Reliability assessment of the OMERACT whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Inter-reader reliability of a new scoring system for evaluating joint inflammation and enthesitis in whole body MRI (WBMRI) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis was tested. The scoring system grades 732 item-region combinations of bone marrow and soft tissue changes for commonly involved joints and entheseal sites. Five radiologists rated 17 WBMRI scans through an online rating platform. Item-wise reliability was calculated for 117 items with non-zero scores in >10 % of readings. Interquartile ranges of the five-reader Kappa reliability coefficients were 0.58-0.73 (range: 0.36-0.88) for the joints, 0.65-0.81 (range: 0.39-0.95) for the entheses, and 0.62-0.75 (range: 0.60-0.76) for chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis-like lesions.

OMERACT validation of a deep learning algorithm for automated absolute quantification of knee joint effusion versus manual semi-quantitative assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To begin evaluating deep learning (DL)-automated quantification of knee joint effusion-synovitis via the OMERACT filter. METHODS: A DL algorithm previously trained on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) knee MRI automatically quantified effusion volume in MRI of 53 OAI subjects, which were also scored semi-quantitatively via KIMRISS and MOAKS by 2-6 readers. RESULTS: DL-measured knee effusion correlated significantly with experts' assessments (Kendall's tau 0.34-0.43) CONCLUSION: The close correlation of automated DL knee joint effusion quantification to KIMRISS manual semi-quantitative scoring demonstrated its criterion validity. Further assessments of discrimination and truth vs. clinical outcomes are still needed to fully satisfy OMERACT filter requirements.

MRI-based synthetic CT for assessment of the bony elements of the sacroiliac joints in children.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the equivalency of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) to conventional CT for sacroiliac joint bony morphology assessment in children. METHODS: A prospective study was performed. Children who had (PET-)CT-scan underwent additional MRI. sCT-CT image quality was analyzed by two readers subjectively overall, semi-quantitatively in terms of cortical delineation, joint facet defects, growth plate fusion, ossified nuclei, lumbosacral transitional anomaly, and bony bridges, and quantitatively for disc space height, spinal canal width, and sacral vertebrae width and height. Cohen's kappa and equivalence analyses with Bland-Altman plots were calculated for categorical and continuous measures respectively. RESULTS: Ten patients were included (6 boys; aged 9-16 years; mean age 14 years). Overall sCT image quality was rated good. Semi-quantitative assessment of cortical delineation of sacroiliac joints, bony bridges, and joint facet defects on the right iliac and sacral sides showed perfect agreement. Correlation was good to excellent (kappa 0.615-1) for the presence of lumbosacral transitional anomaly, fusion of sacral growth plates, joint facet defect, and presence of ossified nuclei. sCT-CT measurements were statistically equivalent and within the equivalence margins (-1-1 mm) for intervertebral disc space height and spinal canal width. Intra- and inter-reader reliability was excellent for quantitative assessment (0.806 < ICC < 0.998). For categorical scoring, kappa ranged from substantial to excellent (0.615-1). CONCLUSION: sCT appears to be visually equivalent to CT for the assessment of pediatric sacroiliac joints. sCT may aid in visualizing sacroiliac joints compared to conventional MRI, with the benefit that no ionizing radiation is used, especially important in children. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI-based synthetic CT, a new technique that generates CT-like images without ionizing radiation, appears to be visually equivalent to CT for assessment of normal pediatric sacroiliac joints and can potentially assess structural damage as it clearly depicts bony cortex. KEY POINTS: • MRI-based sCT is a new image technique that can generate CT-like images. • We found that sCT performs similarly to CT in displaying bony structures of pediatric sacroiliac joints. • sCT has already been clinically validated in the sacroiliac joints in adults. • sCT can potentially assess structural damage from erosions or ankylosis as it clearly depicts bony cortex.

Comparative validation of the knee inflammation MRI scoring system and the MRI osteoarthritis knee score for semi-quantitative assessment of bone marrow lesions and synovitis-effusion in osteoarthritis: an international multi-reader exercise.

Background: Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with symptoms and predict degeneration of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA). Validated methods for their semiquantitative assessment on MRI are available, but they all have similar scoring designs and questionable sensitivity to change. New scoring methods with completely different designs need to be developed and compared to existing methods. Objectives: To compare the performance of new web-based versions of the Knee Inflammation MRI Scoring System (KIMRISS) with the MRI OA Knee Score (MOAKS) for quantification of BMLs and synovitis-effusion (S-E). Design: Retrospective follow-up cohort. Methods: We designed web-based overlays outlining regions in the knee that are scored for BML in MOAKS and KIMRISS. For KIMRISS, both BML and S-E are scored on consecutive sagittal slices. The performance of these methods was compared in an international reading exercise of 8 readers evaluating 60 pairs of scans conducted 1 year apart from cases recruited to the OA Initiative (OAI) cohort. Interobserver reliability for baseline status and baseline to 1 year change in BML and S-E was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Feasibility was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: Mean change in BML and S-E was minimal over 1 year. Pre-specified targets for acceptable reliability (ICC ⩾ 0.80 and ⩾ 0.70 for status and change scores, respectively) were achieved more frequently for KIMRISS for both BML and synovitis. Mean (95% CI) ICC for change in BML was 0.88 (0.83-0.92) and 0.69 (0.60-0.78) for KIMRISS and MOAKS, respectively. KIMRISS mean SUS usability score was 85.7 and at the 95th centile of ranking for usability versus a score of 55.4 and 20th centile for MOAKS. Conclusion: KIMRISS had superior performance metrics to MOAKS for quantification of BML and S-E. Both methods should be further compared in trials of new therapies for OA.

Impact of scan quality on AI assessment of hip dysplasia ultrasound.

AIMS: Early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using ultrasound (US) is safe, effective and inexpensive, but requires high-quality scans. The effect of scan quality on diagnostic accuracy is not well understood, especially as artificial intelligence (AI) begins to automate such diagnosis. In this paper, we developed a 10-point scoring system for reporting DDH US scan quality, evaluated its inter-rater agreement and examined its effect on automated assessment by an AI system-MEDO-Hip. METHODS: Scoring was based on iliac wing straightness and angulation; visibility of labrum, os ischium and femoral head; motion; and other artifacts. Four readers from novice to expert separately scored the quality of 107 scans with this 10-point scale and with holistic grading on a scale of 1-5. MEDO-Hip interpreted the same scans, providing a diagnostic category or identifying the scan as uninterpretable. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement for the 10-point scale was significantly higher than holistic scoring ICC 0.68 vs 0.93, p < 0.05. Inter-rater agreement on the categorisation of individual features, by Cohen's kappa, was highest for os ischium (0.67 ± 0.06), femoral head (0.65 ± 0.07) and iliac wing (0.49 ± 0.12) indices, and lower for the presence of labrum (0.21 ± 0.19). MEDO-Hip interpreted all images of a quality > 7 and flagged 13/107 as uninterpretable. These were low-quality images (3 ± 1.2 vs. 7 ± 1.8 in others, p < 0.05), with poor visualization of the os ischium and noticeable motion. AI accuracy in cases with quality scores < = 7 was 57% vs. 89% on other cases, p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: This study validates that our scoring system reliably characterises scan quality, and identifies cases likely to be misinterpreted by AI. This could lead to more accurate use of AI in DDH diagnosis by flagging low-quality scans likely to provide poor diagnosis up front.

Automatic Assessment Of Hip Effusion From MRI.

Joint effusion is a hallmark of osteoarthritis (OA) associated with stiffness, and may relate to pain, disability, and long-term outcomes. However, it is difficult to quantify accurately. We propose a new Deep Learning (DL) approach for automatic effusion assessment from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) using volumetric quantification measures (VQM). We developed a new multiplane ensemble convolutional neural network (CNN) approach for 1) localizing bony anatomy and 2) detecting effusion regions. CNNs were trained on femoral head and effusion regions manually segmented from 3856 images (63 patients). Upon validation on a non-overlapping set of 2040 images (34 patients) DL showed high agreement with ground-truth in terms of Dice score (0.85), sensitivity (0.86) and precision (0.83). Agreement of VQM per-patient was high for DL vs experts in term of Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)= 0.88[0.80,0.93]. We expect this technique to reduce inter-observer variability in effusion assessment, reducing expert time and potentially improving the quality of OA care.Clinical Relevance- Our technique for automatic assessment of hip MRI can be used for volumetric measurement of effusion. We expect this to reduce variability in OA biomarker assessment and provide more reliable indicators for disease progression.

Consensus-driven conceptual development of a standardized whole body-MRI scoring system for assessment of disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: MRI in JIA OMERACT working group.

OBJECTIVES: Whole body-MRI is helpful in directing diagnostic and treatment approaches, and as a research outcome measure. We describe our initial consensus-driven phase towards developing a whole body-MRI scoring system for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. METHODS: An iterative approach using three rounds of anonymous Delphi surveys followed by a consensus meeting was used to draft the structure of the whole body-MRI scoring system, including the relevant anatomic joints and entheses for assessment, diagnostic item selection, definition and grading, and selection of appropriate MRI planes and sequences. The surveys were completed independently by an international expert group consisting of pediatric radiologists and rheumatologists. RESULTS: Twenty-two experts participated in at least one of three rounds of Delphi surveys and a concluding consensus meeting. A first iteration scoring system was developed which ultimately included the assessment of 100 peripheral, 23 chest, and 76 axial joints, and 64 entheses, with 2-4 diagnostic items graded in each of the items, using binary (presence/absence) and 2-3-level ordinal scores. Recommendations on anatomic MRI planes and sequences were specified as the minimally necessary imaging protocol for the scoring system. CONCLUSION: A novel whole body-MRI scoring system for juvenile idiopathic arthritis was developed by consensus among members of MRI in JIA OMERACT working group. Further iterative refinements, reliability testing, and responsiveness are warranted in upcoming studies.

Imaging assessment of children presenting with suspected or known juvenile idiopathic arthritis: ESSR-ESPR points to consider.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common paediatric rheumatic disease. It represents a group of heterogenous inflammatory disorders with unknown origin and is a diagnosis of exclusion in which imaging plays an important role. JIA is defined as arthritis of one or more joints that begins before the age of 16 years, persists for more than 6 weeks and is of unknown aetiology and pathophysiology. The clinical goal is early suppression of inflammation to prevent irreversible joint damage which has shifted the emphasis from detecting established joint damage to proactively detecting inflammatory change. This drives the need for imaging techniques that are more sensitive than conventional radiography in the evaluation of inflammatory processes as well as early osteochondral change. Physical examination has limited reliability, even if performed by an experienced clinician, emphasising the importance of imaging to aid in clinical decision-making. On behalf of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) arthritis subcommittee and the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) musculoskeletal imaging taskforce, based on literature review and/or expert opinion, we discuss paediatric-specific imaging characteristics of the most commonly involved, in literature best documented and clinically important joints in JIA, namely the temporomandibular joints (TMJs), spine, sacroiliac (SI) joints, wrists, hips and knees, followed by a clinically applicable point to consider for each joint. We will also touch upon controversies in the current literature that remain to be resolved with ongoing research. KEY POINTS: • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic paediatric rheumatic disease and, in JIA imaging, is increasingly important to aid in clinical decision-making. • Conventional radiographs have a lower sensitivity and specificity for detection of disease activity and early destructive change, as compared to MRI or ultrasound. Nonetheless, radiography remains important, particularly in narrowing the differential diagnosis and evaluating growth disturbances. • Mainly in peripheral joints, ultrasound can be helpful for assessment of inflammation and guiding joint injections. In JIA, MRI is the most validated technique. MRI should be considered as the modality of choice to assess the axial skeleton or where the clinical presentation overlaps with JIA.

OMERACT Hip Inflammation Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (HIMRISS) Assessment in Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability, feasibility, and responsiveness of Hip Inflammation Magnetic resonance imaging Scoring System (HIMRISS) for bone marrow lesions (BML) in hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: HIMRISS was scored by 8 readers in 360 hips of 90 patients imaged pre/post-hip steroid injection. Pre-scoring, new readers trained online to achieve intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.80 versus experts. RESULTS: HIMRISS reliability was excellent for BML status (ICC 0.83-0.92). Despite small changes post-injection, reliability of BML change scores was high in femur (0.76-0.81) and moderate in acetabulum (0.42-0.56). CONCLUSION: HIMRISS should be a priority for further assessment of hip BML in OA, and evaluated for use in other arthropathies.

Diagnostic ultrasound assessment of temporomandibular joints: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES:: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the diagnostic capability of ultrasound to assess TMJ alterations as disc displacement (DD), joint effusion (JE) and condylar changes (CC) using 3D imaging modalities as reference standard. METHODS:: Studies were gathered by searching several electronic databases and partial grey literature up to January eighth, 2018 without restrictions of language and time. The risk of bias was evaluated using the second version of Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic of Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADEpro system) instrument was applied to assess the level of evidence across the studies. RESULTS:: After applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were identified and synthesized. All studies were methodologically acceptable presenting low applicability concerns, although none of them fulfilled all QUADAS-2 criteria. The quantitative analysis included 22 studies, 2829 joints in total. The quality of the evidence evaluated by GRADE system suggested moderate confidence in estimating the outcomes. CONCLUSION:: This systematic review demonstrated the ultrasound has acceptable capability to screen for DD and JE in TMD patients. For screening of condylar changes, ultrasound needs further studies using CT or CBCT as reference standard to support its use. More advanced imaging such as MRI can thereafter be used to confirm the diagnosis if deemed necessary.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Using MRI-CBCT Image Registration.

