who participated in a patient satisfaction survey, 3068 (93%) of 3294 women were very satisfied with the services received, and 3216 (93%) of 3478 women reported receiving the method that they were most interested in after receiving counselling. 2382 (78%) of 3040 women rated their care as excellent or very good. INTERPRETATION: Z-CAN was designed as a short-term response for rapid implementation of reversible contraceptive services in a complex emergency setting in Puerto Rico and has served more than 21 000 women. This model could be replicated or adapted as part of future emergency preparedness and response efforts. FUNDING: National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais/provisão & distribuição , Surtos de Doenças , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(44): 1230-1235, 2017 Nov 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121000

RESUMO

Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of microcephaly and other serious brain abnormalities (1). To support state and territory response to the threat of Zika, CDC's Interim Zika Response Plan outlined activities for vector control; clinical management of exposed pregnant women and infants; targeted communication about Zika virus transmission among women and men of reproductive age; and primary prevention of Zika-related adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes by prevention of unintended pregnancies through increased access to contraception.* The most highly effective,† reversible contraception includes intrauterine devices and implants, known as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). On September 28, 2016, the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP) and CDC facilitated a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, of representatives from 15 states to identify state-led efforts to implement seven CDC-published strategies aimed at increasing access to contraception in the context of Zika virus (2). Qualitative data were collected from participating jurisdictions. The number of states reporting implementation of each strategy ranged from four to 11. Participants identified numerous challenges, particularly for strategies implemented less frequently. Examples of barriers were discussed and presented with corresponding approaches to address each barrier. Addressing these barriers could facilitate increased access to contraception, which might decrease the number of unintended pregnancies affected by Zika virus.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Governo Local , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Governo Estadual , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia
17.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(6): 676.e1-676.e11, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28866122

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the patterns and trends of contraceptive use among women living with HIV, compared with noninfected women in the United States. Further, little is known about whether antiretroviral therapy correlates with contraceptive use. Such information is needed to help identify potential gaps in care and to enhance unintended pregnancy prevention efforts. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare contraceptive method use among HIV-infected and noninfected privately insured women in the United States, and to evaluate the association between antiretroviral therapy use and contraceptive method use. STUDY DESIGN: We used a large US nationwide health care claims database to identify girls and women ages 15-44 years with prescription drug coverage. We used diagnosis, procedure, and National Drug Codes to assess female sterilization and reversible prescription contraception use in 2008 and 2014 among women continuously enrolled in the database during 2003 through 2008 or 2009 through 2014, respectively. Women with no codes were classified as using no method; these may have included women using nonprescription methods, such as condoms. We calculated prevalence of contraceptive use by HIV infection status, and by use of antiretroviral therapy among those with HIV. We used multivariable polytomous logistic regression to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraception, and short-acting hormonal contraception compared to no method. RESULTS: While contraceptive use increased among HIV-infected and noninfected women from 2008 through 2014, in both years, a lower proportion of HIV-infected women used prescription contraceptive methods (2008: 17.5%; 2014: 28.9%, compared with noninfected women (2008: 28.8%; 2014: 39.8%, P < .001 for both). Controlling for demographics, chronic medical conditions, pregnancy history, and cohort year, HIV-infected women compared to HIV-noninfected women had lower odds of using long-acting reversible contraception (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86 compared to no method) or short-acting hormonal contraception method (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.70 compared to no method). In 2014, HIV-infected women using antiretroviral therapy were significantly more likely to use no method (76.8% vs 64.1%), and significantly less likely to use short-acting hormonal contraception (11.0% vs 22.7%) compared to HIV-infected women not using antiretroviral therapy. Those receiving antiretroviral therapy had lower odds of using short-acting hormonal contraception compared to no method (adjusted odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.63). There was no significant difference in female sterilization by HIV status or antiretroviral therapy use. CONCLUSION: Despite the safety of reversible contraceptives for women with HIV, use of prescription contraception continues to be lower among privately insured HIV-infected women compared to noninfected women, particularly among those receiving antiretroviral therapy.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção/tendências , Anticoncepcionais Orais Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo/tendências , Esterilização Reprodutiva/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 31(5): 438-448, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28762537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Affordability plays an important role in the utilisation of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and non-IVF fertility treatments. Fertility treatments are associated with increased risk of multiple births. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the affordability of fertility treatments across US states and the percentage of multiple births due to natural conception, non-IVF treatments, and IVF, and the association between these percentages and state-specific multiple birth rates. METHODS: State-specific per capita disposable personal income and state-specific infertility insurance mandates were used as measures of affordability. Maternal age-adjusted percentages of multiple births due to natural conception, non-IVF treatments, and IVF were estimated for each state using birth certificate and IVF data. Scatter plots and regression analysis were used to explore associations between state-level measures of affordability, the percentage of multiple births due to natural conception and fertility treatments, and state-specific multiple birth rates. RESULTS: In 2013, age-adjusted contributions of natural conception, non-IVF fertility treatments, and IVF to multiple births in US were 58.2, 22.8, and 19.0% respectively. States with greater affordability of fertility treatments had higher percentages of multiples due to IVF and lower percentages due to natural conception. Higher percentages of multiples due to IVF and lower percentages due to natural conception were associated with higher state-specific multiple birth rates. CONCLUSION: Increasing affordability of fertility treatments may increase state-specific multiple birth rates. Policies and treatment practices encouraging single-gestation pregnancies may help reduce multiple births resulting from these treatments.


Assuntos
Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez Múltipla/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Materna , Vigilância da População , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(6): 1022-1030, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore disparities in prematurity and low birth weight (LBW) by maternal race and ethnicity among singletons conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using resident birth certificate data from Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan linked with data from the National ART Surveillance System from 2000 to 2010. There were 4,568,822 live births, of which 64,834 were conceived with ART. We compared maternal and ART cycle characteristics of singleton liveborn neonates using χ tests across maternal race and ethnicity groups. We used log binomial models to explore associations between maternal race and ethnicity and LBW and preterm birth by ART conception status. RESULTS: The proportion of liveborn neonates conceived with ART differed by maternal race and ethnicity (P<.01). It was smallest among neonates of non-Hispanic black (0.3%) and Hispanic women (0.6%) as compared with neonates of non-Hispanic white (2.0%) and Asian or Pacific Islander women (1.9%). The percentages of LBW or preterm singletons were highest for neonates of non-Hispanic black women both for non-ART (11.3% and 12.4%) and ART (16.1% and 19.1%) -conceived neonates. After adjusting for maternal factors, the risks of LBW or preterm birth for singletons born to non-Hispanic black mothers were 2.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10-2.14] and 1.56 (95% CI 1.54-1.57) times higher for non-ART neonates and 1.87 (95% CI 1.57-2.23) and 1.56 (95% CI 1.34-1.83) times higher for ART neonates compared with neonates of non-Hispanic white women. The adjusted risk for LBW was also significantly higher for ART and non-ART singletons born to Hispanic (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.47 and adjusted RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.16) and Asian or Pacific Islander (adjusted RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16-1.65 and adjusted RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.52-1.58) women compared with non-Hispanic white women. CONCLUSION: Disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes by maternal race and ethnicity persisted for neonates conceived with and without ART.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(1): 3-9, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926643

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand the most important steps required to implement immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) programs in different Georgia hospitals and the barriers to implementing such a program. METHODS: This was a qualitative study. We interviewed 32 key personnel from 10 Georgia hospitals working to establish immediate postpartum LARC programs. Data were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis principles. We used the Stages of Implementation to organize participant-identified key steps for immediate postpartum LARC into an implementation guide. We compared this guide to hospitals' implementation experiences. RESULTS: At the completion of the study, LARC was available for immediate postpartum placement at 7 of 10 study hospitals. Participants identified common themes for the implementation experience: team member identification and ongoing communication, payer preparedness challenges, interdependent department-specific tasks, and piloting with continuing improvements. Participants expressed a need for anticipatory guidance throughout the process. Key first steps to immediate postpartum LARC program implementation were identifying project champions, creating an implementation team that included all relevant departments, obtaining financial reassurance, and ensuring hospital administration awareness of the project. Potential barriers included lack of knowledge about immediate postpartum LARC, financial concerns, and competing clinical and administrative priorities. Hospitals that were successful at implementing immediate postpartum LARC programs did so by prioritizing clear communication and multidisciplinary teamwork. Although the implementation guide reflects a comprehensive assessment of the steps to implementing immediate postpartum LARC programs, not all hospitals required every step to succeed. CONCLUSION: Hospital teams report that implementing immediate postpartum LARC programs involves multiple departments and a number of important steps to consider. A stage-based approach to implementation, and a standardized guide detailing these steps, may provide the necessary structure for the complex process of implementing immediate postpartum LARC programs in the hospital setting.


Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitais , Papel do Médico , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Comunicação , Anticoncepção/economia , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Implantes de Medicamento , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Administração Financeira de Hospitais , Georgia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Período Pós-Parto , Mecanismo de Reembolso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA