Implementation assessment of a patient personalized clinical pharmacy programme (5P project) into orthogeriatric care pathway.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The orthogeriatric path (hip-fractured elderly patients) is composed of several transition points (emergency surgery, orthopaedic, geriatric and rehabilitation units). The intervention of clinical pharmacists can ensure the continuity of patients' drug management during their hospital stay. The aim of the study was to assess the implementation of clinical pharmacy activities in an orthogeriatric pathway, regarding its impact on medication error prevention, the healthcare professionals' and patients' satisfaction, and the estimated associated pharmaceutical workload. METHODS: Participants were aged 75 or older and managed for proximal femoral fracture. Their admission prescription was reviewed. If they were evaluated at high risk of adverse event (AE), medication reconciliation (MedRec) and pharmaceutical interviews (admission, discharge, and targeted on oral anticoagulant) were added at different steps of their care pathway. The achievement and duration of each clinical pharmacy activity were recorded. The number of pharmaceutical interventions (PI) made during prescription review, and unintentional discrepancies (UID) identified during MedRec were collected. A satisfaction questionnaire was sent to patients and healthcare professionals. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 455 included patients, 284 patients were considered at high risk of AE. Clinical pharmacy activity achievement rates varied between 12% and 98%. A total of 622 PI and 333 UID were identified. The overall patients' and healthcare professionals' satisfaction was rated from 63% to 100%. The total workload was estimated at 376 h: on average 16 min per prescription review, 43 min per admission MedRec, 26 min per discharge MedRec and 17 to 25 minutes per interview. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the programme showed a high potential of drug management securing. To sustain it, additional pharmaceutical human resources and high-performance computing tools are needed.

Medication adherence in pediatric transplantation and assessment methods: a systematic review.

Background: Medication adherence is a major concern in public health. It is fully established that immunosuppressive therapy (IT) and concomitant medications affect transplant outcomes in the pediatric population, showing interest in adherence to this therapy. The aim of the present review was to report on medication adherence in pediatric population post-transplantation. This will enable us to know the situation in this particular population. Methods: A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database. Studies that were published from January 1999 to January 2016 in English language and which investigated medication adherence in pediatric transplantation were included. The type of organ and the methods used to assess medication adherence were studied. Results: A total of 281 records were identified, from which 34 studies were selected: 38% (n=13) on kidney transplantation, 32% (n=11) on liver transplantation, and 23% (n=10) on the transplantation of other organs. Medication adherence was found to be lower than 80% in two-thirds of the studies (64%), and varied from 22% to 97%. This wide range was explained in part by the important heterogeneity of assessment methods among studies. The methods used were objective, non-objective, or combined both types. Most studies did not fully describe the data collected: the time since transplantation, the period over which adherence was assessed, the population, the medications, and the threshold discriminating adherence and non-adherence. Conclusion: The present study found poor medication adherence in the pediatric population post-transplantation. There was a wide range of medication adherence, explained largely by the heterogeneity of assessment methods. Future studies must consider the characteristics of each methodology, but also the threshold defining adherence should be chosen on the basis of clinical outcomes, and describe all data collected to gain precision. To improve adherence in this population, it is essential to identify factors influencing medication (IT and concomitant medications) adherence.

Assessment of the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions performed during medication review in a rheumatology ward.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists contribute to reduce the number of medication errors during medication review. Nevertheless, few French studies report the potential clinical impact of pharmacists' interventions performed after detecting drug-related problems. The objective was to evaluate the clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in a rheumatology ward from medical and pharmaceutical perspectives. METHOD: The analysis was conducted on pharmacists' interventions performed between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in a French teaching hospital. Similar pharmacists' interventions were grouped in one item and they were analysed according to 11 drug categories. The clinical significance of pharmacists' interventions was considered independently by a pharmacist and a rheumatologist using a validated French scale that categorises drug-related problems from minor to catastrophic. The agreement between the two professionals was analysed using the weighted kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Of 1313 prescriptions reviewed, 461 pharmacists' interventions (171 items) were formulated for drug-related problems with an acceptance rate of 67.2%. Of the 418 interventions selected for clinical significance analysis, 235 interventions (56.2%) for the physician and 400 interventions (95.7%) for the pharmacist were at least significant. The two professionals evaluated equally the clinical relevance of 90 items (50.6%). The categories with the most similarities were the analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs (78.1%), the antidiabetics (75.0%) and the anticoagulants (71.4%). The agreement was estimated by a weighted kappa coefficient of 0.29. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the positive clinical relevance of pharmacists' interventions in rheumatology and the importance of medico-pharmaceutical collaboration to prevent medication errors.