PURPOSE: To introduce a new approach to reconstruct a 3D model of the TMJ using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registered images, and to evaluate the intra-examiner reproducibility values of reconstructing the 3D models of the TMJ. METHODS: MRI and CBCT images of five patients (10 TMJs) were obtained. Multiple MRIs and CBCT images were registered using a mutual information based algorithm. The articular disc, condylar head and glenoid fossa were segmented at two different occasions, at least one-week apart, by one investigator, and 3D models were reconstructed. Differences between the segmentation at two occasions were automatically measured using the surface contours (Average Perpendicular Distance) and the volume overlap (Dice Similarity Index) of the 3D models. Descriptive analysis of the changes at 2 occasions, including means and standard deviation (SD) were reported to describe the intra-examiner reproducibility. RESULTS: The automatic segmentation of the condyle revealed maximum distance change of 1.9±0.93 mm, similarity index of 98% and root mean squared distance of 0.1±0.08 mm, and the glenoid fossa revealed maximum distance change of 2±0.52 mm, similarity index of 96% and root mean squared distance of 0.2±0.04 mm. The manual segmentation of the articular disc revealed maximum distance change of 3.6±0.32 mm, similarity index of 80% and root mean squared distance of 0.3±0.1 mm. CONCLUSION: The MRI-CBCT registration provides a reliable tool to reconstruct 3D models of the TMJ's soft and hard tissues, allows quantification of the articular disc morphology and position changes with associated differences of the condylar head and glenoid fossa, and facilitates measuring tissue changes over time.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain Using a Novel Rapid-Acquisition Three-Dimensional SPACE Sequence at 1.5-T: A Pilot Study Comparing Lumbar Stenosis Assessment With Routine Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Sequences.

PURPOSE: To minimize the burden of overutilisation of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a resource-constrained public healthcare system, it may be helpful to image some patients with mechanical low-back pain (LBP) using a simplified rapid MRI screening protocol at 1.5-T. A rapid-acquisition 3-dimensional (3D) SPACE (Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolution) sequence can demonstrate common etiologies of LBP. We compared lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) and neural foraminal stenosis (LNFS) assessment on 3D SPACE against conventional 2-dimensional (2D) MRI. METHODS: We prospectively performed 3D SPACE and 2D spin-echo MRI sequences (axial or sagittal T1-weighted or T2-weighted) at 1.5-T in 20 patients. Two blinded readers assessed levels L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 using: 1) morphologic grading systems, 2) global impression on the presence or absence of clinically significant stenosis (n = 60 disc levels for LSCS, n = 120 foramina for LNFS). Reliability statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Acquisition time was ∼5 minutes for SPACE and ∼20 minutes for 2D MRI sequences. Interobserver agreement of LSCS was substantial to near perfect on both sequences (morphologic grading: kappa [k] = 0.71 SPACE, k = 0.69 T2-weighted; global impression: k = 0.85 SPACE, k = 0.78 T2-weighted). LNFS assessment had superior interobserver reliability using SPACE than T1-weighted (k = 0.54 vs 0.37). Intersequence agreement of findings between SPACE and 2D MRI was substantial to near perfect by global impression (LSCS: k = 0.78 Reader 1, k = 0.85 Reader 2; LNFS: k = 0.63 Reader 1, k = 0.66 Reader 2). CONCLUSIONS: 3D SPACE was acquired in one-quarter the time as the conventional 2D MRI protocol, had excellent agreement with 2D MRI for stenosis assessment, and had interobserver reliability superior to 2D MRI. These results justify future work to explore the role of 3D SPACE in a rapid MRI screening protocol at 1.5-T for mechanical LBP.

Radiographic assessment of bone remodelling in slipped upper femoral epiphyses using Klein's line and the α angle of femoral-acetabular impingement: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Bone remodelling in patients with earlier slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has been shown to have a generally positive effect on both clinical and radiologic parameters. This study aims to further assess the effect of bone remodelling on the femoral head-neck relationship in SUFE patients, with the aid of 2 radiographic measurements not earlier used for this assessment. METHODS: A retrospective review of radiographs was performed on all patients surgically managed for SUFE at a tertiary institution between 2000 and 2006. The postoperative and the most recent review radiographs were used for analysis. Alpha angles of Notzli (generally used to measure cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement) and displacement from Klein's line were measured as markers of femoral head-neck relationship. RESULTS: A total of 59 hips were evaluated with a median mean follow-up time of 17.7 months. Patients had mild-to-moderate SUFE. The postoperative α angle mean reduced by 17.7 degrees (95% confidence interval: 13.6-21.8, P<0.001) at follow up. The displacement from Klein's line improved by a mean of 4.8 mm (95% confidence interval: 3.9-5.8 mm, P<0.001), over the review period. CONCLUSIONS: The femoral head-neck relationship, measured by both the Notzli α angle and the displacement from Klein's line, becomes significantly closer to normal after in situ pinning of mild-to-moderate SUFE, compatible with favorable bone remodelling. Both of these indices show promise for use in prospective study and standardized clinical follow up of patients with SUFE, and could be especially useful in assessing for future femoral-acetabular impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.