Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am Surg ; 85(11): 1276-1280, 2019 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775971

RESUMO

The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is emerging as an acceptable therapy option. The effects of neoadjuvant therapy on 30 days' outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer are not well defined in the literature. NSQIP (2009-2012) was used. Only patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and those who underwent a Whipple were included in the analysis. Patient who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy were compared with those who did not receive therapy. Main outcome measures were as follows: complications, ≥2 units of blood transfusions, length of stay, readmission rates, return to the operating room, and 30-day mortality. A total of 1445 patients (395: neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 1050: no neoadjuvant therapy) were identified. The mean age was 67 ± 12 years, and 51 per cent of the patients were male. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was associated with increase in readmission rates (18% vs 12.2%, P 0.02), unanticipated return to the operating room (2.3% vs 1.1%, P 0.03) with no difference in mortality rates. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is associated with increase in inhospital complications. These differences in outcomes may be explained by the more advance stage of pancreatic cancer in these subsets of patients. Resource utilization and preoperative rehabilitation are of utmost significance to overcome this rise in complications associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Método de Monte Carlo , Duração da Cirurgia , Análise de Regressão , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
2.
J Nucl Med Technol ; 43(3): 201-5, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26111705

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and appropriate use of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (SMPI) versus stress echocardiography in the preoperative evaluation of patients for kidney transplantation. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective study was performed. SMPI was performed with regadenoson and stress echocardiography predominantly with dobutamine. Findings on subsequent coronary angiography were correlated. A cost analysis for SMPI versus stress echocardiography was modeled using reimbursements from the Center for Medicare Services. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients underwent imaging (53 SMPI and 60 stress echocardiography). One hundred percent of SMPI studies were diagnostic, compared with only 80% (48/60) in the stress echocardiography group, and this result was statistically significant (χ(2) = 7.96, P < 0.01). The most common reason for a nondiagnostic test was not reaching the target heart rate. In the SMPI group, 15% (8/53) of patients had ischemia on imaging and all underwent subsequent coronary angiography, which confirmed obstructive coronary lesions. One patient with a negative SMPI result underwent a subsequent angiogram that was negative. In the stress echocardiography group, 5% (3/60) of patients had ischemia on imaging and 2 underwent subsequent angiography, which was negative. Three of 12 patients with nondiagnostic examinations underwent further testing. One patient underwent a follow-up positive SMPI scan but no subsequent coronary angiography. The other 2 patients underwent coronary angiography, which was negative. Of the 45 negative stress echocardiography patients, 6 (13%) underwent angiography, with a positive result for obstructive coronary artery disease in 3 of 6. For the modeling of cost analysis, rates of $1,173 and $1,521 (Center for Medicare Services) were used for SMPI and stress echocardiography, respectively. The model assumed that all nondiagnostic imaging would be referred for further stress testing (i.e., nondiagnostic stress echocardiography would be referred for SMPI). This model estimated that initial noninvasive testing with stress echocardiography versus SMPI resulted in a 50% greater cost. CONCLUSION: For the preoperative evaluation of kidney transplantation, SMPI is more often diagnostic than stress echocardiography. A cost model estimates that initial noninvasive diagnostic testing with stress echocardiography would result in an approximately 50% greater cost than SMPI. Our data also suggest that SMPI has greater diagnostic accuracy than stress echocardiography. Therefore, this single-institution experience supports SMPI as the more appropriate test.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia sob Estresse/economia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Insuficiência Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Arizona/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio/economia , Seleção de Pacientes , Prevalência , Insuficiência Renal/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco
3.
Am J Surg ; 204(6): 1000-4; discussion 1004-6, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23022251

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of epidural analgesia use on postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were grouped on the basis of whether they received epidural analgesia. The effect of epidural use on the composite end point of major complications including death was investigated using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: Overall, 8,610 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy occurred within the United States in 2009, and 11.0% of these patients received epidural analgesia. After controlling for various potential confounders, results of the multivariate regression indicated that epidural analgesia use was associated with lower odds of composite complications including death (odds ratio, .61; 95% confidence interval, .37-.99; P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, epidural analgesia was associated with significantly lower postoperative composite complications.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Analgesia Epidural/economia , Analgesia Epidural/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/economia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/mortalidade , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA