Hemodynamic Assessment in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Dilation: New Insights From Voxel-By-Voxel Analysis of Reverse Flow, Stasis, and Energetics.

Objectives: Clinical management decisions surrounding ascending aorta (AAo) dilation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease benefit from personalized predictive tools. 4D-flow MRI may provide patient-specific markers reflective of BAV-associated aortopathy. This study aims to explore novel 4D-flow MRI parametric voxel-by-voxel forward flow, reverse flow, kinetic energy and stasis in BAV disease. We hypothesize that novel parametric voxel-by-voxel markers will be associated with aortic dilation and referral for surgery and can enhance our understanding of BAV hemodynamics beyond standard metrics. Methods: A total of 96 subjects (73 BAV patients, 23 healthy controls) underwent MRI scan. Healthy controls had no known cardiovascular disease. Patients were clinically referred for AAo dilation assessment. Indexed diameters were obtained by dividing the aortic diameter by the patient's body surface area. Patients were followed for the occurrence of aortic surgery. 4D-flow analysis was performed by a single observer in five regions: left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), AAo, arch, proximal descending aorta (PDAo), and distal descending aorta (DDAo). In each region peak velocity, kinetic energy (KE), forward flow (FF), reverse flow (RF), and stasis were measured on a voxel-by-voxel basis. T-tests (or non-parametric equivalent) compared flow parameters between cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored associations between diameter and parametric voxel-by-voxel parameters. Results: Compared to controls, BAV patients showed reduced stasis (p < 0.01) and increased RF and FF (p < 0.01) throughout the aorta, and KE remained similar. In the AAo, indexed diameter correlated with age (R = 0.326, p = 0.01), FF (R = -0.648, p < 0.001), RF (R = -0.441, p < 0.001), and stasis (R = -0.288, p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, FF showed a significant inverse association with AAo indexed diameter, independent of age. During a median 179 ± 180 days of follow-up, 23 patients (32%) required aortic surgery. Compared to patients not requiring surgery, they showed increased KE and peak velocity in the proximal aorta (p < 0.01), accompanied by increased RF and reduced stasis throughout the entire aorta (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Novel voxel-by-voxel reverse flow and stasis were altered in BAV patients and are associated with aortic dilation and surgical treatment.

Aortic annular dimensions by non-contrast MRI using k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP in pre-procedural assessment for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a technical feasibility study.

To evaluate k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP (balanced steady state free precession) as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for aortic annular area measurement in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning compared to computed tomography angiography (CTA) and other non-contrast MRI sequences with reduced imaging time and without contrast administration. 6 volunteers and 7 TAVR candidates were prospectively enrolled. The volunteers underwent an MRI while TAVR candidates underwent an MRI and CTA. The following non-contrast MRI sequences were obtained at the level of the aortic root: 2D cine b-SSFP [GRAPPA (GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions), R = 2], 3D cine b-SSFP [GRAPPA R = 2], navigator triggered 3D b-SSFP MRA [GRAPPA, R = 2] and k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP [PEAK GRAPPA, R = 5]. Qualitative analysis and aortic annular area measurements in systole and diastole were obtained. k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP provided image quality that is acceptable for confident diagnosis with very good interrater agreement. There was no statistically significant difference in aortic annular measurements between k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP and CTA or other MRI sequences (p > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed no systemic difference of annular area measurements between k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP and each of the other techniques. There was excellent inter-rater agreement on aortic annular area measurements during systolic (ICC = 0.976, p < 0.001) and diastolic (ICC = 0.971, p < 0.001) phases using k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP. K-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP is a promising alternative for the assessment of annular sizing in pre-TAVR evaluation while offering a reasonable combination of imaging parameters during one breath-hold.

Voxel-by-voxel 4D flow MRI-based assessment of regional reverse flow in the aorta.

BACKGROUND: Complex and reverse flow in the aorta has been implicated in aneurysm development and stroke via retrograde embolization. PURPOSE: To evaluate global and regional differences between standard 2D plane-based and volumetric voxel-based quantification of regional forward/reverse flow, and reverse flow fraction (RFF) in the aorta. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: In all, 35 subjects: 10 healthy controls (age: 57 ± 7 years, nine male), nine patients without aortic valve regurgitation (AR) (age: 63 ± 10 years, seven male), six patients with mild AR (age: 66 ± 6 years, five male), and 10 with moderate or severe AR (age: 60 ± 16 years, eight male). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 4D flow MRI (3T and 1.5T) was employed to acquire 3D blood flow velocities with entire thoracic aorta in all subjects. ASSESSMENT: Data analysis included standard 2D plane-based quantification of forward/reverse flow, and RFF-plane. In addition, a new semiautomatic workflow based on 3D segmentation and extraction of an aorta centerline was developed for voxel-by-voxel visualization (forward/reverse flow and RFF-voxel maps) and quantification of regional voxel-by-voxel forward/reverse flow in the entire thoracic aorta. STATISTICAL TESTS: Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to test for differences between groups. A two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare voxel-based and plane-based results. RESULTS: Semiautomatic plane-based analysis showed excellent agreement with standard manual plane-based analysis for net flow and RFF-plane (RFF-plane: y = 0.99x-0.0, net flow: y = 1.00x-0.21, R > 0.99, P < 0.0001). Voxel-by-voxel maps demonstrated marked regional flow reversal in the ascending aorta in all patients and RFF-voxel was significantly increased (P < 0.001) compared to RFF-plane for all four groups, with the most pronounced differences for mild AR (18.0 ± 15.2% vs. 4.7 ± 5.4%). Voxel-based flow and RFF-voxel along the aorta showed areas with marked regional flow reversal (eg, vortex flow) compared to plane-based analysis. DATA CONCLUSION: Voxel-based analysis demonstrated regional flow reversal that was not detected by plane-based analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1276-1286.

Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility and effectiveness of using maximum intensity plots (MIPs) based on 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) velocity data to assess systolic peak velocities in a cohort of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D flow MRI at 1.5T was performed on 51 BAV patients. MIPs were generated from the 4D flow MRI velocity data and used by two users to determine peak velocities in three regions of interest (ROIs): ascending aorta (AAo), aortic arch, and descending aorta. 4D flow MRI peak velocities in the AAo were compared to peak velocities recorded by 2D phase contrast MRI (2D PCMRI) in a subcohort of 36 patients and by Doppler echocardiography in a subcohort of 34 patients. 4D flow MRI peak velocities recorded by each observer were compared for all ROIs to test for interobserver variability. RESULTS: 4D flow MRI recorded significantly higher velocities compared to 2D PCMRI (2.04 ± 0.71 m/s vs. 1.69 ± 0.79 m/s, 17.2% difference, P < 0.001) and similar velocities compared to Doppler echocardiography. There was excellent agreement between the observers, with a mean difference of 0.005 m/s and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. CONCLUSION: 4D flow MRI velocity MIPs allow for efficient measurement of peak velocities in BAV patients with higher accuracy than 2D PCMRI and similar accuracy to Doppler echocardiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1673-1682.

Assessment of left and right atrial 3D hemodynamics in patients with atrial fibrillation: a 4D flow MRI study.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with embolic stroke due to thrombus formation in the left atrium (LA). Based on the relationship of atrial stasis to thromboembolism and the marked disparity in pulmonary versus systemic thromboembolism in AF, we tested the hypothesis that flow velocity distributions in the left (LA) versus right atrium (RA) in patients with would demonstrate increased stasis. Whole heart 4D flow MRI was performed in 62 AF patients (n = 33 in sinus rhythm during imaging, n = 29 with persistent AF) and 8 controls for the assessment of in vivo atrial 3D blood flow. 3D segmentation of the LA and RA geometry and normalized velocity histograms assessed atrial velocity distribution and stasis (% of atrial velocities <0.2 m/s). Atrial hemodynamics were similar for RA and LA and significantly correlated (mean velocity: r = 0.64; stasis: r = 0.55, p < 0.001). RA and LA mean and median velocities were lower in AF patients by 15-33 % and stasis was elevated by 11-19 % compared to controls. There was high inter-individual variability in LA/RA mean velocity ratio (range 0.5-1.8) and LA/RA stasis ratio (range 0.7-1.7). Patients with a history of AF and in sinus rhythm showed most pronounced differences in atrial flow (reduced mean velocities, higher stasis in the LA). While there is no systematic difference in LA versus RA flow velocity profiles, high variability was noted. Further delineation of patient specific factors and/or regional atrial effects on the LA and RA flow velocity profiles, as well as other factors such as differences in procoagulant factors, may explain the more prevalent systemic versus pulmonary thromboembolism in patients with AF.

Language and other regression: assessment and timing.

Understanding of regression in autism has been hampered by variability in parental and clinical recognition and reporting of lost skills. This study introduced an instrument, the Regression Supplement Form, intended to supplement the Autism Diagnosis Interview-Revised and yield precise information about the types and timing of regression and events concurrent with loss and regain of skills. Data were collected from parents of 44 children (38 male, 6 female; mean age = 6 years) with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (37 Autistic Disorder, 7 Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified). Parental responses on the Autism Diagnosis Interview-Revised indicated loss of skills during early development. The profile of regression that emerged included loss of skills between 18 and 21 months, on average, with language-only regression less common than loss of other, nonlanguage skills only or of full regression (loss of language and other skills). The onset of regression typically was gradual in nonlanguage areas and split between gradual and sudden loss for language skills. Some of the children were developing atypically before they lost other, nonlanguage skills, that is, their age at first words was delayed until age 2 years or older. Parents tended to attribute loss to medical factors such as immunizations. Many of the children regained some of the lost skills when they were 3.5-5 years of age, with therapeutic and instructional interventions given credit for the regain.